6.2 Sources of Law; Rights and Duties

Key Takeaways

  • Salmond’s classic sources framework for civil law: legislation, precedent, custom, and agreement (treaty/contract-type recognition themes)
  • Legislation is the formally enacted will of the legislature; precedent binds through judicial hierarchy; custom requires long usage and reasonableness; agreement binds parties when law recognizes it
  • Legal rights are interests protected by law; duties are correlative obligations—perfect rights have enforceable correlative duties
  • Key right classifications: perfect/imperfect, positive/negative, real (in rem)/personal (in personam)
  • Ingredients of a legal right typically include subject (owner), object, content, and person of incidence (against whom it avails)
Last updated: August 2026

Sources of Law; Rights and Duties

Quick Answer: Under the Salmond framework tested on LAW-GAT, the main sources of law are legislation, precedent, custom, and agreement. A legal right is an interest recognized and protected by law; every right has a correlative duty. Master the pairs perfect/imperfect, positive/negative, and real (in rem)/personal (in personam), plus the ingredients of a right (owner, object, content, person bound).

Sources of Law in the Salmond Framework

A source of law is the origin from which a legal rule draws its authority for courts. Salmond’s teaching tradition organizes civil-law sources in a practical set that MCQs still use:

SourceCore ideaTypical exam cue
LegislationRules formally enacted by the law-making authorityStatute, Act, Ordinance, Code
PrecedentLaw declared in prior judicial decisionsStare decisis, ratio decidendi, hierarchy of courts
CustomLong-continued usage accepted as bindingAntiquity, continuity, reasonableness, certainty
AgreementBinding force of pacts the law recognizesContract between parties; also treaty themes in broader outlines

Some textbooks list professional opinion or writings of jurists as persuasive materials; for LAW-GAT English Jurisprudence, prioritize the four-source Salmond set above unless the stem explicitly adds another category.


Legislation

Legislation is law made by the legislature (or other competent legislative authority) in the prescribed form. It is the most direct and, in modern systems, often the supreme formal source within constitutional limits.

Types you may see in options

TypeMeaning
Supreme / primary legislationActs of the highest legislature (subject to constitution)
Subordinate / delegated legislationRules, regulations, by-laws made under statutory power
Autonomic legislation (in some texts)Law-making by autonomous bodies under legal authority

Application rules for MCQs

  • A clear statute generally overrides inconsistent custom
  • Courts interpret legislation; they do not (in orthodox theory) “make” primary statutes
  • Constitutional supremacy (in systems like Pakistan) means even legislation must conform to the Constitution—but that is public-law overlay; Salmond’s source label for the Act remains legislation

Trap: Do not call a High Court judgment “legislation.” Judgment = precedent (or at least judicial decision); Act of Parliament/Assembly = legislation.


Precedent (Case Law)

Precedent is the making of law by courts through decisions that later courts follow.

Key vocabulary

TermMeaning
Stare decisisStand by decided matters—follow prior holdings
Ratio decidendiThe legal principle necessary for the decision—binding part
Obiter dictaThings said by the way—persuasive, not strictly binding
Binding precedentMust be followed by lower courts in the hierarchy
Persuasive precedentMay guide but need not bind (e.g., foreign courts, same-level coordination)

Hierarchy idea (exam skeleton)

  • Lower courts follow higher courts of the same system
  • A decision is precedent for like legal issues, not for every factual resemblance
  • Precedent develops law interstitially where statutes are silent or need interpretation

Salmond-style note: Precedent is a formal source because the legal system authorizes courts to declare law that binds thereafter—not because judges invent private morals.


Custom

Custom is a rule of conduct established by long usage and accepted as legally binding.

Classic requisites (memorize the list)

  1. Antiquity / long duration — not a brand-new fashion
  2. Continuity — unbroken in the required sense
  3. Peaceable enjoyment — not maintained only by force
  4. Certainty and clarity — content must be ascertainable
  5. Reasonableness — not absurd or oppressive
  6. Conformity with statute — custom generally cannot repeal a clear Act
  7. Obligatory character — felt as binding, not optional courtesy

Custom vs usage

Custom (legal)Mere usage / practice
Binding forceRecognized as lawSocial habit only
Court enforcementYes, when proved and validNo, unless imported into contract etc.

Trap: “Everyone does it” ≠ custom. MCQs love options that omit reasonableness or consistency with legislation.


Agreement

Agreement as a source means the law gives binding force to consensual arrangements that meet legal requirements (capacity, free consent, lawful object, etc., in contract theory).

