12.1 Economic Principles of Real Estate Value
Key Takeaways
Market value estimates probable price for specified rights, market conditions and a date.
Test legal permissibility, physical possibility and financial feasibility before identifying the use with the highest supported value.
Substitution compares competing alternatives. Contribution measures how a feature affects the property’s market value.
Use relevant local evidence to assess supply and demand, balance, conformity, progression and regression.
Distinguish an estimate from a price or cost
Market value is an opinion about the most probable price for specified property rights as of a given date. It assumes reasonable exposure in a competitive market, knowledgeable and prudent parties and a transaction free of undue duress. Identify the payment terms and unusual concessions when they affect comparability. The assumptions describe the value question being asked. They do not guarantee what one purchaser will offer.
| Concept | Question it answers |
|---|---|
| Asking price | What amount does the seller currently ask for? |
| Sale price | What consideration did the parties actually agree to for this transaction? |
| Cost | What was spent, or what would it take to acquire, build or replace something on the stated basis? |
| Market value | What is the probable market price for these rights under the stated conditions and date? |
| Value in use | What is the property worth for a specified use or user, given their benefits and constraints? |
A sale price can be strong market evidence when its terms and circumstances are comparable. A related-party transfer, unusual concession or distress can change how much it tells you. Cost is useful evidence for some questions and does not measure the price contribution by itself. For example, a family may pay more for a layout that meets an unusual accessibility need. A seller can value an improvement personally even when comparable evidence supports a smaller price contribution. Utility, scarcity, demand and the ability to transfer the rights all help explain why properties with similar construction costs can sell for different amounts.
Test highest and best use
Highest and best use asks which reasonably probable use produces the highest value once the feasible alternatives have been considered. Test the land as if vacant and the property as improved when relevant. The existing structure may contribute enough value to keep, or evidence may support changing its use, renovating or redeveloping. Analyze timing and costs before assuming that a future opportunity is already available.
| Test | How it applies to a proposed redevelopment |
|---|---|
| Legal permissibility | Check the land-use district, allowable uses, actual approval path, restrictions on title and applicable public requirements. If the case depends on changing controls, support the probability and timing with evidence. |
| Physical possibility | Check site size and configuration, access, services, soil and other physical limitations. |
| Financial feasibility | Determine whether expected benefits justify costs and the risks of carrying out the proposal. Analyze the market for the completed use. |
| Maximum productivity | Compare the value supported by the uses that pass the preceding tests. High gross revenue alone does not establish the result. |
For example, a clinic could earn more than residential use on paper. If the applicable district excludes the clinic and there is no reasonably probable approval or change, the proposal fails the legal test. Verify the current municipal mapping and use definitions for the parcel. A listing label or a nearby project cannot establish the permissions on this lot.
Explain why buyers pay different amounts
Substitution describes how buyers compare available alternatives with similar utility, risk and timing. If two homes meet the same needs, a buyer may choose the less costly one. Financing terms, condition and availability can make two apparently similar alternatives unequal. An investor similarly considers competing properties with comparable income and risks.
Contribution describes the change in the whole property’s value that the market attributes to a feature. Suppose reliable evidence supports a $15,000 increase for a specialized improvement that cost $75,000. Its indicated contribution is $15,000. A renovation can contribute less than its cost, and a comparable adjustment should use evidence of buyer response rather than an invoice as the amount.
Anticipation links current value to expected future benefits. A planned station or future rent may influence today’s market if participants expect those benefits and price in the chance, timing and cost of realizing them. Check what has actually been approved and what remains contingent.
Conformity and balance describe how an improvement fits its market and site. A modest home can benefit from more desirable surroundings, sometimes called progression. A large, high-specification house can receive less market support in a lower-priced area, sometimes called regression. These are tendencies to test against comparable evidence. Check other differences, especially redevelopment potential, before attributing a price gap to surrounding homes. Balance also concerns whether a feature or improvement has enough utility for its cost and site.
Supply and demand explain how the number of competing listings and capable buyers can influence negotiating conditions. Construction and approvals take time, while changes in borrowing costs can affect demand quickly. Compare active inventory, sales pace and days on market for the relevant segment and period. For example, 60 active listings and 20 sales per month imply three months of supply at that pace, before new listings or changes in sales. The number helps describe the market. Its meaning depends on local and historical comparisons.
At a given price, a shortage means the quantity buyers seek exceeds what sellers offer. A surplus means the quantity offered exceeds what buyers seek. At equilibrium, the quantities balance at the prevailing price. Compare inventory, sales pace, price changes and days on market together. If listings and days on market rise while sales slow, investigate whether demand weakened or supply grew before attributing the change to one cause. A planned development can affect expectations before it adds completed homes. Check what has been approved and when supply is likely to arrive.
A price bubble is a distinct concern. Expectations of further gains can themselves raise demand and push prices away from levels supported by fundamentals such as income, financing costs and population. Rapid price growth can also reflect strong underlying demand and constrained supply. A short inventory period or one price statistic cannot establish a bubble.
Bank of Canada on housing demand and supply · Bank of Canada on price exuberance
The current land-use district for a Calgary lot excludes a proposed clinic. Title and the municipal file show no applicable approval, and there is no evidence of a reasonably probable change. The clinic’s projected revenue exceeds that of permitted homes. Which highest and best use test fails on these facts?
Legal permissibility.
Physical possibility, because no corner lot could support a clinic.
Maximum productivity, because homes always have higher value than clinics.
Financial feasibility, because a clinic can never cover its construction cost.
A homeowner spends $75,000 on a custom wine cellar. Comparable evidence indicates that buyers pay $15,000 more for this feature, other differences having been considered. Which principle explains the $15,000?
Anticipation.
Balance of the four agents of production.
Contribution.
Exposure time.
After accounting for redevelopment potential and other differences, comparable evidence shows that a modest home benefits from higher-valued surroundings. In a separate neighbourhood, the market gives limited support to a high-specification home among modest properties. Which pair describes these effects?
Substitution for the modest home and anticipation for the high-specification home.
Progression for the modest home and regression for the high-specification home.
Regression for the modest home and progression for the high-specification home.
Financial feasibility for the modest home and physical possibility for the high-specification home.
Sections you finish are checked off in the contents.