Six Sigma Foundations
Not publishedof exam
Lean Concepts
Not publishedof exam
DMAIC + Project Tools
Not publishedof exam
Statistics + Measurement
Not publishedof exam
SPC + Capability
Not publishedof exam
Quick Facts
- Exam
- CSSC Green Belt
- Path
- Standard Exam
- Questions
- 100
- Types
- Multiple choice, true/false
- Time
- 2 hours
- Pass
- 280 of 400 points
- Percent
- 70%
- Books
- Open book
- Fee
- $195 USD
- Attempts
- 3 within 1 year
- Prerequisites
- None
- Project
- Not required
- Validity
- No expiration
- Blueprint
- 24 sections, no weights
SIPOC
Suppliers Inputs Process Outputs Customers
Belt Levels + Roles
- Belt order
- White, Yellow, Green, Black, Master
- Green Belt
- Collects data under Black Belt
- Green Belt scope
- Keeps day job; smaller projects
- Black Belt
- Directs Green Belt analysis
- Master Black Belt
- Reviews analysis before presenting
- Sponsor / champion
- Senior leader owning the resultOwns
- Champion duties
- Funds, resources, corporate politics
- Process owner
- Metrics, procedures, control plan
Related Quality Methods
- Six Sigma
- Reduces variation and defects
- Lean
- Removes waste (muda)
- Kaizen
- Change for the better
- TQM
- Early enterprise-wide quality program
- BPR
- Radical technical process redesign
- Rummler-Brache
- Nine Boxes performance model
- Nine Boxes grid
- Performer, process, organization levels
- JumpStart
- Fast fix, no statisticsLow risk only
Problem + Quality Framing
- y = f(x)
- Output caused by inputs
- 5 Whys
- Drill past the symptom
- Problem statement
- Where, when, magnitude, metric
- Statement excludes
- No cause, no solution
- VOC
- Voice of the customer
- CTQ tree
- Need, drivers, measurable requirements
- CoPQ
- Cost of poor quality
- Internal failure
- Caught before delivery
- External failure
- Found by the customer
Project + Team Setup
- Project charter
- Output of Define phase
- Charter contents
- Problem, CTQs, roles, duration
- SIPOC
- Suppliers Inputs Process Outputs Customers
- Is / Is Not matrix
- Fixes scope boundaries early
- Stakeholder analysis
- Power versus interest grid
- Project viability model
- 15 weighted selection criteria
- Critical path method
- Dependencies set the schedule
- Tollgate review
- Sponsor approves phase exit
5S Phases
Sort, Straighten, Shine, Standardize, Sustain
Type I vs Type II Muda
Type I
- Non-value-added
- Currently essential
- Make it efficient
Type II
- Non-value-added
- Not essential
- Remove immediately
Streamline vs delete
Waste Picker
- Made too early→Overproduction
- Stock stacks before step→Inventory(Bottleneck)
- Fixing defective output→Correction(Rework)
- People walking needlessly→Motion
- Parts moved needlessly→Conveyance
- Idle between steps→Waiting
- Steps customer never values→Over-processing
- Skills going unused→Talent(CSSC addition)
Seven Muda + Extras
- Overproduction
- Too much, too soon
- Correction
- Rework and defect fixing
- Inventory
- Stock piling before a step
- Motion
- Needless movement of people
- Conveyance
- Needless movement of material
- Over-processing
- More work than required
- Waiting
- Idle time between steps
- CSSC additions
- Talent, ideas, capital
- Type I muda
- Non-value-added but currently essential
- Type II muda
- Non-essential; remove immediately
Seven Muda
Overproduce, Correct, Inventory, Motion, Convey, Process, Wait
Lean Tools + Process
- 5S
- Sort Straighten Shine Standardize Sustain
- Sustain
- Hardest phase; needs commitment
- Just-in-time
- Produce only what's needed
- Value stream map
- Exposes waste across process
- Bottleneck
- Slowest step caps output
- Smaller batches
- Cut lead time, inventory
- Process components
- Inputs outputs events tasks decisions
- Process definition layers
- Steps, time, dependencies, resources
- Poka yoke
- Mistake-proofs the process
DMAIC Order
Define Measure Analyze Improve Control
DMAIC vs DMADV
DMAIC
- Improves existing process
- Define Measure Analyze
- Improve then Control
DMADV
- Creates new process
