1.2 Part I: Stimulus-Based Multiple Choice Strategy
Key Takeaways
- Every Part I question is anchored to a stimulus - a document excerpt, map, chart, graph, timeline, or political cartoon - so read the source and its caption before reading the answer choices.
- Source the stimulus first: identify author, date, audience, and purpose; the attribution line often hands you the period and point of view.
- Most distractors are eliminated with skills, not facts - watch for off-period choices, true-but-irrelevant statements, and extreme words like 'all,' 'never,' or 'only.'
- Budget roughly 50-55 minutes for the 28 questions (about 2 minutes each) and never leave a Part I bubble blank - there is no penalty for guessing.
- When two questions share one stimulus, the second question usually tests a deeper inference (cause, effect, comparison, or point of view) than the first.
Part I Is a Reading Test in Disguise
The 28 Part I questions are all stimulus-based, meaning each one is attached to a source: a short document excerpt, a map, a chart or graph, a timeline, or a political cartoon. The exam is testing whether you can read and reason about evidence the way a historian does, not whether you memorized a textbook. That is good news: even on a unit you found difficult, careful reading of the stimulus often reveals the answer.
Work in a fixed order: read the stimulus and its caption/attribution first, predict an answer in your head, then read the choices. Students who skip to the choices first get pulled toward whichever option 'sounds historical' and walk into the trap answers.
Sourcing the Stimulus
Every document carries an attribution line (author, title, date, source). Before anything else, pull four things from it:
- Author / source - Who created this? A government, a reformer, a colonized subject, a cartoonist?
- Date - This locks the historical period. A passage dated 1848 points to revolutions and industrial reform; one dated 1989 points to the end of the Cold War.
- Audience - Who was meant to read or see it?
- Purpose / point of view - Is the source trying to persuade, justify, criticize, or record? A colonial official defending empire and a colonized nationalist describe the same event very differently.
For a map, read the title, legend, and date - changes in borders, trade routes, or alliance blocs are the point. For a chart or graph, read the axis labels and units before interpreting a trend. For a political cartoon, identify the symbols, the labels, the exaggeration, and the cartoonist's target - cartoons are arguments, not neutral descriptions.
Distractor Elimination
Global II distractors fall into predictable types. Learn to spot them:
| Distractor type | What it looks like | How to beat it |
|---|---|---|
| Off-period | A true fact from the wrong era | Use the stimulus date to reject anything outside the period |
| True but irrelevant | A correct statement that does not answer this question | Re-read the stem; the fact must address what is asked |
| Absolute language | Contains 'all,' 'never,' 'only,' 'always' | History is rarely absolute; treat these with heavy suspicion |
| Opposite/reversed | Flips cause and effect, or who did what | Check direction: who acted on whom |
| Out-of-stimulus | A claim the source never supports | The answer must be grounded in the given source |
For a comparison question, the right answer must be true of both items named - a choice true of only one is wrong even if accurate. For a cause-and-effect question, separate long-term causes, short-term triggers, and effects; distractors often offer a real background condition when the question asks for the immediate trigger.
Reading Each Stimulus Type
Different stimulus formats reward different habits:
- Document excerpts - Read the attribution, then the passage, underlining the author's main claim. The question usually tests what the author argues or implies, not a trivia detail.
- Maps - Compare the map's date and borders to what you know. A map labeled 'Europe, 1942' versus 'Europe, 1949' is testing the difference between Axis expansion and Cold War division.
- Charts and graphs - Identify the trend direction first (rising urbanization, falling mortality), then match it to a historical cause such as industrialization or the Green Revolution.
- Timelines - These test sequence and causation; look at what comes before and after a labeled event.
- Political cartoons - Decode the symbols (an octopus for an empire, a figure labeled with a country), the exaggeration, and the cartoonist's clearly negative or positive stance.
Pacing and Bubbling
- Time budget: About 50-55 minutes for all 28 questions - roughly 2 minutes each. If a question stalls you, mark it, bubble your best guess, and move on; you can return with leftover time.
- No guessing penalty: Regents scoring counts correct answers only, so never leave a Part I bubble blank. A blind guess is a 25% chance; an educated guess after eliminating two choices is a coin flip.
- Paired questions: When two items share one stimulus, the first often tests literal comprehension and the second tests a deeper inference (point of view, cause, or comparison). Don't carry an assumption from the first question into the second - re-anchor to the stem.
- Transcribe carefully: Because MCQs are bubbled on a separate scannable sheet, check the question number every few items so a single skipped bubble does not shift all your later answers.
Finish Part I with a brief buffer so the time-intensive CRQs and essay are never rushed.
A Part I question shows an 1885 political cartoon depicting European leaders dividing a map of Africa, with the caption referencing the Berlin Conference. Which approach best fits the recommended Part I strategy?
A comparison question asks what the French Revolution and the Latin American independence movements had in common. One choice is a true statement about the French Revolution only. How should you treat it?