1.4 Oaths and Affirmations
Key Takeaways
- Oaths and affirmations are spoken pledges of truthfulness that can be standalone notarial acts with no document
- An oath invokes a supreme being; an affirmation does not — and they carry identical legal weight
- Common standalone uses include swearing in witnesses, jurors, deponents, and public officials
- The pledge must be administered verbally and answered verbally — a nod or written statement is not enough
- Refusing to offer an affirmation can violate the signer's First Amendment rights
What Oaths and Affirmations Are
An oath and an affirmation are notarial acts in which a person makes a solemn, spoken pledge to tell the truth. They are the truthfulness step inside every jurat, but they can also be performed standalone — as a complete notarial act with no document attached. The Revised Uniform Law on Notarial Acts lists "administering an oath or affirmation" as its own authorized act for exactly this reason.
Oath
A pledge made with reference to a supreme being or higher power:
"Do you solemnly swear that the testimony you are about to give is the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God?"
Affirmation
A pledge of equal solemnity made with no religious reference:
"Do you solemnly affirm, under penalty of perjury, that the testimony you are about to give is the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth?"
Legal Equivalency and Its Constitutional Basis
Oaths and affirmations carry identical legal weight. This is not a courtesy — it is rooted in the First Amendment, which protects religious freedom, and is reinforced by Article VI of the Constitution, which permits "oath or affirmation" for federal officeholders. No one may be compelled to invoke a deity to give sworn testimony.
| Aspect | Oath | Affirmation |
|---|---|---|
| Legal weight | Full force of law | Full force of law |
| Religious reference | Yes | No |
| Penalty for falsehood | Perjury | Perjury |
| Constitutional protection | — | First Amendment / Article VI |
| Signer's right to choose | Yes | Yes |
Key principle: a notary must never refuse to administer an affirmation in place of an oath. Doing so risks violating the person's constitutional rights and breaches the notary's duty of impartiality.
Standalone Uses
When there is no document, oaths and affirmations are commonly administered to:
- Swear in witnesses at depositions, hearings, or trials
- Administer an oath of office to elected or appointed officials
- Swear in jurors for grand jury or trial service
- Take verbal sworn testimony when nothing is in writing
- Place a person under oath in an insurance investigation before a recorded statement
Procedure for a standalone oath or affirmation
- The person appears before the notary.
- The notary identifies the person (if state law requires it).
- The notary administers the oath or affirmation verbally.
- The person answers aloud — "I do" or "I swear/affirm."
- The notary records the act in the journal where required.
No seal is affixed. Because there is no document to stamp, the journal entry is the official record of a standalone oath. This is a frequent exam trap — there is nothing to seal.
Elements of a Proper Oath or Affirmation
A validly administered pledge has four elements:
- Solemnity — delivered seriously and formally, not casually.
- Verbal administration — the notary speaks the pledge aloud.
- Verbal response — the person answers aloud and affirmatively.
- Specificity — the pledge identifies what is being sworn to (the document, the testimony about to be given, the duties of an office).
What is NOT sufficient
- A silent nod, thumbs-up, or other gesture
- A written statement that the person "agrees to tell the truth"
- Stamping a document without ever speaking the oath
- A vague "You swear?" without the full, formal wording
The exchange must be a real, two-way verbal act. If a signer cannot speak, state law and accommodation rules (e.g., a sign-language interpreter the signer selects) govern — but the notary may not simply skip the verbal element.
Sample Wording by Situation
For a jurat (truth of a document's contents)
Oath: "Do you solemnly swear that the statements in this document are true and correct, so help you God?" Affirmation: "Do you solemnly affirm, under penalty of perjury, that the statements in this document are true and correct?"
For witness or deposition testimony
Oath: "Do you solemnly swear that the testimony you are about to give is the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God?" Affirmation: "Do you solemnly affirm that the testimony you are about to give is the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth?"
For an oath of office
Oath: "Do you solemnly swear that you will faithfully discharge the duties of the office of [title], so help you God?" Affirmation: "Do you solemnly affirm that you will faithfully discharge the duties of the office of [title]?"
Oath Inside a Jurat vs. Standalone Oath
| Feature | Oath inside a jurat | Standalone oath/affirmation |
|---|---|---|
| Document involved | Yes | No |
| Signer signs in your presence | Yes | Not applicable |
| Seal affixed | Yes (on the certificate) | No (journal only) |
| Typical setting | Affidavit, sworn statement | Witness, juror, oath of office |
| Perjury exposure | Yes | Yes |
On the Exam
Remember: oaths and affirmations are legally equal; the pledge must be spoken and answered aloud; the signer chooses between oath and affirmation; the right to affirm has a First Amendment basis; the act can be standalone with no document; no seal is used when there is no document (the journal records it); and a false statement under either is perjury.
What is the only true difference between an oath and an affirmation?
A notary tries to administer an oath by handing the person a written pledge and having them nod. Is this proper?
After administering a standalone oath to a witness with no document present, what should the notary do with the seal?