All Practice Exams

100+ Free Analista do MPU (Área Jurídica) Practice Questions

Prepare for the Concurso MPU — Analista do MPU (Área Jurídica, Brazil) exam with instant access — no signup required.

✓ No registration✓ No credit card✓ No hidden fees✓ Start practicing immediately
100+ Questions
100% Free

Loading practice questions...

Same family resources

Explore More Ministério Público da União (MPU) Career Examinations

Continue into nearby exams from the same family. Each card keeps practice questions, study guides, flashcards, videos, and articles in one place.

2026 Statistics

Key Facts: Analista do MPU (Área Jurídica) Exam

80 MCQs / 120 C-E

Official objective test format plus 1 discursive legal essay

Ministério Público da União / FGV / Cebraspe

4h 30min

Total examination duration for objective and discursive tests

Edital Concurso MPU

R$ 120,00

Official registration fee for Analista do MPU

PGR / MPU

4 Branches

Institutional branches of MPU (MPF, MPT, MPM, and MPDFT)

Lei Complementar nº 75/1993

Nível Superior

Required minimum education credential (Bachelor of Laws / Direito)

Lei nº 11.415/2006

Analista do MPU (Área Jurídica) tests constitutional law, institutional legislation (LC 75/1993), civil procedure and collective rights, criminal law, and legal reasoning in a 4.5-hour competitive federal exam. This page provides 100 free English-language practice MCQs adapted from the official syllabus.

Sample Analista do MPU (Área Jurídica) Practice Questions

Try these sample questions to test your Analista do MPU (Área Jurídica) exam readiness. Each question includes a detailed explanation. Start the interactive quiz above for the full 100+ question experience with AI tutoring.

