2.3 Property Titling, Entity Structures, and Powers of Appointment

Property Titling, Entity Structures, and Powers of Appointment

Quick Answer: How property is titled controls whether it passes through probate, how it is taxed at death, and whether it is protected from creditors. Community property receives a complete 100% double step-up in income tax basis at the first spouse's death under IRC § 1014(b)(6), compared to only a 50% step-up for spousal Joint Tenancy with Right of Survivorship (JTWROS). In estate planning, General Powers of Appointment (GPA) cause full estate inclusion under IRC § 2041, whereas powers limited by an ascertainable standard (HEMS) or Limited Powers of Appointment (LPOA) prevent estate inclusion.

---

1. Forms of Property Ownership

Proper property titling is the foundational starting point for all estate and fiduciary planning. Titling determines three critical legal realities:

1. Management rights during life;
2. Exposure to personal creditor claims; and
3. The mechanism of transfer at death (probate vs. non-probate).

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                     FORMS OF CONCURRENT PROPERTY TITLING                    │
├─────────────────────┬─────────────────────┬─────────────────────────────────┤
│ TENANCY IN COMMON   │ JOINT TENANCY WITH  │     TENANCY BY THE ENTIRETY     │
│       (TIC)         │ SURVIVORSHIP (JTWROS│              (TBE)              │
├─────────────────────┼─────────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────┤
│ • Undivided interest│ • Undivided interest│ • Married couples only          │
│ • Can be unequal    │ • Equal shares only │ • Fifth unity of marriage       │
│ • NO survivorship   │ • Survivorship right│ • Survivorship right            │
│ • Passes via PROBATE│ • Passes NON-PROBATE│ • Passes NON-PROBATE            │
│ • Creditor can seize│ • Creditor can sever│ • Creditor of ONE spouse cannot │
│   fractional share  │   into a TIC        │   attach or force sale of asset │
└─────────────────────┴─────────────────────┴─────────────────────────────────┘

Tenancy in Common (TIC)

• Undivided Fractional Interest: Two or more co-owners hold distinct, undivided fractional shares in property (e.g., 60% / 40%). Shares can be unequal and acquired at different times.
• No Right of Survivorship: When a tenant in common dies, their fractional share does not pass to the surviving co-tenant. Instead, it passes through probate pursuant to the decedent's will or state intestacy laws.
• Tax Treatment: Under IRC § 1014, only the decedent's fractional interest receives a stepped-up income tax basis to fair market value at death.
• Creditor Rights: A creditor of one tenant in common can attach the debtor's fractional interest and petition a court to partition and force the physical sale of the property.

Joint Tenancy with Right of Survivorship (JTWROS)

• The Four Unities: Creation of a valid JTWROS requires the historical common law four unities:
  1. Time (interests acquired at the same time),
  2. Title (acquired through the same deed or instrument),
  3. Interest (identical, equal percentage shares), and
  4. Possession (undivided right to possess the whole).
• Automatic Survivorship (Non-Probate): Upon the death of one joint tenant, the decedent's ownership interest automatically extinguishes, and full ownership vests in the surviving joint tenant(s) by operation of law, completely bypassing probate.
• Severance: Any joint tenant can unilaterally convey their interest to a third party during life, destroying the unities of time and title, which severs the JTWROS and converts the co-ownership into a Tenancy in Common.

Tenancy by the Entirety (TBE)

• Exclusive to Married Couples: Recognized in approximately half of U.S. states, TBE treats husband and wife as a single, indivisible legal entity.
• The Fifth Unity (Marriage): Requires all four unities of JTWROS plus the fifth unity of marriage.
• Asset Protection Superpower: Neither spouse can unilaterally convey, encumber, partition, or sever TBE property without the joinder and consent of the other spouse. Consequently, a judgment creditor of only one spouse cannot attach, place a lien on, or force the sale of TBE property (with the sole exception of federal tax liens under United States v. Craft (2002)).
• Transfer at Death: Passes automatically to the surviving spouse by operation of law outside of probate.

