PracticeVideosBlogFlashcardsEspañol
All Practice Exams

100+ Free NCA Administrative Law Practice Questions

Prepare for the NCA Canadian Administrative Law Examination exam with instant access — no signup required.

✓ No registration✓ No credit card✓ No hidden fees✓ Start practicing immediately
~65% Pass Rate
100+ Questions
100% Free

Loading practice questions...

Same family resources

Explore More NCA Canadian Law Exams

Continue into nearby exams from the same family. Each card keeps practice questions, study guides, flashcards, videos, and articles in one place.

NCA Canadian Business Organizations

Practice Questions

NCA Canadian Civil Procedure

Practice Questions

NCA Canadian Commercial Law

Practice Questions

NCA Canadian Constitutional Law

Practice Questions

NCA Canadian Contract Law

Practice Questions

NCA Canadian Criminal Law

Practice Questions
2026 Statistics

Key Facts: NCA Administrative Law Exam

CAD $500

Exam Fee (plus taxes, per attempt)

NCA, Federation of Law Societies of Canada (April 2025)

50%

Passing Score (pass/fail)

NCA, Federation of Law Societies of Canada

3 hours

Open-Book Online Exam Duration

NCA, Federation of Law Societies of Canada

3 attempts

Maximum Attempts Per Subject

NCA, Federation of Law Societies of Canada

2019 SCC 65

Vavilov, the Governing Standard-of-Review Case

Supreme Court of Canada

100+

Practice Questions Here

OpenExamPrep question bank

The NCA Canadian Administrative Law exam is a mandatory subject for internationally trained lawyers qualifying in Canada. It is a 3-hour, open-book, online (remotely proctored) fact-based paper graded pass/fail at 50%, costing CAD $500 plus taxes per attempt with up to 3 attempts. It centres on judicial review: the post-Vavilov standard of review (reasonableness presumption plus narrow correctness categories), procedural fairness (Baker factors, Knight trigger, bias, legitimate expectations), enabling statutes and jurisdiction, privative clauses, statutory appeals versus judicial review, and remedies (certiorari, mandamus, prohibition, declaration). The real exam uses essay/short-answer questions; these 100 MCQs are knowledge-prep practice.

Sample NCA Administrative Law Practice Questions

Try these sample questions to test your NCA Administrative Law exam readiness. Each question includes a detailed explanation. Start the interactive quiz above for the full 100+ question experience with AI tutoring.

