7.1 NASW Code of Ethics: Core Values and Ethical Principles

7.1 NASW Code of Ethics: Core Values and Ethical Principles

The National Association of Social Workers (NASW) Code of Ethics serves as the definitive moral and professional compass for generalist social workers in the United States. For Bachelor of Social Work (BSW) practitioners, the Code is neither an aspirational suggestion nor a mere regulatory checklist; it is an active, binding covenant that defines professional identity, guides daily decision-making, and safeguards the welfare of client systems. On the ASWB Bachelors Examination, questions addressing ethics do not merely test rote memorization of standard numbers—they evaluate your ability to apply the six core values and direct practice standards to complex, frontline generalist scenarios.

---

Preamble and Purpose of the NASW Code of Ethics

The Historical and Professional Mission

The Preamble of the NASW Code of Ethics establishes the primary mission of the social work profession: to enhance human well-being and help meet the basic human needs of all people, with particular attention to the needs and empowerment of people who are vulnerable, oppressed, and living in poverty.

A defining characteristic of social work that distinguishes it from related disciplines (such as counseling, psychology, or psychiatry) is its unwavering focus on the person-in-environment (PIE) configuration. Social workers recognize that individual suffering and human distress cannot be separated from the systemic, organizational, community, and societal environments in which people live. Consequently, generalist social workers are mandated to promote social change and social justice alongside direct service delivery.

The Six Core Purposes of the Code

According to the Purpose of the NASW Code of Ethics, the document fulfills six foundational functions:

1. Identifying Core Values: Articulates the fundamental values upon which the historical mission of social work rests.
2. Summarizing Broad Ethical Principles: Translates foundational values into actionable principles that reflect the profession's core beliefs and guide generalist practice.
3. Guiding Dilemma Resolution: Establishes a systematic framework to assist social workers in identifying relevant ethical considerations when professional obligations conflict or ethical uncertainties arise.
4. Establishing Public Accountability: Provides ethical benchmarks and standards against which the general public can hold social work professionals accountable.
5. Socializing New Practitioners: Orients students, new graduates, and practitioners new to the field to the unique mission, values, and ethical responsibilities of professional social work.
6. Articulating Standards for Adjudication: Sets forth the official standards that the NASW and state licensing boards utilize to evaluate, review, and adjudicate formal ethics complaints and alleged professional misconduct.

---

The Six Core Values and Their Corresponding Ethical Principles

The NASW Code of Ethics is built upon six interdependent core values. Each value is paired with an explicit ethical principle that dictates how that value must be operationalized in real-world generalist practice.

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|                         THE SIX NASW CORE VALUES & PRINCIPLES                           |
|                                                                                         |
|  [1. SERVICE]              --> Help people in need and address social problems.         |
|  [2. SOCIAL JUSTICE]       --> Challenge social injustice, poverty, and oppression.     |
|  [3. DIGNITY & WORTH]      --> Respect inherent dignity, worth, and self-determination. |
|  [4. HUMAN RELATIONSHIPS]  --> Recognize relationships as central vehicles for change.  |
|  [5. INTEGRITY]            --> Behave in a trustworthy, honest, and ethical manner.     |
|  [6. COMPETENCE]           --> Practice within competence and develop expertise.        |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

1. Service

• Ethical Principle: Social workers' primary goal is to help people in need and to address social problems.
• Practice Operationalization: Social workers elevate service to others above their own self-interest or personal financial gain. Generalist practitioners draw upon their knowledge, values, and skills to help individuals, families, and communities resolve distress and access critical resources.
• Pro Bono Commitment: The Code explicitly states that social workers are encouraged to volunteer some portion of their professional skills with little or no financial return (pro bono service) to advance the welfare of underserved populations.

2. Social Justice

• Ethical Principle: Social workers challenge social injustice.
• Practice Operationalization: Social workers direct their advocacy efforts primarily toward issues of poverty, unemployment, discrimination, educational inequities, and other forms of systemic disadvantage. Generalist practitioners promote public awareness regarding oppression and cultural/ethnic diversity.
• Structural Focus: Social workers strive to ensure equal access to needed information, services, and resources; equality of opportunity; and meaningful client participation in community and organizational decision-making.

