7.3 Part F - General Provisions, Endorsements, and No-Fault Concepts
Key Takeaways
- Part F sets policy-wide conditions: bankruptcy, fraud, subrogation, legal action against us, territory (US/Canada, not Mexico), and termination.
- The 'Two or More Auto Policies' rule limits recovery to the highest single limit - an insurer's own policies cannot be stacked.
- Common endorsements include Miscellaneous Type Vehicle (PP 03 23), Towing and Labor, Extended Non-Owned, Named Non-Owner, and Loan/Lease Gap.
- No-fault states use PIP to pay first-party economic losses regardless of fault and impose a verbal or monetary tort threshold to limit suits.
- PIP is broader than Med Pay (covers wages/essential services) but does not pay the other driver's damages, which remain a liability (Part A) obligation.
Part F - General Provisions
Part F holds the policy-wide conditions that govern how the PAP operates. These are tested because they control claim and lawsuit mechanics across every coverage part.
- Bankruptcy of the insured does not relieve the insurer of its obligations.
- Changes - the policy can be amended only by endorsement issued by the insurer; if broadened coverage is added at no cost during the term, it applies automatically.
- Fraud - the policy provides no coverage for any insured who makes fraudulent statements or engages in fraudulent conduct connected with a loss.
- Legal Action Against Us - no suit may be brought until the insured has fully complied with policy terms; for liability, the insurer's obligation must first be determined by judgment or written agreement.
- Our Right to Recover Payment (subrogation) - after paying a loss, the insurer takes over the insured's right to recover from the responsible party; the insured must do nothing to impair that right.
- Policy Period and Territory - coverage applies in the U.S., its territories/possessions, Puerto Rico, and Canada; it does not extend to Mexico.
- Termination - rules for cancellation and nonrenewal, including statutory notice periods that vary by state.
Two Or More Auto Policies
If the same insurer issues two or more policies covering the same loss, Part F limits recovery to the highest applicable limit under any one policy - the insured cannot stack the insurer's own policies for the same loss.
Common Endorsements
The PAP is frequently tailored by endorsement. The most exam-relevant:
| Endorsement | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Miscellaneous Type Vehicle (PP 03 23) | Extends PAP to motorcycles, motor homes, golf carts, ATVs |
| Towing and Labor (PP 03 03) | Adds roadside towing/labor at the point of disablement |
| Extended Non-Owned Coverage (PP 03 06) | Liability for a furnished/regular-use non-owned auto |
| Named Non-Owner (PP 03 22) | Coverage for a driver who owns no auto |
| Loan/Lease Gap | Pays the gap between ACV and loan/lease balance |
| Joint Ownership Coverage (PP 03 34) | Two unrelated people / more than two relatives sharing a car |
An insured carries two PAP policies with the same insurer, each covering the same damaged auto, with limits of $50,000 and $25,000. Under the Part F 'Two or More Auto Policies' provision, the maximum the insurer pays for one covered loss is:
No-Fault and PIP Concepts
About a dozen states operate no-fault auto systems. Under no-fault, each driver's own insurer pays that driver's economic losses (medical, lost wages, essential services) regardless of who caused the accident, through Personal Injury Protection (PIP) coverage. The goal is to speed payment of medical bills and reduce small-claims litigation.
To limit lawsuits, no-fault states impose a tort threshold that a claimant must cross before suing for pain and suffering (non-economic damages):
- Verbal (descriptive) threshold - suit allowed only for serious injury defined in words: death, dismemberment, significant disfigurement, permanent injury, etc.
- Monetary (dollar) threshold - suit allowed only when medical bills exceed a stated dollar amount.
Choice/add-on states let the insured choose between a no-fault and a traditional tort option, or add PIP-style first-party benefits without restricting the right to sue.
How PIP Differs From Med Pay
The national portion routinely contrasts PIP with PAP Part B Medical Payments:
| Feature | Med Pay (Part B) | PIP (no-fault states) |
|---|---|---|
| Fault required? | No | No |
| Lost wages / essential services | No - medical only | Yes - broader economic loss |
| Mandatory? | Optional in most states | Mandatory in no-fault states |
| Limits tort suits? | No | Yes - subject to threshold |
Worked split-limit reminder. A liability limit shown as 100/300/50 means $100,000 bodily injury per person, $300,000 BI per accident, and $50,000 property damage per accident. If three claimants are injured for $80,000, $120,000, and $60,000, the per-person cap of $100,000 reduces the second and third to $100,000 and $60,000, but the $300,000 per-accident cap is not exceeded ($80,000 + $100,000 + $60,000 = $240,000), so the insurer pays $240,000 in BI. This split-limit logic underlies both liability and PIP/no-fault math on the exam.
Trap: PIP/no-fault is first-party and pays regardless of fault, but it does not pay the other driver's damages - that remains the job of liability coverage (Part A). And no-fault never eliminates the right to sue entirely; it merely raises a threshold.
Cancellation, Nonrenewal, and the Mexico Gap
Part F's Termination provision sets when and how the policy ends. The insurer's notice obligations vary by reason and by state, but the structure is consistent: shorter notice for nonpayment, longer notice for other reasons, and a separate nonrenewal notice at the end of the term.
| Action | Typical notice pattern |
|---|---|
| Cancel for nonpayment | Short (e.g., 10 days) |
| Cancel for other reasons | Longer (e.g., 30 days), often restricted after 60 days in force |
| Nonrenewal | Advance notice before term expires |
The Policy Territory covers the U.S., its territories and possessions, Puerto Rico, and Canada - but not Mexico.
Trap: Driving into Mexico leaves the insured uninsured under the PAP; a separate Mexican auto policy is required. Candidates routinely assume North-American-wide coverage.
In a verbal-threshold no-fault state, an insured suffers a permanent, significant disfigurement in a crash caused by another driver. The insured may: