100+ Free Saber Pro Investigación Jurídica Practice Questions

Prepare for the Colombia ICFES Saber Pro — Módulo Investigación Jurídica exam with instant access — no signup required.

✓ No registration✓ No credit card✓ No hidden fees✓ Start practicing immediately

100+ Questions

100% Free

Loading practice questions...

Same family resources

Explore More Colombia ICFES Saber Pro and Saber TyT

Continue into nearby exams from the same family. Each card keeps practice questions, study guides, flashcards, videos, and articles in one place.

Colombia ICFES Saber Pro

Practice Questions100 questions

Colombia ICFES Saber Pro — Cuidado de Enfermería en los Ámbitos Clínico y Comunitario

Practice Questions100 questions

2026 Statistics

Key Facts: Saber Pro Investigación Jurídica Exam

45 MCQs

Official 2026-2 Investigación Jurídica module is 45 single-answer multiple-choice items

ICFES Guía de orientación Investigación Jurídica Saber Pro 2026-2

40 / 40 / 20%

Official Tabla 4 weights for project design, evaluation, and research ethics

ICFES Guía 2026-2 Tabla 4

Combinatoria 44

2026-2 NBC Derecho y afines combinatoria: this module plus Comunicación Jurídica plus Gestión del Conflicto

ICFES Oferta de combinatorias Saber Pro 2026-2

4 h 30 min

Session-2 time when two or three specific modules are assigned

ICFES Oferta de combinatorias Saber Pro 2026-2

0–300

Saber Pro module score scale; not averaged into Puntaje Global

ICFES Guía de orientación Saber Pro 2026-2

COP 126,000

2026 ordinary Saber Pro fee for public IES; no separate law-module fee is published

Resolución 000629 of 11 November 2025

Spanish

Official guide and items for this module are issued in Spanish

ICFES Guía Investigación Jurídica 2026-2

75% credits

First-time IES-registered students who have passed at least 75% of program credits sit Saber Pro

ICFES Guía 2026-2

Saber Pro combinatoria 44 law-research module: 45 Spanish MCQs, 40% project design, 40% evaluating studies, 20% research ethics, scored 0–300 and not part of the generic Puntaje Global.

Sample Saber Pro Investigación Jurídica Practice Questions

Try these sample questions to test your Saber Pro Investigación Jurídica exam readiness. Each question includes a detailed explanation. Start the interactive quiz above for the full 100+ question experience with AI tutoring.

1A law student in Medellín reads that municipal crews removed street vendors from a plaza and writes in a notebook: “Street vending is a social problem.” For the Saber Pro module Investigación Jurídica, which formulation converts that social fact into a researchable objeto of investigación jurídica or sociojurídica?

A.Poverty in the city center must be ended as soon as possible.

B.How do municipal public-space rules and inspection practices operate when street vendors occupy that plaza?

C.Which party should vendors support in the next local election?

D.How can the student obtain a vendor’s permit for a relative this week?

Explanation: Evidencia 1.1 asks the candidate to identify problems that can be treated as objects of investigación jurídica or sociojurídica. A researchable object names a legal or institutional referent (public-space rules, inspection practices) and a question that legal or sociolegal methods can answer. A slogan, a partisan preference, or a client-service task is not yet that object.

2In Colombian legal research, investigación jurídica often reconstructs norms and jurisprudencia, while investigación sociojurídica links those norms to social practices. Which proposal is a sociojurídica research object rather than a purely dogmatic one?

A.How labor inspectors in Cali’s informal markets actually apply subordination criteria during workplace visits.

B.Reconstructing the legislative history of a single Código Sustantivo del Trabajo article from published travaux.

C.Identifying which Code article a clinic should cite in tomorrow’s demanda.

D.Drafting an employment contract template for a family business.

Explanation: A sociojurídica object asks how law operates in a social setting: inspectors, markets, and applied criteria. Reconstructing legislative history remains a jurídica/dogmatic or historical-legal object. Selecting a citation or drafting a contract are practice tasks, not research objects.

