PracticeVideosBlogFlashcards

7.3 Chemical Reaction Equilibria and Equilibrium Constant Calculation

Key Takeaways

  • Chemical reaction equilibrium at constant temperature and pressure is established when the total Gibbs free energy is minimized, corresponding to Delta G_rxn = sum(nu_i * mu_i) = 0.

  • The thermodynamic equilibrium constant K_a = exp(-Delta G_rxn^o / [R * T]) is a strict function of temperature alone; it is completely independent of total system pressure, reactant concentrations, or the presence of inerts.

  • The van 't Hoff equation [d(ln K_a)/dT = Delta H_rxn^o / (R * T^2)] dictates the thermal response of equilibrium: increasing temperature decreases K_a for exothermic reactions (Delta H_rxn^o < 0) and increases K_a for endothermic reactions (Delta H_rxn^o > 0).

  • Total system pressure shifts the equilibrium composition of gas-phase reactions through K_y = K_a * (P / P^o)^(-Delta nu); elevating pressure shifts equilibrium toward fewer gas moles (Delta nu < 0), whereas reducing pressure promotes expansion reactions (Delta nu > 0).

  • Adding an inert gas at constant total pressure dilutes the reacting mixture and acts identically to an overall pressure reduction, shifting the equilibrium toward the side with the larger number of gas moles (Delta nu > 0).

Last updated: September 2026

7.3 Chemical Reaction Equilibria and Equilibrium Constant Calculation

Thermodynamic reaction equilibrium defines the absolute upper limit of conversion, selectivity, and product yield achievable in chemical reactors. Regardless of catalyst activity, residence time, or reactor geometry, no kinetic mechanism can drive a reaction past its thermodynamic equilibrium boundary. On the NCEES PE Chemical Exam, reaction equilibria questions test your ability to determine standard free energies (ΔGrxn∘\Delta G_{rxn}^\circ), evaluate temperature-dependent equilibrium constants (KaK_a) using the van 't Hoff equation, formulate stoichiometric mole tables, and predict equilibrium shifts using Le Chatelier's Principle.


1. Thermodynamic Criterion of Chemical Reaction Equilibrium

Consider a closed chemical system at constant temperature (TT) and pressure (PP) undergoing a reversible chemical reaction represented by the general stoichiometric equation:

∑i=1CνiAi=0\sum_{i=1}^C \nu_i A_i = 0

Where:

  • AiA_i represents chemical species ii.
  • νi\nu_i is the stoichiometric coefficient: positive for products, negative for reactants, and zero for inerts.

From the fundamental property relation, the differential change in total Gibbs free energy of the reacting mixture is:

dGT,P=∑i=1CμidnidG_{T, P} = \sum_{i=1}^C \mu_i dn_i

The Extent of Reaction (ξ\xi)

The change in moles of each species ii during reaction is governed by stoichiometry through the extent of reaction (ξ\xi, having units of moles):

dni=νidξ  ⟹  ni=ni,0+νiξdn_i = \nu_i d\xi \implies n_i = n_{i,0} + \nu_i \xi

Substituting dni=νidξdn_i = \nu_i d\xi into the Gibbs energy differential:

dGT,P=(∑i=1Cνiμi)dξdG_{T, P} = \left( \sum_{i=1}^C \nu_i \mu_i \right) d\xi

At constant TT and PP, a spontaneous reaction proceeds in the direction that decreases Gibbs energy (dG<0dG < 0). At equilibrium, the system reaches the minimum of the Gibbs energy curve (dG/dξ=0dG/d\xi = 0):

(∂G∂ξ)T,P=∑i=1Cνiμi≡ΔGrxn=0\left( \frac{\partial G}{\partial \xi} \right)_{T, P} = \sum_{i=1}^C \nu_i \mu_i \equiv \Delta G_{rxn} = 0
   G ^
     | \                                  /
     |  \                                /
     |   \                              /
     |    \                            /
     |     \   Spontaneous            /
     |      \  Forward               /
     |       \ (dG/dxi < 0)         /
     |        \                    /
     |         \                  /
     |          '--.__      __.--'
     |                \____/ <--- EQUILIBRIUM: (dG/dxi) = 0
     +--------------------------------------------------------> xi (Extent)
     Reactants (xi = 0)                       Complete Conversion (xi_max)

2. Standard Gibbs Energy of Reaction and the Equilibrium Constant (KaK_a)

The chemical potential of species ii in a mixture is related to its thermodynamic activity (aia_i):

μi=μi∘(T)+RTln⁡ai\mu_i = \mu_i^\circ(T) + R T \ln a_i

Where μi∘(T)\mu_i^\circ(T) is the chemical potential of pure species ii in its standard state at temperature TT and standard pressure P∘P^\circ (1.0 bar1.0\text{ bar} or 1.0 atm1.0\text{ atm}). Substituting this into the equilibrium condition ∑νiμi=0\sum \nu_i \mu_i = 0:

