Section 6.2: Closing Meeting and Reaching Audit Conclusions

Section 6.2: Closing Meeting and Reaching Audit Conclusions

The closing meeting represents the final formal phase of the on-site audit activities. Conducted under the leadership of the Lead Auditor, its primary objective is to present the audit findings and conclusions to the auditee's senior management and process owners. Before this meeting occurs, however, the audit team must perform critical background work to synthesize their findings and arrive at a unified conclusion regarding the Quality Management System (QMS).

Reaching Audit Conclusions

Prior to the closing meeting, the audit team must hold a private "pre-closing meeting." During this session, the team conducts a thorough review of all audit notes, checklists, and documented nonconformities. The goals of this pre-closing meeting are:

1. Resolve Disagreements: Ensure all team members agree on the findings and their grading.
2. Determine the Audit Conclusion: Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the QMS. The conclusion is not just a list of nonconformities; it is a holistic evaluation of:
   • The extent of conformity of the QMS with the audit criteria.
   • The effective implementation, maintenance, and improvement of the QMS.
   • The capability of the management review process and internal audits to maintain QMS integrity.
   • The alignment of the quality objectives with the organization's strategic direction.
3. Formulate Recommendation: For third-party certification audits, the team must decide whether to recommend certification, maintain certification, or suspend/withhold certification until major corrective actions are verified.

---

Preparing and Structuring the Closing Meeting

The closing meeting should be conducted in a professional, structured manner to ensure clarity and maintain the credibility of the audit team. The Lead Auditor is responsible for facilitating the meeting. The agenda and structure of the closing meeting are guided by Clause 6.4.9.1 of ISO 19011:2018.

Meeting Participants

The meeting must include:

• The auditee's senior management (represented by the Top Management defined in Clause 5 of ISO 9001:2015).
• Process owners and department managers who were audited.
• The audit team.
• The client (if the audit was commissioned by a third party).

Formal Agenda of the Closing Meeting

The Lead Auditor should follow a standard checklist to ensure all mandatory elements are covered:

1. Attendance and Introductions: Confirm attendance by having participants sign an attendance sheet.
2. Expression of Appreciation: Thank the auditee's management and staff for their cooperation, time, and facilities provided.
3. Reiterate the Audit Scope and Objectives: Remind the audience of what was audited and why.
4. Statement on Sampling Limitations: This is a critical requirement. The Lead Auditor must explain that the audit was based on a sample of the available information and evidence, and therefore, an element of uncertainty is introduced. The auditee must understand that just because a nonconformity was not found in a process, it does not guarantee that none exist.
5. Presentation of Conformity and Strengths: Before presenting negative findings, it is best practice to highlight the conforming areas, positive trends, and strengths of the QMS.
6. Presentation of Findings (NCRs and OFIs): Present the nonconformities clearly, linking each to the objective evidence and the specific clause of ISO 9001:2015. Group findings by process or department.
7. Explain the Consequences of Findings: Detail what each category of nonconformity means for the organization's certification status.
8. Present the Audit Conclusions / Recommendation: State the audit team's final conclusion and recommendation regarding certification.
9. Define the Post-Audit Process: Explain the timeframes and process for the auditee to submit their root cause analysis and corrective action plans (CAPs).
10. Confidentiality Statement: Reiterate that all information gathered during the audit remains strictly confidential.
11. Provide an Opportunity for Questions and Discussion: Allow the auditee to ask clarifying questions about the findings.

---

Dealing with Disagreement and Conflict

One of the most challenging tasks for a Lead Auditor is handling situations where the auditee disagrees with a finding. Disagreements usually arise from misunderstanding the criteria, misinterpreting the evidence, or fear of negative consequences (such as losing certification or facing internal disciplinary action).

Conflict Resolution Protocols

If an auditee disputes a nonconformity, the Lead Auditor must apply the following principles:

• Remain Objective and Calm: Do not become defensive or engage in emotional arguments. Keep the focus entirely on facts and criteria.
• Review the Evidence and Criteria: Re-read the statement of nonconformity, the specific objective evidence, and the clause requirement. Ask: "Does the evidence show a failure to meet this specific requirement?"
• Listen to the Auditee's Perspective: The auditee might present additional evidence that was not available during the audit (e.g., a misplaced calibration certificate or an approved deviation request). If valid evidence is provided that negates the finding, the auditor must be willing to modify or withdraw the nonconformity.
• Stand Firm on Factual Gaps: If no new evidence is provided, and the finding is factually correct, the Lead Auditor must maintain the nonconformity. Do not negotiate or "downgrade" a finding simply to appease the auditee.
• Document the Disagreement: If the dispute cannot be resolved, the Lead Auditor must document the auditee's objection. Under ISO 17021-1, unresolved differences of opinion between the audit team and the auditee must be recorded in the audit report. The auditee always has the right to appeal the finding to the certification body's technical committee.

Example Scenario: Dispute Resolution

During the closing meeting, the Production Manager disputes a minor nonconformity regarding an operator using an outdated drawing (Rev 2 instead of Rev 4). The manager argues that the changes in Rev 4 did not affect that specific operator's work. The Lead Auditor should respond: "While the physical change may not impact this specific step, Clause 7.5.3.1 requires documented information to be available and suitable for use, and Clause 8.5.1 requires the use of suitable infrastructure and monitored resources. Using an obsolete revision is a failure of document control, regardless of the physical impact on the part. Therefore, the finding stands as written."