All Practice Exams

100+ Free Fachanwalt SAV Haftpflicht- und Versicherungsrecht Practice Questions

Prepare for the Fachanwalt SAV Haftpflicht- und Versicherungsrecht / Avocat spécialiste FSA responsabilité civile et droit des assurances exam with instant access — no signup required.

✓ No registration✓ No credit card✓ No hidden fees✓ Start practicing immediately
100+ Questions
100% Free

Loading practice questions...

2026 Statistics

Key Facts: Fachanwalt SAV Haftpflicht- und Versicherungsrecht Exam

CHF 1,800

SAV Specialist Title & Examination Fee

Schweizerischer Anwaltsverband (SAV / FSA)

CHF 13,500 to CHF 15,000 depending on the course edition

Postgraduate Specialization Course Tuition

SAV / FSA Fachanwaltsausbildung

5 Years

Minimum Bar Practice Experience Required

SAV / FSA Reglement Fachanwalt

100 MCQs

Practice Questions in This Study Bank

Swiss Tort & Insurance Study Bank

5 Years

VVG Statutory Limitation Period (2022 Revision Art. 46)

Bundesgesetz über den Versicherungsvertrag (VVG)

Art. 60 1bis

Direct Right of Action Against Liability Insurers

VVG SR 221.229.1

Art. 73 ATSG

Injured Party Priority (Quotenvorrecht)

Bundesgesetz über den Allgemeinen Teil des Sozialversicherungsrechts

10 Hours/Year

Mandatory Continuous Legal Education (SAV/FSA)

SAV / FSA Weiterbildungsreglement

The Fachanwalt SAV Haftpflicht- und Versicherungsrecht is Switzerland's highest bar specialist certification in tort, liability, and insurance law (SAV / FSA). The qualification involves postgraduate modular coursework, written case examinations, and an oral colloquium before the SAV Fachkommission. This English-language study bank provides 100 verified practice MCQs with extensive Swiss legal rationales and statutory citations.

Sample Fachanwalt SAV Haftpflicht- und Versicherungsrecht Practice Questions

Try these sample questions to test your Fachanwalt SAV Haftpflicht- und Versicherungsrecht exam readiness. Each question includes a detailed explanation. Start the interactive quiz above for the full 100+ question experience with AI tutoring.

