5.4 Multivariate Random Variables
Key Takeaways
- Joint discrete laws are probability matrices; marginals sum out other variables; conditionals renormalize a slice of the joint
- Covariance measures co-movement; correlation standardizes covariance to [−1, 1]; uncorrelated does not imply independent except in special cases (e.g., jointly normal)
- For Y = aX + b, means and covariances transform linearly; portfolio variance needs all pairwise covariances, not just variances
- Var(w₁X₁ + w₂X₂) = w₁²σ₁² + w₂²σ₂² + 2 w₁ w₂ Cov(X₁, X₂)—the core diversification formula
- Conditional expectation E[Y|X=x] is the minimum-MSE predictor of Y given X; i.i.d. sums scale means by n and variances by n (std. by √n)
Multivariate Random Variables
Market, credit, and operational risks move together. QA–4 develops joint distributions, dependence measures, and portfolio variance—the bridge from single-name math to book-level risk.
Joint Probability Matrices
For discrete RVs (X, Y), the joint PMF p(x, y) = P(X = x, Y = y) can be written as a matrix with rows indexed by x and columns by y. Entries are nonnegative and sum to 1.
Worked joint matrix
Let X = 1 if equity book loses money today, else 0. Let Y = 1 if credit book loses money, else 0.
| Y=0 | Y=1 | Row sum (marginal X) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| X=0 | 0.45 | 0.15 | 0.60 |
| X=1 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.40 |
| Col sum | 0.65 | 0.35 | 1.00 |
So P(X=1, Y=1) = 0.20. Both books lose money on 20% of days in this toy history.
Marginals and Conditionals
Marginal of X: p_X(x) = Σ_y p(x, y). From the table, P(X=1) = 0.40. Marginal of Y: P(Y=1) = 0.35.
Conditional of Y given X=x: p(y|x) = p(x, y) / p_X(x). Given equity lost money (X=1):
P(Y=1|X=1) = 0.20 / 0.40 = 0.50, P(Y=0|X=1) = 0.20 / 0.40 = 0.50.
Unconditionally P(Y=1) = 0.35, so equity losses raise the chance of credit losses from 35% to 50%—dependence is visible without computing covariance yet.
For continuous vectors, joint PDFs f(x, y) replace matrices; marginals integrate; conditionals are f(x, y)/f_X(x).
Covariance, Correlation, and Independence
Covariance: Cov(X, Y) = E[(X − μ_X)(Y − μ_Y)] = E[XY] − μ_X μ_Y.
Correlation: ρ(X, Y) = Cov(X, Y) / (σ_X σ_Y), defined when σ_X, σ_Y > 0. Always −1 ≤ ρ ≤ 1. Correlation is invariant to positive scale changes of each variable separately; Cov(aX, bY) = a b Cov(X, Y).
Independence means the joint factors: p(x, y) = p_X(x)p_Y(y) for all x, y (or f(x, y) = f_X f_Y). Independence ⇒ Cov = 0 (when variances exist), but zero covariance does not imply independence in general. Classic counterexamples exist with nonlinear dependence. Special case: if (X, Y) are bivariate normal, then uncorrelated ⇔ independent.
Worked covariance on the 0–1 matrix
E[X] = 0.40, E[Y] = 0.35, E[XY] = P(X=1, Y=1) = 0.20. Cov(X, Y) = 0.20 − 0.40·0.35 = 0.20 − 0.14 = 0.06. Var(X) = 0.40·0.60 = 0.24, Var(Y) = 0.35·0.65 = 0.2275. ρ = 0.06 / √(0.24·0.2275) ≈ 0.06 / 0.2337 ≈ 0.257.
Positive correlation matches the conditional probability increase computed earlier.
| Concept | Definition / test | Common trap |
|---|---|---|
| Independence | Joint = product of marginals | Equating to “ρ = 0” always |
| Cov = 0 | Uncorrelated | Claiming independence |
| ρ = ±1 | Perfect linear relation | Claiming identical outcomes if scales differ |
| Bivariate normal | Uncorrelated ⇔ independent | Extending that equivalence to all laws |
Linear Transforms of Vectors
If Z = aX + bY + c, then E[Z] = aE[X] + bE[Y] + c and
Var(Z) = a²Var(X) + b²Var(Y) + 2ab Cov(X, Y).
