5.2 Processing Discontinuities

Key Takeaways

  • Processing discontinuities are introduced during manufacturing of the component: forming, machining, grinding, welding, heat treatment, plating, and related operations.
  • Map process → expected flaw: quench cracks after rapid cool, grinding burns/cracks after abusive grind, weld LOF/porosity/cracks in fusion joining, forming cracks at high strain locations.
  • Many processing flaws are surface-connected at introduction; others (subsurface weld defects, internal forging bursts) need volumetric methods.
  • Inspection sequence matters: inspect after the process that creates the risk (e.g., after quench and finish grind) when procedures require it.
Last updated: July 2026

5.2 Processing Discontinuities

Quick Answer: Processing discontinuities are introduced while manufacturing the component—forming, machining, grinding, welding, heat treating, plating, and similar operations. They are not primary solidification features of the stock (inherent) and not in-service damage (service). Classic examples include machining cracks, grinding burns and cracks, weld defects, forming cracks, quench cracks, and plating-related cracking. Level III judgment is process → flaw → method → when to inspect.

If inherent flaws answer “what did the mill put in the metal?”, processing flaws answer “what did the shop do to the part?” Domain 4 of the Basic exam repeatedly tests that distinction with manufacturing scenarios.

Definition and Boundaries

A discontinuity is processing-related when the essential free surface, crack, fold, or volumetric defect is created by a fabrication or finishing process applied to stock or a semi-finished product.

Not processingWhy
Ingot pipe, primary inclusionsFormed in material production → inherent
Fatigue crack after 10 years of cyclingFormed in use → service
Weld incomplete fusionFormed during joining → processing
Quench crack after hardeningFormed during heat treatment → processing

Some defects look like service cracks under a microscope. Classification still follows when the crack formed relative to the life cycle, not only fracture-surface appearance.

Process → Flaw Map (High-Yield Table)

ProcessTypical discontinuitiesMorphology / location cuesPrimary NDT tendencies
ForgingLaps, folds, bursts, flashes, seams from scaleSurface folds; internal bursts in heavily worked zonesVT, MT/PT for surface; UT for bursts
Rolling / formingSeams, laps, forming cracks, orange-peel tearsAligned with working direction; tight bends crack on outer fiberMT/PT/VT; UT if midwall
MachiningChatter marks (nonrelevant risk), tool gouges, machining cracks (esp. hard materials)Follow tool path; sharp roots act as stress raisersVT, PT, MT; ET on conductive surfaces
GrindingGrinding cracks, grinding burn (temper/re-harden)Network or transverse cracks on ground face; burn discolorationMT/PT after grind; hardness/etch for burn
Welding (fusion)Porosity, slag, LOF, LOP, undercut, solidification cracks, HAZ cracksAlong weld/HAZ geometryVT + method suite (RT/UT/MT/PT per code)
Heat treatment (quench)Quench cracksOften from sharp corners, holes, section changes; may be deepMT/PT; UT for deep cracks; inspect after quench/temper per procedure
Plating / coatingHydrogen-assisted cracks (high-strength steel), coating blisters, interface delaminationUnderplate or at high-stress sites after plateBake-out process control; MT/PT after plate when required
Drawing / extrusionChevrons, surface scoring, central bursts (severe draws)Longitudinal or internal centerlineVT, UT, ET depending on product

Memorize the left two columns for scenario questions; use the right columns for method selection.

Machining Cracks and Surface Integrity

Machining removes metal. When feeds, speeds, tool wear, or material hardness are wrong, the surface can develop:

  • Cracks from excessive tensile residual stress or thermal shock at the tool tip
  • Deep tool marks that act as notches for later fatigue (processing origin of a stress raiser even if the crack opens in service)
  • Smeared metal that hides underlying flaws from PT

High-hardness alloys, quench-and-temper steels, and some cast irons are especially sensitive. Level III procedures often require surface NDT after final machining of critical features (threads, seal diameters, bearing journals) because machining both creates and reveals discontinuities.

Grinding Burns and Grinding Cracks

Abusive grinding—too aggressive a wheel, inadequate coolant, or glazed wheel—creates localized overheating:

  1. Temper burn: over-tempered soft spots (dark etch response)
  2. Re-hardening burn: thin martensite layer that can crack
  3. Grinding cracks: typically shallow, often perpendicular to the grinding direction or in a network on the ground surface

For NDT:

  • MT (wet fluorescent on steel) is classic for grinding cracks after finish grind of hardened parts
  • PT for nonmagnetics or when MT is unsuitable
  • Visual color change is a clue, not proof of crack depth
  • Timing: many aerospace and gear procedures mandate inspection after final grind, not only after rough machine

Grinding cracks are processing even if the part later fails in fatigue from that crack—the origin class follows introduction during manufacturing.

Weld Defects as Processing Discontinuities

Fusion welding is a manufacturing process; weld discontinuities are therefore processing (unless the weld was sound and a service crack later initiates at the toe). Core families:

Weld discontinuityBrief cause cue
PorosityGas entrapment in solidifying weld metal
Slag inclusionsTrapped flux/slag (SMAW/FCAW etc.)
Lack of fusion (LOF)Incomplete bonding of weld to base or bead to bead
Incomplete penetrationRoot not fully filled/fused as required
UndercutGroove melted into base metal at toe
Solidification / hot cracksWeld metal tears during freezing
HAZ / cold cracksHydrogen + hard HAZ + stress (often delayed)

Method suites are code-driven, but Level III Basic logic remains: surface weld cracks and undercut → VT + MT/PT; volumetric porosity/slag/LOF → RT and/or UT depending on joint access and thickness. Chapter 4 deepens welding processes; here the classification point is origin = processing.

Forming Cracks

Cold or hot forming (bending, stamping, spinning, expanding) can crack material when strain exceeds local ductility:

  • Outer fiber tensile cracks on bend radii
  • Orange-peel surface rupture on coarse-grain material
  • Luders or stretcher strains (more cosmetic, but can confuse VT)

Forming cracks are often surface-breaking and elongated parallel to the free edge of the bend or transverse to the principal stretch direction. MT/PT/VT dominate; UT is secondary unless thickness and access support subsurface checks at severe formed zones.

Heat-Treat Quench Cracks

Quench cracks form when rapid cooling produces tensile surface stresses (or internal stresses) that exceed the material’s strength while it is hard and brittle. Favored sites:

  • Sharp corners, keyways, holes, and abrupt section changes
  • High-hardenability steels quenched too severely
  • Delayed cracking when hydrogen and residual stress combine after quench

NDT implications:

  • Cracks may be deep relative to grinding cracks
  • MT is highly effective on ferromagnetic parts once scale is controlled
  • Procedures often specify inspection after quench and temper and again after final grind if grind is used to restore dimensions
  • Residual stress and permeability changes after heat treat affect MT technique variables—Level III must approve parameters for the as-heat-treated condition

Plating and Related Processes

Electroplating, especially of high-strength steels, can introduce hydrogen that promotes hydrogen-assisted cracking. Process controls (baking after plate) are primary; NDT may be required after plating on fracture-critical parts. Coating processes can also create blisters or delamination at the coating–substrate interface—surface methods for open defects, and specialized approaches when interface integrity is critical.

Inspection Timing and Method Selection

Level III thinking for processing discontinuities:

  1. Identify the last process that can create the flaw of concern
  2. Inspect after that process (and after surface preparation that reveals the surface)
  3. Match surface vs volumetric methods to whether the flaw is expected open to the surface
  4. Do not rely on receiving inspection of raw stock alone if welding, quench, or grind follows
SituationWeak strategyStrong strategy
Hardened gear after finish grindOnly billet UT at millMT/PT of ground teeth/journals after grind
Full-penetration weldVT onlyCode-required volumetric + surface methods
Quenched shaft before temperSkip NDT until shippingMT after quench/temper per procedure; recheck after grind

Exam Traps

  • Calling a quench crack “inherent” because the steel chemistry was high-carbon — chemistry is material; the crack is processing.
  • Calling weld porosity “service” because the vessel is already installed — if it formed during welding, origin remains processing (discovery time ≠ origin class).
  • Using only RT for suspected tight grinding cracks — wrong morphology/method match; surface methods first.
  • Ignoring orientation: forming and grind cracks have preferred directions relative to tools and strain.

Processing discontinuities close the manufacturing half of the origin triad. Section 5.3 covers what happens after the part enters service.

Test Your Knowledge

A quench crack found at a sharp keyway corner on a hardened steel shaft after oil quenching is best classified as:

A
B
C
D
Test Your Knowledge

Which process–discontinuity pairing is most accurate?

A
B
C
D
Test Your Knowledge

A procedure for a quenched-and-tempered gear requires magnetic particle inspection after final tooth grinding. What is the primary Level III rationale?

A
B
C
D
Test Your Knowledge

Incomplete fusion between weld beads in a multi-pass groove weld is classified as a processing discontinuity because it:

A
B
C
D