4.3 Assessment of Voice & Resonance Disorders
Key Takeaways
- Medical examination by an Otolaryngologist (ENT) via laryngoscopy is mandatory prior to initiating SLP voice therapy to visualize laryngeal anatomy and rule out malignant or surgical pathology.
- Perceptual evaluation instruments include CAPE-V (100 mm Visual Analog Scale across 6 core parameters) and GRBAS (4-point ordinal scale rating Grade, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia, and Strain).
- Acoustic and aerodynamic metrics evaluate Jitter (<1.04%), Shimmer (<3.81%), HNR (>20 dB), CPP (gold standard for continuous speech), MPT, and s/z Ratio (>1.4 indicates laryngeal pathology).
- Laryngeal videostroboscopy evaluates glottal closure patterns (hourglass, bowed, complete) and mucosal wave dynamics under synchronized flashing light.
- Resonance disorders (hypernasality vs. hyponasality) are quantified objectively using Nasometry (Nasalance score) and aerodynamic pressure-airflow techniques.
4.3 Assessment of Voice & Resonance Disorders
Multidisciplinary Assessment Workflow & Mandatory Protocols
Assessment of voice and resonance disorders requires a rigorous interprofessional framework. On the Praxis SLP (5331) exam, a core clinical mandate is that an Otolaryngologist (ENT) must perform a medical laryngeal examination (rigid or flexible laryngoscopy) prior to the initiation of speech-language pathology voice intervention.
Clinical Workflow Imperative:
ENT Laryngoscopic Visual Examination (Rule out Carcinoma, Dysplasia, Organic Lesions)
↓
SLP Comprehensive Voice & Resonance Evaluation (Perceptual, Acoustic, Aerodynamic, Imaging)
↓
Behavioral Voice Therapy Implementation
- Rationale: Providing voice therapy without prior ENT examination is ethically and clinically contraindicated, as behavioral therapy cannot resolve malignant laryngeal neoplasms (e.g., squamous cell carcinoma) or structural conditions requiring immediate surgical or pharmacological management.
Subjective Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation
Auditory-perceptual assessment translates human auditory perception of voice quality into standardized clinical ratings.
Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V)
Developed by ASHA, the CAPE-V utilizes a 100-millimeter Visual Analog Scale (VAS) to rate 6 core vocal parameters across three standardized tasks (sustained vowels /a/ and /i/, sentence reading, and running speech):
- Overall Severity: Global impression of vocal deviance.
- Roughness: Perceived irregularity of vocal fold vibration.
- Breathiness: Audible air leakage through an incomplete glottal seal.
- Strain: Perceived vocal effort and hyperfunctional supraglottic adduction.
- Pitch: Auditory perceptual correlate of fundamental frequency ($f_0$).
- Loudness: Auditory perceptual correlate of sound pressure level (SPL).
The GRBAS Scale
The GRBAS system (Japanese Society of Logopedics and Phoniatrics) employs a 4-point ordinal scale (0 = Normal, 1 = Slight, 2 = Moderate, 3 = Severe) across 5 parameters:
- G (Grade): Overall degree of dysphonia.
- R (Roughness): Acoustic correlate of frequency/amplitude perturbation (jitter/shimmer).
- B (Breathiness): Acoustic correlate of turbulent noise and reduced HNR.
- A (Asthenia): Weakness or lack of vocal power.
- S (Strain): Excessive muscular tension and elevated subglottal pressure.
Objective Acoustic & Aerodynamic Assessment
Objective instrumental metrics provide non-invasive, quantitative baselines for tracking vocal physiology and treatment outcomes.
Acoustic Measures & Normative Thresholds
- Fundamental Frequency ($f_0$): Average rate of vocal fold vibration. Normative averages: Adult Males = 100–120 Hz; Adult Females = 180–220 Hz; Children = 250–300 Hz.
- Jitter (Frequency Perturbation): Cycle-to-cycle variation in fundamental frequency during sustained phonation. Normative threshold: $< 1.04%$ (Elevated in vocal fold mass lesions such as nodules or polyps).
- Shimmer (Amplitude Perturbation): Cycle-to-cycle variation in peak sound amplitude during sustained phonation. Normative threshold: $< 3.81%$ (or $< 0.35\ dB)$ (Elevated in glottal incompetence and vocal fold paresis).
- Harmonics-to-Noise Ratio (HNR): Ratio of periodic harmonic vocal energy to aperiodic noise energy. Normative threshold: $> 20\ dB$. Reduced HNR indicates increased breathiness and air turbulence.
- Cepstral Peak Prominence (CPP): Prominence of the cepstral peak relative to the background spectral noise floor. CPP is the current clinical gold standard for continuous speech dysphonia analysis, as it accurately quantifies voice quality without requiring steady sustained vowels or time-domain pitch tracking.
