Guiding Principles
28%of exam
Pre-Award
20%of exam
30 QuestionsMarket ResearchRequired SourcesAcquisition StrategySolicitation
Award
26.7%of exam
Post-Award
25.3%of exam
Quick Facts
- Exam
- CON 3990V
- Format
- 150 multiple-choice
- Pass
- 70%
- Time
- 3 hours
- Book
- Closed
- DoD access
- TAS authorization
- Civilian access
- FAI CSOD request
- Delivery
- Pearson VUE
- Retake
- At least 30 days
- DoD attempts
- 3 per 12 months
- Civilian attempts
- 4 before remediation
- Distribution
- 42 / 30 / 40 / 38
Blueprint Counts
42 | 30 | 40 | 38
Guiding: 42Pre-Award: 30Award: 40Post-Award: 38
CO vs COR
CO
- Holds warrant
- Binds Government
- Signs modifications
COR
- Delegated technical duties
- Monitors performance
- Cannot change contract
Authority stays with CO
Current Exam Blueprint
- Guiding Principles
- 42 questions28%
- Pre-Award
- 30 questions20%
- Award
- 40 questions26.7%
- Post-Award
- 38 questions25.3%
- Competency model
- November 2024 model
- Updated exam
- Live March 31, 2026
- Assessment
- Initial readiness measure
- Result
- Pass or fail
Acquisition Lifecycle
Plan | Solicit | Award | Administer | Close
Plan: 7 and 10Solicit: 12, 13, 15Award: 15 and 16Administer: 42 and 46Close: 4 and 49
Candidate Pathways
- Shared assessment
- CON 3990V
- DoD certification
- Contracting Professional
- Civilian certification
- FAC-C Professional
- DoD registration
- Agency TAS authorization
- Civilian registration
- FAI CSOD authorization request
- DoD attempts
- Three per twelve months
- Civilian attempts
- Four before remediation
- Retake wait
- At least thirty days
Integrity + Judgment
- Actual conflict
- Conflict presently exists
- Potential OCI
- Organizational conflict may arise
- Apparent conflict
- Reasonable appearance exists
- Procurement integrity
- Protect source-selection information
- Unauthorized commitment
- Lacks binding authority
- Ratification
- Authorized official approves later
- Gratuity
- Avoid prohibited benefits
- Impartiality
- Disclose covered relationships
FAR Map: Foundations
- Part 1
- System and authority
- Part 2
- Definitions
- Part 3
- Improper practices and conflicts
- Part 4
- Administrative matters
- Part 5
- Publicizing actions
- Part 6
- Competition requirements
- Part 7
- Acquisition planning
- Part 8
- Required sources
- Part 10
- Market research
- Part 12
- Commercial acquisitions
FAR Map: Lifecycle
- Part 13
- Simplified noncommercial procedures
- Part 15
- Contracting by negotiation
- Part 16
- Contract types
- Part 19
- Small business programs
- Part 31
- Cost principles
- Part 33
- Protests and disputes
- Part 42
- Contract administration
- Part 44
- Subcontracting policies
- Part 46
- Quality assurance
- Part 49
- Termination
March 2026 RFO Update
- RFO exam
- Live March 31, 2026
- Negotiations
- Current material exchange term
- Clarifications
- No proposal revision
- Legacy communications category
- Removed under RFO
- Proposal revision
- Follows completed negotiations
- Part 12
- All commercial acquisitions
- Part 13
- Noncommercial above MPT through SAT
- Evaluation
- Use stated factors only
- Class deviations
- Use applicable deviation text
Supply Source Order
Inventory | Excess | FPI | AbilityOne
Inventory firstExcess secondFPI thirdAbilityOne fourth
Offer vs Quotation
Offer
- Binding upon acceptance
- Forms contract
- Submitted to solicitation
Quotation
- Not binding offer
- Invites Government order
- Supplier may accept order
Acceptance versus order
Acquisition Path Picker
- Required source exists→Apply FAR Part 8
- Market facts missing→Perform market research
- Commercial solution fits→Apply FAR Part 12
- Noncommercial over MPT through SAT→Apply FAR Part 13
- Negotiated selection needed→Apply FAR Part 15
- Competition unavailable→Document Part 6 exception
- Small-business opportunity→Apply FAR Part 19
- Strategy settled→Document acquisition plan
Current Acquisition Thresholds
- Micro-purchase
- $15,000General
- Simplified acquisition
- $350,000General
- Certified data
- At least $2.5 million
- Adequate price competition
- Certified data exception
- Commercial products or services
- Generally certified-data exception
- Law or regulation
- Certified data exception
- Approved waiver
- Certified data exception
- Subcontracting plan
- Over $900,000Other-than-small prime
- Construction plan
- Over $2 millionPublic facility
- Threshold effective
- October 1, 2025
Planning + Strategy
- Requirement
- Defines mission need
- Funding
- Must be available and proper
- Market research
- Informs acquisition strategy
- Acquisition plan
- Integrates major decisions
- Competition
