17.6 Copyright, Fair Use & the TEACH Act

Foundations of Copyright Law in Educational Institutions

Intellectual property law in the United States is anchored directly in the United States Constitution. Article I, Section 8, Clause 8 empowers Congress "To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries." From this constitutional grant arose the Copyright Act of 1976 (17 U.S.C. § 101 et seq.), which forms the statutory bedrock of modern intellectual property regulation.

Copyright protects original works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression. In secondary education, this encompasses a wide spectrum of instructional media: textbooks, literary anthologies, poems, dramatic plays, musical scores, sound recordings, motion pictures, laboratory manuals, digital software, and online graphics.

• Automatic Copyright Attachment: Under current law, an author does not need to publish a formal copyright symbol (©), register the work with the U.S. Copyright Office, or pay a fee for copyright protection to exist. The moment an author writes a paragraph, composes a musical melody, or designs a graphic slide deck and saves or prints it, copyright attaches automatically.
• The Public Domain: Works enter the public domain when their intellectual property rights have expired, have been explicitly forfeited, or are inapplicable (such as works published in the United States before 1931, as of January 1, 2026, or works authored by employees of the U.S. federal government as part of their official duties). Public domain works may be copied, modified, distributed, and performed freely without permission, licensing, or royalty payments.

---

The Fair Use Doctrine (Section 107 of the Copyright Act)

A persistent myth among novice educators is that any reproduction of copyrighted material is legally permitted as long as it is used for "educational purposes." This misconception is dangerous. The Copyright Act does not provide educators with a blanket exemption.

Instead, Section 107 of the Copyright Act establishes the Fair Use doctrine—an affirmative defense that permits the limited reproduction and use of copyrighted materials without the copyright owner's permission for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research.

To determine whether a specific educational use constitutes fair use, the statute mandates an analysis of four statutory factors:

+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|                       THE FOUR STATUTORY FAIR USE FACTORS                     |
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|  1. PURPOSE & CHARACTER       --> Nonprofit, educational & transformative     |
|                                   favors fair use; commercial exploitation    |
|                                   opposes fair use.                           |
|  2. NATURE OF THE WORK        --> Factual, non-fiction & published works      |
|                                   favor fair use; highly creative &           |
|                                   unpublished works oppose fair use.          |
|  3. AMOUNT & SUBSTANTIALITY   --> Small qualitative excerpt favors fair use;   |
|                                   reproducing the "heart of the work" or      |
|                                   entire chapters opposes fair use.           |
|  4. MARKET EFFECT             --> A KEY FACTOR: Does copying replace   |
|                                   a market sale or license? If yes, it is     |
|                                   NOT fair use!                               |
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

1. Purpose and Character of the Use

Nonprofit educational, scholarly, and transformative uses weigh strongly in favor of fair use. A use is considered transformative when it adds something new, altering the original work with new expression, meaning, or message (e.g., a secondary English class using excerpts of conflicting political speeches to teach rhetorical fallacies). Conversely, using a work verbatim merely to entertain students or reproducing it for commercial sale weighs heavily against fair use.

2. Nature of the Copyrighted Work

The law affords greater copyright protection to highly creative, original, and imaginative works (novels, short stories, poems, feature films, choreographic works, musical compositions) than to factual, informational, or scientific works (encyclopedias, scientific journals, news articles, historical chronologies). Reproducing an excerpt from a newspaper article is far more likely to qualify as fair use than reproducing an entire chapter from a contemporary bestselling novel. Furthermore, copying from unpublished works weighs strongly against fair use.

3. Amount and Substantiality of the Portion Used

This factor evaluates both the quantitative amount (the percentage of the total work copied) and the qualitative significance (the substantiality of the portion taken). Copying a 200-word excerpt from a 400-page historical monograph is quantitatively negligible and favors fair use. However, if that 200-word excerpt represents the central core, climax, or "heart of the work," the qualitative taking may weigh against fair use. Using an entire work or an entire chapter generally weighs against fair use unless strictly justified by pedagogical necessity under the Brevity guidelines.

