5.3 Discipline & Unprofessional Conduct
Key Takeaways
- Under 225 ILCS 85/30, IDFPR may refuse to issue or renew, revoke, suspend, place on probation, fine (up to $10,000 per violation), or take other disciplinary or non-disciplinary action against a licensee for enumerated grounds.
- High-yield grounds include material misstatement, Practice Act/rule violations, fraud in obtaining licensure, unprofessional/unethical conduct, impairment affecting safe practice, felony or practice-related criminal conduct, false records, diversion-related failures, and out-of-state adverse actions.
- 68 Ill. Adm. Code 1330.30 catalogs unprofessional and unethical conduct examples such as diversion control failures, false reports, counseling avoidance, discriminatory treatment, dispensing without a valid prescription or without a valid prescriber-patient relationship, and patterns of dispensing errors.
- Licensees must report adverse final actions from other jurisdictions within 60 days; multi-state discipline commonly triggers Illinois review because sister-state action can be prima facie evidence when grounds are substantially equivalent.
- Sanctions are public consumer-protection tools; fines may accompany other discipline, and practicing on a lapsed license, quota interference with professional judgment, and unsafe workplace staffing can all appear as statutory grounds.
5.3 Discipline & Unprofessional Conduct
Quick Answer: 225 ILCS 85/30 authorizes IDFPR to refuse to issue or renew, revoke, suspend, place on probation, fine (generally not to exceed $10,000 per violation), or take other disciplinary or non-disciplinary action for listed grounds—including unprofessional conduct, impairment, fraud, diversion-related failures, false records, and sister-state discipline. 68 Ill. Adm. Code 1330.30 defines many unprofessional and unethical acts in operational detail. Sanctions protect the public and can affect licenses in multiple states.
NABP Area 1.2.2 (disciplinary actions) rewards candidates who can map a messy workplace story to a statutory ground and a plausible sanction—not candidates who only memorize the word “revocation.”
Who Disciplines Whom?
| Actor | Role |
|---|---|
| IDFPR / Division of Professional Regulation | Investigates, prosecutes, and issues orders affecting Illinois licenses/registrations |
| State Board of Pharmacy | Advises and participates in the professional discipline process as provided by law |
| Pharmacy employer | May terminate employment and must report certain terminations (Section 30.1), but cannot “revoke” an Illinois license |
| Other states / NABP | Sister-state actions and national databases can trigger Illinois reporting duties and reciprocal scrutiny |
Exam trap: A manager says “you’re fired, so your license is gone.” Employment termination is not automatic license revocation. Conversely, keeping a job does not block IDFPR from disciplining a license.
Sanction Toolkit (225 ILCS 85/30(a))
The Department may, as it deems proper:
- Refuse to issue or refuse to renew a license
- Revoke a license
- Suspend a license
- Place on probation
- Fine — including fines not to exceed $10,000 for each violation
- Take other disciplinary or non-disciplinary action as proper (this language is broad—think conditions, CE remediation, practice limitations, and similar tools even when a vignette does not use the word “probation”)
Fines may be imposed with other discipline but shall not be the exclusive disposition of discipline arising from conduct resulting in death or injury to a patient. Fines are generally due within 60 days (or as agreed) and are deposited in the Illinois State Pharmacy Disciplinary Fund.
Also know the hard-edge special rules in Section 30:
- Certain second felony CS or public-aid fraud patterns require revocation and bar practice in Illinois (§30(c) concept).
- Circuit court adjudication that a licensee is in need of mental treatment can operate as a suspension until the Department/Board process allows return (§30(e) concept).
- Tax noncompliance with the Illinois Department of Revenue can block issuance or support suspension until tax duties are satisfied (§30(b) concept).
High-Yield Grounds (Memorize the Map, Not Every Word)
Section 30 lists many causes. Group them for exam recall:
Integrity of applications and communications
- Material misstatement to the Department
- Misrepresentation to obtain licenses
- Licensure obtained by fraudulent means
- Failure to respond within 60 days to a written Department request for information
- Failure to comply with a subpoena
Practice Act / rule violations and incompetence
- Violations of the Act or rules
- Pattern of conduct showing incompetence or unfitness
- Aiding another person in violating the Act/rules
- Violation of probation terms
Unprofessional, unethical, dishonest, or harmful conduct
- Unprofessional, dishonorable, or unethical conduct of a character likely to deceive, defraud, or harm the public (as defined by rule—see 1330.30)
- False records or reports in pharmacy practice (including false claims against medical assistance programs)
- Gross and willful overcharging / false fee statements
- HIPAA/privacy disclosures in violation of law
- False, deceptive, or unsubstantiated advertising/solicitations that may jeopardize patient welfare
Controlled substances, diversion, and “good faith” dispensing
- Habitual/excessive use or addiction impairing safe practice (also Section 5.4)
- Dispensing without a lawful written or oral prescription
- Substantial audit discrepancies in prescription drugs including CS
- Failure to sell/dispense in good faith (good-faith concept drawn from the Illinois CSA and applied to all prescription drugs for this ground)
- Selling manufacturer drug samples provided at no cost
Criminal and out-of-state events
- Specified criminal convictions (felony, or misdemeanor involving dishonesty or related to pharmacy/CS)
- Adverse action by another state/jurisdiction against a pharmacy, pharmacist, or technician authorization that is the same or substantially equivalent (certified record is prima facie evidence)
- Failure to report such adverse final actions to the Department within 60 days
Impairment and disability affecting safety
- Physical illness, aging deterioration, or loss of motor skill impairing safe practice
- Physical or mental illness/impairment/disability resulting in inability to practice with reasonable judgment, skill, or safety (including court-declared mental incompetence)
Workplace and professional judgment protections
Illinois’ modern Practice Act grounds also target system-level threats:
- Interfering with a pharmacist’s professional judgment
- Failing to provide a working environment that protects patient welfare (insufficient personnel, missing rest/meal breaks, inadequate time for DUR, immunization, counseling, verification, and other pharmacist duties)
- Introducing productivity quotas or similar programs to the extent they interfere with appropriate professional services
- Providing incentives to induce prescription transfers absent a professional rationale
These items matter on the MPJE because a “corporate made me do it” defense does not erase licensee responsibility—and owners/pharmacies can face grounds for creating unlawful practice environments.
