7.2 Country of Origin Marking and Exceptions

7.2 Country of Origin Marking and Exceptions

Core Regulatory Tenet: Every imported article must be marked legibly, indelibly, conspicuously, and permanently in English with its country of origin (19 U.S.C. § 1304, 19 CFR Part 134) | Ultimate purchaser is the last person receiving goods in imported form (19 CFR 134.1(d)) | J-List items under 19 CFR 134.33 are exempt from marking on the article if containers are marked | CBP Form 4647 provides 30 days to mark or redeliver | Uncorrected marking violations trigger a mandatory 10% ad valorem Special Marking Duty under 19 U.S.C. § 1304(i).

The Statutory Mandate: Section 304 of the Tariff Act of 1930

The statutory requirement that foreign goods imported into the United States bear country of origin marking is codified in Section 304 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. § 1304), and implemented under Title 19 of the Code of Federal Regulations (19 CFR Part 134). The fundamental intent of Congress in enacting Section 304 was to ensure that the ultimate consumer in the United States is fully informed of the foreign origin of merchandise at the time of purchase, enabling consumers to exercise informed buying decisions based upon national origin.

Under 19 U.S.C. § 1304(a) and 19 CFR 134.11, the core marking mandate states:

"Every article of foreign origin (or its container, as provided in subsection (b) hereof) imported into the United States shall be marked in a conspicuous place as legibly, indelibly, and permanently as the nature of the article (or container) will permit, in such manner as to indicate to an ultimate purchaser in the United States the English name of the country of origin of the article."

The Four Qualitative Marking Standards (19 CFR 134.41)

To satisfy Section 304, every mark must fulfill four statutory qualitative standards:

1. Conspicuous Place: The mark must be positioned where it can be easily seen with casual handling of the article during normal retail inspection. It must not be hidden behind labels, beneath internal battery compartments, or concealed under linings.
2. Legibility: The mark must be clearly readable by an individual with normal eyesight. Blurred lettering, microscopically small typefaces, or colors that blend imperceptibly into the background violate the standard.
3. Indelibility and Permanence: The mark must withstand normal handling, shipping, and storage so that it remains intact until the article reaches the ultimate purchaser. While die-stamping, cast-in-the-mold lettering, etching, and engraving are preferred for durable goods, paper stickers or adhesive labels are legally acceptable only if they adhere firmly and cannot be removed without obvious defacement.
4. English Language: The country of origin must be expressed in the English language. Acceptable variants include recognized abbreviations or English spellings of foreign nations (e.g., "Great Britain", "UK", "Holland" for the Netherlands). Obscure abbreviations or acronyms (e.g., "ROK" for Republic of Korea, or "P.R.C." without China) are legally unacceptable. Adjectives alone ("French wine", "Swiss chocolate") are generally disfavored unless combined with the name of the country or preceded by clarifying words such as "Made in" or "Product of".

---

The Ultimate Purchaser Doctrine (19 CFR 134.1(d))

The entire marking framework hinges upon the statutory concept of the ultimate purchaser. Codified under 19 CFR 134.1(d):

$\text{Ultimate Purchaser} = \text{The last person in the United States who will receive the article in the form in which it was imported.}$

CBP regulations distinguish between commercial categories of purchasers:

• Retail Consumer: If an imported article is distributed through wholesale and retail distribution channels without undergoing manufacturing, the ultimate purchaser is the retail consumer who buys the product in a store or online.
• Manufacturing Processor (Substantial Transformation): Under the Gibson-Thomsen rule codified in 19 CFR 134.1(d)(1), if an imported article is sold to a domestic processor who subjects it to manufacturing resulting in substantial transformation (creating a new article with a new name, character, or use), that domestic processor is the ultimate purchaser. In this case, the individual component does not need to be marked, provided the container reaching the processor is marked.
• Non-Transforming Processor: Under 19 CFR 134.1(d)(2), if an imported component is subjected to minor assembly, repackaging, or finishing that does not substantially transform the article (Uniroyal or National Juice Products), the domestic processor is not the ultimate purchaser. The retail consumer who buys the finished item remains the ultimate purchaser; therefore, the foreign component itself must be marked, or the retail package must disclose the foreign origin of the component.
• Gift Recipients: When a retail purchaser buys an imported article as a gift, the purchaser—not the recipient of the gift—is the ultimate purchaser (19 CFR 134.1(d)(3)).
• Lessees and Long-Term Tenants: A person who leases an imported article for long-term commercial or personal use is considered the ultimate purchaser (19 CFR 134.1(d)(4)).