∑i=1Cνi(μi∘+RTln⁡ai)=0\sum_{i=1}^C \nu_i \left( \mu_i^\circ + R T \ln a_i \right) = 0 ∑i=1Cνiμi∘+RT∑i=1Cln⁡(aiνi)=0\sum_{i=1}^C \nu_i \mu_i^\circ + R T \sum_{i=1}^C \ln\left( a_i^{\nu_i} \right) = 0 ∑i=1Cνiμi∘+RTln⁡(∏i=1Caiνi)=0\sum_{i=1}^C \nu_i \mu_i^\circ + R T \ln\left( \prod_{i=1}^C a_i^{\nu_i} \right) = 0

The Standard Gibbs Free Energy Change (ΔGrxn∘\Delta G_{rxn}^\circ)

The summation ∑νiμi∘\sum \nu_i \mu_i^\circ defines the standard Gibbs energy change of reaction at temperature TT:

ΔGrxn∘(T)≡∑i=1Cνiμi∘(T)=∑i=1CνiΔGf,i∘(T)\Delta G_{rxn}^\circ(T) \equiv \sum_{i=1}^C \nu_i \mu_i^\circ(T) = \sum_{i=1}^C \nu_i \Delta G_{f,i}^\circ(T)

Where ΔGf,i∘(T)\Delta G_{f,i}^\circ(T) is the standard Gibbs energy of formation of species ii from its constituent elements in their reference states at temperature TT.

The Thermodynamic Equilibrium Constant (KaK_a)

Defining the thermodynamic equilibrium constant (KaK_a) as the product of activities at equilibrium:

Ka≡∏i=1CaiνiK_a \equiv \prod_{i=1}^C a_i^{\nu_i}

Yields the central thermodynamic identity of chemical equilibria:

ΔGrxn∘=−RTln⁡Ka  ⟺  Ka=exp⁡(−ΔGrxn∘RT)\Delta G_{rxn}^\circ = -R T \ln K_a \iff K_a = \exp\left( -\frac{\Delta G_{rxn}^\circ}{R T} \right)

Important

The Cardinal Rule of Chemical Equilibrium: Because the standard state for each chemical species is defined at a fixed standard pressure (P∘=1.0 barP^\circ = 1.0\text{ bar}), the standard Gibbs energy ΔGrxn∘(T)\Delta G_{rxn}^\circ(T) depends strictly on temperature. Consequently, the thermodynamic equilibrium constant KaK_a is a function of temperature alone: Ka=Ka(T)K_a = K_a(T). Total system pressure, inert gas addition, feed composition, and catalyst presence have zero effect on KaK_a!


3. Gas-Phase Reaction Equilibria Formulation

For gas-phase reactions, the activity of species ii is defined relative to the standard state of pure ideal gas at P∘=1.0 barP^\circ = 1.0\text{ bar} (100 kPa100\text{ kPa} or 1.0 atm1.0\text{ atm}):

ai=fiP∘=yiϕiPP∘a_i = \frac{f_i}{P^\circ} = \frac{y_i \phi_i P}{P^\circ}

Substituting this into the activity equilibrium constant expression:

Ka=∏i=1C(yiϕiPP∘)νi=(PP∘)∑νi(∏i=1Cyiνi)(∏i=1Cϕiνi)K_a = \prod_{i=1}^C \left( \frac{y_i \phi_i P}{P^\circ} \right)^{\nu_i} = \left( \frac{P}{P^\circ} \right)^{\sum \nu_i} \left( \prod_{i=1}^C y_i^{\nu_i} \right) \left( \prod_{i=1}^C \phi_i^{\nu_i} \right)

Defining:

  • Δν≡∑i=1Cνi\Delta \nu \equiv \sum_{i=1}^C \nu_i = net change in moles of gas per stoichiometric reaction unit.
  • Ky≡∏i=1CyiνiK_y \equiv \prod_{i=1}^C y_i^{\nu_i} = mole fraction composition factor.
  • Kϕ≡∏i=1CϕiνiK_\phi \equiv \prod_{i=1}^C \phi_i^{\nu_i} = mixture fugacity coefficient factor (Kϕ≈1.0K_\phi \approx 1.0 at low to moderate pressures).

