All Practice Exams
100+ Free OAB 2ª Fase Practice Questions
Prepare for the OAB Exame de Ordem Unificado — 2ª Fase (Prova Prático-Profissional) exam with instant access — no signup required.
✓ No registration✓ No credit card✓ No hidden fees✓ Start practicing immediately
100+ Questions
100% Free
Loading practice questions...
Same family resources
Explore More OAB Exame de Ordem Unificado (Brazilian Bar Examination)
Continue into nearby exams from the same family. Each card keeps practice questions, study guides, flashcards, videos, and articles in one place.
Sample OAB 2ª Fase Practice Questions
Try these sample questions to test your OAB 2ª Fase exam readiness. Each question includes a detailed explanation. Start the interactive quiz above for the full 100+ question experience with AI tutoring.
1A client seeks legal counsel after receiving an adverse final judgment in an ordinary civil lawsuit rendered by a state trial judge (juiz de direito) in São Paulo. The judgment fully dismissed all claims on the merits. What is the appropriate procedural remedy to challenge this judgment, to which court should the interposition petition and reasons be addressed, and what is the statutory deadline under the Brazilian Code of Civil Procedure (CPC)?
A.Apelação (Appeal), addressed to the trial judge for initial formal interposition and remittal to the Tribunal de Justiça (TJ/SP) for appellate judgment, within 15 business days.
B.Agravo de Instrumento (Interlocutory Appeal), addressed directly to the Tribunal de Justiça (TJ/SP), within 15 business days.
C.Recurso Ordinário Constitucional (ROC), filed directly with the Superior Tribunal de Justiça (STJ), within 15 business days.
D.Embargos Infringentes, filed before the trial judge within 10 business days.
Explanation: Under Art. 1.009 of the CPC, the appropriate remedy against a final judgment (sentença) that resolves the merits is an Apelação. Under Art. 1.010 of the CPC, the petition is interposed before the court of first instance (juízo a quo), which will intimate the appellee for counter-reasons and remit the records to the appellate court (juízo ad quem - TJ/SP), within the general 15-business-day deadline (Art. 1.003, § 5º, CPC).
2In a civil action for damages, the trial judge issues an interlocutory decision rejecting the defendant's preliminary objection alleging the existence of a valid arbitration agreement (convenção de arbitragem). The defendant wishes to challenge this decision immediately. Which procedural piece should the attorney file, and on what legal basis?
A.Agravo de Instrumento, filed directly with the appellate court (Tribunal de Justiça) pursuant to Art. 1.015, clause III, of the CPC.
B.Apelação, filed before the trial court within 15 business days as a final appeal on preliminary jurisdiction.
C.Mandado de Segurança, filed in the appellate court arguing lack of procedural appeal.
D.Correição Parcial, filed with the internal judicial council for error of procedure.
Explanation: Art. 1.015, III, of the CPC explicitly lists decisions rejecting the allegation of an arbitration convention among the interlocutory decisions immediately challengeable by Agravo de Instrumento. This appeal is filed directly before the competent appellate court (Tribunal de Justiça or TRF) within 15 business days (Art. 1.016 and 1.003, § 5º, CPC).
3A plaintiff files a collection lawsuit (Ação de Cobrança) against a debtor. The defendant is properly served and retains you to draft the defense. In reviewing the complaint, you notice that the debt became enforceable 6 years ago, surpassing the 5-year statutory period under Art. 206, § 5º, I, of the Brazilian Civil Code, and the plaintiff failed to include mandatory proof of payment demands. In drafting the Contestação (Answer), how should these arguments be structured?
A.Preliminary objection of lack of procedural interest/documentary ineptitude (Art. 337, CPC), prejudicial defense on the merits asserting statute of limitations/prescription (Art. 487, II, CPC), and subsidiary merits defense.
B.Principal counter-claim (Reconvenção) for damages only, omitting preliminary arguments because prescription extinguishes the suit automatically.