1Under Article 127, §1º, of the Brazilian Federal Constitution of 1988 (CF/88), what are the three institutional principles that govern the Ministério Público?
A.Hierarchical subordination, administrative centralism, and procedural infallibility.
B.Unity (Unidade), Indivisibility (Indivisibilidade), and Functional Independence (Independência Funcional).
C.Judicial delegation, legislative oversight, and executive discretion.
D.Collegiality, compulsory party representation, and absolute anonymity.
Explanation: Article 127, §1º, of the Federal Constitution explicitly establishes that the institutional principles of the Ministério Público are Unity (Unidade), Indivisibility (Indivisibilidade), and Functional Independence (Independência Funcional). Unity means all members integrate a single constitutional body under one head within each branch, indivisibility allows members to replace one another in proceedings without modifying the legal relationship, and functional independence guarantees that members perform their duties according to their own legal conscience and the law without hierarchical subordination in their functional convictions.
2According to Article 128, §1º, of CF/88, what are the constitutional rules governing the appointment of the Procurador-Geral da República (PGR)?
A.Direct election by unanimous vote of all federal judges and labor magistrates for a non-renewable 4-year term.
B.Appointment by the President of the Republic from among career members of the MPU over thirty-five years of age, approved by an absolute majority of the Federal Senate, for a two-year term with reappointment allowed.
C.Appointment exclusively from the three most senior members of the MPF, without requiring Senate confirmation, for a single 5-year mandate.
D.Nomination by the National Council of the Public Prosecution (CNMP) followed by simple majority approval in the Chamber of Deputies.
Explanation: Under Article 128, §1º, of CF/88, the Ministério Público da União is headed by the Procurador-Geral da República, appointed by the President of the Republic from among career members who are over 35 years of age. The nomination requires prior approval by secret ballot and an absolute majority of the Federal Senate. The PGR serves a two-year term, and reappointment (recondução) is permitted.
3Article 128, §5º, I, of CF/88 grants vitaliciedade, inamovibilidade, and irredutibilidade de subsídio to members of the Ministério Público. Regarding the guarantee of inamovibilidade (tenure of location/office), under what constitutional condition may an MP member be removed or transferred against their will?
A.By unilateral executive decree of the President of the Republic during a state of defense.
B.Only for reasons of public interest, through a decision by the competent collegiate body of the Ministério Público, by a vote of two-thirds of its members, ensuring full defense.
C.By simple majority vote of the State Legislative Assembly or Federal Senate upon request of the local governor.
D.Under no circumstances whatsoever, as inamovibilidade is an absolute guarantee that cannot be restricted even by collegiate decision.
Explanation: Under Article 128, §5º, I, 'b', of CF/88, members of the Ministério Público enjoy inamovibilidade, except by reason of public interest, through a decision taken by the competent collegiate body of the Ministério Público, by the vote of two-thirds (2/3) of its members, with full defense guaranteed (assegurada ampla defesa).
4Which of the following activities is constitutionally permitted for an active member of the Ministério Público da União under Article 128, §5º, II, of CF/88?
A.Exercising the private practice of law (advocacia) in non-federal civil matters.
B.Holding one teaching position (exercício de um cargo de magistério), provided there is schedule compatibility.
C.Engaging in political party activity and running for partisan electoral office while in active office.
D.Participating in the commercial administration or management of a private commercial corporation.
Explanation: Article 128, §5º, II, 'd', of CF/88 establishes that members of the Ministério Público are prohibited from exercising any other public position or function, EXCEPT one teaching position (salvo uma de magistério). All other activities listed (advocacia, political party activity, commercial management) are explicitly forbidden.
5Pursuant to Article 130-A of CF/88 (introduced by Constitutional Amendment No. 45/2004), how is the Conselho Nacional do Ministério Público (CNMP) composed?
A.9 members appointed exclusively by the Federal Supreme Court for life tenure.
B.14 members appointed by the President of the Republic after approval by absolute majority of the Federal Senate, presided over by the Procurador-Geral da República.
C.21 members elected directly by universal vote among all Brazilian licensed attorneys and magistrates.
D.11 members chosen exclusively from the Ministério Público Federal with a single 1-year mandate.
Explanation: Article 130-A of CF/88 states that the CNMP consists of 14 members appointed by the President of the Republic after confirmation by absolute majority of the Federal Senate for a 2-year mandate (one reappointment permitted), and it is presided over by the Procurador-Geral da República.
6Regarding the constitutional powers of the Conselho Nacional do Ministério Público (CNMP) under Article 130-A, §2º, of CF/88, what is the scope of its administrative and disciplinary authority?
A.It has full authority to review, alter, and overturn the jurisdictional merits of legal opinions (pareceres) issued by prosecutors in ongoing court cases.
B.It oversees the administrative and financial performance of the MP and the fulfillment of functional duties by its members, possessing concurrent disciplinary authority to receive complaints, initiate disciplinary proceedings, and apply statutory administrative penalties.
C.It exercises direct hierarchical command over the criminal investigative tactics of federal police delegates in all joint operations.
D.It acts as a court of appeal to judge criminal charges brought against Federal Prosecutors for common criminal offenses.
Explanation: Under Article 130-A, §2º, of CF/88, the CNMP is responsible for the administrative, financial, and disciplinary oversight of the Ministério Público and its members. It can receive complaints, order the instigation of disciplinary proceedings, summon records, and apply administrative sanctions. However, it cannot interfere with the functional independence or the substantive merits of legal opinions delivered in court cases.
7Under Article 103 of CF/88 and STF jurisprudence, active standing to file a Direct Action of Unconstitutionality (Ação Direta de Inconstitucionalidade - ADI) is divided between universal petitioners (legitimados universais) and thematic petitioners (legitimados especiais). Which petitioner has universal standing and does NOT need to prove thematic pertinence (pertinência temática)?
A.Confederação sindical ou entidade de classe de âmbito nacional.
B.Mesa de Assembleia Legislativa ou da Câmara Legislativa do DF.
C.Governador de Estado ou do Distrito Federal.
D.Procurador-Geral da República (PGR).
Explanation: The STF divides the petitioners listed in Article 103 into universal petitioners (who can challenge any law on any topic without proving a direct institutional link) and special/thematic petitioners (who must demonstrate pertinência temática). Universal petitioners are: the President of the Republic, the Mesa do Senado Federal, the Mesa da Câmara dos Deputados, the Procurador-Geral da República, the Federal Council of the OAB, and political parties with congressional representation.
8In concentrated constitutional review proceedings (ADI, ADC, ADO, ADPF) before the Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF), what is the constitutional requirement regarding the participation of the Procurador-Geral da República (PGR) under Article 103, §1º, of CF/88?
A.The PGR only participates if requested in writing by the President of the Supreme Court in cases involving fiscal matters.
B.The PGR must be previously heard in all direct actions of unconstitutionality and in all constitutional proceedings before the STF (o Procurador-Geral da República deverá ser previamente ouvido em todos os processos de inconstitucionalidade).
C.The PGR's participation is optional and may be completely substituted by the Advogado-Geral da União whenever the Federal Government is an interested party.
D.The PGR only manifests if the action was originally filed by a political party or a state governor.
Explanation: Article 103, §1º, of CF/88 establishes that the Procurador-Geral da República shall be previously heard in all actions of unconstitutionality and in all other proceedings within the jurisdiction of the Supreme Federal Court. In direct actions, the PGR acts as custos constitutionis (guardian of the constitutional order), providing an independent technical legal opinion (parecer).
9In a Direct Action of Unconstitutionality (ADI) challenging a federal statute before the STF, how do the constitutional roles of the Advogado-Geral da União (AGU) and the Procurador-Geral da República (PGR) differ pursuant to Article 103, §§1º and 3º, of CF/88?
A.Both the AGU and PGR are constitutionally obliged to defend the unconstitutionality of the challenged statute under all circumstances.
B.The AGU acts as the constitutional defender/curator of the legal norm (curador da norma) and shall defend the challenged act, whereas the PGR acts as custos constitutionis, issuing an independent legal opinion that may conclude for either constitutionality or unconstitutionality.
C.The PGR defends the challenged statute while the AGU issues an impartial judicial opinion representing the judiciary.
D.The AGU only participates if the action is filed by the President of the Republic, while the PGR only participates if the action involves criminal legislation.
Explanation: Under Article 103, §3º, CF/88, when the STF reviews the unconstitutionality in abstract of a legal rule or federal/state act, the Advogado-Geral da União is summoned to defend the challenged text (acting as curador da norma, with exceptions recognized by STF when the Court has already declared identical norms unconstitutional). Conversely, under Article 103, §1º, the PGR acts independently as the guardian of the Constitution (fiscal da ordem jurídica), free to manifest in favor of or against constitutionality.
10Under Article 36, III, of CF/88, what is the exclusive constitutional prerogative of the Procurador-Geral da República regarding Federal Intervention (Intervenção Federal) in the States or Federal District?
A.The PGR directly decrees federal intervention and mobilizes the Armed Forces without presidential involvement.
B.The PGR has exclusive active standing to propose the Interventive Direct Action of Unconstitutionality (Representação Interventiva / ADI Interventiva) before the STF to ensure compliance with sensitive constitutional principles (princípios constitucionais sensíveis) or enforcement of federal law.
C.The PGR can only request intervention if authorized in advance by a two-thirds vote of the National Council of Justice (CNJ).
D.The PGR acts solely as defense counsel for the intervened state government before the Federal Senate.
Explanation: Pursuant to Article 36, III, of CF/88, a decree of federal intervention to ensure observance of sensitive constitutional principles (Art. 34, VII) or to ensure the execution of federal law depends on the STF granting a representation filed exclusively by the Procurador-Geral da República (Representação Interventiva / ADI Interventiva).