Aerodynamic Measures & Clinical Ratios
- Maximum Phonation Time (MPT): Longest duration (in seconds) an individual can sustain phonation of /a/ on a single deep breath. Normative adult values: Males = 20–25 seconds; Females = 15–20 seconds.
- s/z Ratio:
- Clinical Interpretation: Both phonemes require equivalent pulmonary expiratory support, but /z/ requires laryngeal vocal fold valving. A ratio $> 1.4$ strongly indicates laryngeal pathology (e.g., vocal fold nodules, polyps, papilloma, or paralysis) that impairs vocal fold vibration during voiced /z/, while unvoiced /s/ remains unaffected.
- Subglottal Pressure ($P_{\sub}$): Air pressure below the closed vocal folds required to initiate phonation (Phonation Threshold Pressure $P_{ h} \≈ 3--5\ cm H_2\O$). Hyperfunctional voice disorders exhibit elevated $P_{\sub}$.
- Mean Phonatory Airflow Rate: Average rate of air passing through the glottis during phonation (Normative range: 80 to 200 mL/s). Values $> 200\ mL/s$ indicate hypofunction/breathiness; values $< 80\ mL/s$ indicate hyperfunction/strain.
Endoscopic & Videostroboscopic Imaging
Laryngeal Videostroboscopy utilizes a synchronized flashing light source triggered by the patient's $f_0$ to create an optical illusion of slow-motion vocal fold vibration.
| Stroboscopic Parameter | Normal / Physiological Presentation | Pathological Manifestations & Clinical Differential |
|---|---|---|
| Glottal Closure Pattern | Complete glottal closure during phase peak | • Hourglass: Bilateral Vocal Fold Nodules<br/>• Bowed / Spindle: Presbyphonia (vocal fold atrophy) or SLN paresis<br/>• Posterior Gap: Common normative variant in young females<br/>• Incomplete / Irregular: Vocal fold paralysis or carcinoma |
| Mucosal Wave | Propagation of mucosal ripple across $\≈ 50%$ of visible fold width | Absent / Stiff mucosal wave indicates deep structural infiltration into the ligament/vocalis muscle (e.g., vocal fold scar, carcinoma, or intracordal cyst) |
| Amplitude of Vibration | Lateral excursion of vocal fold edge $\≈ 50%$ of total fold width | Reduced in hyperfunction or scarring; increased in flaccid paresis |
| Periodicity & Symmetry | Regular, synchronous left-right vibration | Asymmetric vibration indicates structural inequality (unilateral polyp vs. normal fold) |
Assessment of Resonance Disorders & Velopharyngeal Function
Resonance disorders result from abnormal coupling or uncoupling of the oral, nasal, and pharyngeal cavities during speech production.
Differential Typologies of Resonance Disorders
- Hypernasality: Excessive nasal resonance during production of oral vowels and voiced consonants, caused by Velopharyngeal Insufficiency (VPI) (structural defect, e.g., uncorrected cleft palate, short soft palate) or Velopharyngeal Incompetence (neuromuscular deficit, e.g., velar paresis in dysarthria).
- Hyponasality (Denasality): Inadequate nasal resonance during production of nasal phonemes (/m, n, ŋ/), caused by physical nasal airway obstruction (e.g., severe adenoid hypertrophy, nasal polyps, deviated septum).
- Cul-de-sac Resonance: Sound energy trapped in an acoustic cavity with a restricted exit (e.g., oral cul-de-sac caused by enlarged palatine tonsils blocking the oral cavity).
Objective & Clinical Resonance Diagnostics
- Nasometry: Measures Nasalance Score:
- Interpretation: Oral reading passages (e.g., Rainbow Passage without nasals) should yield low nasalance ($< 15%$); scores $> 25--30%$ confirm hypernasality.
- Air Pressure-Airflow Assessment (PERCI): Quantifies velopharyngeal orifice area during high-pressure consonant production (/p, t, k/). Normal closure area is $< 2\ mm^2$; incompetent closure exceeds $10--20\ mm^2$.
- Clinical Mirror Test: Placing a cold dental mirror beneath nostrils during non-nasal production (e.g., /i, s, p/); fogging indicates velopharyngeal air leakage (hypernasality/nasal emission).
During an aerodynamic voice evaluation, a client sustains /s/ for 22 seconds and /z/ for 11 seconds, resulting in an s/z ratio of 2.0. How should the SLP interpret this finding?
Which acoustic parameter represents the modern clinical gold standard for quantifying overall dysphonia severity in continuous speech samples, overcoming the limitation of traditional time-domain perturbation measures?
A 45-year-old high school teacher presents to an outpatient speech clinic with severe ongoing hoarseness and vocal fatigue. What is the mandatory preliminary clinical step the SLP must verify before initiating voice therapy?
During videostroboscopy of a patient presenting with breathy dysphonia, the SLP observes bilateral symmetrical soft tissue swellings at the junction of the anterior one-third and posterior two-thirds of the vocal folds, resulting in an hourglass glottal closure pattern. What vocal fold pathology is observed?