LevelExample
Private agreementContract creating rights in personam between parties
Public/international agreement (broader outlines)Treaties between states—source in international law discourse

For Salmond civil-law MCQs, focus on contract/agreement as generating personal rights and duties recognized by municipal law.

Hierarchy / application snapshot

Conflict patternUsual resolution theme
Statute vs customStatute prevails
Statute vs agreementAgreement cannot legalize what statute forbids; freedom of contract is within law
Precedent vs statuteCourts apply statute; precedent yields to clear legislation
Two agreementsLater variation, interpretation rules, public policy limits

Rights and Duties: The Correlative Structure

What is a legal right?

A legal right is an interest recognized and protected by a rule of law. Protection typically means the law will compel others to respect it (through remedies: damages, injunction, specific relief, prosecution where relevant).

What is a legal duty?

A legal duty is an obligation imposed by law to do or forbear. In Hohfeldian/Salmond teaching style used in exams:

Right in A ↔ Duty in B (correlatives)

If A has a right that B shall not trespass, B has a duty not to trespass.

ConceptCorrelative
RightDuty
Liberty / privilege (in advanced tables)No-right
PowerLiability
ImmunityDisability

LAW-GAT English Jurisprudence usually sticks to right–duty as the main pair; know the word correlative.


Classifications of Rights (Memorize Hard)

1. Perfect rights vs imperfect rights

Perfect rightImperfect right
Correlative dutyFully recognized and enforceable by actionMoral or incomplete legal recognition; no full action (or limited recognition)
Example themeRight to recover a contractual debt in courtCertain claims of gratitude or time-barred moral expectations (illustrative)
Exam cue“Enforceable in a court of law”“Not enforceable by action”

2. Positive rights vs negative rights

Positive rightNegative right
Content of dutyOther must do something (perform)Other must forbear (not interfere)
Example themeRight to delivery of goods under contractRight not to be assaulted; right to exclusive possession against interference

3. Real rights vs personal rights (in rem / in personam)

Real right (right in rem)Personal right (right in personam)
Avails againstWorld at large (all persons generally)Specific person(s) only
Classic fieldProperty / ownershipContract, debt
ExampleOwner’s right that no one interfere with the landBuyer’s right that seller deliver

Memory: Rem = thing / against the world; Personam = against a person.

4. Proprietary vs personal (another textbook axis)

Some outlines distinguish proprietary rights (economic/estate interests) from personal rights (status, reputation, bodily integrity). Do not confuse this with in rem / in personam.


Ingredients (Elements) of a Legal Right

Salmond-style analysis breaks a right into parts. MCQs may ask “which is not an element.”

IngredientMeaning
Subject of the right (person of inherence)The owner of the right—the person in whom it resides
Object of the rightThe thing, act, or interest over which the right exists
Content of the rightWhat the right allows/requires—acts or forbearances
Subject of the duty (person of incidence)The person(s) bound by the correlative duty
Title (often added)The facts that vest the right in the owner (sale, succession, statute)

Mini example

  • Owner (subject): A
  • Object: Blackacre (land)
  • Content: Exclusive use and exclusion of others
  • Persons of incidence: All others (right in rem)
  • Title: Registered sale deed

Duties: Further Exam Angles

ClassificationIdea
Positive dutyDuty to act
Negative dutyDuty to forbear
Primary dutyOriginal obligation (e.g., not to defame)
Secondary / remedial dutyDuty arising from breach (pay damages)
Absolute-looking dutiesOwed to the state/public (criminal law themes) vs private duties

Link to liability (Section 6.3): Breach of duty generates liability—civil, criminal, or both depending on the rule.


Worked MCQ Logic (Without Banking Real Items)

Stem pattern: “A right available against the whole world is…”
Right in rem / real right

Stem pattern: “A right with no enforceable remedy is…”
Imperfect right

Stem pattern: “Law made by the legislature is…”
Legislation

Stem pattern: “Long usage + reasonableness + consistency with statute…”
Custom


Key Takeaways

  • Sources: legislation, precedent, custom, agreement
  • Statute typically outranks custom; courts apply ratio, not mere obiter
  • Right ↔ duty; perfect rights are enforceable
  • Classifications: perfect/imperfect, positive/negative, in rem / in personam
  • Ingredients: owner, object, content, person bound (+ title)
Test Your Knowledge

Which set correctly lists the principal sources of law in the classic Salmond framework emphasized for LAW-GAT English Jurisprudence?

A
B
C
D
Test Your Knowledge

A contractual right to recover the price of goods from a named seller is best classified as:

A
B
C
D
Test Your Knowledge

Which statement best describes a perfect legal right in Salmond-style jurisprudence?

A
B
C
D