Steel Beams and Girders
Key Takeaways
- Steel beam design begins with compatible factored or service demands and the matching LRFD design or ASD allowable resistance format
- Cross-section compactness controls local-buckling behavior, while lateral-torsional buckling depends on compression-flange bracing and unbraced length
- Nominal strength Mn is not the final LRFD or ASD resistance; apply either the applicable resistance factor or safety factor, never both
- Flexure and shear checks do not replace concentrated-force, connection, web, deflection, vibration, and load-path checks
- For a 2026 exam, use the AISC Steel Construction Manual, 15th edition, and the PE Civil handbook active for the test date
Steel Beams and Girders
Keep the formats paired: Compare factored demand
M_u,V_uwith LRFD design resistanceφM_n,φV_n, or compare service/ASD demandM_a,V_awith allowable resistanceM_n/Ω,V_n/Ω. Never compare factored demand with an ASD allowable value or apply bothφandΩ.
From Load Path to Member Demand
Establish tributary loads, combinations, supports, releases, and bracing before selecting a shape. Structural analysis provides moment, shear, reactions, and service deflection. Member design then finds the controlling resistance among applicable limit states. A girder supporting beams may also receive concentrated reactions that a uniform-load sketch hides.
| Design question | Governing input | Common substitution error |
|---|---|---|
| Major-axis flexure | Moment diagram and compression-flange bracing | Using full span automatically as L_b |
| Shear | Shear diagram and web geometry | Assuming flexural capacity proves web capacity |
| Concentrated force | Reaction/load location and bearing length | Smearing a point force over the full span |
| Deflection | Service load, span, stiffness, continuity | Using a factored strength combination |
Check the actual segment under consideration. Positive bending normally puts the top flange in compression; negative bending can put the bottom flange in compression. The brace must restrain the relevant flange and provide the stiffness/strength required by AISC 15th; physical contact alone is not automatically an effective brace.
Compactness and Local Buckling
AISC classifies compression elements from width-to-thickness ratios and element boundary conditions. A compact section can develop the plastic stress distribution assumed by the applicable flexural expression before local buckling. A noncompact element can reach yield but local buckling reduces available inelastic rotation or strength. A slender element buckles elastically and requires the specified reduction.
Classify flange and web separately using the correct material yield stress and table limits. The least favorable applicable element can control the section behavior. “Wide-flange” is a shape family, not proof of compactness, and a compact cross-section can still undergo lateral-torsional buckling.
Lateral-Torsional Buckling
Lateral-torsional buckling, or LTB, couples lateral movement of the compression flange with twist. The key length L_b is the distance between points that adequately brace the compression flange against lateral displacement and twist—not necessarily the beam span. AISC flexural strength regions use limiting lengths and the applicable moment-gradient modifier. Do not choose a favorable C_b without calculating or obtaining it under the permitted expression.
For a 30-ft simple beam braced at both supports and at an effective midpoint brace, the two unbraced segments are 15 ft. Use L_b = 15 ft for a positive-moment compression flange if all three points provide the required restraint. If that midpoint connection restrains only the tension flange or lacks torsional restraint, it does not automatically halve L_b. Re-evaluate bracing where the moment sign changes.
Worked Nominal-to-Design Strength Screen
Analysis gives M_u = 255 kip-ft and V_u = 150 kips. After checking compactness, LTB with the actual L_b, and all applicable section limit states, suppose the controlling nominal strengths are M_n = 300 kip-ft and V_n = 180 kips. The problem supplies LRFD factors φ_b = 0.90 and φ_v = 1.00 for these limit states.
Flexural design strength is
φ_bM_n = 0.90(300) = 270 kip-ft.
The utilization is
M_u/(φ_bM_n) = 255/270 = 0.944.
Shear design strength and utilization are
φ_vV_n = 1.00(180) = 180 kips
and
V_u/(φ_vV_n) = 150/180 = 0.833.
Both screens pass. Comparing M_u directly with M_n would report 0.850 and overstate available design resistance. For ASD, restart with compatible service-load demand and the specified M_n/Ω; do not divide the already factored LRFD result by Ω.
Shear and Plate-Girder Behavior
Web shear resistance depends on web slenderness, material, stiffening, and the applicable buckling/postbuckling provisions. A slender web may buckle before shear yielding; a stiffened girder may use additional behavior only when AISC requirements are satisfied. Openings interrupt shear flow and require an explicit check. High moment and high shear occurring together may trigger an interaction provision rather than two unrelated unity checks.
Concentrated Forces and Connections
At supports, column reactions, hangers, and point loads, investigate the applicable web local yielding, web crippling, sidesway buckling, and compression-buckling limit states. Bearing length, distance to the end, flange restraint, load application to one or both flanges, and stiffeners matter. A stiffener needs its own bearing, buckling, weld, and load-path checks; drawing one does not create unlimited capacity.
Connections must transfer the beam force into the support. Check bolt/weld demand, copes, block shear or net-section effects where applicable, and erection stability. A member adequate between supports can still fail at its end connection.
Serviceability and Final Workflow
Use service-level loads and the correct elastic stiffness for deflection and vibration. Include continuity and composite action only when they are actually present. Camber changes initial geometry but is not added structural stiffness.
- Analyze compatible strength and service combinations.
- Classify flange and web compactness.
- Map every braced segment and compression flange; calculate applicable LTB strength.
- Find controlling
M_nandV_n, then apply exactly one design format. - Check interaction, concentrated forces, openings, stiffeners, and connections.
- Check deflection, vibration, ponding susceptibility, and construction stage.
- Trace reactions into the supporting system.
Use only the supplied AISC 15th edition for a 2026 exam; later AISC editions can change equations, tables, and organization.
In the worked LRFD screen, what is the flexural design strength and utilization for Mn = 300 kip-ft, φb = 0.90, and Mu = 255 kip-ft?
A 30-ft simply supported steel beam has effective compression-flange braces at both supports and at midspan. What unbraced length applies to each positive-moment segment?
Which statement describes a complete steel girder check after flexural design strength has passed?