11.2 Thoracic & Lumbar Spine, Sacrum & Coccyx
Key Takeaways
- Thoracic spine AP and lateral must include the full thoracic vertebral column of interest; swimmer’s or arm-elevated laterals help the upper T-spine when shoulders obscure T1–T3.
- Lumbar spine AP and lateral are centered with iliac crest / L4–L5 landmarks; the L5–S1 spot (lateral or AP axial per protocol) opens the lumbosacral junction; 45° obliques demonstrate the Scottie dog for pars interarticularis evaluation.
- Sacrum AP axial uses cephalad angulation; coccyx AP axial uses caudad angulation; both require a true lateral of the respective segment for orthogonal evaluation.
- Scoliosis series concepts emphasize consistent PA (or AP) geometry, inclusion of the full curve, and reproducible positioning for serial comparison—follow department/pediatric dose protocols.
- Compression fracture recognition on lateral spine images (wedge deformity, endplate disruption, height loss) is a high-weight skeletal pathology link for RTR.6 critique stems.
11.2 Thoracic & Lumbar Spine, Sacrum & Coccyx
Quick Answer: Image the thoracic spine with AP and lateral (add swimmer’s for the upper T-spine when needed). Image the lumbar spine with AP, lateral, L5–S1 spot, and 45° obliques when pars/facets are in question—know the Scottie dog. Sacrum = AP axial cephalad + lateral; coccyx = AP axial caudad + lateral. Watch for compression fractures on laterals and keep scoliosis series reproducible and dose-aware under Canadian RTR practice.
Thoracolumbar and sacrococcygeal radiography dominate outpatient back-pain work-ups and appear throughout trauma series. On the CAMRT exam, expect items that combine centering landmarks, CR angulation direction (cephalad vs caudad), oblique anatomy identification, and pathology patterns such as wedge compression fractures—high secondary-weight skeletal content under clinical procedures and image analysis.
Thoracic Spine — AP
| Element | Typical practice |
|---|---|
| Position | Supine or upright; MSP centered; arms at sides; knees flexed if supine to reduce thoracic kyphosis/lordotic lumbar influence on comfort |
| SID | ~100–115 cm Bucky |
| CR | Perpendicular to T7 (inferior scapular angle level), mid-sagittal |
| Collimation | C7 through L1 region as ordered; include full thoracic transverse width of interest |
| Respiration | Suspended expiration or quiet breathing per protocol (expiration can elevate diaphragm less variably for lower T-spine; follow site) |
| Anode heel | Some protocols place anode superiorly so more intense cathode side covers thicker lower thorax—know the concept |
Evaluation criteria: All twelve thoracic vertebrae (or the ordered segment) included; spinous processes midline (rotation); vertebral bodies and disk spaces demonstrated; sternoclavicular joints and pedicles reasonably symmetric; exposure penetrates both upper and lower thoracic regions (anode-heel and exposure technique matter).
Rotation clues: Spinous processes off midline; unequal pedicle-to-spinous distance; clavicles asymmetric relative to spine.
Thoracic Spine — Lateral
| Element | Typical practice |
|---|---|
| Position | Left lateral recumbent preferred (or upright lateral); arms forward/elevated to clear thorax; head supported so MSP is vertical; spine parallel to IR (radiolucent support under waist if needed) |
| CR | Perpendicular to T7, posterior to mid-axilla along the midcoronal plane |
| Breathing | Quiet breathing technique (long exposure, low mA) may blur lung/rib markings—or suspended respiration per protocol |
| Support | Build up waist so the long axis of the spine is parallel to the table—prevents closed disk spaces from sag |
Evaluation criteria: Open intervertebral disk spaces (spine parallel to IR); posterior ribs largely superimposed (rotation control); T-spine vertebral bodies in profile; proximal humeri not obscuring upper T-spine more than unavoidable; full segment included.
Upper thoracic / swimmer’s for T-spine
When shoulders obscure T1–T3, use a swimmer’s lateral (arm nearest IR up, opposite shoulder depressed) centered near T1–T2, or department-specific arm positions. Same principle as cervical swimmer’s: separate the cervicothoracic/upper thoracic junction from shoulder girdle density.