The general gas-phase equilibrium expression is:

Ka=(PP∘)ΔνKyKϕK_a = \left( \frac{P}{P^\circ} \right)^{\Delta \nu} K_y K_\phi

Ideal Gas Mixture Simplification

At low to moderate operating pressures (P<10−15 barP < 10-15\text{ bar}), gas fugacity coefficients approach unity (Kϕ≈1.00K_\phi \approx 1.00). The relationship simplifies to:

Ka=(PP∘)ΔνKy  ⟹  Ky=Ka(PP∘)−ΔνK_a = \left( \frac{P}{P^\circ} \right)^{\Delta \nu} K_y \implies K_y = K_a \left( \frac{P}{P^\circ} \right)^{-\Delta \nu}

This crucial equation reveals how system pressure governs equilibrium composition (KyK_y) while KaK_a remains constant!


4. Temperature Dependence of KaK_a: The van 't Hoff Equation

To determine how the equilibrium constant changes when reactor temperature varies from standard reference temperature (T0=298.15 KT_0 = 298.15\text{ K}) to operating temperature (TT), we apply the Gibbs-Helmholtz equation:

[∂(G/T)∂T]P=−HT2  ⟹  d(ΔGrxn∘/T)dT=−ΔHrxn∘T2\left[ \frac{\partial (G/T)}{\partial T} \right]_P = -\frac{H}{T^2} \implies \frac{d(\Delta G_{rxn}^\circ / T)}{dT} = -\frac{\Delta H_{rxn}^\circ}{T^2}

Substituting ΔGrxn∘/T=−Rln⁡Ka\Delta G_{rxn}^\circ / T = -R \ln K_a yields the differential van 't Hoff equation:

d(ln⁡Ka)dT=ΔHrxn∘(T)RT2\frac{d(\ln K_a)}{dT} = \frac{\Delta H_{rxn}^\circ(T)}{R T^2}

Where ΔHrxn∘(T)\Delta H_{rxn}^\circ(T) is the standard enthalpy of reaction at temperature TT:

ΔHrxn∘=∑i=1CνiΔHf,i∘\Delta H_{rxn}^\circ = \sum_{i=1}^C \nu_i \Delta H_{f,i}^\circ

Integrated Form (Constant Heat of Reaction Assumption)

Over moderate temperature ranges where ΔHrxn∘\Delta H_{rxn}^\circ is approximately constant (i.e., ΔCp=∑νiCp,i≈0\Delta C_p = \sum \nu_i C_{p,i} \approx 0):

∫Ka(T1)Ka(T2)dln⁡Ka=ΔHrxn∘R∫T1T2dTT2\int_{K_a(T_1)}^{K_a(T_2)} d\ln K_a = \frac{\Delta H_{rxn}^\circ}{R} \int_{T_1}^{T_2} \frac{dT}{T^2} ln⁡(Ka(T2)Ka(T1))=−ΔHrxn∘R(1T2−1T1)=ΔHrxn∘R(T2−T1T1T2)\ln\left( \frac{K_a(T_2)}{K_a(T_1)} \right) = -\frac{\Delta H_{rxn}^\circ}{R} \left( \frac{1}{T_2} - \frac{1}{T_1} \right) = \frac{\Delta H_{rxn}^\circ}{R} \left( \frac{T_2 - T_1}{T_1 T_2} \right)

Thermal Response Directions

  • Endothermic Reactions (ΔHrxn∘>0\Delta H_{rxn}^\circ > 0, absorbs heat): d(ln⁡Ka)dT>0\frac{d(\ln K_a)}{dT} > 0 Increasing temperature increases KaK_a. Equilibrium shifts toward the products, increasing conversion.
  • Exothermic Reactions (ΔHrxn∘<0\Delta H_{rxn}^\circ < 0, releases heat): d(ln⁡Ka)dT<0\frac{d(\ln K_a)}{dT} < 0 Increasing temperature decreases KaK_a. Equilibrium shifts toward the reactants, suppressing conversion.

Rigorous Integration (Temperature-Dependent Heat Capacity)

When ΔCp≠0\Delta C_p \ne 0, ΔHrxn∘(T)\Delta H_{rxn}^\circ(T) varies with temperature according to Kirchhoff's Law:

ΔHrxn∘(T)=ΔHrxn∘(T0)+∫T0TΔCpdT\Delta H_{rxn}^\circ(T) = \Delta H_{rxn}^\circ(T_0) + \int_{T_0}^T \Delta C_p dT ln⁡Ka(T)=ln⁡Ka(T0)+1R∫T0TΔHrxn∘(T)T2dT\ln K_a(T) = \ln K_a(T_0) + \frac{1}{R} \int_{T_0}^T \frac{\Delta H_{rxn}^\circ(T)}{T^2} dT

5. Stoichiometric Table and Reaction Extent Formulation

To solve reaction equilibrium problems systematically on the PE exam, always construct a Stoichiometric Mole Table in terms of the extent of reaction (ξ\xi) or the fractional conversion (XAX_A) of the limiting reactant.

