Texas Ethical Standards and Professional Boundaries

Competency 013 of the Texas Pedagogy and Professional Responsibilities (PPR) EC-12 examination assesses an educator's comprehensive understanding of legal statutes, ethical mandates, and the governance structure of public education in Texas. Teaching is a public trust. Texas educators do not merely function as curriculum facilitators; they serve as fiduciary agents bound by state law and professional standards to protect student welfare, maintain organizational integrity, and uphold public confidence. In Texas, the benchmark for professional conduct is codified under the Texas Administrative Code (19 TAC Chapter 247): Educators' Code of Ethics, administered and enforced by the State Board for Educator Certification (SBEC).

---

Statutory Authority and the Role of SBEC

The Texas Legislature gives SBEC responsibility for educator certification and professional standards. TEA administers relevant programs and investigations. The code has three sets of enforceable standards: professional conduct and performance, conduct toward colleagues, and conduct toward students. Employment consequences under district policy, certification consequences through SBEC, and criminal liability are distinct questions.

The August 2026 code also contains Standards 1.14–1.18. These require compliance with TEC §11.005 restrictions on DEI duties, §11.401 restrictions on assistance with social transitioning, §28.0043 restrictions on sexual-orientation/gender-identity instruction, and §26.008 parent-information requirements; Standard 1.18 addresses promoting or encouraging specified illegal conduct visible or accessible to students. Read the incorporated statutes and current district procedures when a scenario concerns those subjects. These additions do not authorize harassment, unsafe treatment, or disclosure to people without a lawful purpose.

Source: current Chapter 247, August 2026 edition.

---

Standard 1: Professional Ethical Conduct, Practices and Performance

Standard 1 addresses the educator's obligation to the profession, the school district, and the public. Key enforceable provisions include:

1. Compliance with State and Federal Law

Educators must strictly adhere to state and federal statutes, Texas Education Agency (TEA) rules, and local school board policies. Ignorance of the law is never an acceptable defense. Certified professionals are presumed to know the regulatory frameworks governing curriculum, attendance reporting, special education accommodations, and student civil rights.

Teachers frequently handle activity funds, field-trip payments, and club dues. Standard 1.2 prohibits misappropriation or diversion for personal gain; Standard 1.6 covers falsified records and Standard 1.7 requires compliance with law and written board policy. Use authorized accounts, receipts, reconciliation, secure custody, and required deposit procedures. Temporarily borrowing student money for personal expenses remains misappropriation even if the teacher intends to repay it. A local deposit deadline is a local procedure, not a universal statewide 3:00 PM rule. Violations can prompt employment, certificate, and criminal proceedings as the facts warrant.

3. Truthful Professional Certifications and Documents

Educators must not knowingly make false or deceptive statements regarding their professional qualifications, degrees, criminal history records, or previous employment dismissals on certification applications or district employment paperwork. Falsifying professional development records, altering student attendance registers, or misrepresenting grades directly violates Standard 1.

Standard 1.12 addresses illegal use, abuse, or distribution of controlled substances, prescription drugs, and toxic inhalants. Standard 1.13 prohibits being under the influence of alcohol or consuming it on school property or during school activities when students are present. District policies may impose additional restrictions. Follow campus medication procedures and consult the nurse; do not substitute a generalized alcohol-possession claim for the actual rule.

---

Standard 2: Ethical Conduct Toward Professional Colleagues

Standard 2 governs professional interactions among educators, campus administrators, instructional aides, and district staff members. Professional collaboration and institutional health require mutual respect and professional boundaries.

1. Non-Discrimination and Equal Opportunity

Educators must not engage in discriminatory practices against professional colleagues on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, disability, or other legally protected categories in hiring, assignment, evaluation, or professional advancement.

2. Confidentiality of Colleague Information

An educator must safeguard confidential personnel information regarding colleagues—including performance appraisals (such as T-TESS ratings), grievance filings, medical accommodations, and disciplinary actions—unless disclosure is required by law or necessary to serve a compelling professional need.

3. Protection Against Retaliation and Defamation

Educators must not retaliate against a colleague who exercises legal rights, files a grievance, or reports a violation of the Code of Ethics. Making maliciously false, deceptive, or defamatory statements intended to injure a colleague's professional standing, reputation, or employment violates Standard 2.2 (§247.2(2)(B)).

4. Honest and Objective Professional Evaluations

Educators serving in evaluative or supervisory capacities (e.g., department chairs, mentor teachers, campus appraisers) must provide honest, evidence-based evaluations. Falsifying an observation report, inflating performance data, or suppressing critical deficiencies violates professional ethical standards.

---

Standard 3: Ethical Conduct Toward Students

Standard 3 protects students' confidentiality, learning, health, safety, dignity, and professional boundaries. The code's student definition includes persons enrolled in primary or secondary public or private schools, regardless of age, and specified eligible persons aged 18 or younger. An enrolled adult student's consent does not excuse a prohibited educator–student romantic or sexual relationship.

1. Protection of Student Safety and Dignity

Educators must protect students from conditions detrimental to learning, physical health, or mental safety. Teachers are prohibited from deliberately humiliating, ridiculing, disparaging, or emotionally abusing students. Corporal punishment, when permitted by local board policy, must adhere rigidly to administrative guidelines; unauthorized physical discipline or aggressive physical contact violates state regulations.

Standard 3.6 prohibits soliciting or engaging in sexual conduct or a romantic relationship with a student or minor. This ethical boundary applies even when the enrolled student is an adult. Criminal liability under Penal Code §21.12 has its own statutory elements and exceptions; not every act loosely called a boundary crossing is automatically the same felony. SBEC sanctions follow the applicable rules and proceedings, with serious misconduct potentially requiring revocation or other consequences. Do not promise one automatic sanction for every factual situation.

3. Grooming Behaviors and Inappropriate Boundary Crossings

Professional boundary violations rarely begin with overt sexual misconduct. They typically manifest as subtle "grooming" behaviors where the educator treats a student as an emotional confidant or peer. Prohibited boundary crossings include:

• Giving individualized, personal gifts, clothing, or cash to a specific student without parental or administrative knowledge.
• Sharing personal romantic, dating, marital, or emotional struggles with students.
• Meeting with a student alone in private, off-campus settings or unmonitored classrooms with closed doors and obscured windows.
• Loaning personal vehicles or providing unauthorized transportation to students without administrative and parental permission.
• Exhibiting favoritism that isolates the student from peers and fosters emotional dependency on the teacher.

4. Electronic Communications and Social Media Boundaries

Standard 3.8 requires reasonably prudent professional boundaries. Standard 3.9 prohibits inappropriate electronic communication. Evaluate the purpose, content, timing, frequency, concealment, and whether communication includes sexual material, threats, or emotional dependency. An academic purpose does not excuse secrecy or inappropriate intimacy. Conversely, the code does not make every personal-device message automatically the same statewide violation regardless of context; written district policy may restrict channels more strictly.

Use district-approved, retained channels for routine class communication, protect confidentiality, keep exchanges focused on instruction, and follow parent/administrator visibility requirements. Do not develop a private confidant relationship, exchange intimate messages, or use disappearing communication to evade oversight. If a student contacts you during an emergency, respond to protect the student and obtain appropriate emergency help; do not let switching applications delay urgent assistance. Document and notify appropriate personnel afterward.

For transportation, gifts, meetings, and communication, ask whether there is a legitimate professional purpose, appropriate authorization and visibility, and a reasonably prudent boundary. Giving ordinary school supplies through an authorized assistance program differs from secret personal gifts creating dependency. Follow policy and avoid favoritism. Do not label all assistance as grooming, or all compassionate intentions as permission.

---