- Define Measure Analyze
- Design then Verify
Fix existing vs design new
DMAIC Phase Deliverables
- Define
- Charter, SIPOC, scope
- Measure
- Baseline data, FMEA, metrics
- Analyze
- Root causes, validated statistically
- Improve
- Select, pilot, implement
- Control
- Control plan, SPC, handoff
- Design (DMADV)
- Build the new process
- Verify (DMADV)
- Confirm the design performs
- Phase purpose
- Eat the elephant gradually
FMEA RPN
RPN = Severity x Occurrence x Detection
Repeatability vs Reproducibility
Repeatability
- One appraiser
- Same part, same gauge
- Same reading twice
Reproducibility
- Different appraisers
- Same part, same gauge
- Do they agree
One person vs several people
Analyze + Improve Tools
- Fishbone bones
- People Process Materials Procedure
- Optional bones
- Equipment and Environment
- Pareto principle
- 20% causes, 80% effects
- FMEA RPN
- Severity x Occurrence x Detection
- Solutions selection matrix
- Ranks fixes against causes
- Cost benefit analysis
- Weighs gain against spend
- Pilot
- Limited live trial first
- Control plan
- Who monitors what, when
- Visual management
- Status visible at a glance
- Gage R&R
- Tests the measurement system
Type I vs Type II
Type I (alpha)
- Reject a true null
- False alarm
- Set by alpha
Type II (beta)
- Keep a false null
- Missed difference
- Power = 1 - beta
False alarm vs missed signal
Hypothesis Test Picker
- One proportion versus target→1-Proportion test(Discrete data)
- Two proportions compared→2-Proportion test(Discrete data)
- Mean versus target, normal→1-Sample t test(Small sample)
- Same group before, after→Paired t test(Same x factor)
- Means of two populations→2-Sample t test(Different x factors)
- Comparing variance or deviation→Chi-Square test(Also 1-Variance test)
- Median versus target, non-normal→1-Sample Wilcoxon(Fairly symmetrical data)
- Non-normal and badly skewed→1-Sample Sign test(Wilcoxon alternative)
- Two medians, non-normal→Mann-Whitney test(Two x factors)
Defect + Yield Formulas
- DPMO
- (defects / opportunities) x 1,000,000
- DPMO example
- (2 / 900) x 1,000,000 = 2,222
- DPU
- defects / units sampled
- DPU example
- 9 / 50 = 0.18
- Yield
- (opportunities - defects) / opportunities
- FTY
- good units / units entering
- RTY
- (entering - scrap - rework) / entering
- Multi-step yield
- Multiply each step's yield
- Why RTY is lower
- It charges rework as loss
Discrete vs Continuous Data
Discrete
- Nominal, ordinal, binary
- Counted categories
- Needs larger samples
Continuous
- Measured in units
- More precise
- Collect this where possible
Continuous converts down, not up
Distribution Picker
- Pass or fail, fixed trials→Binomial(Discrete)
- Metric reads 'per unit'→Poisson(Discrete counts)
- Trials until first defect→Geometric(Waiting time)
- Time between failures→Exponential(Continuous)
- Skewed durations above zero→Lognormal(Continuous)
- Reliability, shape varies→Weibull(Distribution family)
- Symmetrical continuous data→Normal(Still test normality)
Sigma Conversion Table
- 99.7450% yield
- 2,550 DPMO = 4.3 sigma
- 99.6540% yield
- 3,460 DPMO = 4.2 sigma
- 99.5340% yield
- 4,550 DPMO = 4.1 sigma
- 99.3790% yield
- 6,210 DPMO = 4.0 sigma
- 99.1810% yield
- 8,190 DPMO = 3.9 sigma
- Six sigma
- 3.4 DPMO, 99.99966% yieldGoal
- Worked example
- 99.5% yield = 4.0-4.1 sigma
FTY vs RTY
FTY
- Good units / units in
- Ignores rework
- Looks better
RTY
- Subtracts scrap and rework
- Probability of defect-free unit
- Always lower
Rework hidden vs rework charged
Distribution Basics
- Normal
- Symmetrical continuous bell curve
- Binomial
- Two outcomes, independent trials
- Poisson
- Counts per time or space
- Poisson clue
- The word 'per' in metric
- Geometric
- Trials before first occurrence
- Exponential
- Arrival times, between failures
- Lognormal
- Right-skewed durations above zero
- Weibull
- Family imitating other shapes
- Logistic
- Approximates the normal curve
- Gamma
- Always skewed to right
Hypothesis Testing Terms