---

Statutory Marking Exceptions (19 U.S.C. § 1304(a)(3) & 19 CFR 134.32)

Congress recognized that marking every physical article of foreign commerce is physically or economically impossible. Section 304(a)(3) of the Tariff Act of 1930 and 19 CFR 134.32 enumerate statutory general exceptions where the article itself is exempt from marking (provided its immediate shipping or retail container is properly marked):

---

The J-List (19 CFR 134.33)

Under the authority of Section 304(a)(3)(J), Congress authorized the Secretary of the Treasury to publish an enumerated list of specific agricultural, raw, and industrial commodities that were imported in substantial quantities prior to 1937 and were seldom or never marked. This list is codified in 19 CFR 134.33 as the J-List.

Scope and Operational Mechanics of the J-List

Articles appearing on the J-List are exempt from marking on the article itself. However, this exemption is strictly conditional:

MANDATORY CONTAINER CONDITION (19 CFR 134.33): The outermost containers in which J-List articles are imported, or the retail containers in which they reach the ultimate purchaser, must be marked with the country of origin in accordance with 19 CFR Part 134.

Representative articles on the J-List include:

• Agricultural & Perishable Goods: Artichokes, bananas, cut flowers, eggs, fresh fruits and vegetables, livestock, mushrooms, nuts, sugar, and Christmas trees.
• Raw Industrial & Construction Materials: Bricks, building blocks, ceramic tiles, crude rubber, feathers, hides, raw leather, rough lumber, metal bars, coils of wire, nails, rivets, screws, bolts, and nuts.

Repackaging of J-List and Exempt Merchandise (19 CFR 134.25 & 134.26)

When J-List merchandise or other bulk exempt goods are imported and will be repackaged into retail containers by the importer or intermediate distributor, strict notification rules apply. Under 19 CFR 134.25, the importer must certify on CBP Form 7501 (or ACE equivalent) that the repacked retail containers will be properly marked with country of origin, or provide written notice to subsequent repackers under 19 CFR 134.26 informing them of their legal marking obligation. Failure to comply subjects the importer to liquidated damages under the customs bond.

---

Container Marking Rules: Usual vs. Unusual Containers (19 CFR 134.22–134.24)

Customs regulations establish distinct marking rules for containers based upon their commercial nature:

1. Usual Containers (19 CFR 134.22 & 134.24)

Usual containers are standard commercial packaging designed solely for the transportation, protection, and retail sale of goods (e.g., cardboard boxes, tin cans, glass bottles, paper bags). If the merchandise inside is marked and visible (such as through transparent plastic shrink-wrap), the usual container may not need separate marking. However, if the contents are concealed or exempt from marking (e.g., J-List items), the usual container must be marked with the country of origin of the contents (e.g., "Product of Mexico").

2. Unusual Containers (19 CFR 134.23)

Unusual containers are specialized, decorative, or durable receptacles that possess independent commercial utility and are not customary for the goods they hold (e.g., a carved silver tea caddy containing loose tea, an ornate porcelain decanter holding spirits, or a leather golf bag holding golf balls). Unusual containers must be classified and dutied separately under the HTSUS (General Rule of Interpretation 5(a)), and must be separately marked to indicate the country of origin of the container itself:

$\text{Unusual Container Marking} = \text{Container Made in Italy --- Contents Made in India}$

---

Misleading and Deceptive Markings (19 CFR 134.46 & 134.47)

A high-frequency topic on the CBLE involves imported articles bearing markings that could mislead an ultimate purchaser regarding true geographic origin.