For a portfolio return R_p = Σᵢ wᵢ Rᵢ,
Var(R_p) = Σᵢ wᵢ² σᵢ² + Σᵢ≠ⱼ wᵢ wⱼ Cov(Rᵢ, Rⱼ) = wᵀ Σ w
in matrix form, where Σ is the covariance matrix. Diversification works when covariances are small or negative; in stress, correlations often rise and Var(R_p) jumps even if weights are unchanged.
Worked two-asset variance
σ₁ = 20%, σ₂ = 30%, ρ = 0.4, w₁ = w₂ = 0.5. Var(R_p) = (0.5)²(0.20)² + (0.5)²(0.30)² + 2(0.5)(0.5)(0.4)(0.20)(0.30) = 0.25·0.04 + 0.25·0.09 + 0.5·0.4·0.06 = 0.010 + 0.0225 + 0.012 = 0.0445. σ_p = √0.0445 ≈ 21.1%.
Equal-weight average of standalone vols would be 25%; diversification cuts vol to ~21% here. If ρ → 1, σ_p → 0.5·20% + 0.5·30% = 25%. If ρ → 0, σ_p → √(0.010 + 0.0225) ≈ 18.0%.
Conditional Expectation
The conditional expectation E[Y|X = x] is the mean of the conditional distribution of Y given X = x. As a random variable, E[Y|X] is a function of X. It is the minimum mean-squared-error predictor of Y among functions of X. Tower property: E[E[Y|X]] = E[Y].
In the binary example, E[Y|X=1] = 0.50 and E[Y|X=0] = P(Y=1|X=0) = 0.15/0.60 = 0.25. Knowing X updates the expected credit-loss indicator.
Risk uses: forecasting losses given macro factors, expected exposure given market moves, and regression as linear conditional-mean modeling (later QA readings).
i.i.d. Sums
If X₁, …, Xₙ are i.i.d. with mean μ and variance σ², the sum Sₙ = Σᵢ Xᵢ satisfies E[Sₙ] = nμ and Var(Sₙ) = nσ², so Std(Sₙ) = σ√n. The sample mean X̄ = Sₙ/n has E[X̄] = μ and Std(X̄) = σ/√n—the √n risk-reduction law for independent risks.
Independence is essential for Var(Sₙ) = nσ². With pairwise correlation ρ among every pair (equal-correlation model),
Var(Sₙ) = nσ² + n(n−1)ρ σ² = nσ²[1 + (n−1)ρ],
which grows like n²ρ σ² when ρ > 0 is fixed—systematic risk that diversification cannot kill. That formula is why “many small independent loans” and “many loans tied to one factor” produce different capital answers.
Worked i.i.d. versus correlated
One-period losses on n = 100 exposures, each with σ = $1m.
- Independent: Std(S) = 1·√100 = $10m.
- Equal ρ = 0.2: Std(S) = √{100[1 + 99·0.2]} = √{100·20.8} = √2080 ≈ $45.6m.
Correlation multiplies portfolio risk far more than adding names reduces it.
Synthesis for Exam Day
Read joint tables carefully (marginals vs joints). Do not equate ρ = 0 with independence unless normality (or another listed special case) is given. For portfolio questions, write wᵀΣw or the two-asset expansion explicitly. Use conditional probabilities and E[Y|X] when information is revealed. For aggregation, ask whether risks are i.i.d. or factor-linked before applying √n rules.
From the worked joint matrix, P(Y=1|X=1) equals:
Which statement about correlation and independence is correct?
With σ₁=20%, σ₂=30%, ρ=0.4, and equal weights 0.5, portfolio volatility is closest to:
For n i.i.d. risks each with variance σ², the standard deviation of the sum Sₙ is: