100+ Free Zertifizierungsprüfung für Gerichtssachverständige Practice Questions

Prepare for the Zertifizierungsprüfung nach § 4a SDG für allgemein beeidete und gerichtlich zertifizierte Sachverständige exam with instant access — no signup required.

✓ No registration✓ No credit card✓ No hidden fees✓ Start practicing immediately

100+ Questions

100% Free

Loading practice questions...

2026 Statistics

Key Facts: Zertifizierungsprüfung für Gerichtssachverständige Exam

100

Practice Questions in This Bank

OpenExamPrep

5 or 10 Years

Prior senior practice required — five with a relevant Hochschule or BHS qualification, otherwise ten

§ 2 Abs. 2 Z 1 lit. b SDG

€400

Examination fee payable to the Landesgericht, plus €100 per examiner beyond three

§ 4a Abs. 3 SDG and BMJ ordinance BGBl. II Nr. 397/2007

€400,000

Minimum sum insured per insured event under the compulsory liability insurance

§ 2a Abs. 2 SDG

5 Years

Duration of the entry before recertification is required

§ 6 Abs. 1 SDG

4 Weeks

Period for claiming the expert fee, on pain of losing it

§ 38 Abs. 1 GebAG

Austria's court expert certification is examined by a commission at the Landesgericht under §§ 4 and 4a SDG — a judge in the chair plus at least two specialist examiners nominated by the competent Kammer and the Hauptverband — orally as a matter of principle, with a Probegutachten where expedient, for a €400 fee and an entry limited to five years. This free bank provides 100 research-based English-language multiple-choice practice questions with detailed explanations on Austrian procedural law, expert evidence, the separation of Befund and Gutachten under § 362 Abs. 1 ZPO, the GebAG and liability under § 1299 ABGB — a study aid, not a format simulation.

Sample Zertifizierungsprüfung für Gerichtssachverständige Practice Questions

Try these sample questions to test your Zertifizierungsprüfung für Gerichtssachverständige exam readiness. Each question includes a detailed explanation. Start the interactive quiz above for the full 100+ question experience with AI tutoring.

1Under the Austrian Sachverständigen- und Dolmetschergesetz (SDG), what is an 'allgemein beeideter und gerichtlich zertifizierter Sachverständiger'?

A.A qualified professional who has proven superior expertise and legal knowledge in a statutory certification exam, is registered in the official federal judicial directory (SDG-Liste), and has taken a general oath of office before the Regional Court President

B.A permanent state civil servant employed on a full-time monthly salary by the Ministry of Justice

C.A private commercial sales representative selling laboratory diagnostic equipment to courts

D.An honorary position awarded exclusively to retired judges and politicians

Explanation: Under §§ 1 ff. SDG, an allgemein beeideter und gerichtlich zertifizierter Sachverständiger is an independent professional who possesses verified above-average specialized expertise (überdurchschnittliche Fachkunde) and procedural knowledge, certified by the Landesgericht and listed in the federal SDG-Liste under the general oath of office.

2Under § 2 of the Austrian Sachverständigen- und Dolmetschergesetz (SDG), what are the mandatory prerequisites for certification as a sworn court expert?

A.Expertise plus knowledge of procedural law, the Sachverständigenwesen, Befundaufnahme and the structure of a sound opinion; ten years of activity in a responsible position in the field — five where a relevant Hochschulstudium or berufsbildende höhere Schule was completed; legal capacity, personal suitability, trustworthiness, orderly finances, residence or workplace in the district; adequate equipment; liability insurance under § 2a SDG; and a demonstrated need for experts in that field

B.A minimum age of 65 years and 20 years of military service

C.Ownership of a commercial real estate agency in Vienna

D.A direct recommendation letter from the Federal Chancellor

Explanation: § 2 Abs. 2 Z 1 SDG lists the personal requirements: (a) Sachkunde together with knowledge of the most important rules of procedural law, of the Sachverständigenwesen, of the Befundaufnahme and of how to build a sound and traceable Gutachten; (b) ten years of — preferably professional — activity in a responsible position in the field or a related field immediately before entry, five years being enough where the applicant has completed a relevant Hochschulstudium or a Studium at a berufsbildende höhere Schule; (c) full legal capacity; (d) personal suitability; (e) trustworthiness; (f) citizenship of Austria, an EU or EEA state or Switzerland; (g) habitual residence or place of professional activity in the Landesgericht's district; (h) orderly financial circumstances; and (i) liability insurance under § 2a SDG. Z 1a adds adequate equipment for the field and Z 2 the objective need for experts in it.

3Under § 6 of the Austrian Sachverständigen- und Dolmetschergesetz (SDG), what is the validity period of certification and what is required for Rezertifizierung (recertification)?

A.Certification is granted for a fixed period of five years; recertification requires proving continuous active expert practice, submitting sample court opinions, and completing verified continuing education seminars

B.Certification lasts one year, after which the candidate must repeat the entire written exam

C.Certification is granted for a lifetime without any subsequent quality review

D.Certification lasts twenty years and is renewed automatically by paying a €10 fee

Explanation: Under § 6 Abs. 1 and 2 SDG, certification is limited to five years. Before the five-year term expires, the expert must apply for recertification (Rezertifizierung), submitting proof of regular expert appointments, copies of rendered Gutachten, and certificates of ongoing professional training (Fortbildungsnachweis) to the Landesgericht President.

4Under § 5 of the Austrian Sachverständigen- und Dolmetschergesetz (SDG), what is the legal effect of the general oath of office (allgemeine Beeidigung)?

A.The expert is sworn to perform all future court and authority assignments impartially, conscientiously, and to the best of their knowledge; the expert does not need to be sworn in separately for every individual court case

B.The expert receives lifetime immunity from civil and criminal prosecution

C.The expert is legally permitted to decide the final judgment in place of the judge

D.The expert becomes a member of the Austrian Supreme Court bench

Explanation: Under § 5 SDG, taking the general oath before the Landesgericht President applies to all future court appointments throughout the Republic of Austria, eliminating the necessity of swearing in the expert separately at each hearing (§ 351 ZPO / § 126 StPO).

5Under § 19 of the Austrian Jurisdiktionsnorm (JN), § 47 StPO, and § 7 AVG, when is a court expert considered befangen (biased / conflicted)?

A.Whenever there is any justifiable reason to doubt the expert's complete objectivity and impartiality (e.g., family relationship, business ties, prior private consultation, or personal interest in the outcome of the proceedings)

B.Whenever the expert charges the statutory hourly fee under the GebAG

C.Only if the expert has a criminal record for armed robbery

D.Whenever the expert belongs to the same sports club as the court typist

Explanation: Under § 19 JN, § 47 StPO, and § 7 AVG, the grounds for recusal of judges apply fully to court experts. Any objective circumstance that gives a reasonable person cause to doubt the expert's neutrality constitutes Befangenheit and requires the expert to decline the appointment or be recused.

6What is the affirmative duty of a court expert under § 2a of the SDG if they recognize a reason for Befangenheit (conflict of interest) upon receiving an assignment?

A.The expert must immediately inform the appointing court or authority in writing, disclose the conflicting circumstance, and refrain from taking any investigative steps until the court decides on the appointment

B.The expert should secretly complete the report and keep the conflict hidden

C.The expert should ask the plaintiff for extra cash compensation to remain silent

D.The expert should transfer the assignment to an uncertified business colleague without informing the judge

Explanation: Under § 2a SDG, § 355 ZPO, and § 126 StPO, the expert is under a strict legal duty of immediate self-disclosure (Offenlegungspflicht). Hiding a conflict violates professional ethics and can lead to the annulment of the entire trial and loss of fee entitlements.

7What is the official Rundsiegel (round seal) of an Austrian sworn court expert, and for what purpose may it be used?

A.A round seal designating the expert's name and their capacity, which must be used when signing written Gutachten; an impression must be filed with the competent Landesgericht president after entry in the list

B.A marketing stamp used on commercial advertising flyers and private promotional letters

C.A stamp used to authorize bank wire transfers from foreign corporations

D.A seal used to sign personal family greeting cards

Explanation: § 8 Abs. 5 SDG requires the allgemein beeidete und gerichtlich zertifizierte Sachverständige to use, when signing written Gutachten, a Rundsiegel designating their name and their capacity, and to file a seal impression with the competent president after entry in the Gerichtssachverständigen- und Gerichtsdolmetscherliste. For electronic Gutachten a qualified certificate for electronic signatures takes the place of the seal. Using the seal outside the certified expert activity — for example on commercial advertising — is professional misconduct and can put the expert's Vertrauenswürdigkeit under § 2 Abs. 2 Z 1 lit. e SDG in question.

