11.3 Integrating Ground, Simulation, and Flight Instruction, and Assessing Piloting Ability
Key Takeaways
- The FAA separates flight simulation trainers into three categories: Full Flight Simulator (FFS), Flight Training Device (FTD), and Aviation Training Device (ATD); FFSs and FTDs are collectively called Flight Simulation Training Devices under 14 CFR part 60, while ATDs are approved under AC 61-136 as basic (BATD) or advanced (AATD).
- ATDs cannot be used for airman practical tests or type rating training requirements, and pilot time in an FFS, FTD, or ATD must be recorded as prescribed in 14 CFR 61.51(h).
- Assessment of demonstrated ability must be based on established standards of performance suitably modified for the learner's stage of development, and must consider mastery of the elements of a maneuver rather than merely overall performance.
- Correcting learner errors does not mean taking the controls the moment a mistake appears; safety permitting, it is frequently better to let the learner progress part of the way into the mistake and find a way out.
- Providing guidance and restraint with respect to learners' solo operations is, in the handbook's words, by far the most important flight instructor responsibility, because the instructor is the only person positioned to decide a learner is ready to solo.
11.3 Integrating Ground, Simulation, and Flight Instruction, and Assessing Piloting Ability
Quick Answer: Flight training is expensive and modern aircraft are complex, so the handbook's instruction is to build one integrated curriculum across ground instruction, flight simulation, and the aircraft — teaching knowledge on the ground, procedures in the device, and proficiency in the airplane. The FAA separates trainers into FFS, FTD, and ATD; FFSs and FTDs are Flight Simulation Training Devices (FSTDs) under 14 CFR part 60, while ATDs are approved under AC 61-136 as BATD or AATD and cannot be used for practical tests or type rating training requirements. On the assessment side, demonstrated ability is judged against established standards modified for the learner's stage, and the handbook is explicit that correcting a learner's error does not mean immediately taking the controls — safety permitting, let them progress part of the way into the mistake and find a way out.
Why Integration Is a Cost and Safety Argument
The handbook's premise is economic before it is pedagogical: flight training costs are high and new aircraft are more complex than in the past, so the total training experience should provide a solid base of knowledge and maximize the learner's time without sacrificing the quality of the end product. The airplane is the most expensive classroom on the field. Anything that can be learned cheaper and safer on the ground or in a device should be.
Ground Instruction That Actually Prepares the Learner to Fly
- Ground instruction is effective when it follows an overall plan designed to prepare the learner for flight, with clear objectives.
- Ground training objectives should be related to flight training objectives whenever possible. When an element is taught on the ground as theory, its practice and application should also be experienced in the air, and the instructor should explicitly point out the connection between theory and practice.
- Ground instruction need not be in a classroom. Conduct the preflight at an actual aircraft even though it was first taught academically; take airspace students to an ATC facility to see management of the National Airspace System from the other side of the radar.
- Balance beats media. Studies cited by the handbook show that learners who use electronic media extensively are generally not as well trained as those receiving a balanced mix of e-learning, class, and one-on-one instruction, with technological tools supporting instruction rather than replacing it.
Ground instruction "sets the foundation and is critical to learner pilots becoming well educated and successfully transitioning into the flight environment."
Flight Simulation Training Devices: The Three Categories
| Category | Approved by | Governing document | Levels | Typical user | Key limits |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full Flight Simulator (FFS) | National Simulator Program (Atlanta, GA) | 14 CFR part 60 | Levels A–D | Airlines, aviation colleges and universities | Requires sponsorship by a part 119 certificate holder (part 121/135 operator) or a part 141/142 pilot school or training center; all training is part of an FAA-approved training program |
| Flight Training Device (FTD) | National Simulator Program | 14 CFR part 60 | Levels 4–7 | Airlines, aviation colleges and universities | Same sponsorship requirement; the qualification level affects which maneuvers or tasks may be accomplished |
| Aviation Training Device (ATD) | General Aviation and Commercial Division (Washington, DC) | AC 61-136, FAA Approval of Aviation Training Devices and Their Use for Training and Experience | BATD (basic) and AATD (advanced) | General aviation flight schools training under part 61 or part 141 | The letter of authorization specifies the allowable training credits; ATDs cannot be used for airman practical tests or type rating training requirements |
FFSs and FTDs are collectively described in part 60 as Flight Simulation Training Devices (FSTDs), and the FAA issues the operator a qualification letter annually identifying the level of qualification.