Rule 1330.30 — Unprofessional and Unethical Conduct Catalog
68 Ill. Adm. Code 1330.30 supplies concrete examples. Unprofessional/unethical conduct includes, but is not limited to:
| Theme | Examples from the rule |
|---|---|
| Diversion control | Failing to establish/maintain effective controls against diversion; theft/diversion or attempts |
| Records & billing integrity | False reports/records; failing to file required reports/records; billing for quantities greater than delivered; charging brand when generic dispensed; fraudulent third-party billing |
| Prescription validity | Dispensing after patient death; dispensing without valid prescription; filling when no valid physician-patient relationship exists; failing to exercise judgment on authenticity |
| Counseling | Failing to counsel, failing to respond to counseling requests, circumventing counseling, discouraging counseling |
| Nondiscrimination | Discriminating based on religion, race, creed, color, gender, sexual orientation, age, or national origin |
| Product integrity | Dispensing drugs not FDA-approved / not in USP-NF / not on bulk compounding lists as applicable |
| Steering & blanks | Furnishing Rx blanks referring to a specific pharmacy; arrangements that prepare blanks referring to a specific pharmacy (with limited enrollment/REMS carve-outs) |
| Dispensing process | Dividing a prescription order improperly; dispensing errors causing hospitalization or a pattern/practice of errors |
| Professional decency | Flagrant distasteful conduct breaching accepted ethics; acts violating common standards of decency with a patient |
| CS law | Willfully violating or knowingly assisting violation of laws relating to habit-forming CS |
| Process | Failing to fully comply/respond to a Department subpoena within 60 days |
| Standard of care | Any other act/omission breaching the pharmacist’s responsibility under accepted standards of care |
Study tip: When a stem describes counseling avoidance, diversion, billing fraud, or dispensing without a real patient-prescriber relationship, 1330.30 is often the direct match even if Section 30’s broader unprofessional-conduct ground also fits.
Process Edges That Appear on Exams
- Citations: The Department may issue citations for Act/rule violations with a limited civil penalty framework (compliance newsletters discuss citation tools and corrective action plans). Citations are still public-facing compliance events even when short of full formal prosecution.
- Public nature: Formal complaints and Department orders against licensees are generally public records (with confidentiality protections for certain raw reports—see Section 5.4 on 30.1 reports).
- Multi-state cascade: Discipline in State A can force reporting to Illinois within 60 days and can itself be a ground when substantially equivalent. Always answer as if you must protect every license you hold.
- CE remediation and conditions: Even when revocation is not imposed, expect probation conditions, practice limits, or required CE as exam-plausible outcomes for remediation-eligible misconduct.
Mapping Vignettes to Law
| Fact pattern | Primary anchor |
|---|---|
| Pharmacist works March 1–April 15 on a license that expired March 31 | Unlicensed practice / Section 30 + 1330.80(c) |
| Technician diverting hydrocodone; PIC ignored perpetual inventory red flags | Diversion controls / unprofessional conduct / possible dual pharmacy-PIC exposure |
| Pharmacist posts false “FDA-approved cure” ads | Advertising grounds in §30 + unprofessional conduct |
| Pharmacist convicted of felony CS theft in Indiana; silent in Illinois | Out-of-state action + 60-day reporting failure |
| Corporate enforces verified prescriptions-per-hour quota that blocks counseling time | Unsafe workplace / quota interference grounds |
| Pharmacist files false Medicaid claim records | False records / overcharging grounds |
| Applicant lies about prior discipline on the IDFPR application | Material misstatement / fraud in obtaining licensure |
Study Checklist
- List the sanction menu (deny/renew refuse, revoke, suspend, probation, fine ≤ $10,000/violation, other action).
- Recite five ground clusters: fraud/application, unprofessional, impairment, CS/diversion/good faith, sister-state/reporting.
- Know 1330.30 counseling, diversion, billing, and error-pattern examples cold.
- Remember 60-day clocks for information responses, subpoenas (rule), and out-of-state adverse action reports.
- Separate employer discipline from IDFPR license discipline—both can occur; only IDFPR controls the credential.
Discipline law is the enforcement edge of every other chapter. Section 5.4 turns specifically to impaired practitioners, mandatory reporting, and the balance between rehabilitation pathways and public-protection discipline.
Under 225 ILCS 85/30, which statement correctly describes IDFPR’s fine authority in disciplinary matters?
Which of the following is an example of unprofessional conduct under 68 Ill. Adm. Code 1330.30?
A pharmacist licensed in Illinois is disciplined in another state for conduct that would also be grounds in Illinois. Which reporting duty is most accurate under 225 ILCS 85/30?
Which conduct is most clearly aligned with statutory grounds related to workplace systems under 225 ILCS 85/30?