4. Effect of the Use Upon the Potential Market or Value

The Supreme Court once called this the single most important factor (Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises, 1985), although later decisions stress that all four factors are weighed together. The core question is: Does the unauthorized copying substitute for a commercial purchase, digital subscription, or licensing fee that the copyright owner would otherwise receive? If an educator photocopies thirty copies of a contemporary short story instead of requiring students to purchase the paperback anthology, the educator has directly usurped the market value of the copyrighted work, weighing decisively against fair use.

---

Classroom Photocopying Guidelines (Circular 21)

To provide operational clarity regarding fair use in secondary schools, an ad hoc committee of educational institutions, authors, and publishers developed the Agreement on Guidelines for Classroom Copying in Not-for-Profit Educational Institutions, included in House Report No. 94-1476 (1976) and reprinted in the Copyright Office's Circular 21.

Single Copying for Secondary Teachers

A teacher may make a single copy of any of the following for scholarly research or use in teaching or preparing to teach a class:

• A single chapter from a book.
• A single article from a periodical or newspaper.
• A short story, short essay, or short poem, whether or not from a collective work.
• A chart, graph, diagram, drawing, cartoon, or picture from a book, periodical, or newspaper.

Multiple Copies for Classroom Use: The Three Tests

A secondary educator may make multiple photocopies (not to exceed one copy per enrolled student) for classroom distribution only if the copying satisfies all three of the following tests:

1. The Brevity Test (Strict quantitative limits):
   • Poetry: A complete poem if less than 250 words and printed on not more than two pages, or an excerpt of not more than 250 words from a longer poem.
   • Prose: Either a complete article, story, or essay of less than 2,500 words; or an excerpt from any prose work of not more than 1,000 words or 10% of the work, whichever is less (with a minimum allowance of 500 words).
   • Illustration: One chart, graph, diagram, drawing, cartoon, or picture per book or per periodical issue.
   • "Special Works": Certain works in poetry or prose that combine text with illustrations (such as illustrated children's or graphic literature) that fall short of 2,500 words cannot be reproduced in full; only excerpts of up to 10% of the words may be copied.
2. The Spontaneity Test:
   • The copying must be at the direct inspiration of the individual teacher.
   • The inspiration and decision to use the work and the moment of its use for maximum teaching effectiveness are so close in time that it would be unreasonable to expect a timely reply to a formal request for permission. If a teacher finds a brilliant news article on Tuesday night that connects to Wednesday morning's civics lesson, copying meets the spontaneity test. If the teacher copies that same article every fall for five consecutive years, spontaneity is lost and permission must be secured.
3. The Cumulative Effect Test:
   • The copied material is for one specific course in the school.
   • Not more than one short poem, article, story, or essay or two excerpts may be copied from the same author, nor more than three from the same collective work or periodical volume during one class term.
   • Not more than nine instances of multiple copying for one course during one class term.

+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|                       CLASSROOM REPRODUCTION COMPLIANCE CHECK                 |
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|  PERMITTED (If all 3 tests pass)    |  STRICTLY PROHIBITED AT ALL TIMES       |
|  - Brevity (≤250 words poem;        |  - Consumable materials (workbooks,     |
|    ≤2500 words prose/article).      |    test packets, standardized booklets).|
|  - Spontaneity (immediate idea;     |  - Anthologies and custom coursepacks   |
|    no time to seek permission).     |    compiled to avoid textbook purchase. |
|  - Cumulative Effect (≤9 instances  |  - Repeating the copying semester after |
|    per course per term).            |    semester without written permission. |
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

Prohibitions Written into the Classroom Guidelines

The Guidelines are a negotiated safe harbor printed in a House committee report, not the text of the statute: copying within them is widely treated as fair use, and copying outside them is judged under the four factors. The Guidelines themselves state that the following should not be done:

• Consumable Works: Copying consumable materials—such as workbooks, standardized exercises, standardized test booklets, answer sheets, and study guide packets—is strictly prohibited under all circumstances. A high school math department cannot photocopy pages from a consumable test-prep workbook to "save students or the department money."
• Compiling Custom Anthologies / Coursepacks: Educators cannot photocopy multiple chapters from diverse copyrighted textbooks and bind them into a custom "coursepack" or digital compilation to replace the purchase of published textbooks.
• Charging Students for Profit: Charging students a fee beyond the actual, direct clerical cost of paper reproduction is prohibited by the Guidelines.

