PracticeVideosBlogFlashcardsEspañol
All Practice Exams

100+ Free NCA Professional Responsibility Practice Questions

Prepare for the NCA Canadian Professional Responsibility Examination exam with instant access — no signup required.

✓ No registration✓ No credit card✓ No hidden fees✓ Start practicing immediately
Pass mark 50% Pass Rate
100+ Questions
100% Free

Loading practice questions...

Same family resources

Explore More NCA Canadian Law Exams

Continue into nearby exams from the same family. Each card keeps practice questions, study guides, flashcards, videos, and articles in one place.

NCA Canadian Administrative Law

Practice Questions

NCA Canadian Business Organizations

Practice Questions

NCA Canadian Civil Procedure

Practice Questions

NCA Canadian Commercial Law

Practice Questions

NCA Canadian Constitutional Law

Practice Questions

NCA Canadian Contract Law

Practice Questions
2026 Statistics

Key Facts: NCA Professional Responsibility Exam

50%

Passing Grade (Pass/Fail)

National Committee on Accreditation

3 hours

Exam Duration (Open-Book)

National Committee on Accreditation

$500 CAD

Exam Fee (plus taxes, 2026)

National Committee on Accreditation

Open-book

Online-Proctored Format

National Committee on Accreditation

Model Code

Primary Tested Source

Federation of Law Societies of Canada

100+

Practice Questions Here

OpenExamPrep question bank

The NCA Canadian Professional Responsibility exam is a 3-hour, fact-based, open-book, online-proctored test set by the National Committee on Accreditation of the Federation of Law Societies of Canada. The pass mark is 50% and results are pass/fail. It tests the FLSC Model Code of Professional Conduct with the heaviest emphasis on conflicts of interest (the bright-line rule from R v Neil and McKercher; former-client conflicts from MacDonald Estate v Martin), confidentiality and the public-safety exception (Smith v Jones), duties to the court and the administration of justice, competence, withdrawal, fees and trust accounting, and the regulation of lawyers by Canadian law societies. The fee is $500 CAD plus taxes. Note: the official exam is essay/short-answer; the 100 questions here are multiple-choice knowledge-prep.

Sample NCA Professional Responsibility Practice Questions

Try these sample questions to test your NCA Professional Responsibility exam readiness. Each question includes a detailed explanation. Start the interactive quiz above for the full 100+ question experience with AI tutoring.