3. Dignity and Worth of the Person

• Ethical Principle: Social workers respect the inherent dignity and worth of the person.
• Practice Operationalization: Social workers treat every individual in a caring, compassionate, and respectful fashion, remaining mindful of individual differences, cultural heritage, and diverse identities. Practitioners avoid passing moralistic judgment on clients regardless of past choices or stigmatized life circumstances.
• Dual Responsibility: Social workers promote client socially responsible self-determination. Social workers recognize a dual responsibility to clients and to the broader society, navigating situations where a client's actions may pose serious, foreseeable harm to themselves or others.

4. Importance of Human Relationships

• Ethical Principle: Social workers recognize the central importance of human relationships.
• Practice Operationalization: Social workers understand that relationships between and among people are an indispensable vehicle for human development, psychosocial healing, and systemic change. Generalist workers engage clients as authentic partners in the helping process rather than viewing them as passive cases.
• Relational Capacity: Workers actively seek to restore, maintain, and strengthen interpersonal relationships within families, peer networks, organizations, and communities to bolster social safety nets.

5. Integrity

• Ethical Principle: Social workers behave in a trustworthy manner.
• Practice Operationalization: Social workers act honestly, responsibly, transparently, and consistently with the values of the profession. They maintain clear professional boundaries, avoid exploitation, and manage conflicts of interest.
• Organizational Advocacy: Practitioners actively promote ethical practices and transparency within their employing agencies and organizations, refusing to participate in fraudulent billing, falsified documentation, or discriminatory institutional policies.

6. Competence

• Ethical Principle: Social workers practice within their areas of competence and develop and enhance their professional expertise.
• Practice Operationalization: Generalist practitioners practice only within the boundaries of their education, training, license, supervised experience, and professional certifications. Practitioners must continually upgrade their professional knowledge and clinical skills to remain current with evidence-informed interventions.
• Contributing to the Field: Social workers contribute to the knowledge base of the profession by participating in evaluation, research, continuing education, and mentorship of emerging professionals.

---

Comparison Table: Core Values, Ethical Principles, and Practice Behaviors

---

Ethical Responsibilities to Clients (Standards 1.01–1.17 Overview)

Section 1 of the NASW Code of Ethics articulates the specific standards governing direct practice interactions between social workers and client systems. For the ASWB Bachelors exam, mastery of these seventeen standards is essential:

1.01 Commitment to Clients

Social workers' primary responsibility is to promote the well-being of clients. In general, clients' interests are primary. However, social workers' responsibility to the larger society or specific legal obligations (e.g., mandatory reporting of suspected child abuse, elder neglect, or duties to protect against imminent violence) may supersede loyalty to clients on rare occasions.

1.02 Self-Determination

Social workers respect and promote the right of clients to self-determination and assist clients in identifying and clarifying their goals. Workers may limit clients' right to self-determination only when, in the social workers' professional judgment, clients' actions or potential actions pose a serious, foreseeable, and imminent risk to themselves or others.

1.03 Informed Consent

• Valid Consent: Social workers must use clear, understandable language to inform clients of the purpose of services, risks, limits to services, costs, reasonable alternatives, clients' right to refuse or withdraw consent, and the time frame covered by the consent.
• Language and Literacy Barriers: When clients have difficulty understanding the primary language used in practice, workers must provide a qualified, independent professional interpreter (not a client's minor child or family member) and translate written documents.
• Involuntary Clients: When clients are receiving services involuntarily, workers must clarify the nature and extent of services, the parameters of confidentiality, and what information must be reported to the referring authority (e.g., probation officer, child protective services).
• Electronic Technology: Social workers must assess client capabilities for using technology, explain the risks of electronic communication (e.g., interception, data breaches), and verify identity and licensing boundaries in telehealth.

1.04 Competence

Social workers should provide services and represent themselves as competent only within the boundaries of their education, training, license, certification, consultation received, supervised experience, or other relevant professional experience.

1.05 Cultural Competence

• Social workers must demonstrate understanding of the culture and its function in human behavior and society, recognizing the strengths that exist in all cultures.
• Social workers must demonstrate cultural humility, engaging in continuous self-reflection and critical self-assessment regarding their own cultural identities, biases, and power privileges.
• Social workers must obtain education about and seek to understand the nature of social diversity and oppression with respect to race, ethnicity, national origin, immigration status, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, age, marital status, political belief, religion, and mental or physical disability.