The Strict Mandate of 19 CFR 134.46

When the name of any city, state, or locality in the United States—or any foreign country or locality other than the actual country of origin—appears on an imported article or its packaging, 19 CFR 134.46 applies strictly. This occurs frequently when products bear corporate headquarters addresses (e.g., "Acme Corp, Chicago, IL"), design credits ("Designed in California"), or foreign brand names ("Milano Collection"):

REGULATORY STANDARD (19 CFR 134.46): The actual country of origin must appear in close proximity to the domestic or non-origin reference, in at least a comparable size, and preceded by clarifying words such as "Made in", "Product of", or "Manufactured in" (e.g., "Acme Corp, Chicago, IL — Made in Vietnam").

Souvenirs (19 CFR 134.47)

Under 19 CFR 134.47, souvenir articles bearing the name of a U.S. city, state, or landmark (e.g., "Grand Canyon, Arizona" printed across a ceramic mug made in China) must be marked with the true country of origin in a conspicuous place legibly and permanently (e.g., "Made in China" stamped on the bottom of the mug).

---

Enforcement: CBP Form 4647 and the 10% Special Marking Duty

When CBP inspects merchandise and discovers that an article or its container is not marked, is marked illegibly, or bears misleading markings, CBP enforces compliance through administrative notices and statutory exactions.

CBP Discovers Marking Violation
                 │
                 ▼
CBP Issues Form 4647 (Notice to Mark and/or Notice to Redeliver)
                 │
     ┌───────────┴───────────┐
     ▼                       ▼
Importer Complies       Importer Fails to Comply
Within 30 Days          Within 30 Calendar Days
     │                       │
     ├─ Marks Goods Under    ├─ Breach of Bond Conditions
     │  CBP Supervision      │  Liquidated Damages Assessed
     ├─ Exports Cargo, or    │  (19 CFR Part 113)
     └─ Destroys Goods       │
     │                       ▼
     ▼                  Merchandise Not Marked Before Liquidation
Goods Released               │
No Penalty                   ▼
                        MANDATORY 10% SPECIAL MARKING DUTY
                        Assessed on Customs Appraised Value
                        (19 U.S.C. § 1304(i) / 19 CFR 134.54)

1. CBP Form 4647 (Notice to Mark and/or Notice to Redeliver)

Under 19 CFR 134.51, the port director transmits CBP Form 4647 to the importer of record. The form directs the importer to properly mark the merchandise, export it, or destroy it under CBP supervision. The importer is granted strictly 30 calendar days from the date of the notice to execute compliance. The importer must certify completion on Form 4647 and submit sample photographs or allow CBP physical re-examination.

2. Demand for Redelivery and Liquidated Damages (19 CFR 134.54(a))

If merchandise has already been released from CBP physical custody under bond and the importer fails to properly mark, export, or destroy the goods within 30 days of Form 4647 issuance, CBP issues a Demand for Redelivery. Failure to redeliver the cargo to CBP custody constitutes a breach of customs bond terms under 19 CFR Part 113, triggering liquidated damages equal to the entered value of the goods (or up to three times entered value if restricted or quota goods).

3. The 10% Special Marking Duty (19 U.S.C. § 1304(i))

If merchandise is not properly marked, exported, or destroyed prior to liquidation of the entry, Section 304(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930 imposes a mandatory statutory exaction:

$\text{10\% Special Marking Duty} = 0.10 \times \text{Customs Appraised Value}$

Key legal rules tested on the CBLE regarding the 10% marking duty:

• Mandatory Assessment: Assessment is mandatory by statute; CBP has zero administrative discretion to waive the 10% duty if unmarked goods liquidate.
• Additional to Regular Duties: It is assessed in addition to regular customs duties, AD/CVD duties, and trade remedies.
• Not a Fine or Penalty: The 10% marking duty is legally an exaction or supplemental customs duty. Therefore, it is contested via an administrative protest under 19 U.S.C. § 1514(a)(3), not via a petition for mitigation under Section 1592/1618.

---

Comprehensive Summary Table: Marking Rules, Exceptions, and Form 4647