1A provincial licensing board revokes a contractor's license without giving the contractor any notice or chance to respond. The contractor seeks judicial review, arguing the board breached the duty of procedural fairness. Under Canadian administrative law, what is the foundational source of the contractor's right to a fair process where the enabling statute is silent?
A.Section 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
B.The Statute of Westminster
C.The common law duty of procedural fairness implied at law
D.The doctrine of federal paramountcy
Explanation: Where the enabling statute is silent, Canadian courts imply a common law duty of procedural fairness on administrative decision-makers whose decisions affect the rights, privileges or interests of an individual. Nicholson v. Haldimand-Norfolk Regional Police (1979) and Cardinal v. Director of Kent Institution (1985) established that fairness can be implied even absent statutory language.
2In Knight v. Indian Head School Division No. 19 (1990), the Supreme Court of Canada articulated a three-part test for determining when a common law duty of procedural fairness is triggered. Which of the following is NOT one of the Knight factors?
A.The nature of the decision and the process followed in making it
B.The relationship between the decision-maker and the individual
C.Whether the decision-maker acted in good faith
D.The effect of the decision on the individual's rights
Explanation: Knight's three-prong trigger asks: (1) the nature of the decision and the process followed, (2) the nature of the relationship between the body and the individual, and (3) the effect of the decision on the individual's rights. Good faith is not part of the triggering test; it may bear on the merits but not on whether fairness is owed.
3Baker v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [1999] 2 SCR 817, is the leading authority on the CONTENT of procedural fairness. Which of the following correctly states what the Baker factors determine?
A.The degree or robustness of procedural protections owed in the circumstances
B.Whether the standard of review is correctness or reasonableness
C.Whether a privative clause ousts judicial review entirely
D.The remedy a court must grant once a breach is found
Explanation: Baker provides a non-exhaustive list of factors that determine the CONTENT — how much procedural fairness is owed — once the duty is triggered. The factors include the nature of the decision, the statutory scheme, the importance of the decision to the individual, legitimate expectations, and the decision-maker's choice of procedure.
4Which of the following is among the five non-exhaustive factors the Supreme Court identified in Baker for assessing the content of the duty of fairness?
A.The importance of the decision to the individual or individuals affected
B.The financial cost of providing an oral hearing
C.The political affiliation of the decision-maker
D.Whether the decision-maker is a federal or provincial body
Explanation: The importance of the decision to the individual affected is one of the five Baker factors — the more important the decision, the more robust the procedural protections. The full list: nature of the decision and process; statutory scheme; importance to the individual; legitimate expectations; and the decision-maker's procedural choices.
5The maxim audi alteram partem is a core component of natural justice. Which procedural entitlement does it most directly protect?
A.The right to be heard before an adverse decision is made
B.The right to an unbiased and independent decision-maker
C.The right to written reasons for every administrative decision
D.The right to appeal to a superior court
Explanation: Audi alteram partem — 'hear the other side' — protects the right to be heard, including adequate notice, disclosure of the case to meet, and an opportunity to make submissions. It is one of the two pillars of natural justice; the other, nemo judex in causa sua, protects against bias.
6A government agency publicly promises a community group that it will hold consultations before approving a landfill near their homes. It then approves the project without any consultation. The group argues legitimate expectations. Under Canadian law, what relief can the doctrine of legitimate expectations provide?
A.It can compel the agency to reach the substantive outcome the group wanted
B.It automatically renders the approval void for unconstitutionality
C.It can require the procedural step that was promised, but cannot dictate a substantive result
D.It entitles the group to monetary damages for the broken promise
Explanation: In Canada the doctrine of legitimate expectations is purely procedural. Where a clear, unambiguous representation about a procedure was made, the decision-maker must honour that procedure. As confirmed in Reference re Canada Assistance Plan and Agraira v. Canada (2013), it cannot create substantive rights or fetter the decision on the merits.
7A cabinet adopts a regulation of general application setting emission limits for an entire industry, without consulting affected companies. A company complains it was denied procedural fairness. What is the most likely result?
A.Procedural fairness applies fully because the regulation affects the company's business
B.Procedural fairness does not apply because the decision is legislative in nature
C.The regulation is void because cabinet cannot make delegated legislation
D.The company is owed an oral hearing under the Charter
Explanation: Decisions of a legislative and general nature — such as enacting a regulation (delegated legislation) — do not attract the common law duty of procedural fairness. Where a decision is broadly applicable and not aimed at a narrow class of identifiable individuals, fairness is generally not triggered (Inuit Tapirisat v. Canada).
8Which Charter provision is, in practice, almost the only one relevant to triggering procedural obligations in Canadian administrative law?
A.Section 7 (life, liberty and security of the person)
B.Section 2 (fundamental freedoms)
C.Section 11 (rights on being charged with an offence)
D.Section 15 (equality rights)
Explanation: Section 7 is the Charter provision that matters for administrative procedural fairness because it guarantees that no one be deprived of life, liberty or security of the person except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice, which include procedural content. It only applies where one of those interests is engaged.
9An applicant for refugee protection faces removal that could expose them to torture. They argue they are entitled to enhanced procedural protections. Why does the Charter potentially apply here when it would not apply to ordinary economic regulation?
A.Because the decision engages security of the person under s. 7
B.Because refugee claimants are a constitutionally protected group under s. 15
C.Because s. 11(d) guarantees a fair trial in all administrative proceedings
D.Because the Canadian Bill of Rights overrides all immigration statutes
Explanation: Where an administrative decision implicates life, liberty or security of the person — as a removal exposing someone to torture or death does — s. 7 of the Charter is triggered and requires procedures consistent with the principles of fundamental justice (Singh v. Canada; Suresh v. Canada).
10The Canadian Bill of Rights, unlike the Charter, has a key jurisdictional limitation in administrative law. What is it?
A.It applies only to criminal proceedings
B.It has been repealed and no longer has any effect
C.It applies only to provincial tribunals
D.It applies only to matters within federal legislative authority
Explanation: The Canadian Bill of Rights (1960) is an ordinary federal statute and applies only to matters within federal jurisdiction. Its s. 1(a) and s. 2(e) guarantees of 'fair hearing in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice' can supplement procedural protections for federal decision-makers, but it cannot reach provincial bodies.

