7.1 Cognizance, Private Complaints & Framing of Charges

7.1 Cognizance, Private Complaints & Framing of Charges

[!NOTE] Procedural Pivot: The commencement of judicial proceedings marks the critical transition from executive police investigation to judicial scrutiny. Under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), Chapters XIV, XV, XVI, and XVII govern the conditions requisite for initiation of proceedings, complaints to Magistrates, and the framing of formal charges. Candidates for the Maharashtra Judicial Service Civil Judge & JMFC Examination must master both the structural continuum and the landmark statutory departures introduced by the BNSS, notably the mandatory pre-cognizance hearing under Section 223(1) proviso.

---

The Concept and Nature of Cognizance

The term 'cognizance' is neither defined in the BNSS nor in its predecessor, the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. Etymologically derived from the Latin cognoscere (to know, investigate), cognizance in criminal jurisprudence signifies judicial notice of an offence.

Foundational Judicial Doctrines

• Judicial Application of Mind: In the locus classicus R.R. Chari v. State of U.P. (AIR 1951 SC 207) and reaffirmed in Darshan Singh Ram Kishan v. State of Maharashtra ((1971) 2 SCC 654), the Supreme Court established that taking cognizance does not involve any formal ceremony. A Magistrate takes cognizance of an offence the moment he applies his judicial mind to the suspected commission of an offence for the purpose of taking subsequent judicial steps under the Code toward inquiry or trial.
• Cognizance of the Offence, Not the Offender: In Raghubans Dubey v. State of Bihar (AIR 1967 SC 1167) and Chief Enforcement Officer v. Videocon International Ltd. ((2008) 2 SCC 492), the Apex Court authoritatively settled that cognizance is taken of the offence, not of the offender. Once a Magistrate takes cognizance of an offence based on credible material, his jurisdiction extends over all persons who may have participated in that offence, whether named in the FIR, charge-sheet, or private complaint, or unearthed subsequently during evidence.

                      CHANNELS OF COGNIZANCE UNDER SECTION 210 BNSS
                                             │
         ┌───────────────────────────────────┼───────────────────────────────────┐
         ▼                                   ▼                                   ▼
   Clause (a): Complaint               Clause (b): Police Report          Clause (c): Information /
   Private complaint of facts          Police report under Sec. 193(3)    Own Knowledge (other than
   constituting an offence             arising from investigation         police officer)

---

Cognizance of Offences by Magistrates (Section 210 BNSS / CrPC 190)

Section 210 BNSS establishes the magisterial gateway for all criminal prosecutions:

1. Competent Judicial Officers [Section 210(1)]: Any Magistrate of the first class (JMFC), and any Magistrate of the second class specially empowered under sub-section (2), may take cognizance of any offence:
   • Section 210(1)(a): Upon receiving a complaint of facts which constitute such offence;
   • Section 210(1)(b): Upon a police report of such facts (the final report forwarded under Section 193(3) BNSS / CrPC Section 173(2));
   • Section 210(1)(c): Upon information received from any person other than a police officer, or upon his own knowledge, that such offence has been committed.
2. Empowerment of Second Class Magistrates [Section 210(2)]: The Chief Judicial Magistrate (CJM) may empower any Magistrate of the second class to take cognizance under clause (a) or clause (b) of sub-section (1) of such offences as are within his competence to inquire into or try.

Transfer on Application of the Accused (Section 211 BNSS / CrPC 191)

When a Magistrate takes cognizance under clause (c) of Section 210(1) (upon non-police information or personal knowledge), a severe risk of institutional bias arises, as the judge acts both as initiator and adjudicator. To uphold procedural neutrality:

• Under Section 211 BNSS, before any evidence is taken, the accused shall be informed that he is entitled to have the case inquired into or tried by another Magistrate.
• If the accused (or any of the accused, if more than one) objects to being tried by such Magistrate, the case shall be transferred to the Chief Judicial Magistrate or to such other Magistrate as the CJM may specify.
• Failure to inform the accused of this statutory right vitiates the entire trial proceedings under Section 515 BNSS (CrPC Section 461).

Cognizance of Offences by Sessions Court (Section 213 BNSS / CrPC 193)

Except as otherwise expressly provided by the Sanhita or by any other law for the time being in force, no Court of Session shall take cognizance of any offence as a Court of original jurisdiction unless the case has been committed to it by a Magistrate under Section 232 BNSS (CrPC Section 209).