About the Analista do MPU (Área Jurídica) Exam

The Concurso Público para Analista do Ministério Público da União - Área Jurídica (Direito) selects senior legal analysts for the four institutional branches of the Public Prosecution of the Union: Ministério Público Federal (MPF), Ministério Público do Trabalho (MPT), Ministério Público Militar (MPM), and Ministério Público do Distrito Federal e Territórios (MPDFT). Analistas do MPU provide direct legal assistance to Federal Prosecutors (Procuradores da República, Procuradores do Trabalho, etc.), drafting legal opinions (pareceres), civil public action complaints (ações civis públicas), criminal charges (denúncias), appeals to higher courts (STJ and STF), managing civil inquiries (inquéritos civis), and conducting administrative compliance and human rights investigations. Tested domains include the Federal Constitution of 1988 (CF/88), Complementary Law No. 75/1993 (Estatuto do MPU), Law No. 11.415/2006 (Carreiras do MPU), CNMP Resolutions, Administrative Law, Civil Procedure Code (CPC/2015), Public Civil Action Act (Lei 7.347/1985), Criminal Code (CP), Criminal Procedure Code (CPP), special criminal legislation (Anti-Money Laundering Lei 9.613/1998, Criminal Organizations Lei 12.850/2013), Portuguese grammar and comprehension, and legal-logical reasoning.