8Under § 121 of the Austrian Strafgesetzbuch (StGB) and the SDG, what is the court expert's duty of confidentiality (Verschwiegenheitspflicht)?

A.The expert must maintain strict, perpetual secrecy regarding all trade secrets, personal data, and confidential information learned in the course of their court activities, under threat of criminal and disciplinary sanctions

B.Confidentiality expires the moment the expert submits the fee note to the court

C.The expert is free to publish all confidential trade secrets on social media platforms

D.Confidentiality applies only if the court explicitly pays a confidentiality bonus

Explanation: Under § 121 StGB and the SDG, unauthorized disclosure of secrets entrusted to a court expert in their professional capacity is a criminal offense punishable by imprisonment or fines. The duty of confidentiality is permanent and persists indefinitely even after the conclusion of the case or termination of certification.

9Under § 10 of the Austrian Sachverständigen- und Dolmetschergesetz (SDG), on what grounds must an expert be removed (Entziehung / Streichung) from the SDG-Liste by the Landesgericht President?

A.An entry prerequisite other than the need criterion never existed or has fallen away — for example loss of trustworthiness, of personal suitability or of the mandatory liability insurance — or the expert repeatedly refuses appointment without justification, repeatedly delays the Befund or Gutachten unduly, or persistently breaches the content ban in § 3a Abs. 7 SDG

B.Declining an assignment because the expert is hospitalized with a broken leg

C.Writing a critical academic paper on macroeconomic monetary theory

D.Relocating their private residence from Linz to Salzburg

Explanation: § 10 Abs. 1 SDG requires the president of the Landesgericht to withdraw the status by Bescheid where (Z 1) the entry requirements — with the exception of the need criterion in § 2 Abs. 2 Z 2 SDG — never existed or have since fallen away, (Z 2) the expert repeatedly refuses appointment without justification, (Z 3) they repeatedly delay the Befundaufnahme or the Gutachten unduly, or (Z 4) they persistently breach § 3a Abs. 7 SDG or publish content apt to damage the standing of the justice system. Under § 10 Abs. 4 SDG the president may obtain a reasoned opinion of the § 4a commission where the ground concerns lost Sachkunde or inadequate equipment. Separately, an entry simply expires under § 6 SDG if recertification is not sought in time.

10Under the Hauptverband der allgemein beeideten und gerichtlich zertifizierten Sachverständigen Österreichs (Hauptverband der Gerichtssachverständigen), what is the primary institutional mission of the association?

A.To represent the professional interests of Austrian court experts, publish the official 'Sachverständige' journal, establish ethical standards, organize professional continuing education seminars, and provide expert examiners for Landesgericht certification commissions

B.To enforce commercial price-fixing cartels across Austrian engineering firms

C.To operate a commercial private banking network for real estate developers

D.To appoint all Austrian federal judges without parliamentary oversight

Explanation: The Hauptverband der Gerichtssachverständigen (Hauptverband der Gerichtssachverständigen) is the recognized Austrian umbrella association of certified court experts. It provides comprehensive training, publishes specialized legal literature, upholds high standards of expert report quality, and nominates expert members for the statutory certification boards.

About the Zertifizierungsprüfung für Gerichtssachverständige Exam

The Zertifizierungsprüfung is the statutory examination taken inside the entry procedure of §§ 4 and 4a of the Sachverständigen- und Dolmetschergesetz to become an allgemein beeideter und gerichtlich zertifizierter Sachverständiger in Austria. It is a personal certification: the commission tests expertise clearly above the average of practitioners in the field, together with knowledge of procedural law, the Sachverständigenwesen, the conduct of the Befundaufnahme and the construction of a sound and traceable Gutachten. Successful applicants are entered in the Gerichtssachverständigen- und Gerichtsdolmetscherliste for specific numbered Fachgebiete.

Assessment

Certification takes place inside the entry procedure of §§ 4 and 4a SDG. The president of the Landesgericht must obtain a reasoned opinion from a commission chaired by a judge, who calls in at least two further qualified and independent specialists nominated by the competent Kammer and by the Hauptverband der Gerichtssachverständigen and, so far as possible, listed for the field. Under § 4a Abs. 2 SDG the applicant is examined orally as a matter of principle and, where expedient, in writing as well, in particular through a Probegutachten; the steps are documented and the commission issues a reasoned opinion, deciding by majority with the chair's casting vote. The Hauptverband's Prüfungsstandards state that the examination is not public, that the specialist examiners question for at least 40 minutes and the judicial chair for at least 20 minutes on procedural law and the Sachverständigenwesen, and that a protocol recording the questions and the substance of the answers is signed by the commission. Where the applicant holds a university teaching qualification in the field, or practises a regulated profession that includes giving opinions, the Sachkunde is not examined.

