7.1 Remote Online Notarization Overview
Key Takeaways
- Utah authorized Remote Online Notarization (RON) effective November 1, 2019 under House Bill 52, making it one of the earliest RON-enabled states
- RON lets a notary perform an act over live, two-way audio-visual technology instead of requiring the signer's physical presence
- The remote notary must be physically located in Utah during the session; the principal (signer) may be anywhere with internet access
- Utah RON is governed by Utah Code Title 46, Chapter 1 and Administrative Rule R623-100, administered by the Lieutenant Governor's Office
- The maximum fee for a remote notarial act is $25, versus $10 for a traditional in-person act
What Remote Online Notarization Is
Remote Online Notarization (RON) is a notarial act in which the principal (the person whose signature is being notarized) appears before the notary over live, two-way audio-visual communication rather than in person. Utah authorized RON through House Bill 52 (2019), effective November 1, 2019, placing it among the first dozen states to legalize fully remote acts. The rules now live in Utah Code Title 46, Chapter 1 and the Lieutenant Governor's administrative rule R623-100 (Remote Notarization).
Unlike traditional notarization, every RON act is performed on electronic documents, signed with an electronic signature, sealed with an electronic seal, and recorded start-to-finish. Identity is confirmed not by eyeballing a driver license across a desk but through credential analysis plus dynamic knowledge-based authentication (KBA) run by the technology platform.
Traditional vs. Remote at a Glance
| Aspect | Traditional (in-person) | Remote (RON) |
|---|---|---|
| Signer location | Physically before the notary | Anywhere with internet |
| Notary location | Physically in Utah | Physically in Utah |
| Document | Paper | Electronic only |
| Seal | Inked rubber/embosser stamp | Electronic (tamper-evident) seal |
| Signature | Wet ink | Electronic signature |
| Identity proof | ID, personal knowledge, or credible witness | Credential analysis + KBA |
| Recording | Not required | Mandatory audio-video recording |
| Maximum fee | $10 per act | $25 per act |
The Notary-Stays-in-Utah Rule
The single most-tested location fact: the remote notary must be physically present in Utah at the moment of the act. This holds even when the signer is in Florida, overseas, or on a military base abroad. The notary's commission is a grant of Utah authority and does not travel with the laptop. By contrast, the principal may be located anywhere — another state or another country — so long as the connection supports continuous live video and audio.
A worked scenario: a Utah RON notary in Salt Lake City connects with a signer vacationing in Cancun. The act is valid because the notary is in Utah. If that same notary were attending a conference in Las Vegas and tried to perform the act from a Nevada hotel, the act would be void — the notary, not the signer, broke the location rule.
What Acts RON Covers
RON may be used for the core notarial acts:
- Acknowledgments — by far the most common RON use case, especially in real-estate and lending closings.
- Jurats — the oath or affirmation is administered live on camera before the signature.
- Oaths and affirmations — administered remotely with the affiant visible and audible.
- Signature witnessing — the notary watches the signer execute the electronic document in real time.
Common Traps
- Believing the signer must be in Utah. It is the notary who must be in Utah; the signer can be anywhere.
- Assuming RON is automatically accepted everywhere. Some lenders, title companies, or county recorders may still demand traditional or in-person electronic notarization (IPEN); always confirm acceptance with the receiving party first.
- Confusing RON with electronic notarization in-person: e-notarization (IPEN) still requires physical presence but uses electronic documents. RON removes physical presence entirely.
- Quoting the wrong fee — $10 is the in-person cap; $25 is the RON cap. The higher fee reflects platform and technology costs.
How Utah's Framework Fits the National Picture
Utah's RON law predates the federal SECURE Notarization Act push and the model Revised Uniform Law on Notarial Acts (RULONA) amendments that many states later adopted. Because Utah moved early (2019), its statute and the operational rule R623-100 were drafted in parallel with the Mortgage Industry Standards Maintenance Organization (MISMO) technical standards that lenders rely on, which is why Utah RON closings are widely accepted in real-estate and title workflows.
The interstate recognition principle matters on the exam: a notarial act validly performed under Utah law is generally recognized in other states under each state's recognition statute, the same way a wet-ink Utah acknowledgment is honored elsewhere. The recognizing state looks at whether the act was lawful where performed — and for RON, that means performed by a Utah notary physically in Utah. This is another reason the notary-in-Utah rule is non-negotiable: it is the hook that makes the act portable.
Documents and Edge Cases
Not every document is a comfortable fit for RON, even when the act type is permitted:
| Situation | Practical consideration |
|---|---|
| Recorded real-estate deeds | County recorder and title underwriter must accept electronic + RON format |
| Wills | Many estate practitioners still prefer traditional execution; confirm before relying on RON |
| Out-of-country signers | Time-zone scheduling and ID type (foreign passport) must be supported by the platform |
| I-9 employment forms | Federal acceptance of remote notarization is separate from state notary law |
The recurring lesson: RON authority is a state grant; acceptance is decided by the receiving party — a recorder, lender, court, or federal agency. A notary who confirms acceptance up front avoids a void or rejected act.
During a Utah remote online notarization, where must each party be located?
What is the maximum fee a Utah notary may charge for a remote online notarial act?
Under which Utah law did Remote Online Notarization first become effective?