Statutory Exceptions to the Committal Rule:

1. Defamation of High Public Dignitaries [Section 222 BNSS / CrPC Section 199(2)]: Court of Session may take direct cognizance upon a written complaint by the Public Prosecutor with prior administrative sanction.
2. Special Statutes: Designated Special Courts under the POCSO Act (Section 33), NDPS Act (Section 36A), and Prevention of Corruption Act (Section 5) possess direct statutory authority to take cognizance without committal proceedings.

---

Complaints to Magistrates (Chapter XVI BNSS Sections 223–226)

A 'complaint' under Section 2(1)(h) BNSS means any allegation made orally or in writing to a Magistrate, with a view to his taking action under the Sanhita, that some person (known or unknown) has committed an offence, but does not include a police report.

1. Examination of Complainant & The Revolutionary Proviso (Section 223 BNSS)

Section 223 BNSS (replacing Section 200 CrPC) governs the primary examination of the complainant:

• General Rule: A Magistrate taking cognizance on complaint shall examine upon oath the complainant and the witnesses present. The substance of such examination shall be reduced to writing and signed by the complainant, witnesses, and the Magistrate.
• Dispensation of Examination [Section 223(1) Proviso (a) & (b)]: Examination is dispensed with if:
  • The complaint is made in writing by a public servant acting or purporting to act in the discharge of his official duties or by a Court; or
  • The Magistrate makes over the case for inquiry or trial to another Magistrate under Section 212 BNSS (CrPC Section 192).

[!IMPORTANT] The Historic BNSS Paradigm Shift — Mandatory Opportunity of Being Heard: Under the newly enacted Section 223(1) proviso of BNSS: "Provided that no cognizance of an offence shall be taken by the Magistrate without giving the accused an opportunity of being heard."

• Historical CrPC Position: Under Section 200 CrPC 1973, the accused had no locus standi whatsoever at the pre-cognizance or inquiry stage (Chandra Deo Singh v. Prokash Chandra Bose, AIR 1963 SC 1430). The proposed accused could not be heard, examine witnesses, or submit documents.
• BNSS Mandate: The BNSS fundamentally inverts this doctrine. Before taking cognizance of a private complaint, the JMFC must issue notice and hear the proposed accused. This procedural guarantee acts as a potent shield against frivolous, extortionate, or vindictive private criminal complaints.

2. Postponement of Process & Preliminary Inquiry (Section 225 BNSS / CrPC 202)

Where a Magistrate is authorized to take cognizance of an offence upon a complaint, he may postpone the issue of process against the accused, and either:

• (a) Inquire into the case himself; or
• (b) Direct an investigation to be made by a police officer or by such other person as he thinks fit, for the specific purpose of deciding whether or not there is sufficient ground for proceeding.

3. Dismissal of Complaint (Section 226 BNSS / CrPC 203)

If, after considering the statements on oath of the complainant and witnesses and the result of the inquiry or investigation under Section 225, the Magistrate is of opinion that there is no sufficient ground for proceeding, he shall dismiss the complaint.

• Mandatory Reason Recording: The Magistrate must briefly record his reasons in the dismissal order.
• Remedy Against Dismissal: The complainant may file a criminal revision before the Sessions Court or High Court under Section 438/442 BNSS (CrPC Sections 397/401).
• Second Complaint Rule: A second complaint on the identical facts is generally impermissible, but may be entertained under exceptional conditions: manifest error, patent miscarriage of justice, or new foundational facts that could not with reasonable diligence have been brought on record earlier (Pramatha Nath Talukdar v. Saroj Ranjan Sarkar, AIR 1962 SC 1821).

4. Issue of Process (Section 227 BNSS / CrPC 204)

If in the opinion of the Magistrate there is sufficient ground for proceeding:

• In a summons case, he shall issue a summons for the attendance of the accused.
• In a warrant case, he may issue a warrant, or, if he thinks fit, a summons for causing the accused to be brought or to appear at a certain time.

---

Framing of Charges (Chapter XVII BNSS Sections 234–250)

A charge is the precise formulation of the specific accusation made against a person. As defined by the Supreme Court in V.C. Shukla v. State (1980 Supp SCC 92), the purpose of a charge is to give the accused clear, unambiguous notice of the precise offence alleged against him, fulfilling the constitutional guarantee of fair trial under Article 21.