Integrated Training Curricula
An FFS, FTD, or ATD makes seamless training from the classroom to the aircraft possible. The handbook's worked sequence for an ILS approach:
- Teach the required knowledge — ILS design and the associated flight operations — through ground and classroom training.
- Teach the aircraft flight procedures and the specifics of operating in the National Airspace System.
- Once the learner has the knowledge and understands the procedures, add the psychomotor practice in the simulator, demonstrating and teaching the approach in the FAA-qualified trainer.
- When the learner is proficient with the procedure in the device, transition to the aircraft to verify proficiency and reinforce the ACS.
Most operational tasks and procedures for private pilot certificates, instrument ratings, commercial pilot certificates, and ATP certificates can be initially taught in an FFS, FTD, or ATD.
Logging Training Time and Experience
| Device | What must be recorded | Currency of the approval |
|---|---|---|
| FFS / FTD | The FAA ID number or serial number of the device used | FSTDs are re-qualified annually; users should verify the qualification is current and valid |
| ATD | Logged as BATD or AATD time, with the pilot record identifying the manufacturer and model | The letter of authorization is valid for five years, and the pilot in training should retain a copy |
Pilot time in an FFS, FTD, or ATD must be recorded as prescribed in 14 CFR 61.51(h). The maximum credit toward certificates and ratings is identified in parts 61 and 141 — but there is no limit on how much time can be logged in a device. The FAA's recommendation is pointed: continue training in the simulator until the required tasks are accomplished successfully, before attempting the same tasks in the aircraft.
On-Aircraft Training
On-aircraft training is "the continuation of work that is initiated on the ground." Three rules the FOI can test:
- The instructor must plan the flight to the same extent as the learner who prepares for it. Flight instruction needs objectives and a syllabus paired with the previous ground instruction.
- Flight training is not one size fits all and must often be tailored to the individual.
- Always review the task before the flight, even when the learner has already had ground school on it, to reinforce the learning process. Teaching stalls by flight instruction only produces a worse result than pairing the flight with a ground discussion of stall types and their aerodynamic basis.
Assessment of Piloting Ability
Assessment "determines how, what, and how well a learner is learning." The flight instructor generally uses the review, collaborative assessment (learner-centered grading), written tests, and performance-based tests. Learners must understand the purpose of the assessment, or they will not accept it and little improvement results.
Assessment as a reteaching tool: not every assessment lends itself to reteaching, but when the instructor observes a deficiency and decides a task needs reteaching, the sequence is demonstrate the maneuver → let the learner practice it under direction → evaluate accomplishment by observing the performance.
Demonstrated Ability
- Assessment of demonstrated ability must be based upon established standards of performance, suitably modified to apply to the learner's experience and stage of development as a pilot.
- It must consider the learner's mastery of the elements involved in the maneuver, rather than merely the overall performance. A landing that ends on centerline after three wild corrections is not mastery.
- To sign a learner off for solo, the instructor determines the learner is qualified and proficient in the flight tasks necessary for the flight, based on the ability to demonstrate consistent proficiency across a number of maneuvers.
- At FAA-approved schools, teaching instructors should verify learners meet the proficiency requirements before sending them for any stage check.
Postflight Evaluation
- Keep the learner informed of progress — either as each procedure or maneuver is completed, or summarized in the postflight critique.
- Postflight critiques should be in a written format, such as notes, so the instructor covers everything noticed during the lesson.
- Traditional assessment relies on scales like "excellent, good, fair, poor" or "exceeds standards, meets standards, needs more training," which the handbook says often meets the instructor's needs but not the learner's.
- After a scenario-based lesson, use collaborative assessment: learner self-assessment first (to stimulate growth in the learner's thought processes and behaviors), followed by an in-depth discussion comparing the instructor's assessment to the learner's own.
First Solo and the Post-Solo Debriefing
- The instructor needs to be present during the first solo to answer questions and resolve issues.
- Schedule for time of day, which drives traffic congestion, winds, sun angle, and reflection.
- Have access to a portable radio during supervised solo operations so the operation can be terminated if a situation develops — but keep radio communications to a minimum, and do not talk to the learner on short final.
