Free Practice Questions for Romania Inspector SSM Graduation Assessment

Exam-style questions and explanations by OpenExamPrep.

✓ No registration✓ No credit card

60+ Questions

100% Free

Loading practice questions...

Sample Romania Inspector SSM Graduation Assessment Practice Questions

Try these sample questions to review concepts for the Romania Inspector SSM Graduation Assessment exam. Each question includes a detailed explanation. Start the interactive quiz above for the full 60+ question experience with AI tutoring.

1Which statement best describes the general scope of Legea nr. 319/2006?

A.It covers industrial activities, while office workers are covered only by employment law.

B.It covers private employers, while public employers follow only their internal safety rules.

C.It covers public and private activities, subject to the specific public-service exception in Article 4.

D.It covers employees, but excludes apprentices and students undertaking practical training.

Explanation: Article 3 establishes coverage across public and private activities. Article 4 provides a limited exception where the inherent characteristics of specific public-service activities conflict with the law; Article 5 includes apprentices and students on practical placements within the worker definition.

2A hazardous cleaning step can be eliminated by changing the production process. Which general prevention principle in Article 7 of Legea nr. 319/2006 most directly supports eliminating that step?

A.Evaluating risks that cannot be avoided

B.Avoiding risks

C.Giving appropriate instructions to workers

D.Adapting work to technical progress

Explanation: Avoiding risks is a general prevention principle in Article 7(3). Removing the hazardous step avoids that exposure, whereas assessment and instructions address risks that remain.

3Both a fixed edge-protection system and individual fall-protection equipment are technically feasible for a work area. Which principle must guide the employer's choice of preventive measures?

A.Prefer individual equipment whenever workers have completed training.

B.Treat collective and individual protection as having equal priority in every case.

C.Give collective protective measures priority over individual protective measures.

D.Choose individual equipment first and consider collective measures after an incident.

Explanation: Article 7(3)(h) of Legea nr. 319/2006 gives collective protection priority over individual protection. The selected controls must still address the actual risk and conditions; training does not reverse that priority.

4A process releases harmful dust at a cutting station. Which measure most directly combats the risk at its source?

A.Move exposed workers to other tasks at regular intervals.

B.Provide respirators as the sole routine control.

C.Post a warning sign at the workshop entrance.

D.Capture the dust with suitable local extraction at the cutting point.

Explanation: Local extraction captures the contaminant where it is generated, illustrating the source-control principle in Article 7(3)(c) of Legea nr. 319/2006. Rotation, PPE, and signs may have supporting roles but do not capture the dust at its origin.

5An employer selects necessary personal protective equipment for a worker. Who must bear the cost of this occupational safety measure?

A.The worker initially, with reimbursement only if an accident occurs

B.The employer, without imposing a financial obligation on the worker

C.The employer and worker equally under a standard payroll deduction

D.The worker whenever the equipment is individually fitted

Explanation: Article 7(6) of Legea nr. 319/2006 prohibits safety and health measures from imposing financial obligations on workers. The employer's PPE duties include providing the necessary equipment; individual fitting does not transfer its cost to the user.

6Workers report a concrete, current danger of structural collapse in their work area. Management proposes continuing normal work while a specialist travels to the site. What is the appropriate response under Article 11 of Legea nr. 319/2006?

A.Continue normal work until the specialist formally confirms the danger.

B.Enable workers to stop work and reach safety, and prevent normal resumption while the serious and imminent danger persists, subject to the law's duly justified exceptional cases.

C.Continue work after obtaining written consent from each exposed worker.

D.Keep workers in the area until the CSSM votes on evacuation.

Explanation: Article 11 requires arrangements allowing workers to stop work and leave for safety when serious and imminent danger exists. Normal work must not be demanded while the danger persists, except in duly justified exceptional cases; neither worker consent nor a committee vote replaces immediate protective action.

7Two contractors and the host employer share a workplace. Each has its own risk assessment, but their operations create interacting hazards. Which approach satisfies the multi-employer duties in Article 7(5) of Legea nr. 319/2006?

A.Each employer informs only its own workers and treats the other operations as outside its assessment.

B.The host takes over every contractor's legal safety responsibility through an access permit.

C.The contractors exchange insurance certificates, which replace operational safety coordination.

D.The employers cooperate, coordinate protective actions, and inform one another and workers about relevant risks.

Explanation: Article 7(5) requires employers sharing a workplace to cooperate, coordinate prevention and protection, and exchange relevant risk information, including information for workers or their representatives. Separate assessments are useful inputs, but they do not address interacting activities without coordination.

8A worker leaves a dangerous area because of serious and imminent danger, following the emergency arrangements. How does Article 11(2) of Legea nr. 319/2006 protect that worker?

A.Protection applies only after an ITM inspector approves the departure.

B.The worker must not suffer an unjustified adverse consequence for leaving that area.

C.The worker must use annual leave for the time spent reaching safety.

D.Protection applies only if the worker first obtains the supervisor's written permission.

Explanation: Article 11(2) protects workers who leave a workplace or dangerous area in serious and imminent danger from unjustified negative consequences. Emergency arrangements must enable timely movement to safety rather than require prior inspector approval or a leave request.

9A worker discovers that a machine's protective interlock is defective. Which action follows the worker duties in Article 23 of Legea nr. 319/2006?