---

The TEACH Act and Digital / Hybrid Secondary Classrooms

Section 110(1) of the Copyright Act lets teachers and students perform or display lawfully made works, including showing an entire legally obtained film, during face-to-face teaching in a nonprofit classroom. That exemption does not reach online transmission, so as schools adopted Learning Management Systems (LMS) such as Canvas, Schoology, and Google Classroom, the separate distance-education rule mattered more. Congress enacted the Technology, Education, and Copyright Harmonization (TEACH) Act of 2002 (17 U.S.C. § 110(2)).

Operational Requirements of the TEACH Act

The TEACH Act permits accredited nonprofit educational institutions to transmit digital performances and displays of copyrighted works in remote and hybrid classes without obtaining individual copyright licenses, provided the institution satisfies strict statutory prerequisites:

• Accredited and Non-Profit: The institution must be an accredited, nonprofit educational agency.
• Instructional Nexus: The copyrighted material must be directly related and of material assistance to the teaching content and used under the actual supervision of an instructor as an integral part of a class session.
• Performance Limitations: The performance of non-dramatic literary or musical works may be transmitted in their entirety; however, the performance of dramatic works (feature films, plays, musicals) or audiovisual works must be in reasonable and limited portions (e.g., streaming a 5-minute clip of a documentary, not uploading the entire commercial movie).
• Technological Access Controls: The digital transmission must be restricted strictly to students currently enrolled in the specific course (e.g., behind password-protected LMS logins).
• Copy-Prevention Safeguards: The school must implement technological protection measures (digital rights management, streaming rather than downloading) that reasonably prevent students from saving, recording, or redistributing the copyrighted file.
• Institutional Copyright Policy: The district must maintain published copyright compliance policies and provide clear copyright notices to students on course syllabi and LMS portals.

---

Creative Commons (CC) Licensing and Open Educational Resources (OER)

To facilitate collaborative sharing while respecting intellectual property, the Creative Commons licensing system was established. Creative Commons licenses allow copyright holders to retain ownership while granting the public standardized permissions to share, use, and build upon their creative work without seeking individual written permission.

The Four Core Creative Commons Conditions

• BY (Attribution): All CC licenses require that the user give appropriate credit to the creator, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made.
• SA (ShareAlike): If the user remixes, transforms, or builds upon the material, they must distribute their contributions under the same license as the original.
• NC (NonCommercial): The user may not use the material for commercial purposes (nonprofit secondary classroom use is permissible).
• ND (NoDerivatives): The user may copy and distribute the work in its original form, but no adaptations, remixes, or modifications are permitted.

+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|                       CREATIVE COMMONS LICENSING SPECTRUM                     |
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|  MOST OPEN                                                                     |
|  - CC0          --> Public Domain Dedication (no rights reserved).            |
|  - CC BY        --> Attribution only (free to share, adapt, commercialize).   |
|  - CC BY-SA     --> Attribution + ShareAlike (Wikipedia model).               |
|  - CC BY-NC     --> Attribution + NonCommercial.                              |
|  - CC BY-NC-SA  --> Attribution + NonCommercial + ShareAlike.                 |
|  - CC BY-ND     --> Attribution + NoDerivatives (must share unaltered).       |
|  - CC BY-NC-ND  --> Attribution + NonCommercial + NoDerivatives (most strict).|
|  LEAST OPEN                                                                   |
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

Open Educational Resources (OER)

Open Educational Resources (OER) are teaching, learning, and research materials that reside in the public domain or are released under an open license (such as CC BY or CC BY-SA) that permits their free use and repurposing. OER materials grant educators the "5R Permissions":

1. Retain: The right to make, own, and control copies of the content.
2. Reuse: The right to use the content in a wide range of ways (e.g., in class, on a website, in a video).
3. Revise: The right to adapt, adjust, modify, or translate the content (e.g., translating a science lab into Spanish).
4. Remix: The right to combine the original or revised content with other material to create something new.
5. Redistribute: The right to share copies of the original content, revisions, or remixes with others.

---

Student Intellectual Property Rights

A critical legal issue in modern secondary education concerns the ownership of student-created work.