Lumbar Spine — AP (or PA)
| Element | Typical practice |
|---|---|
| Position | Supine AP common; hips/knees flexed to reduce lordosis and open disk spaces; MSP centered |
| CR | Perpendicular to iliac crest level (~L4–L5) for lumbosacral series, or slightly higher for lumbar-only protocols |
| Collimation | T12 through coccyx/sacrum as ordered; lateral soft tissues / SI region per protocol |
| Respiration | Suspended expiration |
PA lumbar is used in some scoliosis and dose-reduction pathways (beam enters posteriorly, reducing gonad/breast dose concepts in serial imaging)—know that both exist; follow the order and protocol.
Evaluation criteria: Spinous processes midline; SI joints equidistant; pedicles symmetric; intervertebral spaces reasonably open; psoas margins often visible; markers correct; collimation not clipping transverse processes needed for the clinical question.
Lumbar Spine — Lateral
| Element | Typical practice |
|---|---|
| Position | True left lateral recumbent; knees flexed; spine supported parallel to IR; arms forward |
| CR | Perpendicular to iliac crest (L4–L5) for full lumbar lateral |
| Collimation | Lower thoracic transition through sacrum as required |
Evaluation criteria: Open lumbar disk spaces; posterior vertebral margins nearly superimposed (rotation); intervertebral foramina of lumbar spine visualized (lumbar foramina face laterally—unlike cervical); pedicles superimposed; soft-tissue and bony detail sufficient for height loss assessment.
Support the natural waist curve with a sponge when the spine sags into a “hammock”—sag closes disk spaces and mimics pathology.
L5–S1 Spot (Lumbosacral Junction)
The L5–S1 joint is often closed or poorly seen on the full lateral because of beam divergence and pelvic thickness.
| Approach | Typical geometry |
|---|---|
| Lateral spot | True lateral; CR perpendicular (or slight caudal angle per body habitus) to a point 4 cm anterior to the posterior superior iliac spine / at the level of the ASIS–symphysis relationship—commonly described as centered 3–4 cm anterior to the palpable posterior element at L5–S1; collimate tightly |
| AP axial (Ferguson-type concepts) | Cephalad angle (often 30–35° male / 35–45° female range in classic teaching—follow department protocol) centered to lumbosacral joint |
Evaluation: Open L5–S1 intervertebral joint space; L5 and upper sacrum demonstrated without excessive pelvic superimposition; no rotation.
Lumbar Obliques — The Scottie Dog
45° posterior (RPO/LPO) or anterior (RAO/LAO) obliques demonstrate the pars interarticularis and zygapophyseal joints. The classic Scottie dog appearance on an oblique lumbar radiograph:
| Scottie part | Anatomic structure |
|---|---|
| Nose | Transverse process |
| Eye | Pedicle |
| Ear | Superior articular process |
| Foreleg | Inferior articular process |
| Body | Lamina |
| Neck | Pars interarticularis |
A radiolucent collar across the Scottie’s neck suggests spondylolysis (pars defect). Spondylolisthesis is forward slippage of one vertebra on another, often related to bilateral pars defects—best appreciated on the lateral.
| Element | Typical practice |
|---|---|
| Rotation | 45° body oblique |
| CR | Perpendicular to L3 (1–2 in above iliac crest) for general lumbar obliques; adjust for level of interest |
| Side demonstrated | Posterior oblique shows downside zygapophyseal joints of the lumbar spine in standard teaching—confirm with your textbook/protocol pairing used in Canadian programs |
Exam tip: If the stem asks which structure is the Scottie dog’s neck, answer pars interarticularis. If the clinical history is young athlete with extension back pain, think pars defect and ensure obliques/lateral quality.
Sacrum
| Projection | Position | CR | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|---|
| AP axial sacrum | Supine, MSP centered, knees flexed for comfort | 15° cephalad, centered 5 cm superior to pubic symphysis (midway between ASIS and symphysis region per protocol) | Entire sacrum free of foreshortening; sacral foramina visualized; pubis not overlapping excessively |
| Lateral sacrum | True lateral, hips flexed slightly, support spine | Perpendicular to level of ASIS / 3–4 cm posterior to midaxillary sacral level (center to sacrum) | Sacrum in profile; L5–S1 included as needed; femora not rotating the pelvis |
Why cephalad for sacrum? The sacrum curves posteriorly; cephalad angulation reduces foreshortening and projects the sacrum with less pubic superimposition.