3A faculty committee screens undergraduate thesis ideas for the Investigación Jurídica competence. Which proposal cannot be treated as an objeto of investigación jurídica or sociojurídica?

A.Whether an environmental license was issued after the legally required community consultation steps.

B.How first-instance judges in a circuit apply a published line of jurisprudencia on informal labor.

C.Whether a proposed pedestrian bridge’s steel grade meets a civil-engineering load standard.

D.Whether two lines of Corte Constitucional reasoning on equality are internally coherent.

Explanation: Investigación Jurídica objects are problems that legal or sociolegal methods can address: consultation duties, judicial application of jurisprudencia, or doctrinal coherence. A steel-grade calculation is an engineering question. It may appear in a case file, but it is not itself a legal or sociolegal research object.

4During a seminar, a classmate insists that “access to justice is the problem.” Which restatement is a researchable objeto for Investigación Jurídica?

A.Access to justice must improve in Colombia.

B.Peace is a constitutional value that everyone should share.

C.The student will win more tutelas next semester.

D.What barriers do rural users face when trying to file a tutela in municipal courts of Huila?

Explanation: Evidencia 1.1 rewards converting a slogan into a delimited question with a legal mechanism (tutela), a population (rural users), and a setting (Huila municipal courts). Value statements and personal practice goals do not yet constitute a research object.

5Which of the following is a valid objeto of investigación jurídica (dogmatic), as opposed to a free-standing moral opinion?

A.Whether Colombians are honest in everyday life.

B.How the Corte Constitucional has constructed the equality test applied to public-sector hiring disputes in a defined period.

C.Whether the researcher personally admires the 1991 Constitution.

D.Which political candidate would best protect workers.

Explanation: A dogmatic investigación jurídica object reconstructs and evaluates legal reasoning—here, a court’s equality test in a bounded set of hiring disputes. Personal admiration, national character, and electoral preference are not legal-method objects.

6A consultorio jurídico student is preparing a housing case and also drafting a thesis proposal. Which question is a research problem rather than a professional-practice decision?

A.Which remedy should I file tomorrow for this client?

B.Should I settle if the landlord offers two months’ rent?

C.Which remedies do public-university legal clinics in Bogotá actually use in housing cases, and with what recorded outcomes over three years?

D.How do I fill the court’s cover sheet without a rejection stamp?

Explanation: Investigación Jurídica distinguishes a researchable object from the next procedural move in a live file. Comparing clinic remedies and outcomes across a defined set of cases is sociojurídica research. Tomorrow’s filing, settlement, or form-filling are practice.

7A proposal is titled “The crisis of the family in Colombia” and states no court, no comisaría, no statutory institution, and no jurisprudencia. The best diagnosis under evidencia 1.1 is that the proposal:

A.States a social diagnosis that is not yet an objeto of investigación jurídica or sociojurídica.

B.Already satisfies Investigación Jurídica because “family” appears in the Civil Code.

C.Is automatically sociojurídica because it mentions Colombia.

D.Is valid as Comunicación Jurídica and therefore counts for this module.

Explanation: Without a legal or institutional referent, “family crisis” remains a social diagnosis. Naming an institution (comisaría, alimentos process, visitation orders) would open a legal or sociolegal object. Mere presence of a civil-law word, a country name, or a different Saber Pro module does not convert the slogan into Investigación Jurídica.

8A student announces the research problem: “To prove that the 1991 Constitution is the best constitution in the world.” Which reformulation is a researchable investigación jurídica object?

A.To celebrate the Constitution in a patriotic essay.

B.To rank countries by the researcher’s personal preference.

C.To show that all criticism of the Constitution is illegitimate.

D.To compare how a specific constitutional mechanism (for example, tutela standing) is designed and how selected courts have applied it.