1Which body publishes the Model Code of Professional Conduct that serves as the national template adopted, with modifications, by Canadian law societies?
A.The Federation of Law Societies of Canada
B.The Canadian Bar Association
C.The Supreme Court of Canada
D.The Law Society of Ontario
Explanation: The Federation of Law Societies of Canada (FLSC) developed and maintains the Model Code of Professional Conduct, which provincial and territorial law societies adopt with local modifications to harmonize ethical standards across jurisdictions.
2Under the Model Code, the duty of confidentiality requires a lawyer to hold in strict confidence:
A.Only information the client expressly marks as confidential
B.All information concerning the business and affairs of the client acquired in the course of the professional relationship
C.Only information protected by solicitor-client privilege
D.Only information that would be embarrassing to the client if disclosed
Explanation: Model Code rule 3.3-1 imposes an ethical duty of confidentiality covering all information concerning the business and affairs of a client acquired in the course of the professional relationship, regardless of its source and whether or not others share the knowledge.
3In Smith v Jones, [1999] 1 SCR 455, the Supreme Court of Canada recognized an exception to solicitor-client privilege where:
A.The client has not paid the lawyer's account
B.The lawyer believes the client is guilty
C.There is an imminent risk of serious bodily harm or death to an identifiable person or group
D.Disclosure would assist the police in any criminal investigation
Explanation: Smith v Jones established the public-safety exception: privilege may be set aside where there is a clear, serious and imminent risk of serious bodily harm or death to an identifiable person or group of persons. The court weighs the clarity, seriousness, and imminence of the danger.
4The 'bright line rule' articulated in R v Neil, 2002 SCC 70, provides that a lawyer may not:
A.Act against a former client in any matter for life
B.Advertise legal services in a misleading way
C.Charge a contingency fee in a criminal matter
D.Concurrently represent clients whose immediate legal interests are directly adverse, absent informed consent, even in unrelated matters
Explanation: In R v Neil, Justice Binnie set out the bright-line rule: a lawyer (and by extension the firm) may not represent one client whose interests are directly adverse to the immediate interests of another current client, even in unrelated matters, unless both clients consent after full disclosure. It protects the duty of loyalty owed to current clients.
5In MacDonald Estate v Martin, [1990] 3 SCR 1235, the Supreme Court adopted which approach to disqualifying a firm because a lawyer who possesses confidential information from a former client has joined the firm now acting against that client?
A.Automatic disqualification with no opportunity to rebut
B.Disqualification only if actual misuse of information is proven
C.A rebuttable presumption that confidential information is shared within the firm, which may be rebutted by clear and convincing evidence of effective screening measures
D.No disqualification because firms are presumed to maintain Chinese walls
Explanation: MacDonald Estate v Martin established a two-question test: did the lawyer receive confidential information attributable to a solicitor-client relationship relevant to the matter, and is there a risk it will be used to the former client's prejudice. Knowledge is presumed shared within the firm, but the presumption can be rebutted by clear and convincing evidence that adequate screening (ethical walls) was timely established.
6Under the Model Code, 'competence' for a lawyer is best described as:
A.Having passed the bar admission examinations
B.Applying relevant knowledge, skills, and attributes in a manner appropriate to each matter undertaken on behalf of a client
C.Never making any error in a legal matter
D.Holding a specialist certification in the relevant field
Explanation: Model Code rule 3.1 defines a competent lawyer as one who recognizes the limits of their ability and applies the relevant knowledge, skills, and attributes appropriately to each matter. Competence is an ongoing obligation that includes knowing when to decline or seek assistance.
7A lawyer realizes she lacks the knowledge and experience to handle a complex tax matter a client has brought to her. Under the Model Code, the most appropriate course of action is to:
A.Decline the retainer or, with the client's consent, obtain the assistance of a competent lawyer or become competent without undue delay or expense to the client
B.Accept the retainer and learn the area as the matter proceeds without telling the client
C.Refer the client elsewhere and refuse any further involvement in all circumstances
D.Accept the retainer because all lawyers are presumed competent in all areas of law
Explanation: Model Code rule 3.1-2 and its commentary require a lawyer who lacks competence in a matter to either decline to act, obtain the client's instructions to retain or consult a competent lawyer, or become competent without undue delay, risk, or expense to the client. Taking on work beyond one's competence breaches the duty of competence.
8Which statement best distinguishes the ethical duty of confidentiality from solicitor-client privilege?
A.They are identical concepts with the same scope
B.Privilege is broader than confidentiality and covers all information about the client
C.Confidentiality applies only in court while privilege applies everywhere else
D.Confidentiality is a broad ethical duty owed to clients, while privilege is a narrower evidentiary rule protecting confidential communications made for the purpose of seeking or giving legal advice from compelled disclosure
Explanation: Confidentiality (Model Code rule 3.3) is a broad professional obligation covering all information about a client's affairs. Solicitor-client privilege is a narrower legal and evidentiary protection (a substantive rule under Descôteaux and Solosky) that shields confidential communications made to obtain or give legal advice from compelled disclosure.
9A lawyer acting as an advocate before a tribunal discovers that a document she filed contains a material factual statement she now knows to be false. Under the Model Code duty of candour to the tribunal, she must:
A.Do nothing because she has a duty of loyalty to her client
B.Take reasonable steps to correct the false statement, which may require disclosure if the client will not consent to correction and withdrawal is not sufficient
C.Immediately disclose all privileged client communications to the tribunal
D.Withdraw from the case and never speak of it again
Explanation: Model Code rule 5.1-2 prohibits a lawyer from knowingly attempting to deceive a tribunal or influencing the decision by offering false evidence or misstating facts. When a lawyer learns a representation to the court is false, she must take reasonable corrective steps, which may include urging the client to consent to correction and, failing that, disclosing as necessary to avoid misleading the court.
10Under the Model Code, a lawyer's fees must be:
A.Always charged on a contingency basis
B.Equal to the maximum permitted by the law society tariff
C.Fair and reasonable and disclosed to the client in a timely fashion
D.Set without regard to the time and effort involved
Explanation: Model Code rule 3.6-1 requires that a lawyer not charge or accept a fee or disbursement, including interest, unless it is fair and reasonable and has been disclosed in a timely fashion. Factors relevant to reasonableness include time and effort, difficulty, results, and customary charges.

About the NCA Professional Responsibility Exam

The NCA Canadian Professional Responsibility Examination is administered by the National Committee on Accreditation (NCA) of the Federation of Law Societies of Canada to assess internationally trained lawyers and graduates against Canadian standards in legal ethics. The exam is fact-based, open-book, and three hours long, written under remote online proctoring. It tests the FLSC Model Code of Professional Conduct, including the lawyer-client relationship, confidentiality and privilege, conflicts of interest, duties to the court, fees and trust accounting, withdrawal, marketing, and the self-regulation of the profession by Canadian law societies. The real exam is essay/short-answer; the practice questions here are multiple-choice knowledge preparation.

Assessment

Question count not published by the exam provider

Time Limit

3 hours (online-proctored, open-book)

Passing Score

50% (pass/fail)

Exam Fee

$500 CAD + applicable taxes (National Committee on Accreditation (NCA), Federation of Law Societies of Canada)

NCA Professional Responsibility Exam Content Outline

25%

Conflicts of Interest

Bright-line rule (R v Neil; CN Rail v McKercher), former-client conflicts and ethical screens (MacDonald Estate v Martin), joint retainers and the no-secrets rule, transferring lawyers, own-interest conflicts, transactions with clients and independent legal advice

20%

Confidentiality & Privilege

Duty of confidentiality under Model Code rule 3.3, distinction from solicitor-client privilege, the public-safety exception in Smith v Jones, permitted disclosures, and the duration of confidentiality after the retainer ends