- H0
- Null: no difference exists
- Ha
- Alternative: a difference exists
- p-value rule
- p below alpha, reject H0
- Fail to reject
- Not proof H0 true
- Alpha
- Type I error risk
- Beta
- Type II error risk
- Power
- 1 - beta
- Beta 0.20
- Power of 0.80
- Delta
- Smallest difference worth detecting
- Sample size inputs
- Alpha, beta, delta
- Random sampling
- Required, or inference fails
Correlation + Regression
- Scatter diagram
- Shows relationship, never causation
- r range
- -1 through 1
- r near 0
- No relationship at all
- r at 1
- Every point on line
- Pearson
- Usual correlation calculation
- Regression
- Predicts y from x
- Chi-squared goodness-of-fit
- Tests data for normality
- Beyond 3 sigma
- Under 1% of data
Chart Data Split
Variable: X-bar, I-MR. Attribute: p, np, u, c
Control vs Capability
In control
- Low variation
- Control limits from data
- Says nothing about spec
Capable
- Low variation too
- Centered on requirement
- Measured by Cpk
Steady vs steady and right
Control Chart Picker
- Continuous, subgroups under 8→X-bar & R(Mean plus range)
- Continuous, subgroups over 8→X-bar & S(Sigma easily calculated)
- Continuous, no sensible subgroups→I-MR(Individual points)
- Data slow or costly→I-MR(Cannot wait for subgroups)
- Discrete, percent defective→p chart(Sample size varies)
- Discrete, percent, constant size→np chart(Counts nonconforming units)
- Defect counts, size varies→u chart(Defects per unit)
- Defect counts, constant size→c chart(Defects per sample)
Capability + Control Limits
- Sigma level
- Center to nearest specification limit
- Sigma level formula
- (USL - median) / sigma
- Take which value
- The smaller of two
- Cpk
- sigma level / 3
- Cpk 1.33
- Equals sigma level 4
- Cpk 2.0
- Equals sigma level 6
- UCL
- 3 sigma above center
- LCL
- 3 sigma below center
- Zone C
- Nearest the center line
- Zone A
- Outermost, beside control limits
Common vs Special Cause
Common cause
- Built into process
- Expected variation
- Fix the system
Special cause
- Outside normal expectation
- Bad headset, new hire
- Investigate the event
Process noise vs outside event
Out-of-Control Tests
- Test 1
- One point beyond limitsAct now
- Test 2
- Nine in a row, one side
- Test 3
- Six points trending steadily
- Test 4
- Fourteen points alternating direction
- Test 5
- Two of three in A
- Test 6
- Four of five in B
- Test 7
- Fifteen in a row, C
- Test 8
- Eight in a row, skipping C
Common Traps
Sigma level vs priority
Sigma flags worst variation ≠ Cost sets the priority
FTY vs RTY
FTY hides rework ≠ RTY charges rework
Control vs spec limits
Control limits from data ≠ Spec limits from customer
Correlation vs causation
Scatter shows relationship ≠ It never proves cause
Failing to reject
Not proof H0 true ≠ Only insufficient evidence
p charts vs u charts
p tracks defective units ≠ u tracks defect counts
DMAIC vs DMADV
DMAIC improves existing ≠ DMADV designs new
Alpha vs beta
Alpha rejects true null ≠ Beta keeps false null
Cpk vs sigma level
Cpk is sigma / 3 ≠ Cpk 1.33 equals 4
Last Minute
- 1.DPMO = defects / opportunities x 1,000,000
- 2.RTY subtracts scrap and rework
- 3.Multiply step yields for overall
- 4.Cpk = sigma level / 3
- 5.Cpk 1.33 equals sigma level 4
- 6.Control limits sit 3 sigma out
- 7.Subgroups under 8: X-bar & R
- 8.Subgroups over 8: X-bar & S
- 9.No subgroups: use I-MR chart
- 10.p and np track defective units
- 11.u and c track defect counts
- 12.np and c need constant size
- 13.p below alpha means reject H0
- 14.Power = 1 - beta
- 15.Seven muda plus talent, ideas, capital
- 16.5S ends with Sustain
- 17.Charter is the Define output
- 18.Fishbone: People Process Materials Procedure
- 19.Exam: 100 questions, 2 hours
- 20.Pass needs 280 of 400
- 21.Open book: bring your manual
Explore More Council for Six Sigma Certification
Continue into nearby exams from the same family. Each card keeps practice questions, study guides, flashcards, videos, and articles in one place.