1Under Art. 41 para. 1 of the Swiss Code of Obligations (OR), which of the following sets represents the four cumulative statutory requirements that a claimant must establish to succeed in a general tort fault-liability claim?
A.Financial damage (Schaden), objective or subjective illegality (Widerrechtlichkeit), natural and adequate causal nexus (adäquater Kausalzusammenhang), and fault (Vorsatz oder Fahrlässigkeit)
B.Financial damage, gross breach of a contractual obligation, immediate spatial proximity, and debtor default
C.Personal injury, strict operational endangerment (Betriebsgefahr), absence of force majeure, and lack of justification
D.Pecuniary loss, breach of an absolute right, commercial intent to profit, and vicarious liability of a principal
Explanation: General tort liability under Art. 41 para. 1 OR requires four cumulative conditions: (1) damage (Schaden, evaluated under the difference theory), (2) illegality (Widerrechtlichkeit, as Erfolgsunrecht for absolute rights or Verhaltensunrecht via breach of a protective norm for pure economic loss), (3) natural and adequate causation (Kausalzusammenhang), and (4) fault (Vorsatz oder Fahrlässigkeit).
2According to established Swiss Federal Supreme Court jurisprudence (BGE 132 III 359), how is legal damage (Schaden) defined and measured under the difference theory (Differenztheorie)?
A.As any moral and emotional grievance experienced by the injured party regardless of monetary impact
B.As the mathematical difference between the current actual financial position of the injured party's assets and the hypothetical financial position those assets would have had absent the damaging event
C.As the total replacement cost of damaged goods without deduction for depreciation or prior wear and tear
D.As the standardized flat-rate tariff compensation specified in the cantonal civil court fee schedule
Explanation: Under the difference theory (Differenztheorie), damage is defined as an involuntary reduction in net assets (Vermögensverminderung), consisting of a decrease in assets (damnum emergens), an increase in liabilities, or lost profit (lucrum cessans), measured as the difference between the actual and hypothetical asset state (BGE 132 III 359, BGE 131 III 360).
3In Swiss tort doctrine, pure economic loss (reiner Vermögensschaden) does not result from an infringement of an absolute right (life, bodily integrity, property). Under which condition is such pure economic loss deemed objectively illegal (widerrechtlich)?
A.Whenever the tortfeasor acted with slight negligence during commercial negotiations
B.Only if the claimant proves that the tortfeasor was insured under a comprehensive third-party liability policy
C.Only if the harmful conduct violates a specific protective legal norm (Schutznorm) designed to safeguard the claimant's financial assets against that particular type of loss
D.Whenever the economic loss exceeds the threshold of CHF 50,000
Explanation: Under the objective doctrine of illegality (objektive Widerrechtlichkeitstheorie), bodily injury and property damage are inherently unlawful (Erfolgsunrecht). Pure economic loss is only unlawful if caused by conduct that breaches a statutory rule of conduct specifically intended to protect the injured party against asset depletion (Verhaltensunrecht via Schutznorm, e.g., fraud under StGB 146 or bankruptcy provisions; BGE 133 III 323).
4What is the legal standard applied by the Swiss Federal Supreme Court to determine whether natural causation qualifies as adequate causation (adäquater Kausalzusammenhang) in tort law?
A.Whether the event was the sole and exclusive physical trigger of the damage without any contributing factors
B.Whether a reasonable person in the defendant's position subjectively foresaw the exact sequence of events
C.Whether the damaging outcome occurred within a 24-hour window following the initial tortious conduct
D.Whether, according to the ordinary course of things and the general experience of life, the conduct was inherently capable of producing an outcome of the kind that occurred
Explanation: Adequate causation (adäquate Kausalität) is an objective legal evaluation: an act is an adequate cause of damage if, according to the ordinary course of things and general human experience (nach dem gewöhnlichen Lauf der Dinge und nach der allgemeinen Lebenserfahrung), it was generally capable of causing or significantly favoring a result of the kind that occurred (BGE 143 III 242, BGE 132 III 715).
5Under what circumstances does an extraordinary intervening event cause an interruption of the causal chain (Unterbrechung des adäquaten Kausalzusammenhangs) under Swiss tort law?
A.When an unforeseeable, totally extraordinary co-operating cause (such as gross third-party fault, gross victim fault, or force majeure) occurs and has such overpowering intensity that the original act is relegated to insignificance
B.Whenever the injured party engages in any slight degree of contributory negligence
C.Only when the intervening third party is criminally convicted of intentional homicide
D.Whenever the damage occurs on public property rather than private premises
