5.3 Service Discontinuities
Key Takeaways
- Service discontinuities form during operation under load, environment, temperature, or time—not during primary production or shop manufacturing of a sound part.
- Major families: fatigue (initiation/propagation, beach marks), corrosion forms, creep, wear, overload fracture, hydrogen embrittlement in service, and stress corrosion cracking (SCC).
- In-service inspection (ISI) thinking prioritizes high-stress sites, corrosive environments, thermal gradients, and prior indication history—not uniform scanning of every surface equally.
- Level III roles include procedure design for ISI, method selection for expected damage mechanisms, and distinguishing manufacturing remnants from new service growth.
5.3 Service Discontinuities
Quick Answer: Service discontinuities form after a component enters operation, under mechanical load, environment, temperature, radiation, or time-dependent degradation. Core families for Basic include fatigue, corrosion (several forms), creep, wear, overload fracture, hydrogen embrittlement in service, and stress corrosion cracking (SCC). Level III work emphasizes damage-mechanism thinking and in-service inspection (ISI) prioritization—not only naming crack types.
A part can leave the shop sound and still fail years later. Origin class tracks that timeline: if the free surface or crack grew in service, classify it as service, even when it started at a processing stress raiser (the raiser may be processing; the propagated crack is service damage).
Fatigue
Fatigue is progressive, localized permanent damage from cyclic stress below the material’s static ultimate strength.
Initiation and propagation
- Initiation: microcracks form at stress concentrators—fillets, welds toes, corrosion pits, tool marks, inclusions at the surface, fretting contacts.
- Propagation: the crack advances incrementally each cycle (or block of cycles).
- Final fracture: remaining ligament fails by overload (often ductile or brittle thumbnail remainder).
Beach marks and fracture appearance
Beach marks (clamshell marks) are macroscopic arrest or load-change marks on the fatigue fracture surface. They indicate progressive growth under variable amplitude or intermittent operation. Microscopic striations (when present) are cycle-by-cycle features used in failure analysis; Basic-level recognition is that progressive, smooth, thumbnail cracks from stress raisers scream fatigue until proven otherwise.
| Fatigue cue | NDT / Level III implication |
|---|---|
| Starts at surface stress raiser | Surface methods (MT, PT, ET, VT) highly relevant early |
| Planar crack roughly perpendicular to principal tensile stress | UT shear-wave / phased array for depth sizing in many geometries |
| Multiple initiation sites | Inspect all similar geometric details, not one crack only |
| Weld toe / HAZ preference | Focus ISI at toes, attachments, and misalignment peaks |
Fatigue is service even if initiation was helped by a machining notch (processing) or an inclusion (inherent). Exam answers should still identify the active damage mode as service fatigue when growth occurred in operation.
Corrosion Types (Service Context)
Corrosion converts metal to compounds through chemical or electrochemical reaction. Forms that drive NDT planning:
| Form | Brief mechanism | Typical NDT focus |
|---|---|---|
| Uniform (general) thinning | Broad surface metal loss | UT thickness gauging, RT for remaining wall |
| Pitting | Localized anodic attack | VT, UT (pit depth), ET; pits initiate fatigue/SCC |
| Crevice corrosion | Stagnant chemistry in gaps | VT of joints, under deposits; hard to access |
| Galvanic | Dissimilar metal couple | Inspect joints of dissimilar couples |
| Erosion-corrosion | Flow-assisted metal loss | UT grid on elbows, tees, downstream of orifices |
| MIC (microbiologically influenced) | Biofilms accelerate attack | Localized pitting patterns; combined VT/UT |
| Intergranular | Preferential boundary attack | ET, PT of cracked surface, metallography |
Corrosion products can mask or fill cracks, reducing PT sensitivity—Level III procedures address cleaning and method limits.
Creep
Creep is time-dependent plastic deformation under sustained load at elevated temperature (roughly above ~0.4 T<sub>m</sub> absolute for many metals, alloy-dependent). Damage progresses from microvoids on grain boundaries to aligned cavities and eventual intergranular cracking.
ISI thinking for creep-sensitive equipment (steam lines, furnace tubes, turbine components):
- Prioritize high-temperature, high-stress locations (bends, welds, reduced sections)
- Expect volumetric and surface methods depending on stage; replication/metallography often complements NDT
- Dimensional monitoring (strain) may be part of the integrity program alongside crack detection
Creep is pure service (or at least operational) degradation—not a mill inclusion class.
Wear
Wear removes material by contact: adhesive, abrasive, fretting, or erosive mechanisms. Discontinuities include:
- Loss of section and altered geometry
- Fretting cracks at clamped interfaces under micro-motion
- Embedded abrasive and surface smearing that hide cracks
NDT roles: VT and dimensional checks first; MT/PT/ET where fretting cracks are suspected; UT for remaining thickness under wear scars. Wear often interacts with fatigue at fretted surfaces.