General Stoichiometric Balance Table

Species (ii)Initial Moles (ni,0n_{i,0})Change in Moles (Δni=νiξ\Delta n_i = \nu_i \xi)Equilibrium Moles (nin_i)Equilibrium Mole Fraction (yi=ni/ntoty_i = n_i / n_{tot})
Reactant AnA,0n_{A,0}νAξ\nu_A \xi (where νA<0\nu_A < 0)nA=nA,0+νAξn_A = n_{A,0} + \nu_A \xiyA=(nA,0+νAξ)/ntoty_A = (n_{A,0} + \nu_A \xi) / n_{tot}
Reactant BnB,0n_{B,0}νBξ\nu_B \xi (where νB<0\nu_B < 0)nB=nB,0+νBξn_B = n_{B,0} + \nu_B \xiyB=(nB,0+νBξ)/ntoty_B = (n_{B,0} + \nu_B \xi) / n_{tot}
Product CnC,0n_{C,0}νCξ\nu_C \xi (where νC>0\nu_C > 0)nC=nC,0+νCξn_C = n_{C,0} + \nu_C \xiyC=(nC,0+νCξ)/ntoty_C = (n_{C,0} + \nu_C \xi) / n_{tot}
Inerts (I)nIn_{I}00nIn_IyI=nI/ntoty_I = n_I / n_{tot}
TOTALntot,0n_{tot,0}Δνξ\Delta \nu \xintot=ntot,0+Δνξn_{tot} = n_{tot,0} + \Delta \nu \xi1.0001.000

Where:

  • ntot,0=nA,0+nB,0+nC,0+nIn_{tot,0} = n_{A,0} + n_{B,0} + n_{C,0} + n_I
  • Δν=∑νi=νA+νB+νC\Delta \nu = \sum \nu_i = \nu_A + \nu_B + \nu_C
  • Fractional conversion of limiting reactant AA: XA=nA,0−nAnA,0=−νAξnA,0  ⟹  ξ=nA,0XA−νAX_A = \frac{n_{A,0} - n_A}{n_{A,0}} = \frac{-\nu_A \xi}{n_{A,0}} \implies \xi = \frac{n_{A,0} X_A}{-\nu_A}

6. Le Chatelier's Principle: Engineering Process Levers

Henri Louis Le Chatelier (1884) stated that if a system at chemical equilibrium experiences a perturbation in temperature, pressure, or concentration, the equilibrium shifts in the direction that partially offsets the imposed change.

1. Effect of Temperature

  • Governed entirely by the sign of ΔHrxn∘\Delta H_{rxn}^\circ through the van 't Hoff equation.
  • Exothermic (ΔHrxn∘<0\Delta H_{rxn}^\circ < 0): Adding heat (raising TT) shifts equilibrium to the left (reactants). Cooling shifts to the right.
  • Endothermic (ΔHrxn∘>0\Delta H_{rxn}^\circ > 0): Adding heat (raising TT) shifts equilibrium to the right (products).

2. Effect of Total Pressure

  • Pressure does not change KaK_a. It shifts equilibrium through the term (P/P∘)−Δν(P/P^\circ)^{-\Delta \nu} in Ky=Ka(P/P∘)−ΔνK_y = K_a (P/P^\circ)^{-\Delta \nu}.
  • If Δν<0\Delta \nu < 0 (mole-reducing reaction, e.g., N2+3H2⇌2NH3\text{N}_2 + 3\text{H}_2 \rightleftharpoons 2\text{NH}_3, Δν=−2\Delta \nu = -2): Ky=Ka(PP∘)+2K_y = K_a \left( \frac{P}{P^\circ} \right)^{+2} Increasing total pressure PP increases KyK_y, shifting equilibrium toward the product side (higher conversion). This is why Haber-Bosch ammonia synthesis operates at 150−250 bar150-250\text{ bar}.
  • If Δν>0\Delta \nu > 0 (mole-expanding reaction, e.g., CH4+H2O⇌CO+3H2\text{CH}_4 + \text{H}_2\text{O} \rightleftharpoons \text{CO} + 3\text{H}_2, Δν=+2\Delta \nu = +2): Ky=Ka(PP∘)−2K_y = K_a \left( \frac{P}{P^\circ} \right)^{-2} Increasing total pressure suppresses conversion. Lowering pressure or pulling vacuum promotes product yield.
  • If Δν=0\Delta \nu = 0 (equimolar reaction, e.g., CO+H2O⇌CO2+H2\text{CO} + \text{H}_2\text{O} \rightleftharpoons \text{CO}_2 + \text{H}_2): Ky=KaK_y = K_a Total pressure has zero effect on equilibrium conversion or mole fractions!