Assessment

Single 4.5-hour session: Direito Constitucional e Direitos Fundamentais (25%), Legislação do MPU e Direito Administrativo (25%), Direito Processual Civil e Tutela Coletiva (25%), Direito Penal e Processual Penal (15%), Língua Portuguesa e Raciocínio Lógico-Jurídico (10%), plus 1 discursive legal dissertation/case study.

Time Limit

4 hours 30 minutes (270 minutes)

Passing Score

50%

Exam Fee

R$ 120,00 (Ministério Público da União (MPU / MPF) / FGV / Cebraspe)

Analista do MPU (Área Jurídica) Exam Content Outline

25%

Direito Constitucional, Teoria dos Direitos Fundamentais e Controle de Constitucionalidade

Constitutional principles and institutional framework of the Public Prosecution (Arts. 127–130-A CF/88: unity, indivisibility, functional independence, administrative/financial autonomy, member guarantees and prohibitions), concentrated and diffuse constitutional review (ADI, ADC, ADO, ADPF, representation for federal intervention), constitutional role and standing of the PGR, fundamental rights and collective judicial guarantees (habeas corpus, mandado de segurança, mandado de injunção, ação popular), distribution of federal competences, and organization of powers.

25%

Legislação do MPU (Lei Complementar nº 75/1993, Lei nº 11.415/2006, Resoluções do CNMP) e Direito Administrativo

Institutional statute of the MPU (LC 75/1993: organization of MPF, MPT, MPM, MPDFT; powers of the PGR, Conselho Superior, Câmaras de Coordenação e Revisão, Corregedoria-Geral; civil inquiries, requisitions, notifications, and TACs), MPU career civil service law (Lei 11.415/2006), CNMP regulatory resolutions (Resoluções 23/2007 and 181/2017), administrative principles (LIMPE), administrative acts, administrative improbity (Lei 8.429/1992 as amended by Lei 14.230/2021), public tenders and contracts (Lei 14.133/2021), and the federal statutory regime (Lei 8.112/1990).

25%

Direito Processual Civil e Tutela Coletiva

Civil Procedure Code (CPC/2015: general principles, procedural acts, provisional remedies, role of MP as party and custos iuris, system of binding precedents), Public Civil Action Act (Lei 7.347/1985: active standing, inquérito civil, TAC, diffuse/collective/individual homogeneous rights, territorial jurisdiction, and erga omnes res judicata under STF Tema 1075), Consumer Defense Code collective litigation (Lei 8.078/1990 Title III), Mandado de Segurança (Lei 12.016/2009), and Ação Popular (Lei 4.717/1965).

15%

Direito Penal e Processual Penal

Crimes against Public Administration (peculato, concussão, corrupção passiva/ativa, prevaricação, advocacia administrativa, Art. 327 CP public official definitions), Anti-Money Laundering Law (Lei 9.613/1998: placement, layering, integration, reporting obligations), Criminal Organizations Act (Lei 12.850/2013: colaboração premiada, ação controlada, infiltração), Non-Prosecution Agreement (ANPP - Art. 28-A CPP), criminal investigative procedures (PIC), evidentiary law (illicit evidence, fruits of the poisonous tree), and federal criminal jurisdiction (Art. 109 CF/88).

10%

Língua Portuguesa e Raciocínio Lógico-Jurídico

Textual comprehension and official legal drafting (Manual de Redação da Presidência da República: pronomes de tratamento, clareza, concisão, impessoalidade), syntax, normative grammar (concordância verbal e nominal, regência, crase, pontuação), propositional logic (connectives, truth tables, logical equivalence, De Morgan's laws, contrapositive), categorical syllogisms, and deductive legal argumentation.

