Cheat sheet

CSSC Green Belt Cheat Sheet

Practice Questions

Quick Facts

Exam
CSSC Green Belt
Path
Standard Exam
Questions
100
Types
Multiple choice, true/false
Time
2 hours
Pass
280 of 400 points
Percent
70%
Books
Open book
Fee
$195 USD
Attempts
3 within 1 year
Prerequisites
None
Project
Not required
Validity
No expiration
Blueprint
24 sections, no weights

SIPOC

Suppliers Inputs Process Outputs Customers

Drafted in DefineOne brainstorming sessionScales to any process

Belt Levels + Roles

Belt order
White, Yellow, Green, Black, Master
Green Belt
Collects data under Black Belt
Green Belt scope
Keeps day job; smaller projects
Black Belt
Directs Green Belt analysis
Master Black Belt
Reviews analysis before presenting
Sponsor / champion
Senior leader owning the resultOwns
Champion duties
Funds, resources, corporate politics
Process owner
Metrics, procedures, control plan

Related Quality Methods

Six Sigma
Reduces variation and defects
Lean
Removes waste (muda)
Kaizen
Change for the better
TQM
Early enterprise-wide quality program
BPR
Radical technical process redesign
Rummler-Brache
Nine Boxes performance model
Nine Boxes grid
Performer, process, organization levels
JumpStart
Fast fix, no statisticsLow risk only

Problem + Quality Framing

y = f(x)
Output caused by inputs
5 Whys
Drill past the symptom
Problem statement
Where, when, magnitude, metric
Statement excludes
No cause, no solution
VOC
Voice of the customer
CTQ tree
Need, drivers, measurable requirements
CoPQ
Cost of poor quality
Internal failure
Caught before delivery
External failure
Found by the customer

Project + Team Setup

Project charter
Output of Define phase
Charter contents
Problem, CTQs, roles, duration
SIPOC
Suppliers Inputs Process Outputs Customers
Is / Is Not matrix
Fixes scope boundaries early
Stakeholder analysis
Power versus interest grid
Project viability model
15 weighted selection criteria
Critical path method
Dependencies set the schedule
Tollgate review
Sponsor approves phase exit

5S Phases

Sort, Straighten, Shine, Standardize, Sustain

Sort: remove clutterStraighten: a place for eachShine: clean and inspectStandardize: written standardSustain: everyone commits

Type I vs Type II Muda

Type I

  • Non-value-added
  • Currently essential
  • Make it efficient

Type II

  • Non-value-added
  • Not essential
  • Remove immediately

Streamline vs delete

Waste Picker

  1. Made too earlyOverproduction
  2. Stock stacks before stepInventory(Bottleneck)
  3. Fixing defective outputCorrection(Rework)
  4. People walking needlesslyMotion
  5. Parts moved needlesslyConveyance
  6. Idle between stepsWaiting
  7. Steps customer never valuesOver-processing
  8. Skills going unusedTalent(CSSC addition)

Seven Muda + Extras

Overproduction
Too much, too soon
Correction
Rework and defect fixing
Inventory
Stock piling before a step
Motion
Needless movement of people
Conveyance
Needless movement of material
Over-processing
More work than required
Waiting
Idle time between steps
CSSC additions
Talent, ideas, capital
Type I muda
Non-value-added but currently essential
Type II muda
Non-essential; remove immediately

Seven Muda

Overproduce, Correct, Inventory, Motion, Convey, Process, Wait

Plus talentPlus ideasPlus capital

Lean Tools + Process

5S
Sort Straighten Shine Standardize Sustain
Sustain
Hardest phase; needs commitment
Just-in-time
Produce only what's needed
Value stream map
Exposes waste across process
Bottleneck
Slowest step caps output
Smaller batches
Cut lead time, inventory
Process components
Inputs outputs events tasks decisions
Process definition layers
Steps, time, dependencies, resources
Poka yoke
Mistake-proofs the process

DMAIC Order

Define Measure Analyze Improve Control

Define: charterMeasure: baselineAnalyze: root causeImprove: pilotControl: control plan

DMAIC vs DMADV

DMAIC

  • Improves existing process
  • Define Measure Analyze
  • Improve then Control

DMADV

  • Creates new process
  • Define Measure Analyze
  • Design then Verify

Fix existing vs design new

DMAIC Phase Deliverables

Define
Charter, SIPOC, scope
Measure
Baseline data, FMEA, metrics
Analyze
Root causes, validated statistically
Improve
Select, pilot, implement
Control
Control plan, SPC, handoff
Design (DMADV)
Build the new process
Verify (DMADV)
Confirm the design performs
Phase purpose
Eat the elephant gradually