3. Effect of Inerts (Steam, Nitrogen, Argon)

  • Inerts Added at Constant Total Pressure (P=constP = \text{const}): Adding inerts increases total moles ntotn_{tot}, which decreases the partial pressures of reacting components. This dilution acts identically to a reduction in total system pressure:
    • For Δν>0\Delta \nu > 0: Adding inerts increases equilibrium conversion (e.g., steam added to ethylbenzene dehydrogenation to produce styrene).
    • For Δν<0\Delta \nu < 0: Adding inerts decreases equilibrium conversion.
    • For Δν=0\Delta \nu = 0: Adding inerts has no effect on reactant conversion.
  • Inerts Added at Constant Volume (V=constV = \text{const}): In a rigid vessel, adding inerts raises total pressure but leaves the concentrations (ni/Vn_i/V) and partial pressures (PiP_i) of the reactants unchanged. Equilibrium conversion does not shift.

4. Effect of Catalysts

  • Catalysts lower the activation energies (EaE_a) of the forward and reverse reactions by the exact same amount.
  • Catalysts increase the rate of approaching equilibrium, but have zero effect on ΔGrxn∘\Delta G_{rxn}^\circ, KaK_a, or equilibrium conversion.

7. Summary Table: Process Perturbations & Reaction Equilibrium Shifts

Process ModificationEffect on KaK_aEffect on Conversion if Δν<0\Delta \nu < 0Effect on Conversion if Δν=0\Delta \nu = 0Effect on Conversion if Δν>0\Delta \nu > 0
Increase Temperature (Exothermic: ΔH∘<0\Delta H^\circ < 0)DecreasesDecreasesDecreasesDecreases
Increase Temperature (Endothermic: ΔH∘>0\Delta H^\circ > 0)IncreasesIncreasesIncreasesIncreases
Increase Total Pressure (PP)No EffectIncreasesNo EffectDecreases
Decrease Total Pressure (PP)No EffectDecreasesNo EffectIncreases
Add Inerts at Constant Pressure (PP)No EffectDecreasesNo EffectIncreases
Add Inerts at Constant Volume (VV)No EffectNo EffectNo EffectNo Effect
Introduce CatalystNo EffectNo Effect (Faster kinetics only)No EffectNo Effect
Remove Product ContinuouslyNo EffectIncreases (Q<KQ < K)Increases (Q<KQ < K)Increases (Q<KQ < K)

8. Comprehensive Worked Numerical Example: High-Temperature Sulfur Dioxide Oxidation

Problem Statement

In a contact process sulfuric acid plant, sulfur dioxide is catalytically oxidized to sulfur trioxide across a vanadium pentoxide (V2O5\text{V}_2\text{O}_5) catalyst bed:

SO2(g)+12O2(g)⇌SO3(g)\text{SO}_2(g) + \frac{1}{2}\text{O}_2(g) \rightleftharpoons \text{SO}_3(g)

Standard Thermodynamic Data at T0=298.15 KT_0 = 298.15\text{ K} (P∘=1.00 barP^\circ = 1.00\text{ bar}):

  • SO2(g)\text{SO}_2(g): ΔHf,298∘=−296.83 kJ/mol\Delta H_{f,298}^\circ = -296.83\text{ kJ/mol}, ΔGf,298∘=−300.19 kJ/mol\Delta G_{f,298}^\circ = -300.19\text{ kJ/mol}
  • O2(g)\text{O}_2(g): ΔHf,298∘=0.00 kJ/mol\Delta H_{f,298}^\circ = 0.00\text{ kJ/mol}, ΔGf,298∘=0.00 kJ/mol\Delta G_{f,298}^\circ = 0.00\text{ kJ/mol}
  • SO3(g)\text{SO}_3(g): ΔHf,298∘=−395.72 kJ/mol\Delta H_{f,298}^\circ = -395.72\text{ kJ/mol}, ΔGf,298∘=−371.06 kJ/mol\Delta G_{f,298}^\circ = -371.06\text{ kJ/mol}

The converter operates at a temperature of T=700.0 KT = 700.0\text{ K} and an absolute pressure of P=2.00 barP = 2.00\text{ bar}. The feed gas enters with the molar ratio:

  • 1.00 mol SO21.00\text{ mol } \text{SO}_2
  • 0.80 mol O20.80\text{ mol } \text{O}_2
  • 4.00 mol N24.00\text{ mol } \text{N}_2 (inert carrier gas)

Calculate:

  1. The standard enthalpy change (ΔHrxn,298∘\Delta H_{rxn,298}^\circ) and standard Gibbs free energy change (ΔGrxn,298∘\Delta G_{rxn,298}^\circ) at 298.15 K298.15\text{ K}.
  2. The thermodynamic equilibrium constant KaK_a at 298.15 K298.15\text{ K}.
  3. The equilibrium constant KaK_a at converter operating temperature T=700.0 KT = 700.0\text{ K} assuming constant ΔHrxn∘\Delta H_{rxn}^\circ.
  4. The stoichiometric change in gas moles (Δν\Delta \nu) and the expression for KyK_y.
  5. Formulate the equilibrium composition in terms of SO2\text{SO}_2 conversion (XX) and determine the equilibrium conversion at 700.0 K700.0\text{ K} and 2.00 bar2.00\text{ bar}.