1.06 Conflicts of Interest and Dual Relationships

• Avoiding Exploitation: Social workers should be alert to and avoid conflicts of interest that interfere with the exercise of professional discretion and impartial judgment.
• Dual Relationships: Social workers should not engage in dual or multiple relationships with clients or former clients in which there is a risk of exploitation or potential harm to the client. Dual relationships occur when social workers relate to clients in more than one relationship, whether professional, social, financial, or personal.
• Rural and Small Community Settings: In instances where dual relationships are unavoidable (e.g., isolated rural towns, small military installations, close-knit religious or LGBTQ+ communities), the worker must set clear, written boundaries, seek clinical supervision, and protect client confidentiality.

1.07 Privacy and Confidentiality

• Respecting Privacy: Social workers should respect clients' right to privacy and solicit private information only when it is essential to providing services or conducting social work research.
• Confidentiality Exceptions: Confidentiality must be maintained except for valid professional reasons: to prevent serious, foreseeable, and imminent harm to a client or other identifiable person, or when statutory laws require disclosure (e.g., mandatory reporting of child abuse, vulnerable adult exploitation, or court orders signed by a judge).
• Third-Party Payers: Social workers should not disclose confidential information to third-party payers (insurance companies) unless clients have authorized such disclosure in writing.
• Electronic Confidentiality: Social workers must ensure that electronic communications (emails, text messages, client portal records) comply with HIPAA and encryption standards.

1.08 Access to Records

Social workers should provide clients with reasonable access to records concerning the client. Social workers who are concerned that clients' access to their records could cause serious misunderstanding or harm to the client should provide assistance in interpreting the records and facilitate consultation. Only in exceptional circumstances—where there is compelling evidence that access would cause serious harm to the client—should access be limited, and the worker must document the rationale.

1.09 Sexual Relationships

• Absolute Prohibitions: Under no circumstances should social workers engage in sexual activities, inappropriate sexual communications, or sexual contact with current clients, whether consensual or forced.
• Relatives and Associates: Social workers should not engage in sexual activities with clients' relatives or other individuals with whom clients maintain a close personal relationship when there is a risk of exploitation or harm to the client.
• Former Clients: Social workers should not engage in sexual activities with former clients under any circumstances. The NASW Code maintains an absolute, permanent ban on sexual contact with former clients.
• Prior Sexual Partners: Social workers should not provide clinical services to individuals with whom they have had a prior sexual relationship.

1.10 Physical Contact

Social workers should not engage in physical contact with clients (such as holding, hugging, or comforting touch) when there is a possibility of psychological harm to the client as a result of the contact. Workers must establish clear, culturally sensitive boundaries and obtain client consent before offering physical comfort.

1.11 Sexual Harassment

Social workers should not sexually harass clients. Sexual harassment includes sexual advances, sexual solicitation, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal, written, electronic, or physical conduct of a sexual nature.

1.12 Derogatory Language

Social workers should not use derogatory language in their written, verbal, or electronic communications to or about clients. Social workers should use accurate and respectful language in all communications and official case documentation.

1.13 Payment for Services

• Social workers should ensure that fees are fair, reasonable, and commensurate with the services performed, considering clients' ability to pay.
• Bartering: Bartering (accepting goods or services from clients in exchange for social work services) is clinically and ethically discouraged. It is acceptable only in very limited circumstances: when it is culturally normative, initiated by the client, freely entered into without coercion, and essential for service provision, provided there is no exploitation or conflict of interest.

1.14 Clients Who Lack Decision-Making Capacity

When social workers act on behalf of clients who lack the capacity to make informed decisions (e.g., severe intellectual disability, advanced dementia, comatose state), social workers should take reasonable steps to safeguard the interests and rights of those clients, involving designated legal guardians while maximizing the client's participatory assent.

1.15 Interruption of Services

Social workers should make reasonable efforts to ensure continuity of services in the event that services are interrupted by factors such as unavailability, disruptions in electronic communication, relocation, illness, mental or physical disability, or death.

1.16 Referral for Services

Social workers should refer clients to other professionals when the other professionals' specialized knowledge or expertise is needed to serve the clients fully, or when social workers believe that they are not being effective or making reasonable progress with clients. Referrals must involve a smooth, coordinated transfer of responsibility.

1.17 Termination of Services

• Social workers should terminate services to clients and professional relationships when such services and relationships are no longer required or no longer serve the clients' needs or interests.
• Social workers should take reasonable steps to avoid abandoning clients who are still in need of services. If an agency ends services due to nonpayment, the financial contractual criteria must have been explained to the client, the client must not pose an imminent danger to self or others, and the worker must address the clinical consequences of termination and provide appropriate referrals.

