3.5 Depth Dose Characteristics: PDD, TMR, TPR & TAR Relationships
Key Takeaways
- Percentage Depth Dose (PDD) increases with increasing beam energy, increases with increasing field size, and increases with increasing SSD.
- The depth of maximum dose (dmax) deepens with higher beam energy: Co-60 at 0.5 cm, 6 MV at 1.5 cm, 10 MV at 2.5 cm, and 18 MV at 3.3 cm.
- Mayneord F-Factor calculates PDD changes when converting between different Source-Skin Distances (SSD), overestimating PDD increases for large fields at deep depths.
- Tissue Maximum Ratio (TMR) is the ratio of dose at a depth to dose at dmax at a constant distance from the source, making it entirely independent of SSD.
- Tissue Air Ratio (TAR) is independent of SSD and is used primarily for low-energy photons, cobalt-60, and rotational SAD calculations.
Central Axis Depth Dose Physics
\nAs a high-energy photon beam traverses biological tissue, energy is transferred to electrons via photoelectric absorption, Compton scattering, and pair production. These energetic recoil electrons travel through tissue, depositing absorbed dose along their paths. The dose profile along the central axis of the beam exhibits a characteristic curve comprising a build-up region, a point of maximum dose ($d_{\max}$), and an exponential attenuation tail at depth.
100% | + dmax
| / \
80% | / \ Exponential Attenuation Tail
| / \...
60% | / \...
| / Build-up \...
40% | / Region \...
+----------------------------------------> Depth (cm)
0 dmax (1.5 cm) 10 cm 20 cm
Depth of Maximum Dose ($d_{\max}$) and Electronic Equilibrium
$d_{\max}$ represents the depth at which kerma (Kinetic Energy Released per Unit Mass) equals absorbed dose, establishing longitudinal charged particle equilibrium (CPE). In the build-up region between the skin surface and $d_{\max}$, kerma is maximum at the surface and decreases exponentially, while absorbed dose rises rapidly as secondary electrons are generated and travel forward into deeper tissue layers. Beyond $d_{\max}$, absorbed dose decreases exponentially due to photon attenuation.
| Photon Energy / Beam Quality | Depth of Maximum Dose ($d_{\max}$) | Surface Dose (% of $d_{\max}$) | $PDD(10\text{ cm}, 10\times10\text{ cm}^2, 100\text{ cm SSD})$ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Orthovoltage (250 kVp) | 0.0 cm (Skin surface) | 100% | 35.0% |
| Cobalt-60 ($^{60}\text{Co}$) | 0.5 cm | 50.0% | 56.4% |
| 4 MV Photons | 1.0 cm | 40.0% | 61.0% |
| 6 MV Photons | 1.5 cm | 25.0% \u2013 30.0% | 67.0% |
| 10 MV Photons | 2.5 cm | 20.0% | 73.0% |
| 15 MV Photons | 3.0 cm | 15.0% | 77.0% |
| 18 MV Photons | 3.3 cm \u2013 3.5 cm | 10.0% \u2013 12.0% | 80.0% |
Percentage Depth Dose (PDD) Characteristics
Mathematical Definition
Percentage Depth Dose (PDD) is defined as the ratio of absorbed dose at depth ($d$) to absorbed dose at reference depth ($d_{\max}$) along the central axis of the beam, expressed as a percentage. PDD is measured at a fixed Source-to-Skin Distance (SSD) (typically 100 cm SSD) in a water phantom.
\nWhere $d$ is depth, $r$ is field size at the skin surface, and $f$ is SSD.
Physical Parameters Influencing PDD
- Beam Energy (Directly Proportional): Higher energy photons possess greater penetrating power (lower linear attenuation coefficient $\mu$), shifting $d_{\max}$ deeper into tissue and increasing PDD at depth.
- Depth (Inversely Proportional): Beyond $d_{\max}$, photon attenuation and beam divergence cause PDD to decay exponentially with increasing depth.
- Field Size (Directly Proportional): As field size increases, a larger volume of surrounding phantom tissue is irradiated, generating increased phantom scatter radiation reaching the central axis, which increases PDD.
- Source-Skin Distance (Directly Proportional): Increasing SSD reduces beam divergence according to the Inverse Square Law over the depth interval between $d_{\max}$ and depth $d$, which increases PDD.