15%

The Lawyer-Client Relationship

Duty of loyalty, candour and communication, scope and limited-scope retainers, organizational clients and reporting up, diminished-capacity clients, and the allocation of decision-making authority between lawyer and client

15%

Duties to the Court & Administration of Justice

Candour to the tribunal, the prohibition on misleading the court, the advocate-witness rule, handling a guilty client and false evidence, fraud on the court, Crown prosecutor duties, and civility (Groia v LSUC)

12%

Competence, Quality of Service & Withdrawal

Competence and quality of service (rule 3.1), supervision and delegation, errors and omissions reporting, mandatory and optional withdrawal, and criminal-matter withdrawal requiring court leave (R v Cunningham)

8%

Fees, Trust Accounting & Integrity

Fair and reasonable fees, contingency-fee limits, trust accounting and record-keeping, client identification and anti-money-laundering rules, the duty to report serious misconduct, and discrimination/harassment prohibitions

5%

Marketing, Access to Justice & Regulation

Marketing rules and specialist claims, pro bono and limited-scope retainers, access to justice, self-regulation by provincial and territorial law societies, mobility, and unauthorized practice

How to Pass the NCA Professional Responsibility Exam

What You Need to Know

  • Passing score: 50% (pass/fail)
  • Assessment: Question count not published by the exam provider
  • Time limit: 3 hours (online-proctored, open-book)
  • Exam fee: $500 CAD + applicable taxes

Keys to Passing

  • Work through all 100 available questions
  • Review every answer and explanation
  • Track weak areas and revisit them
  • Use our AI tutor for tough concepts

NCA Professional Responsibility Study Tips from Top Performers

1Study the FLSC Model Code of Professional Conduct directly, chapter by chapter, and tab a hard copy you can bring into the open-book exam: integrity, lawyer-client relationship, confidentiality, conflicts, advocacy, fees, and relationship to the profession
2Master the leading cases tested most often: Smith v Jones (public-safety exception), R v Neil and CN Rail v McKercher (bright-line rule for current clients), and MacDonald Estate v Martin (former-client conflicts and ethical screens)
3Conflicts of interest is the single most heavily tested area, appearing in the vast majority of exam sessions, so be able to distinguish current-client, former-client, joint-retainer, and own-interest conflicts and the remedies for each
4Learn the difference between the broad ethical duty of confidentiality (Model Code rule 3.3) and the narrower evidentiary rule of solicitor-client privilege, and know the permitted exceptions to each
5Because the exam is fact-based, practice applying rules to scenarios rather than reciting them, and prepare a simple checklist of issues (duty owed, conflict type, confidentiality, candour to the court, withdrawal) to run against each fact pattern
6Practise under timed, open-book conditions with a tabbed index so you can find the right rule in seconds; managing the three-hour clock is as important as knowing the substantive ethics

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the format of the NCA Canadian Professional Responsibility exam?

The NCA Professional Responsibility exam is a fact-based, open-book examination that is three hours long and administered online with remote proctoring. It uses essay and short-answer questions that ask candidates to apply the FLSC Model Code of Professional Conduct to factual scenarios. Only hard-copy study materials are permitted during the exam; candidates cannot use electronic notes or textbooks.

How much does the NCA exam cost and what is the passing grade?

As of April 2025, the registration fee for each NCA exam is $500 CAD plus applicable taxes. The passing grade is 50%, and results are reported on a pass/fail basis. The NCA offers multiple exam sessions throughout the year, and candidates may schedule the Professional Responsibility exam in any session in which it is offered.

Who administers the NCA Professional Responsibility exam?

The exam is administered by the National Committee on Accreditation (NCA), a standing committee of the Federation of Law Societies of Canada. The NCA assesses the legal education and professional experience of internationally trained lawyers and graduates of foreign law programs, and it assigns required exams such as Canadian Professional Responsibility before a candidate can enter a provincial law society's licensing process.

What topics are tested on the NCA Professional Responsibility exam?

The exam tests the Federation of Law Societies Model Code of Professional Conduct. Key topics are conflicts of interest (the bright-line rule from R v Neil and McKercher, and former-client conflicts from MacDonald Estate v Martin), confidentiality and privilege (including the Smith v Jones public-safety exception), the lawyer-client relationship, competence, duties to the court, fees and trust accounting, withdrawal, marketing, and the regulation of the profession by law societies.

What is the Smith v Jones public-safety exception?

Smith v Jones, [1999] 1 SCR 455, is a Supreme Court of Canada decision establishing that solicitor-client privilege may be set aside where there is a clear, serious, and imminent risk of serious bodily harm or death to an identifiable person or group. The court weighs the clarity, seriousness, and imminence of the danger. This public-safety exception is reflected in Model Code rule 3.3-3 and is frequently tested on the exam.

Why is the open-book format important for studying?

Because the NCA exam is open-book, success depends less on memorization and more on quickly locating the correct Model Code rule and applying it to the facts under time pressure. Strong candidates prepare well-organized, tabbed hard-copy materials and practice issue-spotting with sample fact patterns. Practising with multiple-choice knowledge-prep questions helps you internalize the rules and leading cases so you can apply them efficiently in the three-hour exam.