Step 1: Standard Heats and Free Energies of Reaction at 298.15 K298.15\text{ K}

ΔHrxn,298∘=ΔHf∘(SO3)−ΔHf∘(SO2)−0.5ΔHf∘(O2)\Delta H_{rxn,298}^\circ = \Delta H_{f}^\circ(\text{SO}_3) - \Delta H_{f}^\circ(\text{SO}_2) - 0.5 \Delta H_{f}^\circ(\text{O}_2) ΔHrxn,298∘=−395.72−(−296.83)−0.5(0)=−98.89 kJ/mol=−98,890 J/mol\Delta H_{rxn,298}^\circ = -395.72 - (-296.83) - 0.5(0) = \mathbf{-98.89\text{ kJ/mol}} = -98,890\text{ J/mol} ΔGrxn,298∘=ΔGf∘(SO3)−ΔGf∘(SO2)−0.5ΔGf∘(O2)\Delta G_{rxn,298}^\circ = \Delta G_{f}^\circ(\text{SO}_3) - \Delta G_{f}^\circ(\text{SO}_2) - 0.5 \Delta G_{f}^\circ(\text{O}_2) ΔGrxn,298∘=−371.06−(−300.19)−0.5(0)=−70.87 kJ/mol=−70,870 J/mol\Delta G_{rxn,298}^\circ = -371.06 - (-300.19) - 0.5(0) = \mathbf{-70.87\text{ kJ/mol}} = -70,870\text{ J/mol}

(The negative ΔH∘\Delta H^\circ indicates a strongly exothermic reaction; the negative ΔG∘\Delta G^\circ indicates strong thermodynamic spontaneity at ambient temperature).


Step 2: Equilibrium Constant at 298.15 K298.15\text{ K}

Ka(298.15 K)=exp⁡(−ΔGrxn,298∘RT0)=exp⁡(−−70,870 J/mol(8.31447 J/(mol⋅K))(298.15 K))K_a(298.15\text{ K}) = \exp\left( -\frac{\Delta G_{rxn,298}^\circ}{R T_0} \right) = \exp\left( -\frac{-70,870\text{ J/mol}}{(8.31447\text{ J/(mol}\cdot\text{K)})(298.15\text{ K})} \right) Ka(298.15 K)=exp⁡(70,8702478.96)=exp⁡(28.5886)=2.605×1012K_a(298.15\text{ K}) = \exp\left( \frac{70,870}{2478.96} \right) = \exp(28.5886) = \mathbf{2.605 \times 10^{12}}

At room temperature, equilibrium lies overwhelmingly on the product side (Ka>1012K_a > 10^{12}), but the reaction is kinetically inert without high temperatures to activate the catalyst.


Step 3: Equilibrium Constant at T=700.0 KT = 700.0\text{ K} via van 't Hoff Equation

Apply the integrated van 't Hoff equation:

ln⁡(Ka(T)Ka(T0))=−ΔHrxn∘R(1T−1T0)\ln\left( \frac{K_a(T)}{K_a(T_0)} \right) = -\frac{\Delta H_{rxn}^\circ}{R} \left( \frac{1}{T} - \frac{1}{T_0} \right) 1T−1T0=1700.0 K−1298.15 K=0.00142857−0.00335402=−0.00192545 K−1\frac{1}{T} - \frac{1}{T_0} = \frac{1}{700.0\text{ K}} - \frac{1}{298.15\text{ K}} = 0.00142857 - 0.00335402 = -0.00192545\text{ K}^{-1} ln⁡(Ka(700)Ka(298))=−(−98,8908.31447)×(−0.00192545)=(11,893.72)×(−0.00192545)=−22.9006\ln\left( \frac{K_a(700)}{K_a(298)} \right) = -\left( \frac{-98,890}{8.31447} \right) \times (-0.00192545) = (11,893.72) \times (-0.00192545) = \mathbf{-22.9006} Ka(700.0 K)=Ka(298.15 K)×exp⁡(−22.9006)=(2.605×1012)×(1.1335×10−10)=295.3K_a(700.0\text{ K}) = K_a(298.15\text{ K}) \times \exp(-22.9006) = (2.605 \times 10^{12}) \times (1.1335 \times 10^{-10}) = \mathbf{295.3}

Raising the temperature from 298 K298\text{ K} to 700 K700\text{ K} drops the equilibrium constant by 10 orders of magnitude (from 2.6×10122.6 \times 10^{12} down to 295.3295.3) due to the exothermic heat of reaction.