Mayneord F-Factor for Extended Distance Calculations
\nWhen a patient is treated at an extended SSD (e.g., treating a total body irradiation or whole-leg sarcoma field at 120 cm SSD instead of 100 cm SSD), PDD increases. The Mayneord F-Factor is derived from the Inverse Square Law to calculate the new PDD ($PDD_2$) at extended distance $f_2$ from the known PDD ($PDD_1$) at distance $f_1$:
Clinical Worked Example: A 6 MV photon beam ($d_{\max} = 1.5\text{ cm}$) delivers a PDD of 67.0% at depth $d = 10\text{ cm}$ for $f_1 = 100\text{ cm}$ SSD. Calculate the new PDD at an extended distance $f_2 = 120\text{ cm}$ SSD:
Note on Mayneord F-Factor Limitations: The Mayneord F-Factor works well for small field sizes at moderate depths, but overestimates the PDD increase for large field sizes and deep depths because it ignores the increased phantom scatter generated at extended distances.
Iso-Distance Dosimetric Parameters: TMR, TPR, and TAR
Tissue Maximum Ratio (TMR)
\nIn Source-to-Axis Distance (SAD) setups (isocentric technique), the machine isocenter remains at a fixed distance (100 cm) while patient depth varies. Using PDD is cumbersome because SSD changes with gantry rotation. Tissue Maximum Ratio (TMR) is defined as the ratio of absorbed dose at depth $d$ to absorbed dose at $d_{\max}$, measured at a constant distance from the radiation source.
Fundamental Physics Principle: TMR is completely independent of Source-to-Skin Distance (SSD). TMR depends exclusively on beam energy, depth $d$, and field size projected at depth $r_d$.
Tissue Phantom Ratio (TPR) and Beam Quality Specifier ($TPR_{20,10}$)
Tissue Phantom Ratio (TPR) is the ratio of dose at depth $d$ to dose at a fixed reference depth $d_{\text{ref}}$ (typically 5 cm or 10 cm) at a constant source-to-detector distance.
\nThe ratio of TPR at 20 cm depth to TPR at 10 cm depth in water ($TPR_{20,10}$) serves as the international standard beam quality index under IAEA TRS-398 and AAPM TG-51 protocols to specify photon beam energy independently of electron contamination.
Tissue Air Ratio (TAR)
Tissue Air Ratio (TAR) is the ratio of absorbed dose at depth $d$ in phantom to absorbed dose at the same point in free space (air). TAR is independent of SSD and is used primarily for low-energy photons, Cobalt-60, and radionuclide calculations. At high photon energies (> 10 MV), measuring dose in free space becomes physically unreliable due to large electron contamination cap requirements.
| Parameter | Reference Setup | Distance Constraint | SSD Dependence | Clinical Application |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PDD | Fixed SSD (100 cm) | Surface at 100 cm | Dependent on SSD | Non-isocentric SSD setups, single electron fields |
| TMR | Fixed SAD (100 cm) | Detector at 100 cm | Independent of SSD | Isocentric 3D-CRT, IMRT, VMAT MU calculations |
| TPR | Fixed SAD ($d_{\text{ref}}$) | Detector at 100 cm | Independent of SSD | High-energy photon reference dosimetry ($TPR_{20,10}$) |
| TAR | Fixed SAD (Free space) | Detector at 100 cm | Independent of SSD | Orthovoltage, $^{60}\text{Co}$, rotational arc dosimetry |
A clinical medical physicist is evaluating depth dose tables for a new 18 MV photon beam on a linear accelerator. What is the standard depth of maximum dose (dmax) for an 18 MV photon beam?
A patient is treated at an extended SSD of 120 cm instead of the standard 100 cm SSD. The dosimetrist utilizes the Mayneord F-Factor to recalculate the Percentage Depth Dose (PDD) at a depth of 10 cm. Which of the following statements correctly describes the behavior of PDD as SSD increases?
Why is Tissue Maximum Ratio (TMR) preferred over Percentage Depth Dose (PDD) for calculating Monitor Units (MU) in modern isocentric (SAD) 3D-CRT and IMRT treatment plans?