Constrictive Pericarditis vs. Restrictive Physiology
Key Takeaways
- Septal bounce and respirophasic septal shift, caused by ventricular interdependence within a rigid pericardium, are hallmark constrictive-pericarditis signs absent in restrictive cardiomyopathy.
- Annulus reversus — medial (septal) e′ velocity exceeding lateral e′ velocity — occurs in constriction because the lateral wall is tethered by the diseased pericardium.
- Medial e′ velocity is typically preserved or increased (≥8 cm/s) in constrictive pericarditis but reduced (<8 cm/s) in restrictive cardiomyopathy.
- Hepatic vein diastolic flow reversal predominates in expiration in constrictive pericarditis and in inspiration in restrictive cardiomyopathy.
- Mitral inflow respiratory variation exceeds 25% in constriction but is typically under 10% in restrictive cardiomyopathy, whose filling pattern is already maximally restrictive.
Constrictive Pericarditis: Pathophysiology
Constrictive pericarditis results from a thickened, fibrotic, and often calcified pericardium that loses its normal compliance, encasing the heart in a rigid shell. Total cardiac volume becomes fixed, so early diastolic filling is rapid — driven by the atrioventricular pressure gradient — but abruptly halts once the fixed pericardial volume is reached, producing the "dip-and-plateau" or "square-root sign" on invasive pressure tracings. Because the rigid pericardium isolates the heart from normal respiratory pressure swings, intrathoracic and intracardiac pressures become dissociated, producing exaggerated ventricular interdependence and respirophasic septal motion — features that are not present in restrictive cardiomyopathy, where the myocardium itself, not the pericardium, is the diseased structure.
Key Echocardiographic Signs of Constriction
- Septal bounce (septal shudder): an abrupt, early-diastolic posterior "bounce" of the interventricular septum, best appreciated on M-mode through the septum, reflecting the sudden cessation of ventricular filling.
- Respirophasic septal shift: with inspiration the septum shifts leftward (toward the LV); with expiration it shifts rightward (toward the RV) — the direct 2D correlate of dissociated intrathoracic and intracardiac pressures.
- Annulus reversus: medial (septal) mitral annular e′ velocity exceeds lateral annular e′ velocity — the reverse of the normal pattern, in which lateral e′ exceeds medial e′ — because the lateral wall is tethered by the diseased pericardium while the septum moves relatively freely.
- Preserved or increased medial e′: medial e′ is typically ≥8 cm/s, sometimes supranormal, despite a restrictive-appearing transmitral inflow pattern — a key differentiator from restrictive cardiomyopathy, where tissue Doppler velocities are reduced.
- Hepatic vein flow reversal in expiration: diastolic flow reversal is exaggerated and predominates during expiration in constriction, mirroring the respirophasic septal shift.
- Mitral inflow respiratory variation >25%, the same threshold used for tamponade, reflecting the same exaggerated ventricular interdependence.
- IVC plethora, common to constriction, tamponade, and restrictive physiology alike, reflecting elevated right-sided filling pressure.
Restrictive Cardiomyopathy: The Key Differential
Restrictive cardiomyopathy results from infiltrative or fibrotic myocardial disease — cardiac amyloidosis, sarcoidosis, hemochromatosis, endomyocardial fibrosis — producing a stiff, non-compliant myocardium. Filling is restrictive (high E/A ratio, short deceleration time) similarly to constriction, but because the disease resides in the myocardium itself, not an external constraining shell, septal bounce and respirophasic septal shift are absent, and tissue Doppler velocities are reduced rather than preserved.
Differentiating Constriction from Restriction
| Feature | Constrictive Pericarditis | Restrictive Cardiomyopathy |
|---|---|---|
| Septal bounce | Present | Absent |
| Respirophasic septal shift | Present | Absent |
| Medial e′ velocity | Preserved/increased (≥8 cm/s) | Reduced (<8 cm/s, often <5 cm/s) |
| Annulus reversus (medial e′ > lateral e′) | Present | Absent |
| Hepatic vein diastolic flow reversal | Predominates in expiration | Predominates in inspiration |
| Mitral inflow respiratory variation | >25% | Typically <10% |
| Pericardium | Thickened ± calcified | Normal |
| BNP | Normal or mildly elevated | Often markedly elevated |
Additional adjunctive clues sharpen the distinction further. Longitudinal strain is relatively preserved in constriction, since the myocardium is intrinsically normal, but reduced in restrictive cardiomyopathy — sometimes with a characteristic "apical sparing" pattern in cardiac amyloidosis. When echo findings remain equivocal, cardiac MRI (pericardial thickening, late gadolinium enhancement, real-time cine imaging of septal bounce) or cardiac catheterization with simultaneous LV/RV pressure tracings (concordant versus discordant respiratory pressure changes) can clarify the diagnosis.
Etiology and Additional Diagnostic Clues
Constrictive pericarditis most often follows viral/idiopathic pericarditis, cardiac surgery, mediastinal radiation therapy, or, in endemic regions, tuberculosis; any process causing chronic pericardial inflammation can lead to fibrosis and calcification over months to years. Because calcification is common, a heavily calcified pericardium on 2D imaging — sometimes better appreciated on chest CT — should raise suspicion even before Doppler criteria are formally assessed.
At cardiac catheterization, simultaneous LV and RV pressure tracings show concordant respiratory pressure changes (both ventricular systolic pressures rise or fall together with respiration) in restrictive cardiomyopathy, versus discordant changes (LV and RV systolic pressures move in opposite directions with respiration) in constriction — the invasive correlate of the septal shift seen on echo. Some sources describe the preserved-or-increased medial e′ finding in constriction as "annulus paradoxus," emphasizing that tissue Doppler behaves opposite to what the restrictive-looking mitral inflow pattern would predict.
Finally, remember that constriction and restriction sit on a spectrum with effusive-constrictive pericarditis (Section 10.1), in which a coexisting effusion with tamponade physiology is layered on top of an underlying thickened, constrictive pericardium; the diagnosis is confirmed when RA pressure fails to normalize after pericardiocentesis.
Because management differs fundamentally — pericardiectomy is potentially curative for constriction, while restrictive cardiomyopathy is managed medically and may progress to transplantation — correctly distinguishing the two is both a high-yield exam topic and a decision with major treatment implications. The sonographer's structured evaluation of septal motion, tissue Doppler, and hepatic vein flow is often the first data set that points the clinical team toward the correct diagnosis.
A practical bedside sequence reinforces the pattern: start with M-mode through the septum to look for the bounce, add 2D imaging across the respiratory cycle to confirm the septal shift, then move to tissue Doppler at the medial and lateral mitral annulus to check for annulus reversus, and finish with hepatic vein pulsed-wave Doppler timed to respiration. Running through all four in sequence, rather than relying on any single sign in isolation, is what gives the exam-day and real-world diagnosis its accuracy, since no individual finding is perfectly sensitive or specific on its own.
Which finding, termed annulus reversus, helps differentiate constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy?
Hepatic vein Doppler showing prominent diastolic flow reversal predominantly during EXPIRATION is most consistent with which condition?