All Practice Exams

100+ Free NCA Property Law Practice Questions

Prepare for the NCA Canadian Property Law Examination exam with instant access — no signup required.

✓ No registration✓ No credit card✓ No hidden fees✓ Start practicing immediately
Not officially published per subject Pass Rate
100+ Questions
100% Free

Loading practice questions...

2026 Statistics

Key Facts: NCA Property Law Exam

$500 CAD + tax

Exam Fee Per Subject

NCA, Federation of Law Societies of Canada (2026)

50%

Pass Mark (pass/fail)

NCA, Federation of Law Societies of Canada

3 hours

Open-Book Online Exam

NCA exam information (nca.legal)

11 topics

NCA Property Syllabus Areas

NCA Property Syllabus (2025)

Tsilhqot'in 2014 SCC 44

Leading Aboriginal Title Case

Supreme Court of Canada

100+

Practice Questions Here

OpenExamPrep question bank

The NCA Canadian Property Law Examination is an open-book, 3-hour online exam of 3-4 essay/short-answer problems, set by the NCA of the Federation of Law Societies of Canada for internationally trained and Quebec civil-law lawyers. The pass mark is 50%, and the fee is $500 CAD plus taxes per exam. The NCA Property syllabus is organized around 11 topics covering common-law estates and future interests, the Rule Against Perpetuities, equitable interests and trusts, possession and bailment, leases and licences, co-ownership, easements and covenants, priorities, the registry vs Land Titles (Torrens) systems, and Aboriginal title (Tsilhqot'in Nation v BC). These 100 multiple-choice questions are knowledge-prep practice, not the format of the real essay exam.

Sample NCA Property Law Practice Questions

Try these sample questions to test your NCA Property Law exam readiness. Each question includes a detailed explanation. Start the interactive quiz above for the full 100+ question experience with AI tutoring.

