8.3 The Business Case for EBD: Capital Costs vs. Operational Life-Cycle

The Business Case for EBD: Capital Costs vs. Operational Life-Cycle

Core Principle: EDAC study materials describe the goal of the business case for EBD as determining how healthcare facility investments contribute to improvements in patient-care quality and in the safety and satisfaction of patients and staff while positively enhancing the bottom line. Central to that case is balancing one-time construction costs against ongoing operating savings and revenue enhancements.

Historically, hospital capital projects were often judged by a "first-cost mentality": did the building open on schedule and under the construction budget? EBD broadens the question. A building that is inexpensive to construct but operationally inefficient, noisy, or hard to keep clean can impose recurring costs on the organization for decades.

---

First Cost vs. Lifetime Cost

Rules of thumb such as "1:10:100" are often quoted to make a simple point: for every dollar spent designing and constructing a building, an organization spends far more over the building's life operating and maintaining it, and far more again on the people who work in it. Published ratios vary by study and building type, but the direction is consistent—personnel and operating costs dwarf first cost.

┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│               FIRST COST VS. LIFETIME COST (CONCEPTUAL)                │
├────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│  Design & construction (one time)          ▇▇                          │
│  Operations, maintenance, energy (decades) ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇                   │
│  Staff salaries & benefits (decades)       ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇  │
│  (Illustrative proportions; actual ratios vary)                        │
└────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Strategic Financial Implications

• Small first-cost changes, large operating effects: A design feature that modestly improves staff efficiency, retention, or safety can, over many years, outweigh its added construction cost.
• The reverse is also true: Cutting a feature to save first cost can create recurring costs if it worsens safety, workflow, or retention.
• The business case makes this explicit so leaders can weigh trade-offs with numbers rather than intuition.

[!TIP]

The High-Leverage Strategic Rule

Because staffing and operations are the largest long-term costs, evaluate design investments by their recurring effects on staff time, safety events, and patient experience—not only by their first cost.

Business Plan vs. Business Cases in the Exam Content Outline

CHD's current outline asks candidates to understand the difference between a project business plan, a business case for using evidence-based design, and a business case for specific EBD concepts, strategies, or interventions:

Business Cases Across the Project Lifecycle

Building the Business Case: What EDAC Study Materials Require

EDAC Study Guide 3 describes creating and maintaining an updated business case as important for gaining financial and executive support. It should involve healthcare operations finance, architectural estimating, healthcare research, process improvement, and facilities management.

Compare Facilities Costs at Three Stages

Compare Business Costs and Revenue

To help executives make informed decisions, the business case evaluates both facilities costs and business costs.

The Payback Period

EDAC study materials define the payback period as the time it takes for the cash-flow line to move from a negative to a positive balance.

Six Questions About Cost, Investment, and Return

EDAC Study Guide 1 lists six questions to ask about an EBD project's cost, investment, and return on investment:

1. Is the project urgent in order to fulfill the organization's mission?
2. Is the proposed plan appropriate compared with other alternatives?
3. Is the cost appropriate compared with similar projects in the region?
4. Has the financial impact of increased volume, expense, and revenue assumptions been analyzed?
5. Have the proper sources of funds been analyzed, and are they enough to handle growth?
6. Will EBD features be incorporated and employed in the proposed project?

Keeping the Business Case Current

• Early in design, the team should make sure the business case clearly states the costs, benefits, and executive support for incorporating EBD.
• During construction documents, the team finalizes the business case—documenting return on investment—and delivers it to executive leadership.
• If the budget cannot support an EBD intervention's costs, the team should determine whether the projected return on investment offsets the additional cost rather than dropping the feature by reflex.

---

The "Fable Hospital" Business Case Models

In 2004, Leonard Berry, Derek Parker, Russell Coile Jr., D. Kirk Hamilton, David O'Neill, and Blair Sadler published "The Business Case for Better Buildings" in Frontiers of Health Services Management. They described Fable Hospital, a hypothetical 300-bed hospital that combined evidence-based design features drawn from Pebble Project experience and published research. Their model argued that the added upfront cost of these features could be recovered through operating savings and revenue gains, making better buildings a sound business decision.

The model was later updated as Fable Hospital 2.0 (Sadler and colleagues, Hastings Center Report, 2011) with new calculations.

