All Practice Exams
100+ Free NCA Administrative Law Practice Questions
NCA Canadian Administrative Law Examination practice questions are available now; exam metadata is being verified.
✓ No registration✓ No credit card✓ No hidden fees✓ Start practicing immediately
~65% Pass Rate
100+ Questions
100% Free
1 / 100
Question 1
Score: 0/0
A professional regulator publishes a guideline stating that members 'will normally' be granted an oral hearing in discipline cases. In a particular case it denies an oral hearing without explanation. Which doctrines are most directly relevant to the member's procedural challenge?
A
B
C
D
to track
Same family resources
Explore More NCA Canadian Law Exams
Continue into nearby exams from the same family. Each card keeps practice questions, study guides, flashcards, videos, and articles in one place.
2026 Statistics
Key Facts: NCA Administrative Law Exam
CAD $500
Exam Fee (plus taxes, per attempt)
NCA, Federation of Law Societies of Canada (April 2025)
50%
Passing Score (pass/fail)
NCA, Federation of Law Societies of Canada
3 hours
Open-Book Online Exam Duration
NCA, Federation of Law Societies of Canada
3 attempts
Maximum Attempts Per Subject
NCA, Federation of Law Societies of Canada
2019 SCC 65
Vavilov, the Governing Standard-of-Review Case
Supreme Court of Canada
100+
Practice Questions Here
OpenExamPrep question bank
The NCA Canadian Administrative Law exam is a mandatory subject for internationally trained lawyers qualifying in Canada. It is a 3-hour, open-book, online (remotely proctored) fact-based paper graded pass/fail at 50%, costing CAD $500 plus taxes per attempt with up to 3 attempts. It centres on judicial review: the post-Vavilov standard of review (reasonableness presumption plus narrow correctness categories), procedural fairness (Baker factors, Knight trigger, bias, legitimate expectations), enabling statutes and jurisdiction, privative clauses, statutory appeals versus judicial review, and remedies (certiorari, mandamus, prohibition, declaration). The real exam uses essay/short-answer questions; these 100 MCQs are knowledge-prep practice.
Sample NCA Administrative Law Practice Questions
Try these sample questions to test your NCA Administrative Law exam readiness. Each question includes a detailed explanation. Start the interactive quiz above for the full 100+ question experience with AI tutoring.
1A provincial licensing board revokes a contractor's license without giving the contractor any notice or chance to respond. The contractor seeks judicial review, arguing the board breached the duty of procedural fairness. Under Canadian administrative law, what is the foundational source of the contractor's right to a fair process where the enabling statute is silent?
A.Section 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
B.The Statute of Westminster
C.The common law duty of procedural fairness implied at law
D.The doctrine of federal paramountcy
Explanation: Where the enabling statute is silent, Canadian courts imply a common law duty of procedural fairness on administrative decision-makers whose decisions affect the rights, privileges or interests of an individual. Nicholson v. Haldimand-Norfolk Regional Police (1979) and Cardinal v. Director of Kent Institution (1985) established that fairness can be implied even absent statutory language.
2In Knight v. Indian Head School Division No. 19 (1990), the Supreme Court of Canada articulated a three-part test for determining when a common law duty of procedural fairness is triggered. Which of the following is NOT one of the Knight factors?
A.The nature of the decision and the process followed in making it
B.The relationship between the decision-maker and the individual
C.Whether the decision-maker acted in good faith
D.The effect of the decision on the individual's rights
Explanation: Knight's three-prong trigger asks: (1) the nature of the decision and the process followed, (2) the nature of the relationship between the body and the individual, and (3) the effect of the decision on the individual's rights. Good faith is not part of the triggering test; it may bear on the merits but not on whether fairness is owed.
3Baker v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [1999] 2 SCR 817, is the leading authority on the CONTENT of procedural fairness. Which of the following correctly states what the Baker factors determine?
A.The degree or robustness of procedural protections owed in the circumstances
B.Whether the standard of review is correctness or reasonableness
C.Whether a privative clause ousts judicial review entirely
D.The remedy a court must grant once a breach is found
Explanation: Baker provides a non-exhaustive list of factors that determine the CONTENT — how much procedural fairness is owed — once the duty is triggered. The factors include the nature of the decision, the statutory scheme, the importance of the decision to the individual, legitimate expectations, and the decision-maker's choice of procedure.
4Which of the following is among the five non-exhaustive factors the Supreme Court identified in Baker for assessing the content of the duty of fairness?