1Canadian real property law derives its historical structure from the English feudal system. Under the doctrine of tenures as received into Canada, who is regarded as the ultimate owner of all land, from whom all estates are notionally held?
A.The registered fee simple holder
B.The Federation of Law Societies of Canada
C.The Crown
D.The first person to take possession
Explanation: Under the doctrine of tenures, all land is held mediately or immediately of the Crown; a subject holds an 'estate' in land rather than absolute ownership of the land itself. This is the bedrock of Canadian real property law received from English law.
2The Statute Quia Emptores 1290 is foundational to the modern fee simple. What was its principal effect on the feudal land system?
A.It abolished the life estate
B.It created the Torrens registration system
C.It abolished all forms of tenure
D.It prohibited subinfeudation, permitting substitution so that a purchaser of a fee simple held directly of the grantor's lord
Explanation: Quia Emptores 1290 prohibited subinfeudation (creating new sub-tenancies) and instead allowed substitution, so that a buyer stepped into the seller's place in the feudal chain. Combined with the Tenures Abolition Act 1660, this caused the feudal pyramid to decay, leaving the fee simple as effectively absolute ownership held of the Crown in free and common socage.
3The numerus clausus principle in property law holds that:
A.The number of registered owners of any parcel is capped by statute
B.Parties may create only a closed, limited list of recognized forms of property interest, not novel ones at will
C.Property taxes are calculated on a closed schedule
D.Only the Crown may grant new estates
Explanation: The numerus clausus ('closed number') principle limits the categories of recognized property interests — fee simple, life estate, lease, easement, etc. Parties cannot invent wholly new proprietary forms binding on third parties; novelty is confined to contract. This standardization promotes certainty and reduces information costs for third parties dealing with land.
4A municipality refuses to approve development of privately owned land and effectively designates it for public parkland without compensation, while never formally expropriating title. Following Annapolis Group Inc. v. Halifax Regional Municipality, 2022 SCC 36, when may a landowner claim a 'constructive taking' (de facto expropriation)?
A.Where the state acquires a beneficial interest in the property OR effectively removes all reasonable uses of it
B.Only where formal title actually passes to the state
C.Never, because regulation can never amount to a taking in Canada
D.Only where the Charter expressly protects property rights
Explanation: In Annapolis (2022 SCC 36), the Supreme Court of Canada held that a constructive taking requires (1) an acquisition of a beneficial interest in the property or flowing from it, and (2) the removal of all reasonable uses of the property. The Court clarified that an 'advantage' to the state, not formal title, can satisfy the first branch, broadening the doctrine.
5Which of the following best describes the distinction between real property and personal property at common law?
A.Real property is owned outright while personal property is only leased
B.Real property is tangible and personal property is always intangible
C.Real property is land and interests in land; personal property comprises chattels (movables) and choses in action
D.Real property can be registered while personal property cannot be owned
Explanation: Real property (realty) consists of land and interests in land, historically protected by 'real' actions for recovery of the thing itself. Personal property (personalty) comprises chattels — both choses in possession (tangible movables) and choses in action (intangible rights enforceable by action, such as debts).
6Following the Tenures Abolition Act 1660, the surviving form of tenure by which most freehold land in Canada is held is:
A.Knight service
B.Frankalmoin
C.Serjeanty
D.Free and common socage
Explanation: The Tenures Abolition Act 1660 converted the various feudal tenures into free and common socage, a tenure free of burdensome feudal incidents. Land in Canada's common-law provinces is thus held in free and common socage of the Crown, the tenure underlying the modern fee simple.
7Under the division of powers in the Constitution Act, 1867, primary legislative jurisdiction over 'Property and Civil Rights in the Province' is allocated to:
A.The federal Parliament under s. 91
B.Municipalities under delegated authority
C.The provincial legislatures under s. 92(13)
D.The Supreme Court of Canada
Explanation: Section 92(13) of the Constitution Act, 1867 assigns 'Property and Civil Rights in the Province' to the provinces. Consequently, most real property law — conveyancing, registration, landlord-tenant, succession — is provincial. Federal jurisdiction touches property only through enumerated heads such as Indians and lands reserved for Indians (s. 91(24)).
8A landowner's neighbour erects a structure whose eaves and an advertising sign project into the airspace directly above the landowner's parcel at a low height. Applying Didow v. Alberta Power Limited (1988 ABCA), how does Canadian law treat such an intrusion into airspace?
A.Airspace is wholly unowned, so no trespass can occur at any height
B.A landowner owns airspace literally up to the heavens without limit
C.A landowner has rights in the airspace to such height as is necessary for ordinary use and enjoyment, and a permanent intrusion into that lower stratum is a trespass
D.Only the Crown can sue for intrusions into airspace
Explanation: Didow v. Alberta Power limited the maxim 'cujus est solum...usque ad coelum' (whoever owns the soil owns up to the sky). The landowner has rights in the lower airspace to the extent necessary for the ordinary use and enjoyment of the land; permanent fixed projections (power-line cross-arms there) into that zone constitute trespass, whereas transient passage at height (e.g., aircraft) does not.
9The doctrine of accretion concerns:
A.The gradual and imperceptible addition of land by deposit of soil along a water boundary, which generally belongs to the riparian owner
B.The accumulation of unpaid property taxes
C.The merger of two adjacent fee simple estates
D.The building up of equity in a mortgage over time
Explanation: Accretion is the slow, gradual and imperceptible addition of land to a riparian or littoral boundary through deposition. The newly formed land generally accrues to the adjoining owner. Its converse, erosion, gradually diminishes the parcel; sudden change (avulsion) does not alter boundaries.
10A commercial tenant installs heavy carpeting and equipment in leased premises. A dispute arises over whether these have become 'fixtures' (part of the realty) or remain chattels. Following the approach in La Salle Recreations Ltd. v. Canadian Camdex Investments Ltd., the primary tests for determining whether a chattel has become a fixture are:
A.The degree of annexation to the land and the object/purpose of annexation
B.The cost of the item and the identity of the installer
C.Whether the item is insured and registered
D.Whether the landlord consented in writing
Explanation: La Salle Recreations applied the classic fixtures tests: (1) the degree (mode) of annexation, and (2) the object or purpose of the annexation. An article resting on its own weight is prima facie a chattel; one affixed even slightly is prima facie a fixture, but the controlling question is whether annexation was for the better use of the chattel or for the permanent improvement of the realty.

