6.3 Role Shift, Constructed Action & Constructed Dialogue

In spoken English, discourse reporting relies heavily on indirect speech accompanied by third-person pronouns and complementizers (e.g., "The supervisor told the employee that she was being reassigned and that she should clean out her desk"). In American Sign Language, however, discourse organization is dominated by an extraordinarily powerful, rule-governed linguistic mechanism historically known as role shift, and more precisely termed by modern sign language linguists as Constructed Action (CA) and Constructed Dialogue (CD). Rather than describing an event from an outside observer's detachment, an ASL signer physically shifts into the persona of the referent, demonstrating actions, emotional reactions, and direct utterances from the character's internal perspective.

---

1. Linguistic Definitions: Constructed Action vs. Constructed Dialogue

Pioneered in sociolinguistic research by Deborah Tannen (1989) in spoken language and adapted for signed language linguistics by Ceil Lucas, Melanie Metzger (1995), Elizabeth Winston, and Scott Liddell (2003), the terms "Constructed Action" and "Constructed Dialogue" highlight that these utterances are not theatrical pantomimes or exact reproductions of reality. Instead, they are creative linguistic constructions systematically structured according to the phonological and grammatical rules of ASL.

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|                         THE DUAL COMPONENTS OF ROLE SHIFT                         |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Constructed Action (CA)                    | Constructed Dialogue (CD)            |
+--------------------------------------------+--------------------------------------+
| - Physical embodiment of character's       | - Direct quotation of character's    |
|   actions, gestures, posture, and affect   |   signed utterances, speech, or      |
| - Handshapes and movements depict          |   internal cognitive monologue       |
|   what the character did with objects      | - Replaces indirect reported speech  |
| - Facial musculature reflects the          | - Employs first-person perspective   |
|   character's emotional/mental state       |   without manual quotation marks     |
+--------------------------------------------+--------------------------------------+
|             * Frequently co-occur simultaneously in fluent discourse *            |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

• Constructed Action (CA): The signer utilizes their own body, hands, head, and facial expressions to demonstrate the physical actions, non-verbal reactions, and emotional demeanor of a referent (e.g., ducking in fear, nervously shuffling papers, cautiously opening a door).
• Constructed Dialogue (CD): The signer directly quotes what a referent signed, said, or thought. In CD, the signer signs from the first-person perspective of that character (ME, I), while their body posture and eye gaze establish the character identity.
• In natural signing, CA and CD are seamlessly integrated: while producing CD (signing what the character said), the signer simultaneously produces CA (manifesting the character's nervous facial tick and hunched posture).

---

2. Physical & Phonological Markers of Role Shift

A signer does not announce a role shift with explicit verbal labels like "Now I am becoming the doctor." Instead, the transition into CA/CD is triggered by an obligatory bundle of subtle, highly coordinated phonological markers:

1. Eye Gaze Shift (The Primary Non-Manual Trigger)

In standard ASL discourse, the signer maintains direct eye contact with the addressee. The instant a role shift begins, the signer breaks eye contact with the interlocutor:

• The signer's gaze directs toward an imaginary addressee located at another spatial locus.
• For instance, if portraying a doctor speaking to a seated patient, the signer tilts their head slightly and casts their eye gaze downward toward the spatial locus where the patient was established.
• Conversely, when shifting into the role of the patient, the eye gaze directs upward toward the doctor's locus.

2. Head and Shoulder Rotation (Body Shift)

The signer produces a subtle lateral rotation of the upper torso and shoulders:

• The rotation is typically between 15 and 30 degrees toward the spatial locus representing that specific character.
• The shift is economical and precise; dramatic, exaggerated physical leaps across the room violate ASL phonological norms.
• When shifting between two conversational partners, the signer's torso shifts right to embody Character A, then shifts left to embody Character B.

3. Facial Expression & Affective Transformation

In neutral narration, facial expressions convey syntactic information (e.g., topicalization, questions). During CA/CD, the facial musculature completely transforms to mirror the internal psychological and emotional state of the character:

• Eyebrows, mouth morphemes, eye aperture, and cheek tension project arrogance, panic, sorrow, contempt, or relief.
• The affective display is grammatically bound to the persona, not the narrator.

4. Spatial Reorientation to First-Person Frame

During the duration of the role shift, the physical space around the signer is re-calibrated into the character's own immediate environment:

• Signs produced during CA are perceived as being enacted directly by the character.
• If the narrator previously established that a bookshelf was located on Locus Left, once the signer shifts into the character standing in that room, reaching out to Locus Left represents the character physically grabbing a book from that shelf.

---

3. Typological Contrast: Direct Quotation vs. Indirect Reporting

One of the most profound structural divergences between English and ASL lies in their typological preferences for reported discourse:

Spoken English Preference: Indirect Reporting
"The supervisor reprimanded the employee, telling him that his persistent tardiness
 was unacceptable and that if he arrived late again tomorrow, he would be terminated."