FMEA RPN

RPN = Severity x Occurrence x Detection

Score each 1-10Highest RPN firstRescore after the fix

Repeatability vs Reproducibility

Repeatability

  • One appraiser
  • Same part, same gauge
  • Same reading twice

Reproducibility

  • Different appraisers
  • Same part, same gauge
  • Do they agree

One person vs several people

Analyze + Improve Tools

Fishbone bones
People Process Materials Procedure
Optional bones
Equipment and Environment
Pareto principle
20% causes, 80% effects
FMEA RPN
Severity x Occurrence x Detection
Solutions selection matrix
Ranks fixes against causes
Cost benefit analysis
Weighs gain against spend
Pilot
Limited live trial first
Control plan
Who monitors what, when
Visual management
Status visible at a glance
Gage R&R
Tests the measurement system

Type I vs Type II

Type I (alpha)

  • Reject a true null
  • False alarm
  • Set by alpha

Type II (beta)

  • Keep a false null
  • Missed difference
  • Power = 1 - beta

False alarm vs missed signal

Hypothesis Test Picker

  1. One proportion versus target1-Proportion test(Discrete data)
  2. Two proportions compared2-Proportion test(Discrete data)
  3. Mean versus target, normal1-Sample t test(Small sample)
  4. Same group before, afterPaired t test(Same x factor)
  5. Means of two populations2-Sample t test(Different x factors)
  6. Comparing variance or deviationChi-Square test(Also 1-Variance test)
  7. Median versus target, non-normal1-Sample Wilcoxon(Fairly symmetrical data)
  8. Non-normal and badly skewed1-Sample Sign test(Wilcoxon alternative)
  9. Two medians, non-normalMann-Whitney test(Two x factors)

Defect + Yield Formulas

DPMO
(defects / opportunities) x 1,000,000
DPMO example
(2 / 900) x 1,000,000 = 2,222
DPU
defects / units sampled
DPU example
9 / 50 = 0.18
Yield
(opportunities - defects) / opportunities
FTY
good units / units entering
RTY
(entering - scrap - rework) / entering
Multi-step yield
Multiply each step's yield
Why RTY is lower
It charges rework as loss

Discrete vs Continuous Data

Discrete

  • Nominal, ordinal, binary
  • Counted categories
  • Needs larger samples

Continuous

  • Measured in units
  • More precise
  • Collect this where possible

Continuous converts down, not up

Distribution Picker

  1. Pass or fail, fixed trialsBinomial(Discrete)
  2. Metric reads 'per unit'Poisson(Discrete counts)
  3. Trials until first defectGeometric(Waiting time)
  4. Time between failuresExponential(Continuous)
  5. Skewed durations above zeroLognormal(Continuous)
  6. Reliability, shape variesWeibull(Distribution family)
  7. Symmetrical continuous dataNormal(Still test normality)

Sigma Conversion Table

99.7450% yield
2,550 DPMO = 4.3 sigma
99.6540% yield
3,460 DPMO = 4.2 sigma
99.5340% yield
4,550 DPMO = 4.1 sigma
99.3790% yield
6,210 DPMO = 4.0 sigma
99.1810% yield
8,190 DPMO = 3.9 sigma
Six sigma
3.4 DPMO, 99.99966% yieldGoal
Worked example
99.5% yield = 4.0-4.1 sigma

FTY vs RTY

FTY

  • Good units / units in
  • Ignores rework
  • Looks better

RTY

  • Subtracts scrap and rework
  • Probability of defect-free unit
  • Always lower

Rework hidden vs rework charged

Distribution Basics

Normal
Symmetrical continuous bell curve
Binomial
Two outcomes, independent trials
Poisson
Counts per time or space
Poisson clue
The word 'per' in metric
Geometric
Trials before first occurrence
Exponential
Arrival times, between failures
Lognormal
Right-skewed durations above zero
Weibull
Family imitating other shapes
Logistic
Approximates the normal curve
Gamma
Always skewed to right