Explanation: An interruption of the adequate causal nexus (Kausalitätsunterbrechung) occurs only when an entirely extraordinary, unforeseeable event (force majeure, gross third-party fault, or gross self-fault) operates with such overpowering causal force that the defendant's original contribution is pushed into the background and ceases to be legally relevant (BGE 130 III 182, BGE 127 III 453).
6In Swiss liability law, what defines 'force majeure' (höhere Gewalt) and distinguishes it from ordinary bad weather or operational chance (Zufall)?
A.Any severe storm causing more than CHF 10,000 in property damage across a municipality
B.An extraordinary, completely unforeseeable external natural event of overwhelming force that could not have been prevented or averted even by exercising the utmost care reasonably to be expected
C.Any sudden mechanical failure occurring in equipment that was inspected within the preceding 12 months
D.Any government-mandated administrative lockdown regardless of the underlying legal authority
Explanation: Force majeure (höhere Gewalt) requires an external, completely extraordinary, unforeseeable, and unavoidable catastrophic natural or human event whose consequences could not have been prevented even with the highest diligence (BGE 131 III 115, BGE 112 II 138). Ordinary heavy rain, seasonal frost, or operational machinery failures are normal operational hazards (Zufall), not force majeure.
7A pedestrian is unlawfully attacked by an assailant wielding a weapon. The pedestrian defends himself with a physical blow, breaking the assailant's arm. Under Art. 52 para. 1 OR, what is the legal effect of legitimate self-defense (Notwehr)?
A.The pedestrian remains liable for medical costs under strict causal liability
B.The pedestrian is liable for half the assailant's damages under comparative fault principles
C.The pedestrian's act is legally justified (gerechtfertigt) and therefore not unlawful (nicht widerrechtlich), precluding any liability in tort
D.The pedestrian is exempt from criminal liability but must pay civil compensation determined by equity
Explanation: Under Art. 52 para. 1 OR, an act performed in legitimate self-defense (Notwehr) to ward off an imminent, unlawful attack is legally justified (Rechtfertigungsgrund), provided the defensive reaction is proportionate. Because the act is not unlawful (nicht widerrechtlich), no tort liability arises under Art. 41 OR.
8To avert an imminent explosion threatening multiple human lives, a person breaks into a neighbor's garage and destroys the neighbor's property to obtain fire extinguishers. Under Art. 52 para. 2 OR (Notstand), how is the property damage addressed?
A.The actor is fully liable for punitive damages due to intentional property destruction
B.The property owner must bear the entire loss with no right to seek any compensation
C.The actor's employer is strictly liable under building owner liability (Art. 58 OR)
D.The act of necessity is justified, but the judge may award fair compensation (richterliche Entschädigung nach Ermessen) to the innocent property owner
Explanation: Under Art. 52 para. 2 OR (Notstand / state of necessity), damaging another person's property to avert imminent greater harm to life or limb is legally justified, but the court determines, at its discretion (nach billigem Ermessen), whether and to what extent the person who averted the danger must pay compensation to the innocent third party.
9A participant in an amateur contact sports tournament suffers a broken tibia during a normal, rule-compliant tackle. On which legal ground is tort liability of the tackling player excluded under Swiss law?
A.Effective consent and assumption of risk (Einwilligung / Handeln auf eigene Gefahr) within the customary rules and inherent risks of the sport
B.Statutory immunity under the Swiss Federal Sports Promotion Act
C.Absence of natural causation between the tackle and the bone fracture
D.Lack of legal capacity (Urteilsunfähigkeit) of sports participants
Explanation: Participation in sports involves valid consent (Einwilligung) or assumption of risk (Handeln auf eigene Gefahr) covering typical, inherent injuries that occur during rule-compliant play (BGE 134 III 193). As long as conduct does not egregiously breach game rules or civil safety duties (Verletzung der Sportregeln / Sorgfaltspflichten), illegality is negated.
10How does the Swiss Federal Supreme Court define gross negligence (grobe Fahrlässigkeit) in contrast to slight negligence (leichte Fahrlässigkeit)?
A.Gross negligence requires proving that the actor acted with malicious intent to harm
B.Gross negligence is the failure to observe the most elementary precautions that would have been obvious to any reasonable person in the same situation ('Das darf einfach nicht passieren')
C.Gross negligence is defined strictly by reference to a violation of a criminal code felony provision
D.Gross negligence occurs whenever the financial damages exceed the statutory insurance minimum
Explanation: Gross negligence (grobe Fahrlässigkeit) is characterized as the disregard of fundamental, obvious rules of prudence that would be self-evident to any sensible person in the same circumstances (BGE 119 II 443: 'das darf schlechterdings nicht passieren'). Slight negligence, by contrast, is a minor deviation from the ideal standard of care.