Step 4: Stoichiometry and Equilibrium Expression

Stoichiometric coefficients:

νSO2=−1,νO2=−0.5,νSO3=+1,νN2=0\nu_{\text{SO}_2} = -1, \quad \nu_{\text{O}_2} = -0.5, \quad \nu_{\text{SO}_3} = +1, \quad \nu_{\text{N}_2} = 0 Δν=∑νi=−1−0.5+1=−0.5\Delta \nu = \sum \nu_i = -1 - 0.5 + 1 = \mathbf{-0.5}

Gas-phase equilibrium formulation (P∘=1.00 barP^\circ = 1.00\text{ bar}):

Ka=(PP∘)ΔνKy=(PP∘)−0.5ySO3ySO2⋅yO20.5K_a = \left( \frac{P}{P^\circ} \right)^{\Delta \nu} K_y = \left( \frac{P}{P^\circ} \right)^{-0.5} \frac{y_{\text{SO}_3}}{y_{\text{SO}_2} \cdot y_{\text{O}_2}^{0.5}}

Step 5: Stoichiometric Table and Conversion Calculation

Let XX be the fractional conversion of SO2\text{SO}_2 (extent ξ=1.00X\xi = 1.00 X):

SpeciesFeed Moles (ni,0n_{i,0})ChangeEquilibrium Moles (nin_i)Mole Fraction (yiy_i)
SO2\text{SO}_21.001.00−X-X1.00−X1.00 - X(1.00−X)/ntot(1.00 - X) / n_{tot}
O2\text{O}_20.800.80−0.5X-0.5X0.80−0.5X0.80 - 0.5X(0.80−0.5X)/ntot(0.80 - 0.5X) / n_{tot}
SO3\text{SO}_30.000.00+X+XXXX/ntotX / n_{tot}
N2\text{N}_2 (inert)4.004.00004.004.004.00/ntot4.00 / n_{tot}
TOTAL (ntotn_{tot})5.805.80−0.5X-0.5X5.80−0.5X5.80 - 0.5X1.0001.000

Substitute mole fractions into KyK_y:

Ky=ySO3ySO2yO20.5=Xntot(1.00−Xntot)(0.80−0.5Xntot)0.5=X1.00−Xntot0.80−0.5XK_y = \frac{y_{\text{SO}_3}}{y_{\text{SO}_2} y_{\text{O}_2}^{0.5}} = \frac{\frac{X}{n_{tot}}}{\left(\frac{1.00 - X}{n_{tot}}\right) \left(\frac{0.80 - 0.5X}{n_{tot}}\right)^{0.5}} = \frac{X}{1.00 - X} \sqrt{\frac{n_{tot}}{0.80 - 0.5X}} Ky=X1.00−X5.80−0.5X0.80−0.5XK_y = \frac{X}{1.00 - X} \sqrt{\frac{5.80 - 0.5X}{0.80 - 0.5X}}

Relating KyK_y to KaK_a at P=2.00 barP = 2.00\text{ bar}:

Ky=Ka(PP∘)−Δν=295.3×(2.00)−(−0.5)=295.3×2.00=295.3×1.4142=417.6K_y = K_a \left( \frac{P}{P^\circ} \right)^{-\Delta \nu} = 295.3 \times (2.00)^{-(-0.5)} = 295.3 \times \sqrt{2.00} = 295.3 \times 1.4142 = \mathbf{417.6}

Equating expressions:

X1.00−X5.80−0.5X0.80−0.5X=417.6\frac{X}{1.00 - X} \sqrt{\frac{5.80 - 0.5X}{0.80 - 0.5X}} = 417.6

Solving for XX by trial and error / successive approximation:

  • For X=0.980X = 0.980: 0.9800.0205.80−0.4900.80−0.490=49.0×5.3100.310=49.0×17.129=49.0×4.1387=202.8(<417.6)\frac{0.980}{0.020} \sqrt{\frac{5.80 - 0.490}{0.80 - 0.490}} = 49.0 \times \sqrt{\frac{5.310}{0.310}} = 49.0 \times \sqrt{17.129} = 49.0 \times 4.1387 = 202.8 \quad (< 417.6)
  • For X=0.990X = 0.990: 0.9900.0105.80−0.4950.80−0.495=99.0×5.3050.305=99.0×17.393=99.0×4.1705=412.9≈417.6\frac{0.990}{0.010} \sqrt{\frac{5.80 - 0.495}{0.80 - 0.495}} = 99.0 \times \sqrt{\frac{5.305}{0.305}} = 99.0 \times \sqrt{17.393} = 99.0 \times 4.1705 = 412.9 \approx 417.6
  • For X=0.9905X = 0.9905: 0.99050.0095×4.172=104.26×4.172=435.0(>417.6)\frac{0.9905}{0.0095} \times 4.172 = 104.26 \times 4.172 = 435.0 \quad (> 417.6)

Interpolating yields the equilibrium conversion:

Xeq=0.990(99.0%)X_{eq} = \mathbf{0.990} \quad (\mathbf{99.0\%})

At 700 K700\text{ K} and 2 bar2\text{ bar}, thermodynamic equilibrium permits up to 99.0%99.0\% conversion of sulfur dioxide to sulfur trioxide.