A.The importance of the decision to the individual or individuals affected
B.The financial cost of providing an oral hearing
C.The political affiliation of the decision-maker
D.Whether the decision-maker is a federal or provincial body
Explanation: The importance of the decision to the individual affected is one of the five Baker factors — the more important the decision, the more robust the procedural protections. The full list: nature of the decision and process; statutory scheme; importance to the individual; legitimate expectations; and the decision-maker's procedural choices.
5The maxim audi alteram partem is a core component of natural justice. Which procedural entitlement does it most directly protect?
A.The right to be heard before an adverse decision is made
B.The right to an unbiased and independent decision-maker
C.The right to written reasons for every administrative decision
D.The right to appeal to a superior court
Explanation: Audi alteram partem — 'hear the other side' — protects the right to be heard, including adequate notice, disclosure of the case to meet, and an opportunity to make submissions. It is one of the two pillars of natural justice; the other, nemo judex in causa sua, protects against bias.
6A government agency publicly promises a community group that it will hold consultations before approving a landfill near their homes. It then approves the project without any consultation. The group argues legitimate expectations. Under Canadian law, what relief can the doctrine of legitimate expectations provide?
A.It can compel the agency to reach the substantive outcome the group wanted
B.It automatically renders the approval void for unconstitutionality
C.It can require the procedural step that was promised, but cannot dictate a substantive result
D.It entitles the group to monetary damages for the broken promise
Explanation: In Canada the doctrine of legitimate expectations is purely procedural. Where a clear, unambiguous representation about a procedure was made, the decision-maker must honour that procedure. As confirmed in Reference re Canada Assistance Plan and Agraira v. Canada (2013), it cannot create substantive rights or fetter the decision on the merits.
7A cabinet adopts a regulation of general application setting emission limits for an entire industry, without consulting affected companies. A company complains it was denied procedural fairness. What is the most likely result?
A.Procedural fairness applies fully because the regulation affects the company's business
B.Procedural fairness does not apply because the decision is legislative in nature
C.The regulation is void because cabinet cannot make delegated legislation
D.The company is owed an oral hearing under the Charter
Explanation: Decisions of a legislative and general nature — such as enacting a regulation (delegated legislation) — do not attract the common law duty of procedural fairness. Where a decision is broadly applicable and not aimed at a narrow class of identifiable individuals, fairness is generally not triggered (Inuit Tapirisat v. Canada).
8Which Charter provision is, in practice, almost the only one relevant to triggering procedural obligations in Canadian administrative law?
A.Section 7 (life, liberty and security of the person)
B.Section 2 (fundamental freedoms)
C.Section 11 (rights on being charged with an offence)
D.Section 15 (equality rights)
Explanation: Section 7 is the Charter provision that matters for administrative procedural fairness because it guarantees that no one be deprived of life, liberty or security of the person except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice, which include procedural content. It only applies where one of those interests is engaged.
9An applicant for refugee protection faces removal that could expose them to torture. They argue they are entitled to enhanced procedural protections. Why does the Charter potentially apply here when it would not apply to ordinary economic regulation?
A.Because the decision engages security of the person under s. 7
B.Because refugee claimants are a constitutionally protected group under s. 15
C.Because s. 11(d) guarantees a fair trial in all administrative proceedings
D.Because the Canadian Bill of Rights overrides all immigration statutes
Explanation: Where an administrative decision implicates life, liberty or security of the person — as a removal exposing someone to torture or death does — s. 7 of the Charter is triggered and requires procedures consistent with the principles of fundamental justice (Singh v. Canada; Suresh v. Canada).
10The Canadian Bill of Rights, unlike the Charter, has a key jurisdictional limitation in administrative law. What is it?
A.It applies only to criminal proceedings
B.It has been repealed and no longer has any effect
C.It applies only to provincial tribunals
D.It applies only to matters within federal legislative authority
Explanation: The Canadian Bill of Rights (1960) is an ordinary federal statute and applies only to matters within federal jurisdiction. Its s. 1(a) and s. 2(e) guarantees of 'fair hearing in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice' can supplement procedural protections for federal decision-makers, but it cannot reach provincial bodies.
About the NCA Administrative Law Practice Questions
Verified exam format metadata for NCA Canadian Administrative Law Examination is pending. The practice questions above remain available while official exam length, timing, passing score, fee, and administrator details are reviewed.