A.Report the dangerous condition promptly and do not disable or bypass the protective device.

B.Bypass the interlock temporarily if production targets would otherwise be missed.

C.Wait for the next periodic training session before reporting the defect.

D.Ask a coworker to accept responsibility, then continue using the machine normally.

Explanation: Article 23 requires proper use of equipment and immediate reporting of dangerous situations and protection-system deficiencies. Workers must not arbitrarily remove, change, or defeat safety devices; the defect needs action through the workplace's safety arrangements.

10Which body has state workplace safety inspection and enforcement functions, distinct from an employer's internal prevention service?

A.The employer's CSSM

B.Inspecția Muncii, through the territorial labour inspectorates (ITM)

C.An external prevention service contracted by the employer

D.The provider that issued a worker's Inspector SSM course certificate

Explanation: Legea nr. 319/2006 assigns state labour inspection functions to Inspecția Muncii and its territorial structures. An Inspector SSM course certificate does not confer the public enforcement powers of an inspector de muncă; public-health authorities also have statutory functions in their sphere.

About the Romania Inspector SSM Graduation Assessment Exam

Independent practice by OpenExamPrep for Inspector în domeniul securității și sănătății în muncă (COR 325723). This English-language MCQ study adaptation covers Romanian workplace safety law, assessment, prevention organization, emergencies, documentation, and investigation. It is not an official translation or format simulation, and does not replace the course, Romanian statutory study, practical first-aid training, or any provider-required written, oral, project, or performance work.

Exam sponsor: Authorized adult vocational training provider under county or Bucharest authorization commission coordination. The requirements and fees below concern the certification or admission exam, separate from our free practice resources.

Assessment

For perfecționare and specialization programs, Article 12(3) lets the provider specify the assessment components in its program. Written testing can include MCQs. If a project is required, it is prepared during the course and defended before the commission, replacing the oral component under Article 17. Do not infer a universally mandatory project, case study, practical task, or fixed two-part MCQ examination from this practice bank.

Time Limit

No universal total published. Where used, the methodology allows up to two hours for a written test and 15–20 minutes for project defense; confirm the actual schedule with the provider.

Passing Score

Program-dependent components: methodology minimums are 5/10 for written or oral tests and 6/10 for project defense or practical tests where used. No universal additional overall 6/10 requirement verified.

Exam / Certification Fees

Provider-set. CPPPIM advertises 1,040 RON course participation; a separate exam-only fee and examination inclusion are not identified in that notice.

Exam sponsor website

Fees, eligibility, and exam policies can change. Confirm them with the exam sponsor before applying or paying.

Official sources

CPPPIM — Inspector SSM course offering · Source checked 2026-10-10Centrul de Pregătire și Perfecționare Profesională al Inspecției Muncii advertises a perfecționare program of 80 hours over three weeks, high-school entry without a baccalaureate diploma, and a participation fee of 1,040 lei.
APSAP — Inspector SSM (COR 325723) 2026 course and examination dates · Source checked 2026-10-10A training provider's current offering confirms this assessed occupation remains available in 2026. Its schedule and prices are provider-specific.
Portal Legislativ — adult vocational training certification methodology · Source checked 2026-10-10Articles 2, 5–8 and 12–18 distinguish graduation from qualification certificates, establish provider organization and examination commissions, allow provider-defined components for perfecționare/specialization, and give component-specific grading and timing rules. No additional universal overall average of 6/10 is stated.
Portal Legislativ — Legea nr. 319/2006, consolidated text · Source checked 2026-10-10Primary framework for scope, prevention principles, employer and worker duties, events, accidents, notification and investigation. Former Articles 37 and 38 are repealed and are not taught as current offences here.
Portal Legislativ — norms approved by HG nr. 1425/2006, consolidated text · Source checked 2026-10-10Primary source for prevention organization, assessment updates, plans, intermediate training requirements, CSSM, worker training, investigation procedures, and the six training-topic areas in Annex 6(B). No topic percentages are specified there.
Portal Legislativ — HG nr. 1048/2006 on PPE, republished text · Source checked 2026-10-10PPE suitability, fit, compatibility, and employer provision requirements.
Portal Legislativ — HG nr. 971/2006 Annex 2, safety panels · Source checked 2026-10-10Panel shape, colour, purpose, placement, visibility, and access requirements.
Portal Legislativ — HG nr. 1091/2006, workplace requirements · Source checked 2026-10-10Annex requirements for emergency routes, exit doors, and emergency lighting.
Portal Legislativ — HG nr. 1146/2006, work equipment requirements · Source checked 2026-10-10Annex 1 points 2.8, 2.13 and 2.14 address guarding, safe maintenance, and separation from energy sources.
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2025 — Adult Basic Life Support · Source checked 2026-10-10Primary professional guidance for adult CPR, including 30:2 for rescuers trained and able to provide rescue breaths.
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2025 — First Aid · Source checked 2026-10-10Primary professional guidance for scene safety and severe external bleeding control.

Our practice resources: topics covered

We aim to reflect publicly available exam outlines and topic information in our study resources. Coverage, format, and difficulty may differ from the actual exam, and we cannot guarantee that every detail is accurate or current. Confirm exam requirements, fees, and policies with the official exam sponsor.