C.Petição de Exceção de Incompetência followed by a separate autonomous action to declare the nullity of the debt.
D.Embargos à Execução addressed to the distributor judge, requesting immediate suspension without filing a defense.
Explanation: According to the FGV grading rubric for drafting a Contestação (Art. 334 to 342, CPC), the piece must begin with preliminary procedural objections (Art. 337, CPC, such as ineptitude or lack of standing/interest), followed by prejudicial matters of merits like prescription or decadence (Art. 487, II, CPC), and then the direct and subsidiary merits defenses (princípio da eventualidade, Art. 336, CPC).
4A tenant defaults on rent payments for 4 months under a residential lease contract. The landlord wishes to recover possession of the property and collect the overdue rental amounts with penalties. Under Brazilian law (Lei nº 8.245/1991 - Lei do Inquilinato and CPC), which professional piece and cumulative requests must the attorney formulate?
A.Ação de Despejo cumulada com Cobrança de Aluguéis e Acessórios da Locação, requesting eviction, rescission of the contract, and condemnation of tenant and guarantor to pay outstanding arrears.
B.Ação Reintegratória de Posse cumulada com Perdas e Danos, requesting immediate repossession under general possessory rules of the CPC.
C.Ação Monitória based solely on the rental agreement without requesting termination of the lease or eviction.
D.Ação de Execução de Título Extrajudicial requesting eviction and immediate seal of the residential premises.
Explanation: Under Art. 5º and Art. 62, I, of Lei nº 8.245/1991, regardless of the grounds for termination of the tenancy, the specific action to recover leased property is Ação de Despejo, which can be cumulated with the collection of unpaid rents and contractual charges against the lessee and guarantors (fiadores).
5An appellate court (Tribunal de Justiça) issues a collegial judgment (acórdão) in an appeal where it overlooked a vital express contractual clause and failed to rule on a timely raised constitutional issue. To eliminate the obscurity and omission without altering the substance, what procedural piece must be presented, to whom, and within what deadline?
A.Embargos de Declaração, addressed to the reporting judge (Desembargador Relator) of the appellate panel, within 5 business days.
B.Recurso Especial, addressed to the President of the Tribunal de Justiça, within 15 business days.
C.Agravo Interno, addressed to the collegiate chamber, within 15 business days.
D.Recurso Extraordinário, addressed directly to the Supreme Federal Court (STF), within 5 business days.
Explanation: Under Art. 1.022 of the CPC, Embargos de Declaração are appropriate to clarify obscurity, eliminate contradiction, correct material errors, or supply omissions in any judicial decision (including appellate judgments). Under Art. 1.023 of the CPC, they must be filed within 5 business days before the judge or reporting judge who rendered the decision, interrupting the deadline for other appeals (Art. 1.026, CPC).
6A plaintiff has obtained an enforceable judicial title (sentença condenatória transitada em julgado) for payment of R$ 100,000 against a private corporation. The debtor fails to pay voluntarily within the 15-day period after formal intimation. What procedural step and piece should the creditor's attorney file under the 2015 CPC, and what statutory penalties apply?
A.Petição de Cumprimento de Sentença (Enforcement of Judgment), requesting addition of a 10% fine and 10% attorney's fees pursuant to Art. 523, § 1º, of the CPC, plus judicial asset attachment (penhora).
B.Ação de Execução de Título Extrajudicial, demanding citation to pay within 3 days under Art. 829 of the CPC.
C.Ação Rescisória, to enforce the judgment before the Court of Appeals under Art. 966 of the CPC.
D.Ação Monitória, seeking conversion of the judicial title into a writ of execution under Art. 700 of the CPC.
Explanation: Judicial titles are enforced through a continuous phase within the same procedural relationship called Cumprimento de Sentença (Art. 513 et seq., CPC). When the debtor does not voluntarily pay within 15 business days from intimation, Art. 523, § 1º, of the CPC imposes an automatic 10% fine (multa) and 10% honorários advocatícios on the outstanding debt balance.