About the NCA Administrative Law Exam

The NCA Canadian Administrative Law Examination is a mandatory core subject for internationally trained lawyers (and Quebec civil law graduates) seeking a Certificate of Qualification to enter the licensing process in a Canadian common law province. The official exam is a 3-hour, open-book, remotely proctored online paper that is fact-based, requiring candidates to apply Canadian administrative law principles to problem scenarios rather than recite memorized rules. It tests judicial review of administrative action, with the standard-of-review framework restructured by Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Vavilov, 2019 SCC 65; procedural fairness (Baker, Knight); enabling statutes and jurisdiction; privative clauses; statutory appeals versus judicial review; remedies; administrative tribunals; and legitimate expectations. Our 100 multiple-choice practice questions are knowledge-prep to build the underlying doctrine before the open-book essay exam.

Assessment

Question count not published by the exam provider

Time Limit

3 hours (online, remotely proctored, open-book)

Passing Score

50% (pass/fail)

Exam Fee

CAD $500 + applicable taxes (National Committee on Accreditation (NCA), Federation of Law Societies of Canada)

NCA Administrative Law Exam Content Outline

35%

Procedural Fairness (Triggers & Content)

Sources of procedural obligations (common law, statute, Charter s. 7, Bill of Rights); the Knight three-prong trigger; legitimate expectations (procedural only); the Baker factors governing content; audi alteram partem (notice, disclosure, right to be heard); bias and the reasonable apprehension test; institutional independence (Ocean Port); and the duty to consult Indigenous peoples (Haida).

35%

Substantive Review & Standard of Review

The Vavilov framework: reasonableness presumption and its rebuttal; the three correctness categories (constitutional questions, general questions of central importance, jurisdictional boundaries); statutory appeals and appellate standards (Bell Canada, Housen); the Dunsmuir and CUPE v. NB Liquor history; Doré on Charter values in discretion; and abuse of discretion (Roncarelli v. Duplessis).

15%

Challenging Decisions: Procedure & Standing

Judicial review versus statutory appeal; exhaustion of adequate alternative remedies (C.B. Powell); standing including public interest standing; venue (provincial superior courts and the Federal Court); privative clauses and the constitutional limit on ousting review (Crevier, s. 96); mootness and functus officio.

10%

Remedies

The prerogative remedies — certiorari (quash), mandamus (compel a duty), prohibition (prevent excess of jurisdiction), and the declaration; the discretionary nature of relief and grounds to refuse it (delay, laches, adequate alternative remedy); remit versus substitute under Vavilov; and damages by separate civil action.

5%

Tribunals, Jurisdiction & Enabling Statutes

Tribunals as creatures of statute with no inherent jurisdiction; ultra vires action; implied and incidental powers (ATCO Gas); sub-delegation (delegatus non potest delegare); control of procedure; and tribunal authority to apply the Charter (Conway, Martin).