About the Fachanwalt SAV Haftpflicht- und Versicherungsrecht Exam

The title 'Fachanwalt SAV Haftpflicht- und Versicherungsrecht' (Avocat spécialiste FSA responsabilité civile et droit des assurances / Avvocato specialista FSA responsabilità civile e diritto delle assicurazioni) is the premier postgraduate specialization credential awarded by the Swiss Bar Association (Schweizerischer Anwaltsverband / Fédération Suisse des Avocats - SAV/FSA). It certifies outstanding theoretical expertise and proven practical litigation capability in extra-contractual tort liability (OR Art. 41–61), strict objective liabilities (Road Traffic Act SVG, Product Liability Act PrHG, Environmental Protection Act USG, works owner liability OR Art. 58, principal's liability OR Art. 55), complex damages actuarial capitalization (Erwerbs- und Haushaltschaden, Stauffer/Schätzle/Weber tables, normative care damages, pension loss), moral compensation (Genugtuung Art. 47/49 OR), private insurance contract law (VVG / LCA SR 221.229.1, including the revised direct right of action under Art. 60 Abs. 1bis VVG, 5-year limitation period Art. 46 VVG, and pre-contractual disclosure rules Art. 4–8 VVG), and social insurance subrogation and coordination (ATSG SR 830.1 Art. 69 and 72–75, Quotenvorrecht, UVG accident benefits and complementary pensions, IVG disability calculation, BVG pension fund subrogation, and KVG health insurance). Candidates must demonstrate extensive bar practice (minimum 5 years), submit a vetted portfolio of complex handled cases (Falldokumentation), complete accredited postgraduate course modules, pass written examinations, and succeed in an oral colloquium (Fachgespräch) before the national SAV Fachkommission. This question bank is an English-language MCQ study adaptation designed to assist candidate attorneys, litigators, and legal scholars in mastering high-yield Swiss liability, insurance, and social coordination doctrines.

Assessment

Performance-based assessment

Time Limit

Written specialist examination of 3 to 5 hours at the end of the course + 30 to 60 min oral Fachgespräch

Passing Score

Demonstrated specialist competence across written modules and final oral colloquium before the SAV Fachkommission

Exam Fee

CHF 1,800 (Title and colloquium fee; specialization course CHF 13,500 to CHF 15,000 depending on the course edition) (Schweizerischer Anwaltsverband (SAV / FSA) / Fachkommission Haftpflicht- und Versicherungsrecht)

Fachanwalt SAV Haftpflicht- und Versicherungsrecht Exam Content Outline

20%

General Tort & Fault Liability (OR Art. 41–61)

Covers the core elements of extra-contractual fault liability under the Swiss Code of Obligations (OR Art. 41–61): damage concepts under the difference theory (Differenztheorie), distinction between objective and subjective illegality (Erfolgsunrecht in bodily injury and property damage vs Verhaltensunrecht and protective statutory norms in pure economic loss / reiner Vermögensschaden), natural causation (conditio sine qua non) and adequate causation (adäquater Kausalzusammenhang according to the ordinary course of things and general experience of life), fault grading (Vorsatz, grobe und leichte Fahrlässigkeit, Urteilsfähigkeit), legal grounds of justification (Einwilligung, Notwehr Art. 52 Abs. 1 OR, Notstand Art. 52 Abs. 2 OR, Selbsthilfe Art. 52 Abs. 3 OR), interruption of the causal chain (Kausalitätsunterbrechung through gross third-party fault, force majeure / höhere Gewalt, or gross victim's own fault), plural liability and solidarity (Solidarität Art. 50/51 OR, internal regress cascade / Regressordnung between intentional/culpable tortfeasors, contractual obligors, and strict liability holders), and contractual vs tortious concurrence (Anspruchskonkurrenz Art. 97 ff. / 101 OR vs Art. 41 ff. OR, differences in limitation periods, burden of proof, and vicarious liability).

