13.2 References, Internet Research & Understanding the Case
Key Takeaways
The CET blueprint's references include Black's Law Dictionary, Merriam-Webster, The Bluebook, NCRA Advisory Opinions, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Guide to Judiciary Policy.
Verify a name or term in the case materials first, then in authoritative outside sources, ideally confirming it in two independent places.
Research single terms without surrounding testimony; never paste confidential transcript text into public search engines, translation sites or AI tools.
Understanding the case helps choose between sound-alike words, but it never allows the transcriber to add or change spoken words.
Blueprint topics 30409 to 30411 ask you to define best practice for standard references and research materials, discuss how transcribers can use the Internet effectively for research, and explain why comprehending the case matters.
Standard references
The CET blueprint lists its references. Here is what each is for:
| Reference | Use it for |
|---|---|
| AAERT Best Practices Guide | AAERT's own professional standards for reporting and transcription (2019 edition; AAERT has announced a new edition for 2026) |
| Merriam-Webster Dictionary | Standard spelling, compound words, hyphenation, whether a foreign term is naturalized |
| Black's Law Dictionary | Legal terms and Latin phrases: spelling and meaning |
| The Bluebook | Citation form for cases, statutes and rules; italics for foreign words in legal writing |
| NCRA Advisory Opinions | Ethics questions on services, copies, drafts and gifts |
| Federal Rules of Civil Procedure | Deposition procedure (FRCP 28, 30), redaction (5.2) |
| Guide to Judiciary Policy, Vol. 6 | Federal transcript format, certification, delivery and fees |
Add a medical dictionary and a drug reference for medical testimony (Chapter 18), and keep AAERT's federal format samples and template at hand.
Best practice: use current editions, prefer the authoritative source over a summary of it, keep a job-specific word list (names, places, terms, spellings, speaker voices) and reuse it for related jobs in the same case.
Researching on the Internet
A reliable order of sources
- The case materials: case information, log notes, exhibits, appearances. These are the most authoritative for the case itself.
- Official sources: court websites (judges' names and titles, courthouse addresses), state bar attorney directories (attorney names), government agency sites, company websites for business names and their exact styling.
- Reference sites: online dictionaries, map services for street and place names, and professional directories for doctors.
- Court records: PACER (federal) or state court portals can confirm a caption, party names and a case number. They may charge fees; follow your client's policy.
- General search, used carefully, to find a candidate spelling that you then confirm in an authoritative source.
Search techniques
- Put exact phrases in quotation marks:
"Laffredo" "Essex Police". - Limit to an authoritative domain, as in
site:uscourts.govor a state court domain. - Combine a name with a role and a place to narrow the result:
Dr. [name] orthopedic Burlington Vermont. - Confirm in two independent sources when the stakes are high, such as a party's name or a drug name.
What the Internet cannot do
- It cannot tell you what was said. A plausible spelling found online does not prove the speaker said that word.
- It does not outrank the case materials. If the caption spells a party's name one way, use it, even if a website differs, unless the record itself shows otherwise.
Researching without breaching confidentiality
Research exposes information to outside services, so:
- Search single terms, not quotations of testimony.
- Never paste transcript passages into public search engines, translation services or AI chat tools. Those services may store or reuse the text (Chapter 2).
- Do not contact witnesses, parties or attorneys to ask about spellings unless the client authorizes it; go through the agency.
- Protect work product. Your word list for a sealed case is itself confidential.
Comprehending the case
Understanding what the case is about makes a transcriber more accurate:
- Homophones: in a loan dispute, "principal" (the amount); in an ethics hearing, "principle."
- Punctuation: knowing who is who and what is at issue shows where sentences end and whether a line is a question.
- Speaker IDs: knowing which attorney represents whom, and who is examining, prevents misattribution.
- Terminology: a products-liability case brings engineering terms; a custody case brings family-court terms. Preparing a word list in advance saves time.
How to get up to speed: read the case information and log notes before listening; skim the exhibits; listen to the opening minutes where counsel usually identify themselves and the issues; review earlier transcripts in the same case if the client provides them.
A worked research example
A physician testifies about prescribing "Lyrica" and "gabapentin" and names a colleague, "Dr. Nguyen," at a clinic that sounds like "Copley Ortho."
- Drug names: confirm in a drug reference or DailyMed. Lyrica is a brand name (capitalized); gabapentin is a generic name (lowercase).
- The colleague: search the clinic's official website and the state medical board's license lookup for a Dr. Nguyen at that practice. Two sources agree on the spelling.
- The clinic: the practice's website shows its exact name and styling.
- What you do not do: paste the physician's testimony into a search box, or phone the clinic.
- If verification fails: keep the spelling as heard with (phonetic) on first use (Chapter 12).
Add every verified item to the job's word list with its source, so a later transcriber in the same case can reuse it.
The limit
Comprehension informs choices between possibilities you actually hear. It never licenses adding or changing words to make testimony "make sense." If a witness says something that seems wrong for the case, the transcript keeps it, with (sic) if the misstatement could look like a transcription error (Chapter 5).
Which source is the most authoritative for spelling a party's name in a transcript?
The first result of a general web search
A social media profile with a similar name
The case materials, such as the caption on the case information sheet and the appearances
The transcriber's memory of a similar case
Which research practice protects confidentiality?
Pasting the whole unclear paragraph into a public AI tool
Searching a single unfamiliar term without surrounding testimony
Posting the audio clip in an online transcriber forum
Emailing the witness to ask how to spell a word
A transcriber understands a case well and is sure the witness meant "Exhibit 5" but said "Exhibit 4." What should the transcript show?
Exhibit 5, since the transcriber understands the case
Exhibit 4 or 5, to show both possibilities
(indiscernible), since the reference is confusing
Exhibit 4, with (sic) if the misstatement could look like a transcription error
Sections you finish are checked off in the contents.