About the NCA Property Law Exam

The NCA Canadian Property Law Examination is one of the challenge exams set by the National Committee on Accreditation (NCA) of the Federation of Law Societies of Canada for internationally trained lawyers and Quebec civil-law graduates seeking to qualify in a common-law province. The real exam is open-book, runs three hours online, and consists of 3-4 fact-based essay/short-answer problems graded on a 50% pass mark. It covers Canadian common-law property: the doctrine of tenures and estates, real vs personal property, legal vs equitable interests and trusts, co-ownership, leases and licences, servitudes, mortgages, the registry and Land Titles (Torrens) systems, and Aboriginal title (Tsilhqot'in). Our 100 multiple-choice questions are knowledge-prep practice to reinforce the law before you write the essay exam.

Assessment

Question count not published by the exam provider

Time Limit

3 hours (online, open-book)

Passing Score

50% (pass/fail)

Exam Fee

$500 CAD + taxes (National Committee on Accreditation (NCA), Federation of Law Societies of Canada)

NCA Property Law Exam Content Outline

20%

Estates & Future Interests

Doctrine of tenures and the Crown; fee simple, life estate, fee tail; words of limitation; waste; conditional/determinable fees and rights of re-entry; vested vs contingent interests; the common-law Rule Against Perpetuities (lives in being plus 21 years); public-policy and restraint-on-alienation invalidity (Blackburn v McCallum, Leonard Foundation, McCorkill)

15%

Equitable Interests & Trusts

Legal vs equitable interests, the Court of Chancery, Statute of Uses; three certainties; express, resulting, and constructive trusts; presumption of advancement (Pecore); remedial constructive trust and unjust enrichment (Pettkus v Becker, Kerr v Baranow, Soulos, Moore v Sweet)

12%

Servitudes (Easements, Covenants, Profits)

Easement requirements (dominant/servient tenement, accommodation, no easement in gross); express, implied, and intended easements (Wong v Beaumont, Wheeldon v Burrows); restrictive covenants (Tulk v Moxhay) and building schemes; positive covenants not running (Amberwood, ClubLink); profits a prendre

12%

Priorities & Registration

Common-law and equitable priority rules; bona fide purchaser for value without notice; deeds (registry) systems and notice/race-notice; Land Titles (Torrens) mirror/curtain/net principles, indefeasibility (immediate vs deferred), assurance fund, root of title; Chippewas of Sarnia

12%

Possession, Bailment & Fixtures

Corpus and animus possidendi; possessory title and relativity of title (The Tubantia); finders vs occupiers (Parker v British Airways); abandonment; gifts inter vivos and donatio mortis causa; bailment and sub-bailment (Pioneer Container, Punch v Savoy's); fixtures (La Salle)

10%

Leases & Licences

Leasehold estate and exclusive possession; lease vs licence; assignment vs sublease and Spencer's Case (Merger Restaurants); restraints on assignment (Richfield); covenant for quiet enjoyment (Southwark v Mills); termination and remedies (Highway Properties); residential tenancy reform

9%

Shared Ownership

Joint tenancy vs tenancy in common; four unities; right of survivorship; common-law and equitable presumptions; severance (Williams v Hensman, Hansen Estate, Jansen v Niels); words of severance; partition and sale

10%

Indigenous Rights & Property in Context

Aboriginal title and the territorial test, inherent limit, justification and duty to consult (Tsilhqot'in Nation v BC; s. 35 Constitution Act, 1982); Indian Act Certificates of Possession; modern treaties (Nisga'a Final Agreement); doctrine of tenures, division of powers, numerus clausus, constructive taking (Annapolis)

How to Pass the NCA Property Law Exam

What You Need to Know

  • Passing score: 50% (pass/fail)
  • Assessment: Question count not published by the exam provider
  • Time limit: 3 hours (online, open-book)
  • Exam fee: $500 CAD + taxes

Keys to Passing

  • Work through all 100 available questions
  • Review every answer and explanation
  • Track weak areas and revisit them
  • Use our AI tutor for tough concepts

