All Practice Exams
Free Practice Questions for BAC 2 Série A4 Togo
Exam-style questions and explanations by OpenExamPrep.
✓ No registration✓ No credit card
20+ Questions
100% Free
Loading practice questions...
Same family resources
Explore More Togo Baccalauréat & Probatoire
Continue into nearby exams from the same family. Each card keeps practice questions, study guides, flashcards, videos, and articles in one place.
Sample BAC 2 Série A4 Togo Practice Questions
Try these sample questions to review concepts for the BAC 2 Série A4 Togo exam. Each question includes a detailed explanation. Start the interactive quiz above for the full 20+ question experience with AI tutoring.
1A philosophy commentary distinguishes the subject of a passage from its thesis. Which description identifies the thesis?
A.The broad topic discussed
B.The author's biographical background
C.The position the author argues for
D.The passage's number of paragraphs
Explanation: A thesis is the position defended in response to a problem. A topic names what is discussed, but does not by itself state what the author maintains about it.
2In Descartes' methodical doubt, why temporarily withhold assent from beliefs that can be doubted?
A.To seek a foundation that withstands doubt
B.To prove that all opinions are equally certain
C.To make the majority's opinion the final criterion
D.To abandon every possibility of rational knowledge
Explanation: Methodical doubt is used as a means of seeking secure knowledge. It tests the foundations of belief rather than making permanent uncertainty the aim.
3Which sentence states a normative judgment rather than merely describing what happens?
A.The committee met on Tuesday.
B.Three members voted against the proposal.
C.The meeting lasted two hours.
D.The committee ought to hear those affected before deciding.
Explanation: Ought expresses a claim about what should be done. The other sentences report events or quantities without prescribing a duty.
4An argument claims: 'Every action permitted by law is morally right. This action is permitted by law. Therefore it is morally right.' Which objection most directly challenges a premise rather than the inference form?
A.The conclusion contains fewer words than the premises.
B.Some legally permitted actions can still be morally objectionable.
C.The second premise should be written first.
D.The argument has only one conclusion.
Explanation: The inference has a valid conditional form, but validity does not establish the truth of its premises. Showing that legal permission can coexist with moral wrongness challenges the universal first premise.
5Rousseau distinguishes the general will from a mere sum of private interests. Which policy justification most directly appeals to the common interest?
A.It grants an exception only to the ruler's friends.
B.It benefits the largest donor regardless of public effects.
C.It applies a shared rule intended to protect every citizen's public interests.
D.It is preferred by one influential family.
Explanation: Rousseau's general will concerns the common interest of the political community. A collection of personal advantages or privileged exceptions does not by itself establish that common interest.
6A dissertation asks whether freedom means the absence of every rule. Which synthesis best goes beyond simply repeating either side?
A.Distinguish arbitrary constraints from justified rules that make equal freedom possible.
B.Restate that all rules are restrictions without considering their effects.
C.Declare that every existing rule is just because it exists.
D.List both positions and refuse to examine their assumptions.
Explanation: A productive synthesis introduces a distinction that addresses the conflict developed in the argument. Distinguishing arbitrary constraints from rules supporting equal freedom permits a qualified answer to the original problem.
7A researcher says a hypothesis is supported because it survived a demanding test. What is the most careful conclusion?
A.The hypothesis is proved for every possible circumstance.
B.Any later conflicting result must be ignored.
C.Testing has become unnecessary.
D.The result supports the hypothesis under the tested conditions without making it infallible.
Explanation: A successful test provides evidence that must be interpreted within its conditions and limits. It does not establish that future observations or untested circumstances can never challenge the hypothesis.
8A passage argues that language both expresses thought and helps shape it. Which commentary approach best examines that claim?
A.Replace the passage with the author's biography.
B.Explain both functions and assess how the author's reasons connect them.
C.Assume expression and formation must mean exactly the same thing.
D.Count the nouns without discussing the argument.
Explanation: A commentary should reconstruct the claim and the reasoning supporting it before evaluating its limits. Explaining the two functions allows the reader to assess their proposed relationship rather than erase the distinction.
9In 'Il promet la paix, mais prépare la guerre', which figure rests on contrasting opposed ideas?
A.Une anaphore
B.Une métonymie
C.Une antithèse
D.Une gradation
Explanation: Peace and war are opposing ideas placed in parallel contrast. That contrast produces an antithèse.
10Which sentence contains an explicit comparison rather than a metaphor without a comparison marker?
A.La rivière brille comme un ruban d'argent.
B.La rivière est un ruban d'argent.
C.Un ruban d'argent traverse la vallée.
D.Le ruban de la rivière éclaire la plaine.
Explanation: Comme explicitly links the river to a silver ribbon. The other sentences identify or describe the river through the ribbon image without that explicit comparison marker.
About the BAC 2 Série A4 Togo Practice Questions
Check the official exam sponsor for the exam format, time limit, passing standard, fees, and eligibility requirements. These details are not yet confirmed here.