Explanation: “Best in the world” is a value judgment that cannot be tested as an Investigación Jurídica object. A delimited comparison of a mechanism’s design and judicial application can. Celebration, preference ranking, and silencing criticism are not research problems.

9A classmate proposes: “Design a mediation session for two neighbors who argue about a wall.” For Investigación Jurídica (not Gestión del Conflicto), which version is a researchable object?

A.The script the student will read as mediator next Saturday.

B.How municipal conciliation centers document agreements and what legal effects those agreements later produce in local litigation.

C.Which neighbor is morally right about the wall.

D.How to calm both parties using only body language.

Explanation: This module tests research design, not conflict-management performance. Documentation practices and the legal effects of conciliation agreements are sociojurídica objects. The live mediation script, a moral verdict, and body-language technique belong to other competences.

10A proposal’s “problem” is: “Interview all magistrates of the Corte Suprema de Justicia this semester to know what they really think.” The main defect under evidencia 1.1 is that the student has:

A.Confused an infeasible data-collection wish with a delimited research object about law or legal practice.

B.Chosen the only valid method for any investigación jurídica.

C.Correctly treated unpublished private opinions as a substitute for jurisprudencia.

D.Satisfied the module by naming a high court.

Explanation: A research object is a question about norms, institutions, or legally relevant practices that methods can address. “Interview everyone on the Court this semester” is a sampling fantasy, not a problem. Published decisiones, a feasible sample of despachos, or a reconstructed line of jurisprudencia would be objects; private opinions are not a shortcut around that work.

About the Saber Pro Investigación Jurídica Exam

The ICFES module Investigación Jurídica is a Saber Pro specific-competency module offered to SNIES NBC Derecho y afines. It is part of the Examen de Estado de la Calidad de la Educación Superior under Ley 1324 de 2009, not professional licensure and not the Ley 1905 Examen de Estado de Idoneidad. ICFES’s 2026-2 combinatoria table assigns combinatoria 44 as this module plus Comunicación Jurídica plus Gestión del Conflicto; combinatoria 0 is generics only. The 2026-2 guide specifies 45 Spanish single-answer multiple-choice items. Tabla 4 weights conceiving legal and sociolegal research projects at 40%, evaluating coherence and pertinence at 40%, and research ethics at 20%. This free bank is an English-language four-option MCQ study adaptation of the official afirmaciones — not an official ICFES translation, not a Spanish-booklet simulation, and not a substitute for Comunicación Jurídica, Gestión del Conflicto, the generic sitting, or actual legal-research practice.

Assessment

Saber Pro session 1 (all candidates): five generic modules in 4 hours 40 minutes. When an IES selects NBC Derecho y afines combinatoria 44, session 2 assigns Investigación Jurídica, Comunicación Jurídica, and Gestión del Conflicto in 4 hours 30 minutes. Combinatoria 0 is generics only. This bank covers only the Investigación Jurídica module.

Time Limit

Session 2: 4 hours 30 minutes when combinatoria 44 assigns three specific modules. Plus 4 hours 40 minutes for the generic session (ICFES Oferta de combinatorias Saber Pro 2026-2).

Passing Score

No pass/fail. Each Saber Pro specific module scored 0–300 without decimals and reported separately. These scores are not averaged into the Puntaje Global.

Exam Fee

No separate module or combinatoria 44 fee is published. Eligible first-time students registered by an IES pay the applicable 2026 ordinary Saber Pro fee: public IES COP 126,000; private IES COP 126,000–224,000 by tuition band; graduates COP 224,000 (Resolución 000629 of 11 November 2025). (ICFES (Instituto Colombiano para la Evaluación de la Educación))

Saber Pro Investigación Jurídica Exam Content Outline

40%

Concibe proyectos de investigación jurídica y sociojurídica

Identify researchable legal and sociolegal problems and relate title, objectives, and problem statement. Official evidencias 1.1–1.2; Guía 2026-2 Tabla 4 assigns 40%.