Time Limit

varies-by-module

Passing Score

There is no numeric pass mark. The commission issues a reasoned opinion under § 4a Abs. 2 SDG, deciding by majority with the chair's casting vote. The president of the Landesgericht then decides on entry by Bescheid after any further inquiries considered necessary, and the applicant has no right to be entered (§ 4 Abs. 3 SDG).

Exam Fee

€400 payable to the competent Landesgericht before the examination, rising by €100 for each examiner beyond three; only a quarter is payable if the candidate withdraws at least three days beforehand or is prevented by an unforeseen or unavoidable event substantiated within 14 days (§ 4a Abs. 3 SDG and § 2 of the BMJ ordinance BGBl. II Nr. 397/2007). The same fee applies on recertification where the commission is instructed. (Präsidentinnen und Präsidenten der Landesgerichte as certification bodies under § 3 SDG, supported by the § 4a commissions)

Zertifizierungsprüfung für Gerichtssachverständige Exam Content Outline

Examined by the judicial chair — Prüfungsstandards, section 3.5

Verfahrensrecht und Sachverständigenwesen

Court organisation and proceedings under the ZPO, StPO, AußStrG and AVG, the taking of evidence and expert evidence, appointment under § 351 ZPO, the oath under § 358 ZPO, oral clarification under § 357 Abs. 2 ZPO and the sanctions of § 354 ZPO

Examined by the judicial chair — Prüfungsstandards, section 3.5

Sachverständigenlistenwesen und Berufsrecht

Entry and certification under §§ 2, 4 and 4a SDG, the five-year term and recertification under § 6 SDG, continuing education and the Bildungs-Pass, the Rundsiegel of § 8 Abs. 5 SDG, withdrawal under § 10 SDG and the insurance duty under § 2a SDG

Examined by the specialist examiners — Prüfungsstandards, sections 3.3 and 3.5

Befundaufnahme, Gutachtensmethodik und Trennungsprinzip

Analysing the assignment, conducting the Befundaufnahme with both parties present, the separation of Befund and Gutachten anchored in § 362 Abs. 1 ZPO, Schlüssigkeit and Nachvollziehbarkeit, hypothetical premises, and the ban on answering legal questions

Examined by the judicial chair — Prüfungsstandards, section 3.5

Gebührenrecht und Haftung

Mühewaltung under § 34 GebAG, attendance under § 35, Aktenstudium under § 36, the Warnpflicht of § 25 Abs. 1a GebAG with its €2,000 and €4,000 thresholds, the four-week claim period of § 38 Abs. 1 GebAG, fee determination under § 39 GebAG, and liability under §§ 1299 and 1300 ABGB and § 288 StGB

How to Pass the Zertifizierungsprüfung für Gerichtssachverständige Exam

What You Need to Know

Passing score: There is no numeric pass mark. The commission issues a reasoned opinion under § 4a Abs. 2 SDG, deciding by majority with the chair's casting vote. The president of the Landesgericht then decides on entry by Bescheid after any further inquiries considered necessary, and the applicant has no right to be entered (§ 4 Abs. 3 SDG).
Assessment: Certification takes place inside the entry procedure of §§ 4 and 4a SDG. The president of the Landesgericht must obtain a reasoned opinion from a commission chaired by a judge, who calls in at least two further qualified and independent specialists nominated by the competent Kammer and by the Hauptverband der Gerichtssachverständigen and, so far as possible, listed for the field. Under § 4a Abs. 2 SDG the applicant is examined orally as a matter of principle and, where expedient, in writing as well, in particular through a Probegutachten; the steps are documented and the commission issues a reasoned opinion, deciding by majority with the chair's casting vote. The Hauptverband's Prüfungsstandards state that the examination is not public, that the specialist examiners question for at least 40 minutes and the judicial chair for at least 20 minutes on procedural law and the Sachverständigenwesen, and that a protocol recording the questions and the substance of the answers is signed by the commission. Where the applicant holds a university teaching qualification in the field, or practises a regulated profession that includes giving opinions, the Sachkunde is not examined.
Time limit: varies-by-module
Exam fee: €400 payable to the competent Landesgericht before the examination, rising by €100 for each examiner beyond three; only a quarter is payable if the candidate withdraws at least three days beforehand or is prevented by an unforeseen or unavoidable event substantiated within 14 days (§ 4a Abs. 3 SDG and § 2 of the BMJ ordinance BGBl. II Nr. 397/2007). The same fee applies on recertification where the commission is instructed.