How to use Fable Hospital on the exam and in practice:

• It is an illustrative business case model, not the measured results of a real hospital.
• Its logic—compare one-time incremental costs with recurring savings and revenue, then estimate payback—is exactly the reasoning EDAC study materials ask teams to apply to their own projects with their own data.

---

Reimbursement Programs That Raise the Stakes

In Medicare's current payment environment, hospitals bear more financial consequences for preventable harm and poor experience:

1. Hospital-Acquired Conditions (HAC) payment provision: Under Section 5001(c) of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, Medicare does not pay the higher amount for certain conditions acquired during the hospital stay (for example, falls and trauma, catheter-associated urinary tract infections, vascular catheter-associated infections, and stage 3 and 4 pressure ulcers) when they were not present on admission.
2. Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program (HACRP): Created under the Affordable Care Act, it reduces Medicare payments by 1% for hospitals in the worst-performing quartile on its patient safety and infection measures.
3. Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP): Reduces base Medicare payments by up to 3% for excess readmissions for selected conditions and procedures.
4. Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP): Adjusts payments based on performance, including the HCAHPS patient experience survey (which asks about cleanliness and quietness of the hospital environment).

Per-Case Costs of Harm

Published estimates help quantify operational savings. For example:

• The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) estimated additional hospital costs for selected hospital-acquired conditions; its 2017 analysis put the added cost of a hospital-acquired fall at about $6,700 per case, with separate estimates for infections, pressure injuries, and other conditions.
• The Joint Commission has reported that a fall with injury adds an average of about $14,000 and several days to a hospital stay.

Use current, well-sourced estimates—and ideally your organization's own cost data—when building a business case.

---

Human Capital Economics: The Cost of Nurse Turnover

Staff outcomes carry real financial weight. EDAC study materials note that employee turnover may be influenced by facility design, and turnover is expensive:

• Recent NSI Nursing Solutions national retention reports estimate the average cost of turnover for one bedside registered nurse at roughly $60,000, including recruitment, orientation, overtime, and agency coverage.

┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                     THE ANATOMY OF RN TURNOVER COSTS                   │
├───────────────────────────────────┬────────────────────────────────────┤
│ DIRECT COSTS                      │ INDIRECT OPERATIONAL COSTS         │
│ • Recruitment advertising         │ • Premium overtime paid to staff   │
│ • Sign-on bonuses                 │ • Travel / agency nurse contracts  │
│ • HR processing & credentialing   │ • Lost productivity during         │
│ • Clinical orientation preceptors │   orientation                      │
│ • Formal classroom training hours │ • Higher error risk with unfamiliar│
│                                   │   temporary staff                  │
└───────────────────────────────────┴────────────────────────────────────┘

A Hypothetical Labor Example

Consider a hospital with 600 registered nurses and 18% annual turnover (108 departures). At about $60,000 per departure, turnover costs roughly $6.5 million per year. If a package of workplace improvements—well-placed supplies, ceiling lifts, noise control, and restorative break space—contributed to reducing turnover to 16% (12 fewer departures), the avoided cost would be about $720,000 per year. Because pay, staffing, and leadership also drive turnover, a credible business case states its assumptions and tracks results after occupancy.

---

Capital Budgeting Metrics: Payback, NPV, and IRR

1. Simple Payback Period

Simple Payback Period (Years) = Incremental EBD Capital Investment ($) / Net Annual Savings ($/Year)

Example (hypothetical): Ceiling lifts for a unit cost $350,000 and are projected to avoid $175,000 per year in injury, overtime, and related costs:

Payback Period = $350,000 / $175,000 per year = 2.0 Years

2. Net Present Value (NPV)

Net present value accounts for the time value of money by discounting future cash flows to today:

NPV = ∑ [ CF_t / (1 + r)^t ] - C_0  (summed from t = 1 to T)

Where C_0 is the incremental investment at Year 0, CF_t is the net cash inflow in Year t, r is the organization's discount rate, and T is the analysis period. A proposal with NPV > 0 creates value at that discount rate.

3. Internal Rate of Return (IRR)

The internal rate of return is the discount rate at which NPV equals zero. If the IRR exceeds the organization's required rate of return (hurdle rate), the investment is financially attractive compared with that threshold.