20%

Strict & Objective Liabilities (OR & Special Statutes)

Focuses on simple and strict causal liabilities under the Swiss Code of Obligations, Swiss Civil Code, and federal special statutes: principal's liability (Geschäftsherrenhaftung Art. 55 OR, enterprise organization, and the fourfold Sorgfaltsbeweis: cura in eligendo, instruendo, custodiendo, and organization of work), animal keeper liability (Tierhalterhaftung Art. 56 OR), building and works owner liability (Werkeigentümerhaftung Art. 58 OR, Werkmangel: construction defects vs maintenance deficits, absolute causal liability without exoneration via care), head of household liability (Familienoberhaupthaftung Art. 333 ZGB); Road Traffic Act (SVG / LCR Art. 58–89: motor vehicle keeper liability, Betriebsgefahr, strict exoneration conditions Art. 59 SVG, direct right of action against third-party liability insurer Art. 65 SVG, exclusion of contractual defenses Art. 65 Abs. 2 SVG, multi-vehicle collisions Art. 60/61 SVG, National Guarantee Fund NGF and National Bureau of Insurance NVB); Product Liability Act (PrHG: producer liability, defect categories, safety expectations Art. 4 PrHG, development risk defense Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. e PrHG, CHF 900 deductible for private property damage Art. 6 PrHG); Environmental Protection Act (USG Art. 59a ff.); Railway Act (EBG Art. 40b ff.); and Aviation Act (LFG Art. 64 ff.).

20%

Damages Assessment & Moral Compensation (Schadensberechnung & Genugtuung)

Examines detailed damages computation methodologies and moral compensation in Swiss practice: difference theory (Differenztheorie: hypothetical vs actual financial position), concrete calculation of personal injury (Personenschaden Art. 46 OR) and property damage (Sachschaden), temporary and permanent loss of earnings (Erwerbsschaden, Valideneinkommen vs Invalideneinkommen, career progression scenarios), present value capitalization (Kapitalisierung) using the standard Stauffer/Schätzle/Weber and Leonard actuarial tables, selection of the judicial discount rate (Rechnungszins), normative household damage (Haushaltschaden, compensation for lost homemaking capacity without actual external expenditure, Swiss Federal Statistical Office SAKE/ESS data), professional and family nursing/care expenses (Pflegeschaden, normative compensation of care provided by relatives under Art. 42 Abs. 2 OR), future pension loss (Rentenschaden AHV/IV/BVG retirement capital deficit), benefit offset (Vorteilsanrechnung / compensatio lucri cum damno), and moral compensation (Genugtuung Art. 47/49 OR: severity of physical/mental suffering, Federal Supreme Court benchmark tables, basic starting amount adjustments, reduction for contributory negligence, and default interest from the date of the damaging event).

20%

Insurance Contract Law (VVG / LCA — 2022 Revision)

Detailed coverage of the Swiss Insurance Contract Act (VVG SR 221.229.1, including all provisions of the landmark 2022 partial revision): pre-contractual duty of disclosure and legal consequences of breach (Anzeigepflichtverletzung Art. 4–8 VVG, written/electronic questionnaire requirements, strict 4-week cancellation deadline from insurer's knowledge Art. 6 Abs. 1 VVG, statutory causality requirement barring claim denial if undisclosed fact did not influence the insured event Art. 6 Abs. 3 VVG), increase of risk (wesentliche Gefahrserhöhung Art. 28–30 VVG), maturity of insurance benefits Art. 41 VVG (4 weeks after complete documentation), extension of the general statutory limitation period to 5 years (Verjährung Art. 46 VVG, with 10-year absolute cap), insured's duty to mitigate damages (Schadenminderungspflicht Art. 61 VVG), over-insurance, double insurance (Art. 53 VVG), under-insurance calculation (Pro-rata-Regel), direct statutory right of action for injured third parties against liability insurers (Art. 60 Abs. 1bis VVG), policyholder's 14-day right of revocation (Art. 2a VVG), ordinary termination rights after 3 years for multi-year contracts (Art. 35a VVG), and termination following a partial claim (Art. 42 VVG).