Coccyx
| Projection | Position | CR | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|---|
| AP axial coccyx | Supine | 10° caudad, centered 5 cm superior to pubic symphysis | Coccyx free of superimposition and foreshortening |
| Lateral coccyx | True lateral; collimate tightly | Perpendicular 5 cm posterior to the greater trochanter / to the coccyx | Coccygeal segments in profile; tight collimation critical (high scatter region) |
Do not confuse angles: Sacrum cephalad, coccyx caudad on AP axial projections. Mixing them is a classic MCQ trap.
Empty bladder when possible for AP sacrum/coccyx improves visualization and patient comfort; follow department prep policies. Use tight collimation and gonad-dose awareness consistent with current facility guidance—never sacrifice required anatomy for decorative shielding placement.
Scoliosis Series Concepts
Scoliosis imaging evaluates lateral curvature, often in adolescents, with serial follow-up. Core ideas for the RTR:
| Concept | Practice implication |
|---|---|
| PA preferred when feasible | Reduces dose to breast and thyroid compared with AP for many protocols |
| Full curve inclusion | From upper cervical or thoracic end vertebra through lumbar/sacrum as ordered—include iliac crests for Risser/maturity context when protocol requires |
| Upright weight-bearing | Standing shows functional curve better than recumbent for many assessments |
| Reproducibility | Same SID, markers, foot placement, and breathing instructions for serial comparison |
| Special views | Lateral bending, traction, or fulcrum bending per orthopedic protocol—not freelanced |
| Dose | Collimate; use PA; avoid excess repeats; pediatric technique charts; shield only if it does not obscure required landmarks |
You are not expected to measure Cobb angles as a radiologist would, but you must produce images on which curvature and endpoints can be assessed without rotation artifact or clipped anatomy.
Compression Fracture Recognition (Link to RTR.6)
Lateral thoracic and lumbar images are primary plain-film tools for vertebral compression fractures (osteoporosis, trauma, pathologic).
| Sign | What you may see |
|---|---|
| Anterior wedge | Reduced anterior vertebral height vs posterior |
| Biconcave / endplate depression | Middle height loss; endplate irregularity |
| Burst features (suspect) | Posterior element involvement, retropulsion clues—CT/MRI often needed; do not over-call from limited views |
| Soft-tissue | Paravertebral widening on AP thoracic trauma |
| Level counting | Count from known landmarks (T12 ribs, iliac crest/L4–L5) so the report level is correct |
Positioning quality affects diagnosis: A rotated lateral underestimates or mimics height loss; closed disk spaces from sagging spine confuse endplate assessment; underexposure hides cortical lines. Critique exposure, rotation, and support before attributing every contour change to disease.
Positioning Summary Table — T/L Spine, Sacrum, Coccyx
| Exam | Key projection notes |
|---|---|
| T-spine AP | CR ⊥ T7; full T1–T12; check rotation |
| T-spine lateral | Spine parallel to IR; quiet breathing option; arms clear |
| Swimmer’s / upper T | When shoulders hide T1–T3 |
| L-spine AP | CR to iliac crest; knees flexed; expiration |
| L-spine lateral | Support waist; open disks; true lateral |
| L5–S1 spot | Tight collimation; open lumbosacral joint |
| L oblique 45° | Scottie dog; pars = neck |
| Sacrum AP axial | 15° cephalad |
| Coccyx AP axial | 10° caudad |
| Sacrum/coccyx lateral | True lateral; tight collimation for coccyx |
| Scoliosis | PA upright full curve; reproducible serial technique |
Bottom Line for Thoracolumbar & Sacrococcygeal RTR Work
Center with crest and T7 landmarks, keep the long axis of the spine parallel to the IR on laterals, and use the correct cephalad vs caudad axial angles for sacrum and coccyx. Deploy L5–S1 spots and Scottie-dog obliques when the clinical question targets the lumbosacral junction or pars. Treat compression fracture evaluation as a partnership between geometry quality and pathology pattern recognition. Produce scoliosis images that are complete, comparable, and dose-conscious. That combination of procedure skill and image analysis is high-yield for CAMRT skeletal gen-rad competencies.
Which central-ray angulation is appropriate for a routine AP axial projection of the sacrum?
On an oblique lumbar radiograph, the “neck” of the Scottie dog corresponds to which structure?
How does the routine AP axial coccyx projection differ in tube angle direction from the AP axial sacrum?
A lateral lumbar image shows a vertebra with decreased anterior height relative to posterior height and endplate deformity after minor trauma in an older adult. Which interpretation best fits a common pathologic pattern the technologist should recognize for critique context?