---

2. Community Property vs. Common Law: The Double Step-Up in Basis

Nine states operate under Community Property systems (Arizona, California, Idaho, Louisiana, Nevada, New Mexico, Texas, Washington, and Wisconsin), while several others (Alaska, Florida, South Dakota, Tennessee, and Wyoming) permit couples to opt in via Community Property Trusts.

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                     COMMUNITY PROPERTY BASICS & TAXATION                    │
├──────────────────────────────────────┬──────────────────────────────────────┤
│          SEPARATE PROPERTY           │          COMMUNITY PROPERTY          │
├──────────────────────────────────────┼──────────────────────────────────────┤
│ • Acquired prior to marriage         │ • All property acquired during       │
│ • Acquired during marriage by gift,  │   marriage while domiciled in a CP   │
│   devise, bequest, or descent        │   state (regardless of whose name    │
│ • Governed by sole ownership rules   │   is on the title or paycheck)       │
│ • 100% basis step-up on owner's death│ • Deemed owned 50/50 by spouses      │
└──────────────────────────────────────┴──────────────────────────────────────┘

The Section 1014(b)(6) "Double Step-Up" Rule

The single greatest income tax advantage of community property is the double step-up in basis under IRC § 1014(b)(6).

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│           WORKED TAX EXAMPLE: JTWROS VS. COMMUNITY PROPERTY BASIS            │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Scenario: Married couple purchases stock for $200,000 ($100k each basis).   │
│ At Husband's death, the stock is worth $1,000,000 ($500k each FMV).         │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ CASE A: Held as Common Law JTWROS (IRC § 2040(b))                           │
│ • Husband's 50% share steps up from $100,000 to $500,000                    │
│ • Wife's 50% share remains at original cost basis of $100,000               │
│ • Total Adjusted Basis to Surviving Wife = $500,000 + $100,000 = $600,000   │
│ • If Wife sells immediately for $1,000,000: Taxable Capital Gain = $400,000 │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ CASE B: Held as Community Property (IRC § 1014(b)(6))                       │
│ • Husband's 50% share steps up from $100,000 to $500,000                    │
│ • Wife's 50% share ALSO steps up from $100,000 to $500,000                 │
│ • Total Adjusted Basis to Surviving Wife = $500,000 + $500,000 = $1,000,000 │
│ • If Wife sells immediately for $1,000,000: Taxable Capital Gain = $0       │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

---

3. Probate vs. Non-Probate Asset Transfer Mechanisms

                          ┌────────────────────────────────┐
                          │    ASSET TRANSFER PATHWAYS     │
                          └───────────────┬────────────────┘
                                          │
               ┌──────────────────────────┴──────────────────────────┐
               ▼                                                     ▼
┌─────────────────────────────┐                       ┌─────────────────────────────┐
│       PROBATE PATHWAY       │                       │     NON-PROBATE PATHWAY     │
├─────────────────────────────┤                       ├─────────────────────────────┤
│ • Sole ownership assets     │                       │ • Beneficiary Designations  │
│ • Tenancy in Common (TIC)   │                       │   (IRAs, 401ks, Life Ins.)  │
│ • Assets payable to Estate  │                       │ • Titling with Survivorship │
│ • Controlled by Last Will   │                       │   (JTWROS, TBE)             │
│ • Public court proceedings  │                       │ • TOD / POD Registrations   │
│ • Subject to delay and fees │                       │ • Revocable Living Trusts   │
└─────────────────────────────┘                       └─────────────────────────────┘

Critical Rule: Non-probate transfer mechanisms (contracts, beneficiary designations, TOD/POD registrations, and trust agreements) strictly override and supersede any contrary provisions contained in a Last Will and Testament. If a Will leaves all assets to Child A, but an IRA names Child B as designated beneficiary, Child B receives the entire IRA by contract outside of probate.

---

4. Powers of Appointment (POAs)

A Power of Appointment is a legal right granted by a property owner (the donor) to another individual (the donee or powerholder) enabling the donee to designate who will receive beneficial ownership of the property (the appointees). If the donee fails to exercise the power, the property passes to the takers-in-default specified in the original instrument.