ASL Typological Preference: Direct Quotation via Constructed Dialogue (CD/CA)
[Locus Left: SUPERVISOR | Locus Right: EMPLOYEE]
Narrator: SUPERVISOR APPROACH EMPLOYEE.
[Shift Right: Shoulders turn 20° right, stern brow, glare down at Employee locus]
Supervisor (CD/CA): "YOU EVERY-DAY LATE, CANNOT! TOMORROW YOU LATE AGAIN? YOU FIRED!"
[Shift Left: Shoulders turn 20° left, hunched posture, eyes look up nervously]
Employee (CD/CA): "PLEASE, ONE-MORE CHANCE! CAR ENGINE BROKE!"

Why ASL Overwhelmingly Prefers Constructed Dialogue

1. Linguistic Density & Visual Directness: In ASL, indirect reporting with complementizers ("said that", "felt that") is clunky, artificial, and cognitively redundant. CD allows the signer to communicate the speaker's exact tone, urgency, social hierarchy, and verbatim lexical content in a single, unified burst of visual information.
2. Elimination of Third-Person Ambiguity: In spoken English, indirect speech often leads to confusing pronoun stacking ("He told him that he thought his father had seen him"). In ASL, alternating body shifts and eye gazes instantly delineate who is speaking, who is listening, and how each participant reacts, eliminating referential ambiguity entirely.
3. Internal Cognitive Monologue ("Thought Quotation"): ASL signers use CD not only for spoken or signed words, but to depict internal thoughts. By shifting the body, glancing upward, and signing THINK ME SHOULD QUIT ME?, the signer constructs an internal monologue that English would render as "She wondered whether she should quit her job."

---

4. Multi-Character Interactions and Narrative Chaining

In extended narratives—such as describing a multi-vehicle accident, an interactive medical examination, or a complex negotiation—signers utilize sophisticated role shift chaining:

Micro-Shifts and Turn-Taking Mechanics

In rapid dialogue, a native signer can alternate between two or three characters within a span of seconds:

• Micro-shifts: The signer produces only a slight turn of the chin or a flick of eye gaze to transition between speakers, maintaining high discourse velocity.
• Hierarchical Vertical Mapping: Power relationships are mapped along the vertical axis of the signing space. A judge or teacher is portrayed with an upright posture and downward eye gaze; a defendant or young student is portrayed with a lowered posture and upward eye gaze.

Blended Spaces (Narrator + Character Blend)

In advanced ASL discourse, signers frequently create a dual-viewpoint blend (Liddell, 2003). In a blend, the signer simultaneously functions as both the external narrator and the internal character:

• The dominant hand may execute a depicting verb from the narrator's objective viewpoint (e.g., CL:3 car driving off a cliff), while the signer's head, eyes, and facial expression depict the terror of the driver inside the vehicle (CA: driver).

---

5. Technical Challenges in Interpreted Discourse: Legal, Medical & Clinical Settings

For the working interpreter and CASLI candidate, managing CA and CD presents severe cognitive and ethical demands:

1. The Legal Attribution Dilemma (Courtroom & Depositions)

In a legal proceeding, an interpreter interprets a Deaf witness on the stand who uses CA/CD to depict an assault:

• The witness shifts shoulders, adopts a menacing scowl, and signs: BREAK DOOR ENTER, KILL YOU ME!
• Catastrophic Interpreting Error: The interpreter voices in the first person without contextual framing: "I will break the door down and kill you!" To the judge and jury, it sounds as if the witness on the stand is confessing to a violent threat.
• Ethically and Linguistically Sound Interpretation: In legal discourse, where the official court record must attribute speech with absolute precision, the interpreter must convey the character frame: "He broke down the door and said, 'I'm going to kill you!' " The interpreter accurately renders the CD as reported speech, preventing severe miscarriages of justice.

2. Vocal Prosody and Dynamic Equivalence

When interpreting ASL CA/CD into spoken English, the interpreter cannot speak in a flat, dispassionate monotone. The facial expression and postural affect of the ASL signer are grammatical morphemes that carry emotional tone and semantic weight:

• If a Deaf client uses CA depicting extreme agitation and terror while signing POLICE GRAB ME, the spoken English interpretation must convey that urgency and distress through vocal inflection, volume, and pacing: "The police grabbed me!" (voiced with alarm), rather than a dry reading.
• Conversely, the interpreter must never embellish or over-dramatize beyond what is linguistically encoded in the ASL source.

3. Preserving Primary Speaker Identity in Multi-Party Settings

In corporate board meetings or psychiatric evaluations, the interpreter must clearly distinguish when the Deaf consumer is speaking for themselves versus when they are quoting another party through CD. Failure to accurately register the break in eye contact and shoulder shift can lead the hearing participants to believe the consumer holds delusions or is contradicting themselves.