13.3 Interest Rate Futures
Key Takeaways
- Money-market day-count conventions (ACT/360, ACT/365, 30/360) change accrued interest and discount-instrument pricing
- T-bill quotes are discount rates; convert carefully between discount, price, and bond-equivalent yield
- T-bond/note futures use clean prices, accrued interest, and conversion factors; the CTD minimizes net delivery cost
- Theoretical bond futures price links the CTD forward price to the conversion factor, adjusted for delivery options
- Duration-based hedge ratios size futures overlays but fail when yields curve-twist, CTD switches, or convexity differs
Interest Rate Futures
FMP–19 applies futures mechanics to short-term and long-term interest-rate contracts. Exam success hinges on day-count discipline, T-bill quote conversion, the Treasury futures delivery system (conversion factors and cheapest-to-deliver), and hedge sizing with duration—plus knowing when that hedge breaks.
Day-Count Conventions
Interest accrual depends on the market’s day-count:
| Convention | Typical use | Year basis |
|---|---|---|
| ACT/360 | U.S. money markets, T-bills, LIBOR-era deposits, many FRAs | Actual days / 360 |
| ACT/365 | Some sterling markets, certain gilts conventions | Actual days / 365 |
| 30/360 | Many U.S. corporates and agencies | 30-day months / 360 |
| ACT/ACT | U.S. Treasuries (notes/bonds) | Actual / actual |
Mis-applying ACT/360 versus ACT/ACT is a classic FRM trap when computing accrued interest or comparing instruments.
Worked accrued interest (Treasury-style sketch)
A Treasury note with semiannual coupon $3 per 100 par: if 45 actual days have elapsed in a 182-day coupon period (ACT/ACT), accrued ≈ 3 × (45/182) ≈ $0.7418 per 100. Under a wrong 30/360 assumption with 45 days in a 180-day half-year, accrued = 3 × (45/180) = $0.75—close but not identical; larger gaps appear near irregular periods.
T-Bill Discount and Price
U.S. T-bills are quoted on a bank discount basis:
Yd = [(Face − Price) / Face] × (360 / t)
Price = Face × [1 − Yd × (t / 360)]
where t = days to maturity. The discount yield understates the true investment rate because it uses Face in the denominator and a 360-day year. Bond-equivalent yield (semiannual) and effective annual yield require converting from price.
Worked T-bill price
Face $1,000,000; 90 days; discount quote Yd = 4.00%.
Price = 1,000,000 × [1 − 0.04 × (90/360)] = 1,000,000 × [1 − 0.01] = $990,000.
Holding-period return = 10,000 / 990,000 ≈ 1.0101%. Annualize with 365 days for a simple BEY-style measure: (10,000 / 990,000) × (365/90) ≈ 4.10%. Note 4.10% > 4.00% discount quote.
Reverse: price → discount
Price 992,500; t = 60; Face 1,000,000.
Yd = [(1,000,000 − 992,500)/1,000,000] × (360/60) = 0.0075 × 6 = 4.50%.
Clean vs Dirty Price and Accrued Interest
Treasury notes and bonds (and T-bond futures invoice amounts) separate:
- Clean price: quoted price without accrued
- Dirty price: clean + accrued = amount paid in the cash market
Futures invoice price for delivery ≈ (futures settlement price × conversion factor) + accrued interest on the delivered bond. Understanding clean versus dirty prevents double-counting accrued in hedge P&L.
Conversion Factor
The conversion factor (CF) scales bonds of different coupons and maturities into the futures’ 6% standard (for CBOT U.S. T-bond/note futures; confirm contract specs on the exam if a vignette gives a different standard).
Roughly, CF is the clean price per $1 face that the bond would have if its YTM equaled the futures’ standard rate (6%), with maturity rounded per exchange rules. High-coupon bonds have CF > 1; low-coupon bonds have CF < 1.
Invoice amount ≈ futures quote × CF × contract size scaling + accrued interest
Delivery Cost and Cheapest to Deliver (CTD)
Shorts in T-bond futures may deliver any eligible bond. They choose the cheapest-to-deliver (CTD)—the bond that maximizes the short’s profit (minimizes the cost of buying the bond and delivering).