---

Hierarchy and Interplay of Values in Generalist Practice

In daily BSW generalist practice, core values do not exist in isolation. Frequently, two or more values create dynamic tension that requires thoughtful ethical analysis:

1. Dignity and Worth vs. Service (Safety): A client residing in squalor wishes to remain in their home, asserting self-determination (Dignity and Worth). The social worker is deeply concerned for the client's physical health and sanitary safety (Service). Unless the client is legally incompetent or poses imminent, serious self-harm, self-determination takes precedence over worker paternalism.
2. Social Justice vs. Integrity (Agency Policy): An agency policy mandates denying food pantry assistance to undocumented families. The social worker's commitment to Social Justice demands challenging this policy. The worker must demonstrate Integrity by working through legitimate administrative, professional, and advocacy channels to modify the policy rather than covertly falsifying intake records.
3. Competence vs. Service: A generalist BSW at a community mental health center is asked to conduct specialized neurocognitive testing for an adult client with suspected traumatic brain injury because no psychologist is available. Although the worker wants to be of service, practicing outside one's scope of Competence violates ethical standards and poses substantial harm to the client. The worker must decline the task, explain the limits of competence, and advocate for an external neuropsychological referral.

---

Practice Vignettes and Application

Practice Vignette 1: Rural Dual Relationships and Competence

A generalist social worker operates at the only outpatient health clinic in a rural frontier county with a population of 2,500. A 32-year-old resident requests case management services to navigate Medicaid enrollment and chronic illness management. During the intake, the worker realizes the client is the spouse of the social worker's child's primary school teacher. No other case managers practice within a 60-mile radius.

Generalist Analysis: In rural and isolated environments, dual relationships cannot always be completely avoided. Because refusing service would deprive the client of essential healthcare access (violating the principle of Service), the social worker must not summarily terminate or turn the client away. Instead, following Standard 1.06(c), the social worker must engage in transparent dialogue with the client regarding potential dual-relationship boundaries, obtain written informed consent clarifying the distinct professional role, document the boundary discussion in the case record, and establish regular clinical supervision with a regional supervisor to monitor and mitigate any boundary blurring.

Practice Vignette 2: Protecting Client Records and Confidentiality

A generalist social worker at a supportive housing agency receives a phone call from an attorney representing a client's landlord in an eviction proceeding. The attorney demands: "I need a copy of your client's mental health intake and progress notes immediately. If you don't fax them over by 5:00 PM today, I will have the court issue a subpoena." The client has not authorized any release of information.

Generalist Analysis: Under NASW Standards 1.07(b) and 1.07(c), social workers must protect the confidentiality of all client information. An attorney's verbal threat, written demand, or even an attorney-issued subpoena is not a court order signed by a judge. The social worker must not disclose any records or confirm whether the individual is a client. The worker's correct action is to politely decline disclosure, cite professional confidentiality mandates, inform the client of the request, and consult with the agency's legal counsel or executive supervisor. Only a court order signed by a judge mandates disclosure, and even then, the worker advocates to limit the disclosure to the minimum necessary information.

---

Common ASWB Examination Traps: Core Values and Standards

1. The Subpoena vs. Court Order Trap: Exam scenarios frequently present an attorney issuing a subpoena for client records. A subpoena issued by a lawyer does NOT authorize breaching confidentiality. Social workers must assert privilege and withhold records until the client signs an informed consent release or a judge issues a direct court order.
2. The Absolute Ban on Sexual Relationships: There is NO grace period (e.g., 2 years or 5 years) in the NASW Code that permits sexual relationships with former clients. Unlike the American Psychological Association (APA) or other codes, the NASW Code enforces an absolute, permanent prohibition against sexual relationships with former clients.
3. Bartering Misconceptions: Bartering is not completely illegal, but it is heavily restricted. If an exam question asks if bartering is permitted, do not choose "Never permitted." However, if the client offers bartering and the worker accepts without proving cultural normativity and lack of exploitation, it is an ethical violation.
4. Using Family Members as Translators: When working with non-English speaking clients, relying on bilingual family members (especially minor children) is an ethical violation of informed consent, confidentiality, and cultural competence. The worker must always secure an official, professional medical/social services interpreter.
5. Supervising Professional Boundaries with Social Media: Personal social media requests (e.g., "friending" or "following") from current or former clients must be declined. Social workers must maintain separate personal and professional online profiles to prevent boundary violations and privacy breaches.