3.1 The Valuation Hierarchy and Price Actually Paid or Payable

3.1 The Valuation Hierarchy and Price Actually Paid or Payable

Quick Answer: Customs appraisement in the United States is governed strictly by Section 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Trade Agreements Act of 1979 (19 U.S.C. § 1401a) and codified in 19 CFR Part 152. Customs appraisers must follow an unbending statutory sequence of six valuation methods: (1) Transaction Value of Imported Merchandise, (2) Transaction Value of Identical Merchandise, (3) Transaction Value of Similar Merchandise, (4) Deductive Value, (5) Computed Value, and (6) the Fallback Method. The only exception to this sequence is the importer's statutory right under 19 U.S.C. § 1401a(a)(2) to invert the order of Deductive and Computed Value by filing a written election with CBP at or before filing the entry summary.

The Statutory Hierarchy of Valuation

Every commercial shipment entered into the commerce of the United States must be appraised under one—and only one—statutory valuation basis. U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officers and licensed customs brokers are legally bound to follow a strict sequential hierarchy. An appraiser cannot skip a primary method to reach a secondary method unless the preceding basis cannot be determined under the statute.

1. Transaction Value of Imported Merchandise (19 U.S.C. § 1401a(b))
   ↓ [If rejected or cannot be determined]
2. Transaction Value of Identical Merchandise (19 U.S.C. § 1401a(c))
   ↓ [If unavailable]
3. Transaction Value of Similar Merchandise (19 U.S.C. § 1401a(c))
   ↓ [If unavailable]
4. Deductive Value (19 U.S.C. § 1401a(d))  ←→  5. Computed Value (19 U.S.C. § 1401a(e))
   [Order may be inverted upon written importer request at entry summary]
   ↓ [If both unavailable]
6. Fallback Method (19 U.S.C. § 1401a(f))

1. Transaction Value of Imported Merchandise (19 U.S.C. § 1401a(b))

Transaction value is the primary basis of appraisement and is used for the great majority of commercial importations into the United States. Under 19 CFR 152.103, transaction value is defined as the Price Actually Paid or Payable (PAPP) for the merchandise when sold for exportation to the United States, plus specific statutory additions (packing, selling commissions, assists, royalties, and resale proceeds) to the extent they are not already included in the invoice price.

2. Transaction Value of Identical Merchandise (19 U.S.C. § 1401a(c))

If transaction value cannot be determined (e.g., consignment shipments where no sale occurred, or transactions where relationship influenced the price), CBP turns to the transaction value of merchandise that is identical in physical characteristics, quality, and reputation, produced in the same country, and exported at or about the same time as the imported goods (19 CFR 152.104).

3. Transaction Value of Similar Merchandise (19 U.S.C. § 1401a(c))

If no identical goods transaction value exists, CBP looks to similar merchandise: goods produced in the same country that, while not alike in all respects, have like characteristics and component materials that enable them to perform the same functions and be commercially interchangeable.

4. Deductive Value (19 U.S.C. § 1401a(d))

Deductive value is essentially the resale price of the merchandise in the United States to unrelated buyers, minus statutory deductions for U.S. profit and general expenses (or commissions), international and domestic transportation and insurance, customs duties, and federal taxes (19 CFR 152.105).

5. Computed Value (19 U.S.C. § 1401a(e))

Computed value builds the customs value from the ground up using the foreign manufacturer's production records. It comprises the cost of materials, fabrication, packing, and an amount for profit and general expenses equal to that usually reflected in sales of merchandise of the same class or kind by producers in the country of exportation (19 CFR 152.106).

6. The Fallback Method (19 U.S.C. § 1401a(f))

When value cannot be determined under any preceding method, the fallback method permits appraisement based on a flexible adaptation of the prior methods using reasonable means consistent with statutory principles, subject to seven explicit statutory prohibitions.

---

The Importer's Statutory Right of Reversal

A perennial high-frequency CBLE test question centers on 19 U.S.C. § 1401a(a)(2) and 19 CFR 152.101(c). Under this statutory provision:

The importer may elect to reverse the order of application of Deductive Value and Computed Value.

Procedural Requirements for Inversion

• Form of Election: The election must be made in writing by the importer of record.
• Filing Deadline: The written request must be submitted to the Center of Excellence and Expertise (Center) director or port director at or before the time the entry summary (CBP Form 7501) is filed.
• Subsequent Reversion: If the importer elects Computed Value first, but the foreign manufacturer's cost accounting data cannot be substantiated or verified within a reasonable time, CBP does not drop straight to the Fallback method; instead, appraisement reverts to Deductive Value before Fallback is considered.
• CBP Discretion: CBP does not have the authority to unilaterally invert this order. The right belongs exclusively to the importer.

---

Price Actually Paid or Payable (PAPP)

Under 19 U.S.C. § 1401a(b)(4)(A) and 19 CFR 152.102(f), the Price Actually Paid or Payable is defined as:

"The total payment (whether direct or indirect, and exclusive of any costs, charges, or expenses incurred for transportation, insurance, and related services incident to the international shipment of the merchandise from the country of exportation to the place of importation in the United States) made, or to be made, for imported merchandise by the buyer to, or for the benefit of, the seller."

Direct vs. Indirect Payments

The scope of PAPP is expansive, governed by the judicial precedent Generra Sportswear Co. v. United States, 905 F.2d 377 (Fed. Cir. 1990), which established the legal presumption that all payments made by the buyer to the seller, or to a third party for the benefit of the seller, are part of the dutiable price.

Commercial Discounts and Rebates

Customs valuation treats price adjustments with strict temporal distinctions:

1. Cash and Quantity Discounts (19 CFR 152.103(a)(1)): Prompt-payment discounts and trade discounts are permissible reductions from PAPP if they were agreed upon prior to the time of entry summary filing (or entry filing if entry is made under immediate delivery). Even if the cash discount has not yet been earned at the time of entry, if the sales contract established the discount schedule prior to entry, CBP will appraise the merchandise net of the discount.
2. Post-Importation Rebates (19 U.S.C. § 1401a(b)(4)(B)): The statute contains an unbending rule: "Any rebate of, or other decrease in, the price actually paid or payable made or effected between the buyer and seller after the date of importation of the merchandise into the United States shall be disregarded in determining the transaction value." If an importer discovers minor defects after arrival and negotiates a $10,000 price concession, that renegotiation has zero effect on customs value. The entered value remains the original invoice price.
3. Latent Defects vs. Renegotiations: If goods do not conform to specifications at the time of importation (e.g., completely ruined in transit before arrival, or breached warranty existing prior to importation), the importer may pursue administrative relief under 19 CFR 158.12 (merchandise partially damaged or defective at entry), which requires proving the condition existed at the time of importation, rather than relying on a post-importation commercial rebate.

---

Mandatory Disqualifications from Transaction Value

Under 19 U.S.C. § 1401a(b)(2) and 19 CFR 152.103(j), Transaction Value cannot be used if any of the following four conditions exist:

1. Disposition or Use Restrictions: There are restrictions on the disposition or use of the goods by the buyer, other than restrictions that are imposed by law, limit the geographic area in which the goods may be resold, or do not substantially affect the value of the goods.
2. Unquantifiable Conditions/Considerations: The sale or price is subject to a condition or consideration for which a value cannot be determined (e.g., seller sells widget A for $5 only if buyer also purchases 1,000 units of widget B at an inflated price, or price depends on non-customs barter).
3. Unquantifiable Subsequent Proceeds: Part of the proceeds of any subsequent resale, disposal, or use accrues directly or indirectly to the seller, and an appropriate statutory addition cannot be calculated based on objective and quantifiable data.
4. Unacceptable Related-Party Pricing: The buyer and seller are related (under 19 U.S.C. § 1401a(g)), and the importer fails to establish that the relationship did not influence the price under the Circumstances of the Sale test or Test Values test.

---

Summary Comparison of the Six Appraisement Methods