20%

Social Insurance Coordination & Subrogation (ATSG, UVG, IVG, BVG, KVG)

Addresses the Federal Act on the General Part of Social Insurance Law (ATSG SR 830.1) and specific social insurance statutes: coordination of cash benefits and statutory overcompensation limits (Überentschädigungsverbot Art. 69 ATSG: limit of presumed lost earnings plus additional injury-related costs), statutory subrogation / recourse of social insurers (Regress und Subrogation Art. 72–75 ATSG, ex lege transfer of claims upon occurrence of the insured event), threefold congruence requirements (personelle, sachliche, zeitliche Kongruenz), non-congruent benefits immune from social insurance subrogation (Integritätsentschädigung UVG Art. 24/25 UVG vs Genugtuung, BGE 134 III 489), priority of the injured victim (Quotenvorrecht des Geschädigten Art. 73 Abs. 1 ATSG in cases of partial liability or insurance limits); specific benefit structures under UVG (statutory accident definition Art. 6 UVG, bodily injury similar to accident Art. 6 Abs. 2 UVG, daily allowance 80%, disability pension, complementary pension up to 90% combined with AHV/IV under Art. 20 UVG), IVG (priority of rehabilitation over pensions / Eingliederung vor Rente, income comparison method Art. 16 ATSG / 28 IVG), BVG (mandatory and extra-mandatory occupational pension funds, statutory subrogation Art. 34b BVG), KVG (statutory health benefits, exclusion of subrogation against third-party liability insurers except under Art. 72 ATSG); and Swiss civil litigation procedure (Streitverkündung Art. 78–81 ZPO, Streitverkündungsklage Art. 82 ZPO, Teilklage Art. 86 ZPO, judicial expert evidence vs party-commissioned medical assessments).

How to Pass the Fachanwalt SAV Haftpflicht- und Versicherungsrecht Exam

What You Need to Know

  • Passing score: Demonstrated specialist competence across written modules and final oral colloquium before the SAV Fachkommission
  • Assessment: Performance-based assessment
  • Time limit: Written specialist examination of 3 to 5 hours at the end of the course + 30 to 60 min oral Fachgespräch
  • Exam fee: CHF 1,800 (Title and colloquium fee; specialization course CHF 13,500 to CHF 15,000 depending on the course edition)

Keys to Passing

  • Work through all 100 available questions
  • Review every answer and explanation
  • Track weak areas and revisit them
  • Use our AI tutor for tough concepts

Fachanwalt SAV Haftpflicht- und Versicherungsrecht Study Tips from Top Performers

1Master the Difference Theory and Capitalization Tables: Learn how to structure personal injury claims using concrete income calculations (Valideneinkommen vs Invalideneinkommen), normative household damage (Haushaltschaden based on SAKE tables), and present value capitalization (Stauffer/Schätzle/Weber tables, active vs passive capitalization periods, Rechnungszins).
2Distinguish Strict Liabilities and Exoneration Defenses: Memorize the precise statutory exoneration tests: principal's liability (OR Art. 55 Sorgfaltsbeweis), building owner liability (OR Art. 58 causal liability without Sorgfaltsbeweis), motor vehicle keeper liability (SVG Art. 58/59 strict cumulative exoneration requirements), and product liability (PrHG Art. 4/5 development risk defense and CHF 900 deductible).
3Internalize the 2022 VVG Partial Revision: Understand the direct right of action against liability insurers (Art. 60 Abs. 1bis VVG), the 5-year limitation period (Art. 46 VVG), the 4-week cancellation deadline for breach of pre-contractual disclosure (Art. 6 Abs. 1 VVG) combined with the statutory causality requirement (Art. 6 Abs. 3 VVG), and the 14-day revocation right (Art. 2a VVG).
4Navigate ATSG Subrogation and the Quotenvorrecht: Memorize the threefold congruence criteria (personelle, sachliche, zeitliche Kongruenz) under Art. 72 ATSG, the non-congruence of Integritätsentschädigung (Art. 24 UVG) with moral damages (Genugtuung Art. 47 OR), and the exact mathematical application of the victim's Quotenvorrecht under Art. 73 Abs. 1 ATSG.
5Understand Regress Cascades and Solidarity: Study internal recourse between multiple liable parties under OR Art. 50/51: intentional/grossly negligent tortfeasors bear primary liability, followed by contractual obligors, and finally strict objective causal liability holders.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Fachanwalt SAV Haftpflicht- und Versicherungsrecht specialist title?