- Debrief immediately after the solo, while the flight is vividly etched in memory and the questions come quickly.
Correction of Learner Errors — the Most Misread Paragraph in Chapter 9
Correction of learner errors does not include taking over from learners immediately when a mistake is made. Safety permitting, it is frequently better to let learners progress part of the way into the mistake and find a way out. The handbook's example is a weight-shift control aircraft, where the bar moves right to turn left and a beginner instinctively moves it the wrong way; letting the learner see the effect of that input is a valuable demonstration of the aircraft's stability. "It is difficult for learners to learn a maneuver properly if they seldom have the opportunity to correct an error."
The mirror-image problem: a learner may perform a maneuver correctly without understanding the principles and objectives involved. When the instructor suspects this, require the learner to vary the performance slightly, combine it with other operations, or apply the same elements to other maneuvers. A learner who does not understand the principles will probably not be able to do this successfully — which is a correlation-level probe disguised as a flight exercise.
Pilot Supervision
Flight instructors have the responsibility to provide guidance and restraint with respect to the solo operations of their learners. The handbook calls this "by far the most important flight instructor responsibility," because the instructor is the only person in a position to determine that a learner is ready for solo. Before endorsing a learner for solo flight, require a demonstration of consistent ability to perform all of the fundamental maneuvers.
Dealing with Normal Challenges
Teach learners to solve the ordinary problems of flight — traffic pattern congestion, a change in active runway, unexpected crosswinds. The learner masters these individually before being able to perform them collectively.
Visualization
Scenario-based training lends itself to visualization. Have the learner visualize and describe how the flight will progress under normal circumstances; then the instructor injects an unforeseen circumstance — a weather change bringing excessive winds on final, an undesired landing site for a balloon learner, a rope break for a glider learner, a radio outage for an instrument learner — and the learner visualizes handling it. The instructor asks questions to check the learner's thought processes, and the stated boundary is to "challenge the learner with realistic flying situations without creating overburdening unrealistic scenarios."
Practice Landings
- Aircraft speed and control take precedence over other actions during landings and takeoffs.
- Full-stop landings help develop aircraft control, allow careful checklist use, and allow time for detailed instruction.
- Stress touching down in the first third of the runway to ensure stopping before the end — which means teaching the learner to go around if not touched down within that distance, and to go around for an oscillation or significant bounce.
- Requiring full-stop landings during the first solo gives the instructor the opportunity to stop the flight if necessary.
- Gliders (other than motor gliders) cannot go around. Teach low-energy landings based on current weather and wind conditions, which prepares the learner for an off-field landing.
FOI Exam Traps & Common Misconceptions
- Trap 1 (device categories): FFS and FTD are FSTDs under part 60 (FFS Levels A–D, FTD Levels 4–7). ATDs are approved under AC 61-136 as BATD or AATD and may not be used for practical tests or type rating training requirements.
- Trap 2 (taking the controls): The keyed answer is almost never "immediately take the controls." Safety permitting, let the learner progress part of the way into the error and recover — they cannot learn to correct errors they are never allowed to make.
- Trap 3 (the most important responsibility): For the flight instructor specifically, the handbook names guidance and restraint regarding learners' solo operations as by far the most important responsibility.
- Trap 4 (demonstrated ability): Judge mastery of the elements of the maneuver against established standards modified for the learner's stage — not the overall impression, and not a comparison with other students.
- Trap 5 (first third of the runway): The landing standard taught for solo readiness is touchdown within the first third, with a go-around required otherwise, and full-stop landings on the first solo so the instructor can stop the flight.
- Trap 6 (media balance): Learners who lean heavily on electronic media are generally less well trained than those who receive a balanced mix; technology supports instruction rather than replacing it.
A part 61 flight school wants to use its advanced aviation training device (AATD) to conduct a portion of an instrument applicant's practical test. What does FAA-H-8083-9B say about this?
During a dual flight, a student begins rolling into a turn in the wrong direction. The situation is not yet unsafe. According to FAA-H-8083-9B, what should the flight instructor generally do?
An instructor is planning a student's first solo. Which set of practices matches the guidance in FAA-H-8083-9B?
A student flies a chandelle within tolerance, but the instructor suspects the student does not actually understand the principles behind it. What technique does the handbook recommend?
You've completed this section
Continue exploring other exams