5.1 PAR-Q, Health History, Lifestyle Questionnaire, and Documentation
Key Takeaways
On the CPT7 blueprint, PAR-Q+, health history, and lifestyle screening sit inside the Assessment domain and always precede any physical test.
The PAR-Q+ is a safety screen, not a diagnosis: any "yes" routes the client to the ePARmed-X+ or to physician clearance before vigorous exercise.
Subjective intake covers occupation, lifestyle, recreation, and medical/medication history because each one changes test selection and risk.
Common HR/BP-altering medications (beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, diuretics) mean heart-rate formulas and readings must be interpreted cautiously.
Documentation should record the data, date, client self-report, the trainer's action, and any referral or clearance requirement.
Intake Is the First Assessment
For the NASM Certified Personal Trainer (CPT7) exam, assessment does not start when the client squats, steps, or lifts. It starts with subjective information gathered before any physical test. NASM teaches a deliberate sequence: collect subjective data (readiness screen, health history, lifestyle questionnaire), then objective physiological data (heart rate, blood pressure, body composition), then movement and performance assessments. Skipping the subjective stage to "just start training" is a classic exam trap, because the screen is what tells the trainer whether a physical assessment is even safe to administer.
The goal of intake is threefold: safety (rule out conditions that make exercise risky today), scope (decide what the trainer may handle versus refer), and assessment selection (choose tests that fit the client's age, history, and goals). A 58-year-old desk worker with knee surgery history and a 22-year-old recreational runner should not receive identical assessment batteries, and intake is where that branching decision is made.
The PAR-Q+ Readiness Screen
The PAR-Q+ (Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire for Everyone) is the standardized pre-participation screen NASM uses. It is a short, self-report questionnaire of yes/no general health questions (heart condition, chest pain at rest or with activity, dizziness/loss of balance, bone or joint problems, blood-pressure or heart medications, and any other reason not to exercise). Key points the exam tests:
- It is a screen, not a diagnosis. A "yes" does not mean the client cannot exercise; it means more information or clearance is needed first.
- If the client answers "no" to all questions, they are generally cleared to begin gradually.
- A "yes" routes them to the follow-up pages (ePARmed-X+) and, when indicated, to physician clearance before moderate-to-vigorous activity.
- A client who reports chest discomfort during activity and wants to start hard intervals "today" should be held back: defer vigorous testing, recommend medical clearance, and start conservatively only after clearance.
The PAR-Q+ protects both the client and the trainer's legal/professional standing. It is documented, dated, and signed.
| Screen result | Meaning | Trainer action |
|---|---|---|
| All "no" | No flags identified | Begin gradual program; reassess as needed |
| Any "yes" | Possible risk | Follow-up via ePARmed-X+; refer for clearance if indicated |
| Symptomatic now | Acute red flag | Do not test; refer |
Health History, Lifestyle, and Medications
Beyond the readiness screen, NASM collects a broader health-history and lifestyle questionnaire. This captures:
- Occupation — sitting vs. standing, repetitive motions, dress shoes/heels, overhead work. A desk worker's prolonged hip flexion and rounded posture directly predict overhead-squat compensations, so this item guides posture and movement assessment.
- Lifestyle/recreation — hobbies, sport, sleep, stress, tobacco, alcohol, and prior exercise experience.
- Medical history — past injuries, surgeries, chronic conditions, and family history.
- Medications and supplements — because several common drugs change cardiovascular responses.
Medications that affect heart rate and blood pressure are heavily tested. Beta-blockers blunt the heart-rate response, lowering both resting and exercise HR, so HR-based intensity formulas become unreliable and the trainer should lean on RPE and the talk test. Calcium channel blockers and diuretics can also alter HR/BP and hydration. The exam wants the trainer to recognize that a "normal" target-HR number may be meaningless for a medicated client.
Why intake drives test choice
- Occupational sitting → expect overhead-squat compensations; prioritize posture/movement screens.
- Knee surgery history → avoid high-impact cardio tests; choose low-impact options.
- Beta-blocker use → use RPE/talk test instead of %HRmax targets.
Documentation and Informed Consent
Professional documentation is part of the assessment, not an afterthought. NASM expects the trainer to obtain informed consent (explaining what each test involves and its risks, and confirming the client agrees to participate voluntarily) and to keep clear, dated records. Consent should be obtained before any physical testing, and the client should understand they may stop at any time. Good documentation captures: the data collected, the date, the client's own report in their words, the trainer's action (e.g., "recommended physician clearance"), and any referral or clearance status.
An appropriate documentation entry is factual and scope-conscious — for example: "6/12: Client reports occasional chest tightness with stairs. PAR-Q+ "yes" to chest discomfort. Deferred cardio testing; advised physician clearance before vigorous exercise." An inappropriate entry would diagnose ("client has angina") or prescribe treatment, both outside CPT scope. The trainer records what was observed and reported, not a clinical interpretation.
Good records protect the client, support program decisions, create a baseline for reassessment, and document that the trainer acted within scope and standard of care. They are kept confidential and stored securely, consistent with the trainer's professional and legal obligations. The exam frequently rewards the answer that documents conservatively and refers, over the answer that pushes ahead and records a self-made diagnosis.
The intake sequence at a glance
- PAR-Q+ readiness screen (with informed consent).
- Health-history and lifestyle questionnaire (occupation, medical, medications).
- Objective vitals and body-size measures (HR, BP, BMI, circumference).
- Movement and performance assessments — only if screening clears the client.
- Document everything and define the next safe step.
A new client answers "yes" to chest discomfort during activity on the PAR-Q+ and wants to start a hard interval workout today. What should the trainer do first?
Run the interval session at reduced intensity and watch for symptoms
Defer vigorous testing/training and recommend medical clearance before proceeding
Administer a maximal VO2max test to gather objective data
Tell the client they cannot ever exercise with this answer
Which lifestyle questionnaire item is most directly useful when planning posture and movement assessments for an office worker?
Their daily occupational posture and repetitive sitting
Their favorite music for workouts
The brand of their athletic shoes
Their preferred gym check-in time
A client takes a beta-blocker. Why does this matter for intake and later intensity monitoring?
It guarantees the client is unsafe to train
It raises resting heart rate and makes HR formulas read too high
It blunts heart-rate response, so RPE and the talk test are more reliable than HR formulas
It only affects body-composition testing
Which documentation entry after intake is most appropriate for a CPT?
"Client has early angina; started cardiac rehab protocol."
"Prescribed a low-sodium diet to fix the client's blood pressure."
"PAR-Q+ 'yes' to chest discomfort with activity; deferred vigorous testing and advised physician clearance."
"Diagnosed exercise-induced asthma and recommended an inhaler."
Sections you finish are checked off in the contents.