40%

Evalúa la coherencia y pertinencia de investigaciones

Derive conclusions from legal research, distinguish legal from non-legal solutions, and match solutions to findings. Official evidencias 2.1–2.3; Guía 2026-2 Tabla 4 assigns 40%.

20%

Principios éticos de la investigación

Recognize unethical research conduct and apply ethical principles in legal and sociolegal inquiry. Official evidencias 3.1–3.2; Guía 2026-2 Tabla 4 assigns 20%.

How to Pass the Saber Pro Investigación Jurídica Exam

What You Need to Know

Passing score: No pass/fail. Each Saber Pro specific module scored 0–300 without decimals and reported separately. These scores are not averaged into the Puntaje Global.
Assessment: Saber Pro session 1 (all candidates): five generic modules in 4 hours 40 minutes. When an IES selects NBC Derecho y afines combinatoria 44, session 2 assigns Investigación Jurídica, Comunicación Jurídica, and Gestión del Conflicto in 4 hours 30 minutes. Combinatoria 0 is generics only. This bank covers only the Investigación Jurídica module.
Time limit: Session 2: 4 hours 30 minutes when combinatoria 44 assigns three specific modules. Plus 4 hours 40 minutes for the generic session (ICFES Oferta de combinatorias Saber Pro 2026-2).
Exam fee: No separate module or combinatoria 44 fee is published. Eligible first-time students registered by an IES pay the applicable 2026 ordinary Saber Pro fee: public IES COP 126,000; private IES COP 126,000–224,000 by tuition band; graduates COP 224,000 (Resolución 000629 of 11 November 2025).

Keys to Passing

Work through all 100 available questions
Review every answer and explanation
Track weak areas and revisit them
Use our AI tutor for tough concepts

Saber Pro Investigación Jurídica Study Tips from Top Performers

1Follow the published 40/40/20 split: equal time on project design and evaluating published studies, then ethics.

2ICFES items test whether a problem is researchable as legal or sociolegal inquiry — not whether you can recite a Código Civil article from memory.

3Keep title, general objective, specific objectives, and problem statement internally consistent; evidencia 1.2 scores that relation.

4Do not treat a political slogan, a purely technical engineering fix, or an unfalsifiable moral claim as a legal solution to a research finding (evidencia 2.2).

5These MCQs are an English study aid. Practise also with ICFES's Spanish cuadernillos so the official language and stem style are not a surprise.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is ICFES Saber Pro Investigación Jurídica?

It is a specific-competency module of Colombia's Saber Pro Examen de Estado offered to SNIES NBC Derecho y afines. When an IES assigns combinatoria 44, first-time candidates sit 45 Spanish single-answer multiple-choice items on conceiving, evaluating, and ethically conducting legal and sociolegal research.

Is there a single ICFES exam called Saber Pro Derecho?

No. ICFES names modules, not degree titles. Combinatoria 44 for NBC Derecho y afines assigns three separately named modules. This bank covers only Investigación Jurídica.

Is this the same as the Ley 1905 Examen de Estado de Idoneidad?

No. Saber Pro is ICFES’s higher-education quality exam under Ley 1324 de 2009. The idoneidad exam is a separate Consejo Superior de la Judicatura requirement under Ley 1905 de 2018 for the tarjeta profesional.

How is the module scored?

There is no pass/fail cut. Each Saber Pro module is scored 0–300 without decimals and reported separately. Those scores are not averaged into the Puntaje Global.

How many questions and how long is the official combinatoria?

This module’s 2026-2 guide states 45 selección múltiple con única respuesta items. Combinatoria 44’s three specific modules share a 4-hour-30-minute second session, plus 4 hours 40 minutes for the generic session.

Is this practice bank in the same language and format as the real exam?

No. ICFES issues the current module guide and items in Spanish. This bank is an English-language four-option MCQ study adaptation of the official afirmaciones, not an official translation or a substitute for sitting the Spanish booklet.