Keys to Passing

Work through all 100 available questions
Review every answer and explanation
Track weak areas and revisit them
Use our AI tutor for tough concepts

Zertifizierungsprüfung für Gerichtssachverständige Study Tips from Top Performers

1Master the separation of Befund and Gutachten and know where it comes from: § 362 Abs. 1 ZPO requires the opinion to be reasoned and, after an inspection, to open with a description of what was inspected — the Befund.

2Do not confuse the ZPO expert provisions: § 351 governs appointment after hearing the parties on the person, § 357 Abs. 1 the written opinion and its deadline, § 357 Abs. 2 the duty to give oral clarification, § 358 the oath, § 362 Abs. 2 the renewed assessment, and § 354 the sanctions for refusal or delay.

3Know the fee timeline exactly: warn under § 25 Abs. 1a GebAG before the cost ceiling is exceeded, and claim within four weeks of completing the work under § 38 Abs. 1 GebAG — the frequently repeated '14 days under § 34 Abs. 4' is not in the statute.

4Understand the grounds for Befangenheit and the affirmative duty to disclose them at once; a one-sided Befundaufnahme is the classic route to a successful challenge and to an unusable opinion.

5Distinguish the three expert roles: the court-appointed Gerichtssachverständiger as a means of evidence, the Amtssachverständiger of § 52 AVG in administrative proceedings, and the Privatgutachter whose report counts as qualifizierter Parteivortrag.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Austrian court expert certification examination?

It is the examination held inside the entry procedure of §§ 4 and 4a of the Sachverständigen- und Dolmetschergesetz. Before entering an applicant in the Gerichtssachverständigen- und Gerichtsdolmetscherliste for a particular Fachgebiet, the president of the Landesgericht must obtain a reasoned opinion from a commission chaired by a judge and staffed with at least two further independent specialists nominated by the competent Kammer and by the Hauptverband der Gerichtssachverständigen.

What is tested, and by whom?

Two strands. The specialist examiners test expertise clearly above the average of practitioners in the field, professional experience, equipment, and the applicant's grasp of Befundaufnahme and Gutachten methodology. The judicial chair tests procedural law and the Sachverständigenwesen — court organisation, the taking of evidence, expert fees and the Warnpflicht, the Elektronischer Rechtsverkehr, Befangenheit, the qualities of a usable opinion, liability and the general private, commercial and criminal law background. The Hauptverband's Prüfungsstandards indicate minimum durations of 40 and 20 minutes respectively.

How long does the certification last, and what does recertification require?

Under § 6 Abs. 1 SDG the entry is limited to five years and can be extended by five years at a time. The application must be filed at the earliest one year and at the latest three months before expiry (§ 6 Abs. 2 SDG), listing the court proceedings the expert has worked in with file numbers and courts and evidencing continuing education. The decision-making body assesses continued suitability, including trustworthiness, and may obtain a reasoned opinion from the § 4a commission — and must do so where suitability cannot otherwise be reliably assessed (§ 6 Abs. 3 SDG).

What fee rules govern Austrian court experts?

The Gebührenanspruchsgesetz governs. § 34 GebAG sets the Mühewaltungsgebühr at judicial discretion by time and effort and by what the expert would ordinarily earn outside court, with a statutory minimum per started hour; §§ 35 and 36 GebAG cover attendance at hearings and Aktenstudium. § 25 Abs. 1a GebAG obliges the expert to warn the court in good time where the fee will exceed the Kostenvorschuss or, absent one, the value in dispute or €2,000 — €4,000 before a Landesgericht or in a prosecutor's investigation — on pain of losing the excess. The claim itself must be made within four weeks of completing the work under § 38 Abs. 1 GebAG.

Is this practice bank in the same format as the real examination?

No. The real examination is an oral commission examination in German, possibly with a written Probegutachten, and much of it turns on the applicant's own technical field. This bank is an English-language multiple-choice study adaptation of the cross-cutting legal and methodological curriculum. It is not an official translation and cannot substitute for field-specific preparation or for practising the drafting of a Gutachten.