13.4 Other States, USL&H, and Federal Acts
Key Takeaways
- Item 3.A lists states of operation at inception; Item 3.C (Other States Insurance) covers states the employer may expand into - never both.
- Monopolistic states cannot be covered by Other States Insurance; coverage there must come from the state fund.
- USL&H is a no-fault FEDERAL comp law for shore-based maritime workers, added by endorsement (WC 00 01 06).
- The Jones Act (vessel crew) and FELA (interstate railroad workers) are FAULT-based - the worker must sue and prove negligence.
- The Voluntary Compensation Endorsement offers statutory-equivalent benefits to employees exempt from the comp statute.
Where the Policy Applies: Item 3.A vs Item 3.C
The Information Page controls geography:
| Item | Name | Function |
|---|---|---|
| 3.A | Primary / designated states | States where the employer operates at inception; Part One applies there in full |
| 3.C | Other States Insurance | Lists states the employer may expand into later; coverage springs up automatically if operations begin there |
A state can be listed in 3.A or 3.C — never both. If an employer begins work in a brand-new state that is neither listed, there may be a coverage gap. Listing "all states except those with monopolistic funds and [3.A states]" in 3.C is a common broad approach.
Other States Insurance in Practice
Use Item 3.C when an employer might expand into states it is not operating in yet:
- If a state is listed in 3.C and the employer later begins operations there, Part One coverage automatically applies as if the state had been listed in 3.A from the start.
- A state the employer is already operating in at inception belongs in 3.A, not 3.C.
- Monopolistic-fund states cannot be covered by Other States Insurance — coverage there must come from the state fund.
Exam tip: "plans to expand later" -> 3.C; "already working there now" -> 3.A.
USL&H Act (Maritime Shore-Based Workers)
The Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act (USL&H) is a federal workers' comp law covering employees injured on the navigable waters of the United States or adjoining areas (piers, docks, terminals, shipyards) used in loading, unloading, repairing, or building vessels.
- It is a no-fault comp system like state law, but federal, with higher benefit scales than most states.
- State WC policies exclude USL&H obligations unless added by the USL&H Coverage Endorsement (WC 00 01 06), which extends Part One to USL&H.
- USL&H covers shore-based maritime workers — not the crew of a vessel (that is the Jones Act, below).
Major Federal Acts and the Jones Act
Several federal statutes cover workers outside state systems:
| Act | Who it covers | Nature |
|---|---|---|
| USL&H Act | Shore-based maritime workers (longshoremen, harbor workers) | No-fault federal comp; add via endorsement |
| Jones Act (Merchant Marine Act) | Crew members / seamen of a vessel | Negligence-based; seaman SUES the employer in tort |
| FELA (Federal Employers' Liability Act) | Interstate railroad workers | Negligence-based; employee must prove fault |
| Defense Base Act | Civilian contractors on U.S. military bases overseas | Extends USL&H |
| Federal Black Lung / FECA | Coal miners / federal civilian employees | Federal comp programs |
Critical contrast: USL&H and state comp are no-fault. The Jones Act and FELA are fault-based — the worker must sue and prove the employer's negligence. The Jones Act covers the crew of a vessel; USL&H covers the shore-based workers who load and service it.
Voluntary Compensation Endorsement
Some workers are exempt from a state comp statute (e.g., certain farm laborers, domestic, or casual employees) and so are not automatically entitled to benefits. The Voluntary Compensation Endorsement lets the employer offer those employees statutory-equivalent benefits voluntarily. If the worker accepts the benefit, that typically releases the employer from a tort suit; if the worker rejects benefits and sues, the matter shifts to Part Two.
Item 3.A vs. Item 3.C — Where the Policy Applies
The WC policy's Information Page controls geography. Item 3.A lists states where coverage applies on a primary basis at inception. Item 3.C (Other States Insurance) lists states where coverage automatically extends if the employer later begins operations there during the term — but only states named in 3.C (or "all states except those in 3.A and the monopolistic states") are covered. A state listed in neither 3.A nor 3.C is uninsured for an employee who gets hurt working there — the classic exam trap when an employer expands into a new state without endorsing it.
Other States Insurance in Practice
If an employer hires a worker in a 3.C state, the insurer pays that state's statutory benefits as if it were a 3.A state. The fix for a truly new operation is to add the state to 3.A by endorsement. Monopolistic states can never be picked up by 3.C — coverage there must come from the state fund.
USL&H and Maritime Workers
The Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act (USL&H) is a federal WC law covering maritime employees (longshoremen, ship repairers, harbor workers) injured on navigable waters or adjoining piers/docks — workers not seamen but beyond state WC. USL&H benefits are higher than typical state benefits, so the exposure is added by the USL&H Coverage Endorsement specifying the federal act. A dockworker loading cargo is USL&H; a clerical worker inland is state WC.
The Jones Act and Other Federal Acts
The Jones Act (Merchant Marine Act) covers seamen (crew members) and, unlike no-fault WC, lets an injured seaman sue the employer for negligence — so it is a liability exposure handled by maritime employers liability/P&I, not standard WC. Other federal acts include the Federal Employees' Compensation Act (FECA), the Federal Employers' Liability Act (FELA) for railroad workers (also negligence-based), the Defense Base Act, and the Federal Black Lung program. The tested distinction: USL&H and FECA are no-fault; the Jones Act and FELA are negligence/fault-based suits.
Voluntary Compensation Endorsement
The Voluntary Compensation Endorsement extends WC-style benefits to employees not subject to a WC statute (certain farm or domestic workers, or workers in a jurisdiction with no compulsory law), offering statutory-scale benefits in lieu of a tort suit — closing a gap the standard policy leaves.
A California employer's workers occasionally travel to Ohio (a monopolistic state) to perform short jobs. How does the employer properly arrange coverage?
Which statement correctly distinguishes the Jones Act from the USL&H Act?