- Full and open default
- Justification
- Supports statutory exception
- Set-aside
- Reserves small-business competition
- Presolicitation notice
- Publicizes proposed action
- Sources sought
- Tests market capability
- Evaluation factors
- Match acquisition objectives
Required Source Order
- Specific mandates
- Check FAR 8.101 first
- Agency inventory
- First supply source1
- Excess property
- Second supply source2
- FPI
- Third supply source3
- AbilityOne
- Fourth supply source4
- AbilityOne-listed service
- Mandatory service source
- Required-use contract
- Must use when suitable
- Existing governmentwide contract
- Consider when suitable
- Shared service
- Consider when suitable
- Commercial sources
- Use after mandatory sources
Solicitation + Methods
- Part 12
- Commercial products and services
- Part 13
- Noncommercial above MPT through SAT
- Part 15
- Negotiated acquisitions
- RFP
- Requests contract offers
- RFQ
- Requests nonbinding quotations
- Offer
- Acceptance forms contract
- Quotation
- Not a binding offer
- Amendment
- Changes solicitation before award
- Solicitation
- Requests offers or quotations
Analysis Triad
Price total | Cost elements | Realism probable
Price: totalCost: elementsRealism: probable cost
Price vs Cost Analysis
Price
- Total amount
- No element breakdown
- Competition often supports
Cost
- Individual elements
- Certified data often supports
- Tests allocability and allowability
Total versus elements
Analysis Picker
- Adequate competition→Price analysis
- Cost elements provided→Cost analysis
- Cost-reimbursement offer→Cost realism
- Data threshold met→Certified data(Unless exception applies)
- Commercial product or service→Check certified-data exception
- Price seems excessive→Reasonableness test
- Costs seem understated→Realism test
- Objectives established→Negotiate and document
Contract Type Signals
- FFP
- Price stays fixed
- FPEPA
- Defined economic adjustment
- FPI contract
- Target sharing formulaFixed-price
- CPFF
- Allowable costs plus fixed fee
- CPIF
- Cost incentive sharing
- CPAF
- Subjective award fee
- T&M
- Labor rates plus materials
- Labor-hour
- Labor rates only
- T&M limitation
- No suitable alternative type
- T&M ceiling
- Contractor exceeds at own risk
- IDIQ
- Orders within contract scope
- Risk rule
- Contractor bears FFP cost risk
RFO Exchanges
Clarify without revision | Negotiate then permit revision
Clarify: explain without revisionNegotiate: address material issuesRevision opportunity follows negotiation
Reasonableness vs Realism
Reasonableness
- Is price too high
- Protects Government
- Required award judgment
Realism
- Are costs believable
- Predicts probable cost
- Required for cost-reimbursement
High versus believable
Contract Type Picker
- Stable requirement→FFP
- Economic uncertainty→FPEPA
- Target sharing desired→FPI
- Uncertain allowable costs→CPFF
- Cost incentive desired→CPIF
- Subjective incentive needed→CPAF
- Labor extent unknown→T&M(Only when no other type fits)
- Labor only needed→Labor-hour(Only when no other type fits)
- Recurring uncertain quantity→IDIQ
Pricing + Analysis
- Price analysis
- Evaluates total price
- Cost analysis
- Evaluates cost elements
- Cost realism
- Predicts probable performance cost
- Reasonableness
- Protects against overpricing
- Unbalanced pricing
- Overstated and understated line items
- Certified data
- Current accurate complete
- Other data
- Supports fair pricing
- Technical analysis
- Validates labor and quantities
- Negotiation objective
- Government's initial position
- PNM
- Records negotiated result
Clarification vs Negotiation
Clarification
- Explains proposal aspects
- No proposal revision
- Cannot cure material defects
Negotiation
- Material issues discussed
- Revision opportunity follows
- After competitive range
Revision separates negotiation
Source Selection
- SSA
- Makes selection decision
- SSEB
- Evaluates proposals
- Stated factors
- Control proposal evaluation
- Tradeoff
- Permits higher-priced selection
- LPTA
- Lowest acceptable evaluated price
- Competitive range
- Best suited for negotiation
- Clarification
- No proposal revision
- Negotiation
- Addresses material proposal issues
- Proposal revision
- Opportunity follows completed negotiations
- Debriefing
- Explains award decision
- Responsibility
- Contractor can perform
- Best value
- Optimizes stated factors
LPTA vs Tradeoff
LPTA
- Acceptability only
- Lowest evaluated price
- No strength premiums
Tradeoff
- Relative merits matter
- Higher price permitted
- Rationale required
Acceptability versus relative merit
FFP vs CPFF
FFP
