3.2 Arizona General Liability Insurance
Key Takeaways
- Arizona allocates damages by pure comparative negligence (A.R.S. 12-2505) and applies several-only liability under A.R.S. 12-2506 — each defendant pays only its own percentage, with narrow exceptions.
- Joint and several liability survives only when defendants act 'in concert,' for an agent/principal relationship, or where a party is held vicariously liable.
- Commercial General Liability (CGL) and most commercial casualty rates are 'file-and-use' through the Department of Insurance and Financial Institutions (DIFI).
- Punitive damages are generally NOT insurable in Arizona as against public policy, though vicarious punitive liability may be covered.
- Arizona products-liability claims face a 2-year statute of limitations and a 12-year statute of repose; medical malpractice requires expert certification and has a 2-year discovery-rule limit.
Pure Comparative Negligence Meets Several Liability
Arizona pairs two doctrines that examiners love to contrast. Pure comparative negligence (A.R.S. 12-2505) governs how much a plaintiff recovers; several-only liability (A.R.S. 12-2506) governs how much each defendant pays.
A.R.S. 12-2506 abolished joint and several liability. In a personal-injury, property-damage, or wrongful-death action, 'the liability of each defendant is several only and is not joint.' Each defendant is liable only for its own percentage of fault — a plaintiff can no longer collect an entire judgment from one 'deep-pocket' co-defendant.
| Feature | Arizona rule |
|---|---|
| Default allocation | Several only — each pays its own % |
| Collect 100% from one defendant? | No (except listed exceptions) |
| Fault assigned to non-parties? | Yes — reduces named defendants' shares |
| Who apportions fault | The trier of fact, as a whole, at one time |
Worked example. A jury finds $100,000 in damages: Defendant A 60% at fault, Defendant B 40%. A pays $60,000; B pays $40,000. If B is insolvent, the plaintiff cannot force A to cover B's $40,000.
Exceptions where joint liability survives
- Defendants acting in concert (a common plan/design).
- A defendant acting as the agent or servant of another.
- A party held vicariously liable for another's fault.
- Certain hazardous-substance and federal-environmental claims.
Why this matters to a casualty producer
Because Arizona apportions fault to non-parties (people not sued, including the plaintiff's employer or a settled defendant), a CGL or auto liability insurer's exposure depends on the named insured's share — not the full judgment. A defendant whose share is small pays only that share, so liability limits are sized against likely allocated fault, not the gross verdict. The flip side: a plaintiff who cannot reach a key tortfeasor (insolvent, immune, or unidentified) absorbs that uncollectible share, reinforcing the value of first-party UM/UIM and umbrella coverage.
Commercial General Liability (CGL) and Rate Regulation
The Commercial General Liability (CGL) policy is the backbone of business casualty coverage. Producers should be able to read the declarations and explain the trigger and limits structure.
| CGL element | Key point |
|---|---|
| Coverage A | Bodily injury & property damage liability |
| Coverage B | Personal & advertising injury |
| Coverage C | Medical payments (no-fault, small limits) |
| Trigger | Occurrence (when injury happens) vs. claims-made (when claim is reported) |
| Limits | Per-occurrence limit + aggregate cap per policy term |
| Defense costs | Usually outside the limit (in addition to), with a duty to defend |
Arizona regulates commercial casualty rates on a file-and-use basis through the Department of Insurance and Financial Institutions (DIFI):
- Rates and forms are filed with DIFI and may be used immediately.
- Filings must be supported by actuarial data and may not be excessive, inadequate, or unfairly discriminatory.
- DIFI may disapprove a rate after the fact (post-implementation review).
Punitive Damages: Generally Uninsurable
Unlike some states (e.g., Texas), Arizona courts hold that insuring one's own punitive damages violates public policy, because shifting the punishment to an insurer defeats deterrence.
| Situation | Insurable in Arizona? |
|---|---|
| Insured's own punitive damages | Generally NO |
| Vicarious punitive liability (employer for employee) | May be covered |
| Compensatory damages | Yes |
Products, Malpractice, and Time Limits
Arizona casualty exposures are shaped by statutes of limitation and repose:
- Products liability: strict liability for manufacturing defects; 2-year statute of limitations from injury; a 12-year statute of repose generally bars suits for products sold more than 12 years earlier.
- Medical malpractice: 2-year limit under the discovery rule; a preliminary expert opinion / certification of merit is required to proceed. Arizona's constitution bars caps on damages, so recovery is unlimited.
- General negligence/personal injury: 2-year statute of limitations (A.R.S. 12-542).
Professional Liability and Occurrence vs. Claims-Made
Many Arizona professionals carry or are encouraged to carry liability (errors & omissions) coverage:
| Profession | Arizona treatment |
|---|---|
| Attorneys | Must disclose to clients if they carry no malpractice coverage |
| Architects / engineers | E&O commonly required for state/public contracts |
| Real estate licensees | A state recovery fund offers limited consumer protection |
| Insurance producers | E&O strongly recommended; not state-mandated |
Professional and CGL liability hinge on the coverage trigger, a frequent exam item:
- Occurrence policies cover injury that happens during the policy term, no matter when the claim is reported — better for long-tail exposures.
- Claims-made policies cover claims first made during the term (subject to a retroactive date); when the policy ends, an insured buys an extended reporting period (tail) to cover late-reported claims for prior acts. A gap between a claims-made expiration and a new occurrence policy can leave prior acts uninsured if no tail is purchased — a frequent client-service issue producers must flag at renewal.
Exam tip: Don't confuse the doctrines. Comparative negligence cuts the plaintiff's award; several liability splits the defendants' checks. Memorize: pure comparative + several-only + punitive damages uninsurable = the Arizona liability profile.
A jury awards $200,000 and assigns Defendant X 25% fault and Defendant Y 75% fault. Y is bankrupt. Under A.R.S. 12-2506, how much can the plaintiff collect from X?
Under Arizona public policy, are an insured's own punitive damages typically covered by liability insurance?
Which time limit best matches Arizona products-liability law?