6.2 Risk Matrices and ALARP
Key Takeaways
- Risk is commonly expressed as likelihood × severity using a company-approved risk matrix
- Qualitative matrices use descriptive bands; semi-quantitative matrices assign numeric scores for ranking
- ALARP means risk is reduced As Low As Reasonably Practicable—further reduction would be grossly disproportionate to the benefit
- Supervisors must document residual risk, controls in place, and why remaining risk is tolerable
- High residual risk requires escalation; “we have always done it” is not an ALARP argument
6.2 Risk Matrices and ALARP
Quick Answer: A risk matrix multiplies or combines likelihood and severity to rank risk. ALARP (As Low As Reasonably Practicable) means you reduce risk until further reduction would cost grossly more than the safety benefit gained—and you must document that decision.
After HEMP Identify, supervisors Assess risk so resources go to the biggest threats. Most Nigerian industrial employers use a risk matrix (often 5×5) defined in the HSE-MS. Level 3 candidates must read a matrix, apply it consistently, and explain ALARP without treating it as a slogan that excuses weak controls.
What “Risk” Means in Assessment
In workplace HSE:
- Hazard = potential source of harm
- Risk = combination of the likelihood of a hazardous event and the severity of its consequences
You assess risk with existing controls (current risk) and again with proposed additional controls (residual risk). Examiners care whether you claim “low risk” while critical barriers are missing.
Anatomy of a Risk Matrix
A typical matrix has:
| Axis | Meaning | Example scale |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood (probability/frequency) | How often the event could occur | Rare → Almost certain (1–5) |
| Severity (consequence) | How bad the outcome could be | Negligible → Catastrophic (1–5) |
| Risk score / colour | Priority for action | Low (green), Medium (amber), High/Extreme (red) |
Severity may consider people, environment, asset, and reputation (PEAR). A small spill might be Medium for environment but Low for people; an H₂S release might be Extreme for people even if asset damage is limited. Use the worst credible consequence the company matrix requires—not the best-case fantasy.
Qualitative vs Semi-Quantitative
| Approach | How it works | Supervisor use |
|---|---|---|
| Qualitative | Descriptive bands only (Low/Medium/High) without numbers | Fast toolbox ranking, simple tasks |
| Semi-quantitative | Numeric likelihood × severity (e.g., 3 × 4 = 12) mapped to colours | JHA forms, PTW risk sections, audit trails |
| Fully quantitative (rare at crew level) | Frequencies, QRA modelling | Major hazard facilities / specialists |
Level 3 focuses on qualitative and semi-quantitative practice. Semi-quantitative scoring helps compare tasks (“12 vs 6”) but false precision is a trap: a score of 12 is only as good as the judgment behind the 3 and the 4.
Scoring Likelihood Honestly
Likelihood rises when:
- Exposure is frequent (daily task vs once a year)
- Many people are exposed
- Controls are weak, bypassed, or untested
- Conditions are degrading (rainy season, night, SIMOPS, new contractors)
- History shows near misses
Likelihood falls when robust engineering and proven procedures are in place and verified. Do not lower likelihood simply because “nobody has been hurt yet.”
Scoring Severity Honestly
Severity reflects credible harm:
- First aid vs lost-time injury vs fatality / multiple fatalities
- Localised spill vs creek/river contamination affecting communities
- Minor equipment damage vs major fire/explosion
For work at height without fall prevention, severity of a fall from significant height is typically High/Extreme even if the worker is experienced. Experience reduces some error likelihood; it does not make gravity optional.
Using the Matrix in Supervisory Workflow
- List significant hazards from Identify.
- For each, judge likelihood and severity with current controls.
- Read the matrix colour/score and action rule (e.g., red = stop / escalate).
- Add controls using the hierarchy.
- Re-score residual risk.
- Decide if residual risk is tolerable / ALARP; if not, do not proceed.
Nigerian examples:
- Scaffold erection beside live plant: likelihood Medium if competent scaffolders and exclusion zones exist; severity High for falls and dropped objects → amber/red until additional controls.
- Manual excavator work near buried cables without locates: likelihood may be Medium-High; severity Extreme for electrocution/explosion → do not start until cable detection and permits confirm safe dig.
- Routine office ergonomics complaint: often lower matrix priority than process safety threats, but still manage via OH pathways—matrix priority is relative, not a reason to ignore health.
ALARP — Meaning for Supervisors
ALARP means risk is reduced As Low As Reasonably Practicable. The idea (rooted in UK common-law/regulatory thinking and widely used in oil & gas and major hazard industries globally, including Nigerian IOCs and many contractors) is:
- You must implement risk reduction that is reasonably practicable.
- You may stop adding measures when the sacrifice (cost, time, effort, operational difficulty) is grossly disproportionate to the safety benefit.
- You cannot declare ALARP while obvious, cheap, effective controls remain unused.
ALARP is not:
- “Zero risk” (almost never achievable)
- “As Low As Easily Convenient”
- A rubber stamp for continuing a high-risk practice because production pressure is high
- Proven merely by issuing PPE
Good vs Weak ALARP Arguments
| Weak claim | Stronger supervisory approach |
|---|---|
| “We have always done it this way.” | Show barriers, residual score, and considered alternatives |
| “Helmets were issued, so ALARP.” | Show hierarchy: can we eliminate/engineer first? |
| “No incidents last year.” | Use leading indicators and barrier health, not luck |
| “Client wants speed.” | Escalate conflict; do not silently accept intolerable risk |
Documenting ALARP and Residual Risk
Documentation turns judgment into a defensible record. A Level 3 supervisor should ensure records show:
- Task description and location
- Hazards assessed and matrix scores (inherent/current and residual)
- Controls selected and who verifies them
- Why residual risk is considered tolerable / ALARP
- Escalation path if residual risk remains high
- Names, dates, and toolbox talk acknowledgment
If an inspector, auditor, or incident investigation asks “why was this allowed?”, your form should answer without relying on memory.
Escalation Rules
Company matrices usually define mandatory actions:
- Low: proceed with standard controls; monitor
- Medium: additional controls / supervisor approval
- High/Extreme: stop work, escalate to area authority / HSE, redesign task
Never “average away” an Extreme severity scenario by inventing an unrealistically low likelihood. If severity is Extreme and barriers are uncertain, treat it as escalate.
Linking Matrices Back to HEMP
- Assess uses the matrix.
- Control and Recover change the score.
- Reassessment after change of conditions (weather, SIMOPS, night shift) is part of dynamic risk assessment.
Exam Focus Points
Expect questions that mix numbers and judgment: given likelihood 4 and severity 5, what priority? Or: which statement correctly describes ALARP? Correct answers emphasize proportionate reduction, documentation, and not accepting high residual risk without escalation. Incorrect options often confuse ALARP with zero risk or with PPE-only solutions.
Practice translating live Nigerian jobs into matrix language: state likelihood, severity, colour, extra controls, residual risk, and whether you would allow the job to start. That fluency is what Level 3 supervision looks like under audit.
In semi-quantitative risk assessment, risk is most commonly expressed as which combination?
What does ALARP require of a supervisor before accepting residual risk?
A dig near buried electrical cables is scored with Extreme severity and uncertain location controls. The most appropriate supervisory action is to:
Which statement best contrasts qualitative and semi-quantitative matrices for supervisors?