It is the official postgraduate specialist title for Swiss attorneys-at-law in tort, civil liability, and insurance law, awarded by the Swiss Bar Association (Schweizerischer Anwaltsverband / Fédération Suisse des Avocats - SAV/FSA). It certifies the highest level of specialized theoretical knowledge and practical litigation competence in Swiss torts, strict causal liability regimes, damages calculations, private insurance contract law (VVG), and social insurance coordination and subrogation (ATSG, UVG, IVG, BVG).

What are the eligibility requirements and admission process for the SAV specialist title?

Candidates must be admitted to the Swiss Bar (Schweizerisches Anwaltspatent / Brevet d'avocat) with at least 5 years of active professional practice as an attorney-at-law. They must prove substantial specialized practical experience through a documented case list (Falldokumentation) of complex tort and insurance files, successfully complete the accredited SAV postgraduate course curriculum (consisting of approximately 120–140 hours of intensive lectures and seminars), pass written modular examinations, and pass a comprehensive oral colloquium (Fachgespräch) before the national SAV Fachkommission.

What major legal reforms are tested on the examination?

The examination rigorously tests recent landmark legislative revisions, including the 2022 Partial Revision of the Insurance Contract Act (VVG SR 221.229.1), which introduced the injured third party's direct right of action against liability insurers (Art. 60 Abs. 1bis VVG), extended the statutory limitation period from 2 to 5 years (Art. 46 VVG), introduced statutory revocation rights (Art. 2a VVG), and codified ordinary termination rights (Art. 35a VVG). It also tests the revised limitation law in the Swiss Code of Obligations (Verjährungsrecht OR Art. 60: 3-year relative and 10/20-year absolute limitation periods) and the 6th IVG revision regarding disability pension assessment.

What is the Quotenvorrecht and why is it central to Swiss tort and social insurance practice?

The Quotenvorrecht (injured party's priority under Art. 73 Abs. 1 ATSG) dictates that when a tortfeasor is only partially liable (for example, due to contributory negligence of the victim under Art. 44 OR) or when liability coverage limits are insufficient to cover total damages, the injured victim's direct claim for uncompensated damage takes legal priority over the subrogated recourse claim of social insurers (such as UVG, IVG, or SUVA). Social insurers may only satisfy their recourse claims out of any remaining balance after the victim has been made fully whole.

How are personal injury damages calculated and capitalized in Switzerland?

Damages are calculated strictly according to the difference theory (Differenztheorie). For permanent bodily injury, future loss of earnings (Erwerbsschaden) is calculated by comparing hypothetical income without the accident (Valideneinkommen) with residual earning capacity (Invalideneinkommen). Future recurring losses are converted into a lump-sum capital amount using actuarial present value capitalization tables (Barwerttabellen by Stauffer/Schätzle/Weber and Leonard) applying a judicial discount rate (Rechnungszins, traditionally benchmarked by the Federal Supreme Court at 3.5%, with modern adjustments to lower rates). In addition, normative household damage (Haushaltschaden) is compensated without requiring actual paid replacement help, and family nursing care (Pflegeschaden) is compensable under Art. 42 Abs. 2 OR.

Is this question bank an official SAV/FSA publication?

No. This question bank is an independent English-language MCQ study adaptation developed to help candidate attorneys-at-law, Swiss bar candidates, in-house insurance counsel, and international practitioners master the complex doctrines, statutory articles, and leading Federal Supreme Court (BGer) precedents governing Swiss tort liability, insurance law, and social insurance coordination.