7A buyer purchases a commercial property and discovers that the seller had earlier sold the exact same property to a third party who registered the deed. The buyer is being sued by the registered owner in an eviction and possessory action. To guarantee indemnification rights in the same proceeding if defeated, which third-party intervention piece must the defendant draft within the Contestação?
A.Denunciação da Lide (Impleader / Joinder of Guarantor) against the alienator under Art. 125, clause I, of the CPC, to enforce eviction warranty (evicção).
B.Chamamento ao Processo (Calling to the Proceeding) under Art. 130 of the CPC, to establish joint and several debt liability.
C.Incidente de Desconsideração da Personalidade Jurídica under Art. 133 of the CPC.
D.Oposição (Opposition) under Art. 682 of the CPC, to claim ownership as an external third party.
Explanation: Under Art. 125, I, of the CPC, Denunciação da Lide is admissible and must be requested in the Answer (Contestação) to bring into the lawsuit the alienator liable for evicção, allowing immediate adjudication of the regressive indemnity claim in the same judgment.
8In a divorce with division of property (Ação de Divórcio Litigioso c/c Partilha de Bens), the wife discovers that the husband is actively draining shared bank accounts and transferring corporate shares to relatives. She needs an urgent court order to freeze the marital assets before the defendant is served. Which procedural mechanism must the attorney formulate in the Petição Inicial?
A.Tutela Provisória de Urgência Cautelar em caráter incidental (ou antecedente), requesting asset freezing (indisponibilidade de bens / arrolamento) under Arts. 300 and 301 of the CPC.
B.Tutela de Evidência under Art. 311, IV, of the CPC, requiring prior counter-arguments from the defendant.
C.Ação Rescisória with a request for suspensive effect under Art. 969 of the CPC.
D.Exceção de Pré-Executividade, requesting immediate seizure of accounts without bail.
Explanation: Under Arts. 300 and 301 of the CPC, a Tutela de Urgência Cautelar is granted when there are elements demonstrating the probability of the right (fumus boni iuris) and the danger of damage or risk to the useful outcome of the proceeding (periculum in mora), including conservatory measures like freezing of assets, arrolamento, or judicial deposit.
9A state appellate court (Tribunal de Justiça) affirms a judgment in open contradiction to a binding federal statute (Federal Law) and against the uniform interpretation established by the Superior Tribunal de Justiça (STJ). All internal appeals and prequestionamento requirements have been fulfilled. Which procedural piece is the proper constitutional appeal to the STJ?
A.Recurso Especial (REsp), interposed before the President or Vice-President of the Tribunal de Justiça pursuant to Art. 105, III, 'a' and 'c', of the 1988 Federal Constitution and Art. 1.029 of the CPC.
B.Recurso Extraordinário (RE), filed before the Federal Supreme Court under Art. 102, III, 'a', of the Federal Constitution.
C.Agravo em Recurso Especial (AREsp), filed directly with the STJ registry within 15 business days.
D.Reclamação Constitucional, filed in the Federal Senate against the appellate court.
Explanation: Recurso Especial (REsp) is the constitutional appeal directed to the STJ (Art. 105, III, 'a' and 'c', CF/88; Art. 1.029, CPC) when a local court decision violates federal law or diverges from the interpretation of another appellate tribunal. It is interposed before the local court's presidency for admissibility screening.
10A bank executes a promissory note against a borrower in an Execução de Título Extrajudicial. The borrower was cited and claims that the note was fully paid prior to the suit, presenting an authenticated receipt signed by the bank's authorized director. Which defense piece should the debtor's attorney file, before which court, and within what statutory timeframe under the CPC?
A.Embargos à Execução, distributed by dependency to the same court of execution within 15 business days from the juntada of the citation notice, pursuant to Arts. 914 and 915 of the CPC.
