9.3 Causes of Loss Forms (Basic, Broad, Special)
Key Takeaways
- Three causes of loss forms: Basic (CP 10 10, 11 named perils), Broad (CP 10 20), and Special (CP 10 30, open-peril).
- Theft is excluded by Basic but covered by both Broad and Special - a classic exam distinction.
- The Special form covers all direct physical loss except exclusions, shifting the burden of proof to the insurer.
- Flood, earthquake/earth movement, war, nuclear hazard, ordinance or law, and government action are excluded under ALL three forms unless endorsed.
- Building water damage from burst pipes (Broad/Special) is NOT the same as flood, which is always excluded.
Why a Separate Form
A commercial property policy needs two forms: a coverage form (the BPP, CP 00 10) that says what is insured, and a Causes of Loss form that says which perils are covered. Choosing the causes of loss form is the single biggest driver of premium and of how a claim is adjusted.
Basic Form (CP 10 10) - 11 Named Perils
The Basic form is named-peril: the insured must prove the loss came from one of these listed perils.
| # | Peril | Exam note |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fire | Hostile (out-of-place) fires only |
| 2 | Lightning | Direct strike or resulting fire |
| 3 | Explosion | Excludes steam-boiler explosion |
| 4 | Windstorm or Hail | Interior covered only if wind first makes an opening |
| 5 | Smoke | Sudden and accidental |
| 6 | Aircraft or Vehicles | Self-propelled |
| 7 | Riot or Civil Commotion | Includes looting during a riot |
| 8 | Vandalism | Excluded if building vacant 60+ days |
| 9 | Sprinkler Leakage | Automatic fire-protection systems |
| 10 | Sinkhole Collapse | Sudden sinking into a void |
| 11 | Volcanic Action | Airborne blast, ash, lava; not earthquake |
Note: theft is NOT a Basic-form peril.
Broad Form (CP 10 20) - Adds Coverage
The Broad form includes all 11 Basic perils and adds:
- Falling objects (exterior must be penetrated first for interior damage)
- Weight of snow, ice, or sleet
- Water damage - sudden, accidental discharge from plumbing, HVAC, or appliances (NOT flood)
- Breakage of building glass (limited)
- Collapse as an additional coverage from specified causes
Theft becomes covered at the Broad level.
Special Form (CP 10 30) - Open Peril
The Special form flips the logic: it covers all risks of direct physical loss EXCEPT those excluded. Because coverage is presumed, the burden of proof shifts to the insurer to show an exclusion applies. It is the broadest and most expensive form and the basis for the Businessowners Policy building coverage (9.5).
Exclusions Common to All Three Forms
| Exclusion | Why |
|---|---|
| Ordinance or Law | Code-upgrade cost; needs CP 04 05 |
| Earth Movement | Earthquake, landslide, mine subsidence |
| Government Action | Seizure or destruction by authority |
| Nuclear Hazard | Reaction, radiation, contamination |
| Utility Services | Off-premises power/water failure |
| War and Military Action | Declared or undeclared |
| Water | Flood, surface water, sewer backup, mudflow |
Flood and earthquake are never covered by any of the three forms. Flood needs a separate policy (often NFIP); earthquake needs the CP 10 40 earthquake endorsement.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Peril / feature | Basic | Broad | Special |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coverage approach | Named | Named | Open peril |
| Fire / lightning | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Theft | No | Yes | Yes |
| Water damage (pipes/HVAC) | No | Yes | Yes |
| Weight of snow/ice | No | Yes | Yes |
| Glass breakage | No | Yes | Yes |
| Flood | No | No | No |
| Earthquake | No | No | No |
| Premium level | Lowest | Medium | Highest |
Worked Scenario
A pipe bursts overnight and water ruins a retailer's inventory. The Broad and Special forms cover it as accidental discharge of water; the Basic form does not list water damage and pays nothing. If instead a river overflows into the store, no form pays — that is flood, requiring a separate flood policy.
Anti-Concurrent-Causation
The excluded perils apply "regardless of any other cause or event that contributes concurrently or in any sequence to the loss." If an excluded peril (flood) and a covered peril (wind) combine, the portion attributable to the excluded peril is still excluded. Adjusters use this to apportion hurricane losses between covered wind and excluded storm surge.
Collapse as an Additional Coverage
Under the Broad and Special forms, collapse is not a peril but an additional coverage triggered only by specified causes: a Causes of Loss peril; hidden decay; hidden insect or vermin damage; weight of people or personal property; weight of rain that collects on a roof; or use of defective material during construction. Settling, cracking, shrinking, bulging, and expansion are not collapse. A building that merely cracks has no collapse claim; a roof that caves in from concealed rot does.
Picking the Right Form
| Situation | Best fit | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Tight-budget warehouse, low theft risk | Basic | Lowest premium, fire/lightning core |
| Retailer wanting theft + water + snow | Broad | Adds theft, water, weight of snow |
| High-value or hard-to-foresee exposures | Special | Open-peril; insurer must prove exclusion |
Because the Special form covers anything not excluded, it picks up oddball losses — a forklift puncturing a wall, paint spilled across stock — that a named-peril form would never list. That breadth is exactly why exclusions, not inclusions, are the study focus.
Common Traps
- Theft is the most-missed item: Basic excludes it; Broad and Special cover it.
- Water damage is not flood. Internal pipe leaks can be covered; rising surface water never is.
- A building vacant more than 60 consecutive days loses vandalism, water-damage, theft, glass, and sprinkler-leakage coverage, and other covered losses are cut 15 percent.
- Open-peril does not mean unlimited — theft of jewelry, furs, and similar property carries $2,500 special sublimits.
A retailer's inventory is destroyed when a sprinkler pipe bursts and floods the floor overnight. Which causes of loss form(s) would pay this water-damage loss?
Under the Special (open-peril) form, who bears the burden of proving whether a loss is covered?