Hypothesis Testing Terms

H0
Null: no difference exists
Ha
Alternative: a difference exists
p-value rule
p below alpha, reject H0
Fail to reject
Not proof H0 true
Alpha
Type I error risk
Beta
Type II error risk
Power
1 - beta
Beta 0.20
Power of 0.80
Delta
Smallest difference worth detecting
Sample size inputs
Alpha, beta, delta
Random sampling
Required, or inference fails

Correlation + Regression

Scatter diagram
Shows relationship, never causation
r range
-1 through 1
r near 0
No relationship at all
r at 1
Every point on line
Pearson
Usual correlation calculation
Regression
Predicts y from x
Chi-squared goodness-of-fit
Tests data for normality
Beyond 3 sigma
Under 1% of data

Chart Data Split

Variable: X-bar, I-MR. Attribute: p, np, u, c

p, np: defective unitsu, c: defect countsnp, c: constant size

Control vs Capability

In control

  • Low variation
  • Control limits from data
  • Says nothing about spec

Capable

  • Low variation too
  • Centered on requirement
  • Measured by Cpk

Steady vs steady and right

Control Chart Picker

  1. Continuous, subgroups under 8X-bar & R(Mean plus range)
  2. Continuous, subgroups over 8X-bar & S(Sigma easily calculated)
  3. Continuous, no sensible subgroupsI-MR(Individual points)
  4. Data slow or costlyI-MR(Cannot wait for subgroups)
  5. Discrete, percent defectivep chart(Sample size varies)
  6. Discrete, percent, constant sizenp chart(Counts nonconforming units)
  7. Defect counts, size variesu chart(Defects per unit)
  8. Defect counts, constant sizec chart(Defects per sample)

Capability + Control Limits

Sigma level
Center to nearest specification limit
Sigma level formula
(USL - median) / sigma
Take which value
The smaller of two
Cpk
sigma level / 3
Cpk 1.33
Equals sigma level 4
Cpk 2.0
Equals sigma level 6
UCL
3 sigma above center
LCL
3 sigma below center
Zone C
Nearest the center line
Zone A
Outermost, beside control limits

Common vs Special Cause

Common cause

  • Built into process
  • Expected variation
  • Fix the system

Special cause

  • Outside normal expectation
  • Bad headset, new hire
  • Investigate the event

Process noise vs outside event

Out-of-Control Tests

Test 1
One point beyond limitsAct now
Test 2
Nine in a row, one side
Test 3
Six points trending steadily
Test 4
Fourteen points alternating direction
Test 5
Two of three in A
Test 6
Four of five in B
Test 7
Fifteen in a row, C
Test 8
Eight in a row, skipping C

Common Traps

Sigma level vs priority

Sigma flags worst variation Cost sets the priority

FTY vs RTY

FTY hides rework RTY charges rework

Control vs spec limits

Control limits from data Spec limits from customer

Correlation vs causation

Scatter shows relationship It never proves cause

Failing to reject

Not proof H0 true Only insufficient evidence

p charts vs u charts

p tracks defective units u tracks defect counts

DMAIC vs DMADV

DMAIC improves existing DMADV designs new

Alpha vs beta

Alpha rejects true null Beta keeps false null

Cpk vs sigma level

Cpk is sigma / 3 Cpk 1.33 equals 4

Last Minute

  1. 1.DPMO = defects / opportunities x 1,000,000
  2. 2.RTY subtracts scrap and rework
  3. 3.Multiply step yields for overall
  4. 4.Cpk = sigma level / 3
  5. 5.Cpk 1.33 equals sigma level 4
  6. 6.Control limits sit 3 sigma out
  7. 7.Subgroups under 8: X-bar & R
  8. 8.Subgroups over 8: X-bar & S
  9. 9.No subgroups: use I-MR chart
  10. 10.p and np track defective units
  11. 11.u and c track defect counts
  12. 12.np and c need constant size
  13. 13.p below alpha means reject H0
  14. 14.Power = 1 - beta
  15. 15.Seven muda plus talent, ideas, capital
  16. 16.5S ends with Sustain
  17. 17.Charter is the Define output
  18. 18.Fishbone: People Process Materials Procedure
  19. 19.Exam: 100 questions, 2 hours
  20. 20.Pass needs 280 of 400
  21. 21.Open book: bring your manual
Same family resources

Explore More Council for Six Sigma Certification

Continue into nearby exams from the same family. Each card keeps practice questions, study guides, flashcards, videos, and articles in one place.