Contents and Particulars of Charge

• Contents [Section 234 BNSS / CrPC 211]: The charge must state the specific offence, the law and section violated, and must be written in the language of the Court. If the accused has previously been convicted of any offence and is liable to enhanced punishment, the fact, date, and place of the previous conviction must be explicitly stated in the charge.
• Particulars as to Time, Place & Person [Section 235 BNSS / CrPC 212]: The charge must contain particulars as to the time and place of the alleged offence and the person against whom it was committed. In offences of criminal breach of trust or dishonest misappropriation of money, it is sufficient to specify the gross sum and the dates between which the offence is alleged to have been committed, provided the time between the first and last date shall not exceed one year.
• Manner of Committing Offence [Section 236 BNSS / CrPC 213]: Required when the nature of the case is such that time and place particulars do not give sufficient notice (e.g., cheating under Section 318 BNS or obstructing a public servant).

Effect of Errors in Charge (Section 238 BNSS / CrPC 215 & Section 510 BNSS / CrPC 464)

Under Section 238 BNSS, no error in stating the offence or particulars, and no omission to state the offence or particulars, shall be regarded at any stage of the case as material, unless the accused was in fact misled by such error or omission, and it has occasioned a failure of justice.

Under Section 510 BNSS, a finding, sentence, or order of a competent court cannot be held invalid merely on the ground of the absence of a charge or any defect in the charge, unless the appellate court is satisfied that a failure of justice has in fact resulted.

---

Joinder of Charges (Sections 241–246 BNSS / CrPC 218–223)

The fundamental procedural rule governing criminal trials is codified in Section 241 BNSS (CrPC Section 218): For every distinct offence of which any person is accused there shall be a separate charge, and every such charge shall be tried separately.

To prevent multiplicity of proceedings and judicial harassment, Sections 242 to 246 establish statutory exceptions where multiple charges or multiple accused may be joined in a single trial:

                     STATUTORY EXCEPTIONS TO SEPARATE TRIALS
                                        │
    ┌───────────────────────────────────┼───────────────────────────────────┐
    ▼                                   ▼                                   ▼
  Section 242: Three Offences        Section 243: Same Transaction      Section 244: Doubt as to
  of Same Kind within 12 Months      Series of acts forming one         Offence Committed
  punishable with same term.         continuous connected transaction.  Alternative / joint charges.

1. Three Offences of Same Kind in One Year [Section 242 BNSS / CrPC 219]

When a person is accused of more offences than one of the same kind committed within the space of twelve (12) months from the first to the last of such offences, whether in respect of the same person or not, he may be charged with, and tried at one trial for, any number of them not exceeding three.

• Offences are deemed of the same kind when punishable with the same amount of punishment under the same section of the penal law.

2. Series of Acts Forming the Same Transaction [Section 243(1) BNSS / CrPC 220(1)]

If, in one series of acts so connected together as to form the same transaction, more offences than one are committed by the same person, he may be charged with, and tried at one trial for, every such offence.

• Test of Same Transaction: Community of purpose, continuity of action, proximity of time, and unity of place (State of A.P. v. Cheemalapati Ganeswara Rao, AIR 1963 SC 1850).

3. Doubtful Offences & Minor Offences [Sections 244 & 245 BNSS / CrPC 221 & 222]

• Alternative Charges [Section 244]: If a single act or series of acts is of such a nature that it is doubtful which of several offences the facts proved will constitute, the accused may be charged with all or any of such offences, or charged in the alternative.
• Conviction of Minor Offence [Section 245]: When a person is charged with an offence consisting of several particulars, and a combination of some of them constitutes a complete minor offence, he may be convicted of the minor offence although he was not charged with it.

4. Persons Who May Be Charged Jointly [Section 246 BNSS / CrPC 223]

The following persons may be joined and tried together in a single trial:

• Persons accused of the same offence committed in the course of the same transaction;
• Persons accused of an offence and persons accused of abetment or attempt to commit such offence;
• Persons accused of different offences committed in the course of the same transaction;
• Persons accused of offences of theft, extortion, cheating, or criminal breach of trust, and persons receiving or retaining stolen property connected therewith.

Alteration of Charge (Section 239 BNSS / CrPC 216)

Any Court may alter or add to any charge at any time before judgment is pronounced. Every such alteration or addition shall be read and explained to the accused. Under Section 240 BNSS, whenever a charge is altered, the prosecutor and the accused possess a statutory right to recall or re-summon and examine any witness who has been examined.

---

Practical Exam Traps & Maharashtra Subordinate Judiciary Tips