9. Critical PE Exam Traps & Pitfalls

Trap 1: Believing that System Pressure Changes the Equilibrium Constant (KaK_a)
This is among the most heavily tested conceptual distractors on the NCEES PE Chemical Exam. Pressure NEVER changes KaK_a! KaK_a is solely a function of temperature (Ka=exp⁡[−ΔG∘/(RT)]K_a = \exp[-\Delta G^\circ / (R T)]). Pressure changes the equilibrium composition (KyK_y) through the (P/P∘)−Δν(P/P^\circ)^{-\Delta \nu} factor, but KaK_a remains strictly constant.

Trap 2: Inverting Signs in the van 't Hoff Equation
Notice the negative sign in ln⁡(K2/K1)=−(ΔH∘/R)(1/T2−1/T1)\ln(K_2/K_1) = -(\Delta H^\circ / R) (1/T_2 - 1/T_1). For an exothermic reaction (ΔH∘<0\Delta H^\circ < 0), −ΔH∘-\Delta H^\circ becomes positive. When heating (T2>T1T_2 > T_1), (1/T2−1/T1)(1/T_2 - 1/T_1) is negative. A positive multiplied by a negative yields a negative, meaning ln⁡(K2/K1)<0  ⟹  K2<K1\ln(K_2/K_1) < 0 \implies K_2 < K_1. Verify this physical consistency: heating an exothermic reaction must reduce KK.

Trap 3: Forgetting Inert Moles in the Total Mole Count (ntotn_{tot})
When setting up mole fractions (yi=ni/ntoty_i = n_i / n_{tot}), inerts (such as nitrogen in air, or steam) do not react, but they must be included in ntotn_{tot}. Omitting inerts from the denominator artificially inflates the reactant partial pressures, producing severe calculation errors.

Trap 4: Expecting a Catalyst to Increase Thermodynamic Equilibrium Conversion
If an exam question asks "Which modification will increase the equilibrium conversion of an endothermic reaction?" and includes "Adding an active catalyst" as an option, do not pick it! Catalysts only increase the rate at which equilibrium is reached. They alter neither ΔGrxn∘\Delta G_{rxn}^\circ nor KaK_a nor equilibrium conversion.

Test Your Knowledge

The industrial synthesis of methanol (CO(g) + 2 H2(g) <=> CH3OH(g)) is strongly exothermic with an enthalpy of reaction Delta H_rxn^o = -90.7 kJ/mol (assumed constant over the operating span). At T1 = 500.0 K, the equilibrium constant is K_a(500 K) = 6.20 * 10^(-3). If a temperature runaway in the reactor bed increases the operating temperature to T2 = 550.0 K, what is the new thermodynamic equilibrium constant K_a(550 K)?

A

4.51 * 10^(-2)

B

6.20 * 10^(-3)

C

8.53 * 10^(-4)

D

1.24 * 10^(-5)

Test Your Knowledge

Consider the high-temperature steam-methane reforming reaction: CH4(g) + H2O(g) <=> CO(g) + 3 H2(g), for which Delta H_rxn^o = +206 kJ/mol. Which combination of operating adjustments will UNAMBIGUOUSLY increase the equilibrium conversion of methane (CH4) at steady state?

A

Increasing the total system pressure at constant temperature, and reducing the steam-to-methane ratio in the feed

B

Decreasing the reactor operating temperature, and injecting an inert gas at constant vessel volume

C

Adding a highly selective nickel reforming catalyst, and increasing the total system pressure

D

Increasing the reactor operating temperature, decreasing the total system pressure, and introducing excess steam at constant total pressure

Test Your Knowledge

An equimolar gas-phase isomerization reaction A(g) <=> B(g) (Delta nu = 0) is conducted in an isothermal tubular reactor at T = 400.0 K and P = 1.00 bar. Feed gas consists of pure A. At equilibrium, gas chromatography confirms that 75.0% of A has been converted to B. Assuming ideal gas behavior, what is the standard Gibbs free energy change of reaction Delta G_rxn^o at 400.0 K?

A

+3.65 kJ/mol

B

-3.65 kJ/mol

C

-12.8 kJ/mol

D

+12.8 kJ/mol

Sections you finish are checked off in the contents.