11.4 Claims, Coordination of Benefits, and Subrogation
Key Takeaways
Health claims follow the indemnity principle: restore the insured but never let them profit from a loss.
Claim timeline: notice 20 days, forms 15 days, proof 90 days; unfair claims settlement laws require prompt acknowledgment, investigation, and payment.
COB designates a primary and secondary plan so total reimbursement never exceeds 100% of the actual expense.
The birthday rule makes the parent with the earlier calendar-year birthday (month/day) primary for a child covered under both parents.
Subrogation recovers a paid claim from a liable third party, whereas COB coordinates between two insurers covering the same person.
Paying Claims Without Over-Indemnifying
Health insurance is built on the principle of indemnity — the insured should be restored to their pre-loss financial position but not profit from a loss. Three mechanisms enforce this when more than one source could pay: the claims-handling process, Coordination of Benefits (COB), and subrogation. The exam tests the claim timeline, the COB primary/secondary rules (especially the "birthday rule"), and the difference between COB and subrogation.
The Claims Process
Claim handling mirrors the uniform provisions but adds operational steps:
- Notice of claim — within 20 days (or as soon as reasonably possible).
- Claim forms — insurer sends within 15 days; if not, a written statement suffices.
- Proof of loss — within 90 days.
- Time of payment — paid immediately for lump sums; periodic benefits at least monthly.
- Payment of claims — to the insured (death benefit to beneficiary).
States impose unfair claims settlement rules: insurers must acknowledge claims promptly, investigate reasonably, and pay or deny within set windows. Failing to do so, or denying without a reasonable basis, is an unfair trade practice subject to penalties.
Coordination of Benefits (COB)
When a person is covered by two group plans, COB prevents collecting more than 100% of the actual expense. One plan is primary (pays first, up to its normal benefit) and the other is secondary (pays the balance up to its own limit).
Order-of-determination rules:
- The plan covering the person as an employee/member is primary over the plan covering them as a dependent.
- For a child covered under both parents, the birthday rule applies: the plan of the parent whose birthday falls earlier in the calendar year (month/day, not year of birth) is primary.
- For divorced parents, a court decree controls; absent that, the custodial parent's plan is usually primary.
- A plan covering an active employee is primary over one covering them as retired/laid-off.
Worked Example — COB and the Birthday Rule
A child is covered under both parents' group plans. The father's birthday is March 3; the mother's is September 12. A claim of $1,000 is incurred. The father's plan covers 80% of allowed charges; the mother's covers 90%.
- Primary plan = father's, because his birthday (March 3) falls earlier in the calendar year. It pays 80% × $1,000 = $800.
- Secondary plan = mother's. It pays the remaining $200, since total reimbursement is capped at the $1,000 actual expense — the family is reimbursed in full but does not profit.
- Without COB, both plans might each pay their share and the family could collect $800 + $900 = $1,700 on a $1,000 loss, violating indemnity. COB exists to stop exactly that.
COB Carve-Backs and Excess Provisions
Two refinements appear on harder COB items. First, secondary plans often use a non-duplication (carve-out) rule rather than paying the full remaining balance: the secondary pays only the amount, if any, by which its own normal benefit exceeds what the primary paid. If the primary paid 80% and the secondary would also have paid 80%, the secondary owes nothing — there is no extra balance under its own schedule.
Second, some individual policies carry an excess (other-insurance) provision that pays only after all other coverage is exhausted. Read whether the item describes group COB or an individual excess clause — they yield different numbers.
Subrogation vs Coordination of Benefits
Subrogation is the insurer's right, after paying a claim, to step into the insured's shoes and recover from a liable third party. If a negligent driver injures your insured and the health insurer pays $20,000 in medical bills, subrogation lets the insurer recoup that $20,000 from the at-fault driver (or their liability insurer). The insured cannot collect twice — once from the health plan and again, for the same bills, from the tortfeasor.
| Feature | Coordination of Benefits | Subrogation |
|---|---|---|
| Other party | Another insurer/plan covering the insured | A liable third party who caused the loss |
| Purpose | Order who pays first; cap at 100% | Recover paid claim from the wrongdoer |
| Trigger | Dual coverage | Third-party fault |
Both uphold indemnity by preventing the insured from profiting from a single loss.
Assignment, Facility of Payment, and Time of Payment
Payment mechanics generate several exam items:
- Payment of Claims directs benefits to the insured; if the insured dies, any unpaid benefit goes to the beneficiary, or absent one, to the estate.
- A Facility of Payment clause lets the insurer pay a small capped amount to a relative who appears equitably entitled when no beneficiary is named.
- Assignment lets the insured direct payment to a provider (assignment of benefits), but it transfers the right to the proceeds, not ownership of the policy.
- Time of Payment of Claims requires lump-sum benefits to be paid immediately on proof, and periodic indemnities (disability income) at least monthly. Unreasonable delay triggers interest and unfair-claims penalties.
Unfair Claims Settlement Practices
State versions of the NAIC Unfair Claims Settlement Practices Act make it a violation to do any of the following as a general business practice:
- Misrepresent pertinent facts or policy provisions.
- Fail to acknowledge and act promptly on communications about claims.
- Fail to adopt reasonable standards for prompt investigation.
- Refuse to pay claims without a reasonable investigation.
- Compel insureds to litigate by offering substantially less than amounts ultimately recovered.
- Deny a claim without a reasonable basis or fail to provide a prompt, written explanation of a denial.
A single inadvertent error is generally not a violation; the law targets a pattern. Penalties include fines, license suspension, and required restitution.
A child is covered under both parents' group plans. The mother's birthday is May 4 and the father's is November 20. Under the birthday rule, which plan is primary?
The father's plan, because fathers are presumed primary
The mother's plan, because her birthday falls earlier in the calendar year
Whichever plan has the higher benefit percentage
The plan of the older parent by year of birth
A health insurer pays $20,000 in medical bills after its insured is injured by a negligent driver, then recovers that amount from the at-fault driver's liability insurer. This recovery right is called:
Coordination of benefits
Subrogation
Reinstatement
Misstatement of age adjustment
Sections you finish are checked off in the contents.