A common ranking metric:
Delivery cost basis ≈ Dirty cash price − (futures settlement × CF + accrued)
Equivalently, traders watch basis = cash clean price − futures × CF. The CTD is typically the bond with the lowest basis (most negative / cheapest) after financing (forward basis / implied repo).
| Factor favoring CTD status | Intuition |
|---|---|
| Duration / coupon vs 6% standard | Low-coupon long bonds often CTD when yields > 6%; high-coupon when yields < 6% (classic rule of thumb) |
| Liquidity and repo specialness | Hard-to-finance bonds may not be CTD even if on paper |
| Delivery-option value | Timing, wild-card, and end-of-month options affect futures vs forward |
Worked CTD comparison (illustrative)
Futures settlement = 120-00 (120% of par). Bond A: clean 118, CF = 0.9750 → futures×CF = 117.00; basis = 118 − 117 = 1.00. Bond B: clean 131, CF = 1.1000 → futures×CF = 132.00; basis = 131 − 132 = −1.00. Bond B looks cheaper on this clean basis snapshot (more negative basis); financing and accrued can change the ranking—exam questions usually give enough numbers to compute which bond maximizes the short’s proceeds net of purchase cost.
Theoretical T-Bond Futures Price
For the CTD, in a frictionless market without delivery options:
Forward clean price of CTD ≈ (Cash dirty price − PV of coupons during forward period) × e^(rT) − accrued at forward date
(or the equivalent with discrete repo financing). Then:
Theoretical futures ≈ Forward clean price of CTD / CF_CTD
Actual futures trade below this forward/CF value by the value of the short’s delivery options (quality option among bonds, timing options). When the question says “ignore delivery options,” use Forward/CF. When it emphasizes options, futures < Forward/CF.
Worked theoretical futures (simplified)
CTD forward clean price = 99.00; CF = 0.9000. Theoretical futures (no options) = 99.00 / 0.9000 = 110.00. If delivery options are worth 0.40 futures points, futures ≈ 109.60.
Duration-Based Hedge Ratio
To hedge a bond portfolio with interest-rate futures:
N_f ≈ − (P × D_P) / (F × D_CTD / CF) or commonly N_f ≈ − (D_P P) / (D_F F)
where D_P is the portfolio’s duration, P portfolio value, F futures contract value (per contract), and D_F is the duration of the futures underlying (often approximated by CTD duration / CF, or given directly).
More precisely, many texts use:
Hedge ratio = (P_target × ModDur_target) / (P_CTD × ModDur_CTD) × CF
with sign negative for a short futures hedge of a long bond inventory.
Worked hedge ratio
Portfolio value $10,000,000; modified duration 7.0. CTD dirty price value corresponding to one futures ≈ $120,000; CTD modified duration 9.0; CF = 1.05. Approximate number of contracts to short:
N ≈ (10,000,000 × 7) / (120,000 × 9) × 1.05 ≈ 70,000,000 / 1,080,000 × 1.05 ≈ 64.81 × 1.05 ≈ 68 contracts (short).
(Exact formulas vary by whether F is futures invoice value or CTD value; follow the vignette’s definition.)
Limitations of Duration Hedges
Duration-based futures hedges assume:
- Parallel yield shifts — curve twists (2s10s steepeners) leave residual P&L
- Stable CTD — if the CTD switches when yields move, futures duration jumps
- Linear (duration-only) response — convexity differences between portfolio and CTD matter in large moves
- Spread risk — corporate or MBS portfolios hedged with Treasury futures retain OAS/spread exposure
- Delivery option effects — futures DV01 ≠ CTD DV01 / CF exactly when options are valuable
| Limitation | Practical implication |
|---|---|
| Nonparallel shifts | Use key-rate durations or multiple contracts |
| CTD switch | Rebalance; watch yield vs 6% region |
| Spread risk | Add CDS or credit futures overlays |
| Convexity | Options or barbell/bullet structure management |
Exam Synthesis
Convert T-bill discount quotes to prices before comparing returns. For bond futures, always ask: which bond is CTD, what is CF, and is the question ignoring delivery options? Size hedges with duration, then list why the hedge can fail—especially CTD switches and curve reshaping.
A 180-day T-bill with face 100 is quoted at a 5% discount. Its price is closest to:
The cheapest-to-deliver bond into T-bond futures is the eligible bond that:
Ignoring delivery options, if the CTD forward clean price is 108 and CF = 1.20, the theoretical futures price is:
A duration hedge of corporates using T-bond futures is most likely to underperform when: