6.5 RON Special Considerations
Key Takeaways
- A properly performed RON is valid under Ohio law, but acceptance by foreign countries, some courts, agencies, and recording offices varies - the notary cannot guarantee acceptance
- Ohio law governs every online act the notary performs because the notary must be physically in Ohio, regardless of where the signer sits
- Electronic estate-planning documents carry heightened exposure; notaries should confirm any added bond, insurance, or filing requirements before handling electronic wills or powers of attorney
- RON sessions create recordings containing biometric and identity data, so platform security, access control, and breach response are core duties
- Technical failures must never be 'finished anyway' - a dropped or failed session is rescheduled, though the technology fee may still apply
Acceptance Is Not Guaranteed
A RON performed under ORC 147.60-147.66 is legally valid in Ohio, but validity is not the same as acceptance. The notary should counsel signers that some recipients may refuse or scrutinize a remotely notarized document.
| Recipient | Potential issue |
|---|---|
| Foreign governments | May not recognize U.S. RON; apostille/legalization rules differ |
| Certain courts | Some require traditional, wet-ink notarization for filings |
| Government agencies | Policies vary by agency and document type |
| Financial institutions | Internal policy may demand in-person execution |
| County recording offices | After HB 315, Ohio recorders must accept electronically notarized documents, but out-of-state recorders may not |
The notary's duty is to perform the act correctly and to inform the signer that acceptance elsewhere varies - not to promise universal acceptance. Liability does not arise merely because a distant recipient declines a correctly executed RON.
Sensitive Documents and Heightened Exposure
Electronic estate-planning documents - electronic wills, electronic powers of attorney, and similar instruments - carry outsized liability because errors may surface years later, after the principal has died or lost capacity, and often affect vulnerable people. Before notarizing such documents online, a notary should confirm:
- whether the platform and the notary carry adequate errors-and-omissions (E&O) coverage and any required bond;
- whether a separate proof or filing must be made with the Secretary of State for the specific document class;
- whether witness requirements for the underlying instrument (for example, will-execution formalities) can be satisfied over the same audio-video channel.
Do not assume a standard online authorization automatically covers every high-risk document class - verify the current requirement before the session, because the consequences of getting an electronic will wrong are severe and long-delayed.
Security and Privacy Duties
Every RON session generates a recording holding the signer's face, voice, identity credential, and personal data - a rich target for misuse. The notary's obligations:
| Duty | Concrete action |
|---|---|
| Choose a reputable platform | Confirm encryption, access logging, and OAC 111:6-1-05 compliance |
| Protect credentials | Never share platform login or signing keys |
| Secure the workspace | Prevent third parties from viewing the screen or session |
| Control access to recordings | Limit to authorized personnel; follow retention rules |
| Respond to incidents | Notify the platform and, where required, the Secretary of State of a breach |
Handling Technical Failure
| Problem | Correct response |
|---|---|
| Connection drops | Reconnect or restart; never complete a partial act |
| Poor video/audio | Pause; resolve before proceeding |
| ID will not scan | Adjust lighting/angle; if it still fails, do not proceed |
| Repeated KBA failure | Apply the lockout rule; reschedule |
Worked scenario: Halfway through a jurat the signer's internet drops after the oath but before the signature. The notary may not complete the certificate from the partial recording - the signing was not witnessed live. The notary documents the failure, reschedules a fresh session, and may still bill the up-to-$10 technology fee for the platform use. Convenience never overrides any RON requirement; urgency is not an exception to credential analysis, KBA, recording, or the journal.
Jurisdiction Always Anchors to Ohio
No matter where the signer sits, Ohio law governs the act because the notary is physically in Ohio. That single fact answers a cluster of exam questions:
| Question pattern | Correct anchor |
|---|---|
| "Whose notary standards apply?" | Ohio's |
| "Who has disciplinary authority?" | The Ohio Secretary of State |
| "Can the notary perform the act from another state?" | No - the notary must be in Ohio |
| "Does the signer's foreign location void the act?" | No - the signer may be anywhere |
When advising an out-of-state or overseas signer, the notary should note that the document's downstream use - recording, court filing, or use abroad - may be governed by other jurisdictions' rules, even though the notarization is governed by Ohio.
A Working Risk Checklist
Before and during a sensitive online session, run through:
- Authority - is my commission and online authorization current?
- Platform - does it perform credential analysis, KBA, recording, and tamper-evident sealing?
- Identity - did credential analysis and KBA both pass, and does the face match the ID?
- Document class - is this an electronic will or other high-risk instrument needing extra coverage or filings?
- Disclosure - has the signer been told the fees, including that the technology fee may apply to a failed session?
- Records - is the recording captured and the journal entry complete with the evidence of identity and fee?
Disability and Accessibility
Nothing in RON waives the notary's duty to ensure the signer understands and freely signs. If a signer over video appears confused, coerced, or unable to communicate, the notary must decline just as in person - the screen does not lower the awareness-and-volition standard. If communication needs an interpreter, the interpreter's involvement should be handled consistently with Ohio's identification and oath requirements and documented in the journal. RON expands reach, not the categories of people whose signatures a notary may lawfully take.
A foreign government refuses to accept a document an Ohio notary properly notarized via RON. What is the correct understanding?
Why do electronic estate-planning documents like electronic wills warrant extra caution for an online notary?
You've completed this section
Continue exploring other exams