6.1 Jurat Requirements
Key Takeaways
- A jurat requires the signer to sign the document in the notary's presence
- The signer must take an oath or affirmation administered verbally before the notary completes the act
- California Civil Code section 1185 governs identity proof; a jurat allows ID documents or credible witnesses
- Every jurat must carry the boxed Civil Code section 1189 disclaimer stating the notary verifies identity only, not truthfulness
- The notary certifies that the signer swore the contents are true, NOT that the contents are actually true
What a California Jurat Actually Requires
A woman hands you an affidavit she signed at home yesterday. At the bottom you read "Subscribed and sworn to before me." You must refuse to attach a jurat to that signature. A jurat is the only common California notarial act that forces the signer to do two things in front of you, neither of which has happened yet.
Under California Civil Code section 1185 and the 2026 California Notary Public Handbook, a jurat has exactly two non-negotiable elements:
| Element | Statutory rule | If missing |
|---|---|---|
| Signature in your presence | The affiant must sign the document while you watch | No valid jurat-pre-signed paper is not allowed |
| Verbal oath or affirmation | You administer it aloud; signer answers "I do" | No valid jurat-a silent signing is not sworn |
Both must occur, in that order, before you complete the certificate. A jurat with only a signature is really an acknowledgment in disguise, and notarizing it as a jurat is a serious error tested heavily on the exam.
Jurat vs. Acknowledgment-The Single Most-Tested Contrast
Roughly one in eight exam questions turns on telling these two acts apart. Memorize this grid cold:
| Feature | Jurat | Acknowledgment |
|---|---|---|
| Sign in your presence? | REQUIRED | Not required-may be pre-signed |
| Oath/affirmation? | REQUIRED | Never |
| What the signer affirms | "The contents are true" | "I executed this document" |
| Trigger wording | "Subscribed and sworn to before me" | "Acknowledged before me ... executed the same" |
| Typical documents | Affidavits, declarations, depositions | Deeds, powers of attorney, trusts |
Memory hook: Jurat = Just signed now + Judge me (sworn). Acknowledgment = Already signed, just Admitting it was me.
Reading the certificate, not the document
Never decide the act from the document's title. Read the certificate wording the customer brings, because that is what the law you are signing requires:
- "Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me" -> jurat
- "Affirmed before me" / "Sworn to" -> jurat
- "Acknowledged before me" / "executed the same" -> acknowledgment
If the document has no certificate, you may not choose the act for the signer-that is the unauthorized practice of law. Ask the signer or the document's drafter which is needed.
The Two Elements in Practice, Plus the Pre-Signed Trap
Element 1-signing in your presence
If the affiant already signed, you have three clean fixes:
- Have them strike the old signature and sign anew in your presence.
- Have them re-sign on a fresh line and initial the change.
- If neither works, decline and tell them to return ready to sign.
Element 2-the verbal oath or affirmation
A jurat oath must be spoken. Silently pointing at the form does not count. A typical script:
"Do you solemnly swear (or affirm) that the statements in this document are true and correct?" - Signer: "I do."
Identity proof for a jurat
Civil Code section 1185 lets you identify a jurat signer by (a) acceptable ID documents (current or issued within 5 years-California DL/ID, U.S. passport, etc.) or (b) the oath of credible witnesses. Personal knowledge is NOT a permitted method for a jurat in California-this is a classic trap, because personal knowledge is allowed for acknowledgments. Always verify identity for a jurat with documents or credible witnesses.
The Certificate, the Disclaimer Box, and Journaling
California mandates the exact jurat certificate wording. Since 2015, every jurat (and acknowledgment) must carry a boxed disclaimer at the top of the certificate, required by Civil Code section 1189:
"A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document."
The certificate body then reads, in substance:
| Field | Example entry |
|---|---|
| Venue | State of California, County of Los Angeles |
| Statement | Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me |
| Date | on this 14th day of June, 2026 |
| Signer | by Jane A. Doe |
| ID basis | proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence |
| Notary signature & seal | (your signature + photographically reproducible seal) |
Journal entry
Log every jurat in your sequential journal: date and time, type of act (jurat), document title/date, signer's name and signature, the ID method, and the fee. The maximum fee per signature for a jurat is $15 in California. The journal entry must note that an oath was administered.
What you do and do not certify
| You DO certify | You do NOT certify |
|---|---|
| The signer personally appeared | The contents are true |
| The signer signed in your presence | The document is legally valid |
| You administered an oath/affirmation | The signer is honest |
If the signer lies, that is perjury (Penal Code section 118)-their crime, not yours. Expect 3-4 exam items here: pre-signed documents, the personal-knowledge trap, the section 1189 box, and the "truth vs. sworn-to-truth" distinction.
What two things are required for a California jurat that are NOT required for an acknowledgment?
When performing a jurat, what is the notary actually certifying?
A signer wants a jurat but you only know them through personal knowledge. What is the problem?