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                   GENERAL VS. LIMITED POWERS OF APPOINTMENT                 │
├──────────────────────────────────────┬──────────────────────────────────────┤
│   GENERAL POWER OF APPOINTMENT (GPA) │  LIMITED / SPECIAL POWER OF APP.     │
│             (IRC § 2041)             │               (LPOA)                 │
├──────────────────────────────────────┼──────────────────────────────────────┤
│ • Exercisable in favor of:           │ • Exercisable ONLY in favor of a     │
│   1. The Powerholder,                │   defined group (e.g. descendants)   │
│   2. The Powerholder's Estate,       │ • CANNOT be exercised in favor of    │
│   3. The Powerholder's Creditors, or │   holder, estate, or creditors       │
│   4. Creditors of their Estate       │ • NOT included in powerholder's      │
│ • 100% INCLUDED in gross estate      │   gross estate                       │
│ • Causes step-up in basis (§ 1014)   │ • No basis step-up at death          │
└──────────────────────────────────────┴──────────────────────────────────────┘

The Ascertainable Standard Exception (HEMS) (IRC § 2041(b)(1)(A))

A power to consume, invade, or appropriate property for the benefit of the powerholder which is limited by an ascertainable standard relating to the Health, Education, Maintenance, or Support (HEMS) of the decedent is NOT a General Power of Appointment.

• Treas. Reg. § 20.2041-1(c)(2): Magic words that satisfy the ascertainable standard include "support in reasonable comfort," "maintenance in health and reasonable comfort," "education, including college and professional education," and "medical, dental, and hospital expenses."
• Prohibited Words (Triggering GPA Inclusion): Subjective words such as "comfort," "happiness," "welfare," "pleasure," "benefit," or "desire" do not qualify as ascertainable standards and will convert the power into a taxable General Power of Appointment.

The "5-and-5 Power" Safe Harbor (IRC § 2041(b)(2) / § 2514(e))

A trust beneficiary may hold an annual non-cumulative right to withdraw trust principal. Under general tax law, allowing a withdrawal power to lapse would be treated as a taxable gift to remainder beneficiaries.

Under IRC § 2514(e) and § 2041(b)(2), the lapse of a power is exempt from gift and estate tax release rules to the extent that the withdrawal right does not exceed the greater of:

1. $5,000, or
2. 5% of the aggregate value of the trust assets at the time of lapse.

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                     5-AND-5 POWER LAPSE CALCULATION                         │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Example: Trust corpus = $800,000. Beneficiary holds annual right to         │
│ withdraw $60,000. Beneficiary allows the power to lapse on Dec 31.          │
│                                                                             │
│ • 5% of Trust Corpus = 5% × $800,000 = $40,000                             │
│ • Safe Harbor Limit = Greater of $5,000 or $40,000 = $40,000                │
│ • Excess Subject to Taxable Gift / Release = $60,000 - $40,000 = $20,000    │
│ • The $20,000 excess is treated as a taxable transfer by the beneficiary!   │
│                                                                             │
│ Estate Tax Inclusion in Year of Death: If beneficiary dies during the year, │
│ only the unexercised $60,000 withdrawal right for that single year is       │
│ includible in their gross estate under IRC § 2041.                          │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

---

5. Wealth Planning Entity Structures

Valuation Discounts and Section 2036 Pitfalls

Wealth transfer planning with FLPs and LLCs frequently utilizes two substantial valuation discounts:

1. Discount for Lack of Marketability (DLOM): Reflects the inability to rapidly convert closely held entity units into cash on an open market (typically 10% to 25%).
2. Discount for Lack of Control (DLOC): Reflects a minority non-voting interest's inability to direct distributions, force liquidations, or control operations (typically 10% to 20%).

IRS Section 2036 Traps: Under IRC § 2036(a)(1) & (a)(2), the IRS will disregard FLP/LLC structures and pull 100% of the underlying assets back into the decedent's gross estate at undiscounted fair market value if:

• The senior family member commingles personal funds with entity bank accounts;
• The senior member uses entity funds to pay personal living expenses or estate taxes;
• The entity fails to maintain formal books, records, and state filings; or
• There was no legitimate, significant non-tax business purpose for creating the entity (Estate of Strangi, Estate of Powell, Estate of Bongard).