Overload Fracture
Overload is single-event (or few-event) fracture when applied stress exceeds the load-carrying capacity of the remaining section. Features:
- Little progressive beach-mark history on the final fracture face (though overload may finish a fatigue crack)
- Gross plastic deformation in ductile materials; crystalline cleavage facets in brittle fractures
- May follow an impact, overpressure, or collision
NDT after overload events focuses on adjacent structure for secondary cracks and on confirming whether a pre-existing fatigue or manufacturing flaw reduced the section. The overload event itself is a service/operational failure mode.
Hydrogen Embrittlement in Service
Hydrogen embrittlement (HE) reduces ductility and promotes brittle cracking when atomic hydrogen is present under tensile stress. Sources in service include:
- Corrosion reactions generating hydrogen
- High-pressure hydrogen service
- Cathodic protection systems under some conditions
- Residual hydrogen from prior processes that was not fully baked out (borderline processing vs service—if cracking occurs in operation under stress, treat as service HE for ISI purposes; if cracking occurred right after plating, processing)
Cracks can be internal or surface-connected, often with little plastic deformation. Method selection depends on material and access: UT for internal cracks in susceptible alloys; MT/PT when surface-breaking; process and environmental controls remain primary prevention.
Stress Corrosion Cracking (SCC)
SCC requires a susceptible material, a specific environment, and tensile stress (applied or residual). Cracks may be intergranular or transgranular depending on the system (e.g., austenitic stainless in chlorides; brass in ammonia; high-strength steels in certain aqueous environments).
| SCC feature | Level III implication |
|---|---|
| Often branched crack networks | PT/MT for surface; UT for depth; do not assume single planar fatigue crack |
| May grow with little general corrosion | Clean appearance does not mean “no SCC” |
| Residual weld stress is enough | As-welded stainless systems need environmental control and focused ISI |
| Incubation then rapid growth | Interval-based inspection may miss late-stage acceleration—risk-based programs help |
SCC is a flagship service discontinuity family on Basic exams because it forces multi-factor reasoning.
In-Service Inspection Thinking for Level III
Shop manufacturing inspection asks: “Did we make it right?” ISI asks: “How is it degrading, and where first?”
Prioritization framework
- Damage mechanism — fatigue, corrosion, creep, SCC, HE, wear, overload risk
- Locations of high driving force — stress concentrators, welds, supports, thermal gradients, flow disturbances, stagnant crevices
- Detectability — surface vs embedded; insulation; coating; access
- Consequence — leak, fracture, toxic release, structural collapse
- History — prior repairs, known thin areas, previous indications, process upsets
Method orientation for service damage
| Expected service damage | Often primary methods |
|---|---|
| Surface fatigue at fillets/welds | VT, MT/PT, ET; UT for sizing |
| Internal fatigue / embedded cracks | UT (including phased array where used) |
| Wall thinning / erosion | UT thickness grids, RT profile |
| SCC / branched surface cracks | PT/MT + UT depth; environmental review |
| Creep cavitation (early) | Replication/metallography + targeted NDT of cracks |
| Hydrogen cracks | UT/MT depending on location; process review |
Distinguishing old manufacturing flaws from new service growth
Level III procedures and evaluation rules must separate:
- Non-growing manufacturing remnants within acceptance limits
- Active service cracks that require repair, re-rate, or retirement
Tools include sizing trending, fracture-surface/history review, load and environment logs, and comparison to baseline inspections. A midwall lamination present at fabrication is inherent; a new crack growing from a corrosion pit after ten years is service.
Integrated Origin Triad (Exam Close)
| Question | Inherent | Processing | Service |
|---|---|---|---|
| When? | Material production | Manufacturing of the part | Operation |
| Example | Inclusion stringer, pipe, segregation | Quench crack, weld LOF, grinding crack | Fatigue, SCC, creep, pitting |
| Typical first methods | UT/RT for internal; MT/PT if opened | Surface methods after grind/weld/quench; RT/UT for welds | Mechanism-driven mix + ISI focus |
Master this triad and Domain 4 scenario questions become systematic: read the history → assign origin class → predict morphology → select methods and inspection timing.
Beach marks on a fracture surface of a rotating shaft fillet most strongly indicate which damage process?
Stress corrosion cracking (SCC) requires which combination of factors?
Which inspection strategy best reflects Level III in-service inspection thinking for a high-temperature steam line susceptible to creep?
A corrosion pit forms on a pressure vessel shell in service, and years later a fatigue crack propagates from the pit under cyclic pressure. How should the growing crack be classified by origin class?