- Price fixed
- Contractor cost risk
- Stable requirement
CPFF
- Allowable costs reimbursed
- Fixed fee
- Government cost risk
Risk follows uncertainty
Convenience vs Default
Convenience
- Government choice
- Fault not required
- Settlement costs possible
Default
- Unexcused contractor failure
- Excess costs possible
- Excusable causes matter
Need versus fault
Post-Award Action Picker
- Direction changes scope→Stop and notify CO
- Within-scope change→Contract modification
- Work fails requirements→Inspection remedies
- Performance endangered→Cure notice
- Default considered→Show-cause notice
- Government need ends→Termination for convenience
- Unexcused contractor failure→Termination for default
- Written demand asserted→Claim process
- Performance complete→Contract closeout
Administration + Quality
- COR delegation
- Written limited authority
- Surveillance
- Monitors contractor performance
- QASP
- Defines surveillance approach
- Inspection
- Examines contract conformance
- Acceptance
- Acknowledges conforming delivery
- Nonconformance
- Apply contractual remedies
- CPARS
- Records contractor performance
- Invoice review
- Verifies payable performance
- Government property
- Track contractor accountability
- Subcontract consent
- CO approval when required
- Privity
- Government lacks subcontract privity
Protest vs Claim
Protest
- Challenges acquisition action
- Preaward or postaward
- Forum deadlines control
Claim
- Contract performance dispute
- Demand asserted as right
- CO decision required
Acquisition versus contract
Changes + Disagreements
- Unilateral mod
- One Government signature
- Bilateral mod
- Both parties sign
- Change order
- Directs within-scope change
- Constructive change
- Government conduct changes performance
- REA
- Requests equitable adjustment
- Claim
- Written demand asserted as right
- CO final decision
- Triggers appeal rights
- Cure notice
- At least ten days remain
- Show-cause notice
- Termination appears appropriate
- Protest
- Challenges acquisition action
Unilateral vs Bilateral Modification
Unilateral
- One Government signature
- Exercises existing authority
- May direct change
Bilateral
- Both parties sign
- Reflects agreement
- Often settles adjustment
Authority versus agreement
Termination + Closeout
- Termination convenience
- Contractor fault not required
- Termination default
- Unexcused contractor failure
- Excusable delay
- May prevent default liability
- Excess costs
- Possible default remedy
- Settlement proposal
- Proposes allowable termination costs
- Termination notice
- Stops authorized work
- Final payment
- Required before closeout
- Release
- Extinguishes covered claims
- Property clearance
- Resolves Government property
- Commercial termination
- Cause or convenience
- Closeout
- Confirms all obligations complete
Common Traps
Certification vs warrant
Certification shows competence ≠ Warrant grants authority
FAR vs DFARS
FAR is Government-wide ≠ DFARS supplements DoD
Quotation vs offer
Quotation is nonbinding ≠ Offer binds upon acceptance
COR authority
COR monitors delegated duties ≠ COR cannot change contract
Reasonableness vs realism
Reasonableness tests high price ≠ Realism tests believable costs
Justification vs research
Research informs strategy ≠ Justification supports competition exception
Clarification vs revision
Clarification explains without revision ≠ Revision opportunity follows negotiation
Convenience vs fault
Convenience needs no fault ≠ Default needs unexcused failure
Direction vs authority
Contractor request is not direction ≠ Only CO changes contract
FPI acronym
Source: Federal Prison Industries ≠ Type: fixed-price incentive
RFO terminology
Use negotiations now ≠ Legacy communications category removed
Last Minute
- 1.Counts: 42 / 30 / 40 / 38
- 2.150 questions; 70%; three hours
- 3.Closed book; internalize FAR map
- 4.March 2026 exam uses RFO
- 5.MPT $15K; SAT $350K
- 6.Certified data at least $2.5M
- 7.Part 12 means commercial
- 8.Part 13: noncommercial above MPT
- 9.Part 15 uses negotiations
- 10.Supply order ends at AbilityOne
- 11.CO binds; COR monitors
- 12.Price total; cost elements
- 13.Realism predicts probable cost
- 14.LPTA acceptability; tradeoff merits
- 15.Clarification allows no revision
- 16.Convenience choice; default fault
- 17.Retakes wait at least 30 days
- 18.DoD: three per 12 months
- 19.FAI: four before remediation
Same family resources
Explore More Federal Acquisition Certifications
Continue into nearby exams from the same family. Each card keeps practice questions, study guides, flashcards, videos, and articles in one place.