How to Pass the NCA Administrative Law Exam

What You Need to Know

  • Passing score: 50% (pass/fail)
  • Assessment: Question count not published by the exam provider
  • Time limit: 3 hours (online, remotely proctored, open-book)
  • Exam fee: CAD $500 + applicable taxes

Keys to Passing

  • Work through all 100 available questions
  • Review every answer and explanation
  • Track weak areas and revisit them
  • Use our AI tutor for tough concepts

NCA Administrative Law Study Tips from Top Performers

1Learn the Vavilov framework cold: start every substantive-review answer by selecting the standard — reasonableness presumed, rebutted only by a statutory appeal/legislative signal or a rule-of-law correctness category (constitutional questions, general questions of central importance, jurisdictional boundaries between bodies). Never apply the old Dunsmuir four-factor analysis.
2For procedural fairness, separate the TRIGGER (Knight three-prong test or legitimate expectations) from the CONTENT (the Baker factors). On the exam, first show fairness is owed, then calibrate how much is owed.
3Remember legitimate expectations is purely procedural in Canada — it can require a promised procedure but never dictates a substantive outcome (Agraira; CAP Reference). This is a frequent distractor.
4Distinguish a statutory appeal from judicial review: appeals bring appellate standards (correctness for questions of law per Bell Canada/Housen), while judicial review presumes reasonableness. Spotting which one applies often decides the question.
5Match remedies to function: certiorari quashes, mandamus compels a duty, prohibition prevents an excess of jurisdiction, and a declaration states rights. Note that judicial review relief is discretionary and damages require a separate civil action.
6Use Roncarelli v. Duplessis for abuse of discretion: there is no untrammelled discretion; even broad, subjective statutory language must be exercised in good faith, for proper purposes, and reasonably.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the format of the NCA Canadian Administrative Law exam?

The official NCA Administrative Law exam is a 3-hour, open-book, fact-based paper written online with remote proctoring. It uses essay and short-answer questions (occasionally with a multiple-choice or true/false section) that require you to apply Canadian administrative law principles to problem scenarios, not merely recite rules. It is graded pass/fail, with 50% being a pass. Our 100 multiple-choice questions are knowledge-prep practice to build the doctrine you will need.

How much does the NCA Administrative Law exam cost?

As of April 2025, the registration fee for each NCA exam is CAD $500 plus applicable taxes. This is separate from the NCA assessment application fee (CAD $400 plus taxes). All fees are in Canadian dollars and set on a cost-recovery basis by the Federation of Law Societies of Canada.

What is the passing score and how many attempts do I get?

NCA exams are graded on a pass/fail basis, with 50% being a pass. You are permitted up to 3 attempts per subject. You cannot re-register for an exam until you have received the result of your previous attempt, and results are released approximately 10 to 12 weeks after the last exam of each session.

Why is Vavilov so important for this exam?

Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Vavilov, 2019 SCC 65, restructured the standard of review for substantive judicial review. It established that reasonableness is the presumptive standard, rebuttable only where the legislature signals otherwise (including a statutory appeal) or where the rule of law requires correctness (constitutional questions, general questions of central importance, and jurisdictional boundaries between administrative bodies). The NCA syllabus stresses that the old Dunsmuir contextual four-factor analysis is no longer good law, and answers relying on it earn no marks.

What are the key cases I must know for procedural fairness?

Baker v. Canada (1999) governs the content of fairness through its non-exhaustive list of factors and also recognizes a contextual duty to give reasons. Knight v. Indian Head School Division (1990) supplies the three-prong trigger for when common law fairness is owed. Other essentials include Cardinal v. Director of Kent Institution (fairness can be implied; breach generally invalidates), the reasonable apprehension of bias test from Committee for Justice and Liberty, and Ocean Port on institutional independence yielding to clear statutes.

How should I prepare for an open-book NCA exam?

Because the exam is open-book and fact-based, memorizing case names alone is not enough — you must be able to apply the law quickly to complex facts. Build a concise, well-organized outline keyed to the syllabus structure (procedural fairness, substantive review, remedies), prepare an issue-spotting checklist and a Vavilov standard-of-review flowchart, and practice writing timed answers using the NCA's official sample exams. Use these 100 multiple-choice questions first to lock in the underlying doctrine, then move to full problem questions.