How to Pass the Analista do MPU (Área Jurídica) Exam

What You Need to Know

  • Passing score: 50%
  • Assessment: Single 4.5-hour session: Direito Constitucional e Direitos Fundamentais (25%), Legislação do MPU e Direito Administrativo (25%), Direito Processual Civil e Tutela Coletiva (25%), Direito Penal e Processual Penal (15%), Língua Portuguesa e Raciocínio Lógico-Jurídico (10%), plus 1 discursive legal dissertation/case study.
  • Time limit: 4 hours 30 minutes (270 minutes)
  • Exam fee: R$ 120,00

Keys to Passing

  • Work through all 100 available questions
  • Review every answer and explanation
  • Track weak areas and revisit them
  • Use our AI tutor for tough concepts

Analista do MPU (Área Jurídica) Study Tips from Top Performers

1Master Complementary Law No. 75/1993: Focus heavily on the competencies of the Procurador-Geral da República, the structure of the Câmaras de Coordenação e Revisão, and the statutory powers to requisition documents, conduct inspections, and issue administrative recommendations under Articles 6 and 8.
2Understand Constitutional Review and the PGR's Role: Study Articles 102, 103, and 127–130-A of CF/88, noting that the PGR must be heard in all direct actions of unconstitutionality (ADI, ADC, ADO, ADPF) and has exclusive active standing to propose Federal Interventive Actions (representação interventiva).
3Differentiate Collective Rights under the CDC and LACP: Know the definitions and cosa judicata effects of diffuse rights (direitos difusos), collective rights stricto sensu, and individual homogeneous rights (direitos individuais homogêneos) under Articles 81 and 103 of Lei 8.078/1990.
4Review the Amended Administrative Improbity Act (Lei 14.230/2021): Memorize that administrative improbity now strictly requires specific willful intent (dolo específico), eliminates negligent improbity (culpa), establishes exclusive standing for the Ministério Público, and imposes an 8-year statute of limitations from the date of the act.
5Practice Propositional Logic Equivalences and Portuguese Redação Oficial: Master De Morgan's laws, contrapositive rules, and the correct forms of address (Vossa Excelência) and conciseness principles from the Manual de Redação da Presidência da República.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the four institutional branches that comprise the Ministério Público da União (MPU)?

Under Article 128, I, of the Brazilian Federal Constitution and Article 2 of Complementary Law No. 75/1993, the MPU consists of: 1) Ministério Público Federal (MPF), 2) Ministério Público do Trabalho (MPT), 3) Ministério Público Militar (MPM), and 4) Ministério Público do Distrito Federal e Territórios (MPDFT).

What is the role of an Analista do MPU - Área Jurídica?

Analistas do MPU (Direito) perform high-level legal and technical support functions for Federal Prosecutors. Responsibilities include drafting legal opinions (pareceres), civil public actions, criminal complaints (denúncias), appeals to regional and superior federal courts (TRFs, TST, STM, TJDFT, STJ, and STF), analyzing evidence in civil inquiries (inquéritos civis) and criminal investigations (PICs), and assisting in public hearings and judicial proceedings.

What educational qualifications are required for the Analista do MPU (Área Jurídica) position?

Candidates must hold a recognized Bachelor of Laws degree (diploma de graduação de Nível Superior em Direito) issued by an educational institution accredited by the Ministry of Education (MEC). Unlike prosecutorial positions, three years of post-graduation legal practice (atividade jurídica) is generally not required for the Analista civil service role unless specified for member positions.

What are the passing criteria for the MPU Analista examination?

Candidates must achieve at least 50% of the total available points on the objective multiple-choice/true-false examination, avoid zero scores in any individual knowledge domain, and obtain at least 50% on the discursive legal essay to qualify for final ranking and appointment.

How are civil inquiries (Inquéritos Civis) reviewed within the MPU when an analyst or prosecutor recommends dismissal (arquivamento)?

Under LC 75/1993 (Art. 62, IV) and CNMP Resolution 23/2007, when a member of the MP concludes that grounds for filing a public civil action do not exist, they must promote the substantiated dismissal (arquivamento) and transmit the case records within 3 (three) days to the competent Coordination and Review Chamber (Câmara de Coordenação e Revisão - CCR) for mandatory homologation or rejection.