Ownership of Student-Created Works

Secondary students own the copyright to the original expressive works they create in school. This includes:

• Analytical essays, creative writing stories, and research papers.
• Original artwork, paintings, sculptures, and architectural sketches.
• Computer algorithms, web applications, and software code.
• Original musical compositions, recorded audio podcasts, and video presentations.

Displaying, Publishing, and Commercializing Student Artifacts

• Classroom and Public Display: Teachers may display student assignments within the physical classroom as part of ordinary instructional pedagogy. However, if a school wishes to publish student work on a publicly accessible district website, print it in a promotional community brochure, or submit it to an external public competition, the school must obtain written permission from the student (and parents/guardians if the student is a minor under local policy).
• Intellectual Property and Student Inventions: If a high school student in an advanced robotics, engineering, or coding course invents a novel device or authors commercial software, the intellectual property rights reside with the student. School districts cannot demand royalties or assignment of patent/copyright claims without explicit, independent legal agreements executed with parental consent.

---

Comparative Table of Educational Intellectual Property Frameworks

---

Concrete Secondary Classroom Scenarios

Scenario 1: Compiling a Modern Drama Coursepack

An 11th-grade English teacher wants to teach a unit on contemporary American playwrights. To save students the $45 cost of purchasing a published drama anthology, the teacher photocopies three complete award-winning plays from the public library, binds them together with an introduction, and sells the custom spiral-bound coursepacks to students for $8 each to cover printing costs.

• Fair Use Analysis:
  1. Purpose: While nonprofit educational, it directly replicates commercial anthologies.
  2. Nature: Dramatic plays are highly creative, expressive works receiving maximum copyright protection.
  3. Amount: Copying three entire plays violates the Brevity test completely.
  4. Market Impact: Usurps the publisher's commercial sales.
  • Outcome: Severe copyright violation. Compiling unauthorized coursepacks and copying entire creative plays is strictly prohibited. The teacher and district face substantial statutory copyright damages.

Scenario 2: Streaming Documentary Clips in an Online Physics Course

A high school physics teacher designs an online hybrid unit on astrophysics hosted on the school's password-protected Canvas LMS. The teacher streams a 6-minute excerpt from a commercially copyrighted documentary illustrating gravitational lensing, directly integrating the clip into a discussion module comparing Einstein's predictions with telescope data. Access is restricted exclusively to enrolled physics students, and the video streaming format prevents students from downloading the media file to their personal drives.

• TEACH Act Analysis:
  • The school is an accredited nonprofit educational institution.
  • The media is directly related to the instructional physics standard.
  • The portion used is a "reasonable and limited portion" (6-minute clip, not the full documentary).
  • The video is hosted behind secure, authenticated student logins.
  • Technological safeguards prevent downloading or redistributing.
  • Outcome: Full compliance with the TEACH Act and educational fair use.

---

Common Exam Traps & Misconceptions

• Trap 1: Believing Nonprofit Educational Use Grants Blanket Immunity: Candidates often assume that if an educator does not profit financially from copying, fair use automatically applies. In reality, the fourth factor (market effect) frequently overrides educational intent. Copying entire books or consumable workbooks for educational use is very unlikely to be fair use because it substitutes for sales.
• Trap 2: Photocopying Consumable Workbooks to Save School or Family Money: A classic scenario on the Praxis PLT exam involves a teacher photocopying pages from a test-preparation workbook because the school has budget cuts or parents cannot afford supplies. The Classroom Guidelines expressly exclude consumables, and copying them to avoid a purchase almost never survives the four-factor fair use analysis.
• Trap 3: Assuming the School District Automatically Owns Student Creative Work: Candidates often mistakenly believe that because a student wrote an essay, created a painting, or developed software code on school property using school computers, the school owns the work under "work made for hire." In federal law, students retain complete, exclusive intellectual property ownership of their original coursework.
• Trap 4: Confusing Spontaneous Classroom Sharing with Repeated Annual Distribution: If a teacher finds a timely article in the morning newspaper and photocopies it for class that day, it is protected by the spontaneity test. However, if the teacher files that article away and photocopies it every year for subsequent classes without obtaining licensing permission, the spontaneity exemption is void and copyright infringement occurs.