NCA Property Law Study Tips from Top Performers

1Build a one-page map of the common-law estates: fee simple, life estate, and the (abolished) fee tail, then layer on defeasible fees (determinable vs condition subsequent) and the future interests that follow them — these distinctions drive a large share of the exam
2Drill the common-law Rule Against Perpetuities on possibilities, not actual events: an interest is void unless it must vest, if at all, within a life in being plus 21 years; ignore statutory wait-and-see reforms, which the NCA does not test
3Memorize the unjust-enrichment trilogy elements (enrichment, corresponding deprivation, absence of juristic reason) and trace the remedial constructive trust through Pettkus v Becker, Kerr v Baranow (joint family venture), Soulos, and Moore v Sweet
4For co-ownership, lock in the four unities and the three modes of severance from Williams v Hensman (act on one's share, mutual agreement, course of dealing), as applied in Hansen Estate v Hansen
5Compare the registry (deeds) system with the Land Titles (Torrens) system: learn the mirror/curtain/net principles, indefeasibility (immediate vs deferred), the fraud exception, and the assurance fund — registration is a reliable exam topic
6Know Tsilhqot'in Nation v BC cold: the territorial occupation test, the inherent limit, inalienability except to the Crown, the justification test for infringement, and the duty to consult under s. 35 — it is the single most heavily tested Indigenous-property authority

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the NCA Canadian Property Law Examination?

It is a challenge exam set by the National Committee on Accreditation (NCA), a standing committee of the Federation of Law Societies of Canada. The NCA assesses internationally trained lawyers and Quebec civil-law graduates who want to qualify to practise in a common-law province, and may assign the Property subject. Candidates can satisfy the requirement either by passing this exam or by completing an approved Canadian law school course.

What is the format of the real NCA Property exam?

The NCA Property exam is open-book and runs three hours online (the NCA allows an extra hour over the historic two hours for online long-form exams). It consists of 3-4 fact-based essay/short-answer problems, similar to a Canadian law school exam, that test your ability to apply property-law doctrine to problems. The pass mark is 50%. Our 100 multiple-choice questions are knowledge-prep practice to build that doctrine; they are not the format of the actual exam.

How much does the NCA Property exam cost in 2026?

The registration fee for each NCA exam, including Property, is $500 CAD plus applicable taxes (effective for exams from April 2025 onward). There is also a one-time NCA assessment fee of $400 CAD plus taxes paid when you first apply. Cancellation, appeal, and the CPLED Legal Research and Writing course carry separate fees.

What subjects and cases does the NCA Property syllabus cover?

The NCA Property syllabus is organized around 11 topics: property in context, boundaries of property, possession, common-law estates, Aboriginal title and Indigenous interests, equitable interests, conditional transfers and future interests, leases and licences, shared ownership, servitudes, and priorities and registration. Key Canadian authorities include Tsilhqot'in Nation v BC, Pettkus v Becker, Kerr v Baranow, Soulos v Korkontzilas, Moore v Sweet, Pecore v Pecore, Hansen Estate v Hansen, Highway Properties v Kelly Douglas, and Annapolis Group v Halifax.

How is Canadian property law different from US property law on this exam?

This is a Canadian common-law exam, so terminology and authorities are Canadian. It emphasizes the doctrine of tenures and the Crown, the common-law Rule Against Perpetuities, the registry versus Land Titles (Torrens) registration systems with indefeasibility, and Aboriginal title under s. 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982 (Tsilhqot'in). Adverse possession is largely abolished, and positive covenants generally do not run with freehold land (Amberwood). It does not test US-specific doctrines.

How should I prepare for the NCA Property exam?

Plan roughly 80-150 hours of self-study using the current NCA syllabus and Ziff's Principles of Property Law (the prescribed text), reading the assigned cases on CanLII. Build a strong outline of estates, future interests, the Rule Against Perpetuities, trusts, co-ownership, servitudes, and registration. Because the exam is open-book and problem-based, practice issue-spotting and writing IRAC-style answers under time pressure, and use these multiple-choice questions to confirm you know the rules cold before you write.