7.3 Part F General Provisions, Endorsements, and No-Fault Concepts
Key Takeaways
- Part F provisions cover bankruptcy, changes, subrogation, legal action, and a territory of the US, Puerto Rico, and Canada - Mexico is excluded.
- Appraisal settles disputes over the amount of a physical damage loss using two appraisers and an umpire; it never decides coverage.
- Key endorsements include Miscellaneous Type Vehicle (PP 03 23), Towing and Labor (PP 03 03), and Extended Non-Owned (PP 03 06).
- No-fault PIP pays the insured's own bodily-injury costs regardless of fault, with lawsuits limited by monetary or verbal tort thresholds.
Part F: General Provisions
Part F of the PAP contains the boilerplate conditions that govern the whole contract. The most tested provisions are:
- Bankruptcy: Bankruptcy or insolvency of the insured does not relieve the insurer of its obligations.
- Changes: The policy and any endorsements contain all agreements; changes require the insurer's written consent. If the insurer broadens coverage during the policy period without a premium charge, the broadened coverage applies automatically.
- Legal Action Against Us: No suit may be brought until the insured has fully complied with policy terms; for liability, the obligation must first be determined by judgment or written agreement.
- Our Right to Recover Payment (Subrogation): After paying a loss, the insurer succeeds to the insured's right to recover from a responsible third party. The insured must not impair this right.
- Policy Period and Territory: Coverage applies to accidents and losses occurring in the United States, its territories or possessions, Puerto Rico, or Canada - and while the vehicle is shipped between their ports. Mexico is excluded.
Two or More Auto Policies and Termination
Part F's Two or More Auto Policies provision states that if more than one PAP issued by the same insurer applies to the same accident, the maximum payable is the highest limit under any one policy - this prevents stacking from one carrier. Termination rules (often modified by state law) limit when an insurer may cancel a policy in force more than 60 days to nonpayment of premium, license suspension, or material misrepresentation, and require advance written notice (commonly 10 days for nonpayment, 20-30 days for other reasons).
Appraisal
When the insurer and insured disagree on the amount of a physical damage loss, either party may demand appraisal. Each selects a competent appraiser; the two appraisers select an umpire, and agreement by any two of the three sets the amount. Appraisal resolves amount, never coverage. Each party pays its own appraiser and shares the umpire cost.
Common Endorsements
Several ISO endorsements modify the PAP and appear on the exam by name and form number:
| Endorsement | Form | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Miscellaneous Type Vehicle | PP 03 23 | Extends PAP to motorcycles, motor homes, golf carts |
| Towing and Labor Costs | PP 03 03 | Adds towing/road service sublimit per disablement |
| Extended Non-Owned Coverage | PP 03 06 | Liability for autos furnished for regular use |
| Joint Ownership Coverage | PP 03 34 | Covers autos owned by unrelated co-owners |
| Coverage for Damage to Your Auto - OEM Parts | PP 03 31 | Requires original-equipment repair parts |
The Miscellaneous Type Vehicle (PP 03 23) is the most frequently tested because it is how a motorcycle or motor home gets PAP coverage; without it, those vehicles are not covered autos.
No-Fault Concepts and Personal Injury Protection
In no-fault states, each driver's own insurer pays for that driver's injuries through Personal Injury Protection (PIP) regardless of who caused the accident, reducing litigation over minor injuries. PIP typically covers medical expenses, a percentage of lost wages, essential services, and a death benefit. No-fault systems restrict the right to sue (the tort threshold), allowing lawsuits only when injuries cross a monetary threshold (a dollar amount of medical bills) or a verbal threshold (defined serious injuries such as permanent disfigurement or death).
Trap: No-fault applies to bodily injury, not property damage. A driver can still sue for vehicle damage in a no-fault state, and PIP does not pay the other party's injuries.
PIP Coordination and Worked Example
PIP benefits are often coordinated with health insurance to control premium; the insured elects which coverage is primary. Consider a no-fault state with a $10,000 PIP limit and an 80% wage-loss benefit capped at $1,500/month.
| Item | Amount |
|---|---|
| Medical bills | $7,000 |
| Monthly wage before injury | $2,000 |
| Wage-loss benefit (80%) | $1,600 -> capped at $1,500 |
| Months disabled | 2 |
| Wage-loss paid | $3,000 |
| Total PIP demand | $10,000 |
The demand exactly meets the $10,000 PIP limit, so PIP pays $10,000 and the insured looks to other coverage (health insurance or, if the tort threshold is met, the at-fault driver) for the remainder. This illustrates why limit selection and the wage-loss cap are tested numerics.
Part F General Provisions and No-Fault Concepts
Part F - General Provisions governs the whole policy:
| Provision | Effect |
|---|---|
| Policy territory | U.S., its territories/possessions, Puerto Rico, and Canada (not Mexico) |
| Termination | Cancellation and nonrenewal notice rules; the out-of-state coverage raise-up |
| Two or more autos | Limits are not added across vehicles on one policy |
| Legal action against us | Conditions precedent before suing the insurer |
| Bankruptcy of insured | Does not relieve the insurer |
No-Fault concepts: In no-fault states, Personal Injury Protection (PIP) pays the insured's own medical, wage-loss, and essential-services benefits regardless of fault and restricts lawsuits below a verbal or monetary threshold. Mississippi is a traditional tort (at-fault) state - it has NO compulsory no-fault/PIP system; an injured party recovers from the at-fault driver's liability coverage, supplemented by the insured's own Med Pay and UM/UIM.
Exam trap: Do not apply PIP/no-fault rules to a Mississippi fact pattern. Because Mississippi is tort/at-fault, the chain is Part A liability of the at-fault driver -> the injured insured's Med Pay (Part B) -> UM/UIM (Part C) when the at-fault driver is uninsured or underinsured. The policy territory excludes Mexico, a frequent travel-coverage question.
An insured and insurer agree that a windshield loss is covered under OTC but disagree on the repair amount. Which Part F provision resolves the dispute?
In a no-fault state with a verbal threshold, when may an injured party step outside the no-fault system and sue the at-fault driver for bodily injury?