B.Contestação, filed within 15 business days after the initial conciliation hearing under Art. 335 of the CPC.
C.Agravo de Instrumento, filed directly with the Tribunal de Justiça within 15 business days.
D.Ação Rescisória, filed before the regional appellate court within 2 years.
Explanation: Under Art. 914 of the CPC, the debtor may oppose the execution of an extrajudicial title through Embargos à Execução, independently of attachment (penhora), deposit, or surety. Under Art. 915 of the CPC, the deadline is 15 business days counted from the date of filing of the certificate of service (juntada do comprovante de citação).
About the OAB 2ª Fase Exam
The OAB 2ª Fase (Prova Prático-Profissional) is the practical-professional stage of the Brazilian Bar Examination. Candidates must draft a comprehensive procedural piece and resolve four discursive legal questions in their chosen area of specialization, demonstrating forensic drafting competence, jurisdictional accuracy, and command of substantive law.
Assessment
Part 1: Drafting of a professional procedural piece (peça prático-profissional, 5.0 points); Part 2: Four discursive problem-solving questions (1.25 points each, total 5.0 points) in the candidate's chosen legal practice area (Constitutional, Administrative, Civil, Criminal, Labor, Commercial, or Tax Law).
Time Limit
5 hours (300 minutes)
Passing Score
6.0 out of 10.0 points (60%)
Exam Fee
R$ 350,00 for the full exam; a reduced fee set by the edital complementar applies to reaproveitamento (Conselho Federal da OAB (CFOAB) / FGV Conhecimento)
OAB 2ª Fase Exam Content Outline
15%
Peça Profissional e Processo Civil
Petição Inicial, Contestação, Reconvenção, Apelação, Agravo de Instrumento, Embargos de Declaração, and execution defenses.
15%
Peça Profissional e Processo Penal
Resposta à Acusação, Memoriais, Apelação Criminal, RESE, Habeas Corpus, and Revisão Criminal.
15%
Peça Profissional e Processo do Trabalho
Reclamação Trabalhista, Contestação Trabalhista, Recurso Ordinário, Agravo de Petição, and Embargos à Execução.
15%
Peça Profissional e Controle Constitucional
Mandado de Segurança, Ação Popular, Ação Civil Pública, ADPF, ADI, and Mandado de Injunção.
15%
Peça Profissional e Processo Tributário
Ação Anulatória de Débito Fiscal, Mandado de Segurança Tributário, Repetição de Indébito, and Embargos à Execução Fiscal.
25%
Peça Profissional Administrativa e Empresarial
Actions against public entities, state liability, corporate dissolution, and judicial restructuring.
How to Pass the OAB 2ª Fase Exam
What You Need to Know
- Passing score: 6.0 out of 10.0 points (60%)
- Assessment: Part 1: Drafting of a professional procedural piece (peça prático-profissional, 5.0 points); Part 2: Four discursive problem-solving questions (1.25 points each, total 5.0 points) in the candidate's chosen legal practice area (Constitutional, Administrative, Civil, Criminal, Labor, Commercial, or Tax Law).
- Time limit: 5 hours (300 minutes)
- Exam fee: R$ 350,00 for the full exam; a reduced fee set by the edital complementar applies to reaproveitamento
Keys to Passing
- Work through all 100 available questions
- Review every answer and explanation
- Track weak areas and revisit them
- Use our AI tutor for tough concepts
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the passing score for the OAB 2ª Fase?
Candidates must obtain at least 6.00 points out of a possible 10.00 points across the practical piece and the four discursive questions.
Can candidates consult legislation during the 2ª Fase?
Yes, candidates are permitted to consult non-annotated legal codes, statutes, and legislation (Vade Mecum) during the 2ª Fase examination.
How is the 2ª Fase structured?
The examination comprises one practical drafting piece worth 5.0 points and four discursive legal questions worth 1.25 points each (totaling 5.0 points), completed over a 5-hour duration.